Xuhan, Sean and others.
As stated in the commit message and bug, this is a temporary measure to
avoid making ra_mode and ipv6_address_mode consumable in the icehouse
release.
I made this move because https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70649/ did not
land in Icehouse, and that was needed to make those two attributes
functional, in my opinion.
I probably won't be able to attend tomorrow's meeting.
However, if you are looking for a solution where one could decide to
leverage anyway those attributes tweaking a few configuration, that might
be possible using the policy engine, even if I dislike this approach.
Salvatore
On 8 April 2014 08:23, Xuhan Peng pengxu...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean,
I've added Salvatore's code review of Hide ipv6 subnet API attributes to
our discussion list.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85869/
Xuhan
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
I've added a section for tomorrow's agenda, please do add topics that
you'd like to discuss.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_8th
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
