Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-29 Thread Dina Belova 
Folks,

change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310419/ proposed to
performance-docs. Thanks Ann, soon it'll appear on
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/#

Cheers,
Dina

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com>
wrote:

> Indeed it will be a terrific contribution.
>
> Edgar
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:10 AM, Dina Belova <dbel...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I think Ann's report is super cool and 100% worth publishing on OpenStack
> performance-docs <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/#>.
> This is really good information to share community-wide.
>
> Ann, please think if you would like to contribute to performance
> documentation.
>
> Cheers,
> Dina
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova <
> akamyshnik...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I won't attend summit in Austin, that is why I decided to
>> present these results in the mailing list instead.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any session presenting these results during the Summit? It will
>>> be awesome to have a session on this. I could extend the invite to the Ops
>>> Meet-up. We have a section on lighting talks where the team will be very
>>> intesreted in learning from your testing.
>>>
>>> Edgar
>>>
>>> From: Anna Kamyshnikova <akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>
>>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
>>> questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:30 AM
>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>>> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale
>>>
>>> >I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>>> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>>> >physical nodes are hard to come by.
>>>
>>> Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent
>>> fixes, but I will be able to do this in May or later.
>>>
>>> >About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For
>>> All project.
>>> >Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>>> >perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.
>>>
>>> [1] http://osic.org
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointing this!
>>>
>>> >It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>>> >scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>>>
>>> Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.
>>>
>>> P. S.
>>>
>>> I've updated environment description in report with some details.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido <
>>> rsblend...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
>>>> > Hi guys!
>>>> >
>>>> > As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
>>>> > nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
>>>> > not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
>>>> > enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
>>>> > deployments have.
>>>> >
>>>> > Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
>>>> > nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
>>>> > shaker and rally tests and also performed some
>>>> > manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
>>>> > share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect
>>>> statistics
>>>> > for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
>>>> > make sure that we are heading the right way.
>>>> >
>>>> > The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
>>>> > google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>>>>
>>>> It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>>>> scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>>>>
>>>> Rossella
>>>>
>>>> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-20 Thread Edgar Magana 
Indeed it will be a terrific contribution.

Edgar


On Apr 20, 2016, at 4:10 AM, Dina Belova 
<dbel...@mirantis.com<mailto:dbel...@mirantis.com>> wrote:

Folks,

I think Ann's report is super cool and 100% worth publishing on OpenStack 
performance-docs<http://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/#>. This 
is really good information to share community-wide.

Ann, please think if you would like to contribute to performance documentation.

Cheers,
Dina

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova 
<akamyshnik...@mirantis.com<mailto:akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>> wrote:
Unfortunately, I won't attend summit in Austin, that is why I decided to 
present these results in the mailing list instead.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Edgar Magana 
<edgar.mag...@workday.com<mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com>> wrote:
Is there any session presenting these results during the Summit? It will be 
awesome to have a session on this. I could extend the invite to the Ops 
Meet-up. We have a section on lighting talks where the team will be very 
intesreted in learning from your testing.

Edgar

From: Anna Kamyshnikova 
<akamyshnik...@mirantis.com<mailto:akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:30 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

>I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>physical nodes are hard to come by.

Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent fixes, but 
I will be able to do this in May or later.

>About testing on scale it's not so problematic because of the Cloud For All 
>project.
>Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org<http://osic.org/>

Thanks for pointing this!

>It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.

P. S.

I've updated environment description in report with some details.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido 
<rsblend...@suse.com<mailto:rsblend...@suse.com>> wrote:


On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
> not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
> enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
> deployments have.
>
> Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
> nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
> shaker and rally tests and also performed some
> manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
> share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
> for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
> make sure that we are heading the right way.
>
> The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
> google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Rossella

>
> [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> [2]
> - 
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Regards,
> Ann Kamyshnikova
> Mirantis, Inc
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc

__
OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-20 Thread Dina Belova 
Folks,

I think Ann's report is super cool and 100% worth publishing on OpenStack
performance-docs <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/#>.
This is really good information to share community-wide.

Ann, please think if you would like to contribute to performance
documentation.

Cheers,
Dina

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova <
akamyshnik...@mirantis.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately, I won't attend summit in Austin, that is why I decided to
> present these results in the mailing list instead.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is there any session presenting these results during the Summit? It will
>> be awesome to have a session on this. I could extend the invite to the Ops
>> Meet-up. We have a section on lighting talks where the team will be very
>> intesreted in learning from your testing.
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> From: Anna Kamyshnikova <akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>
>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:30 AM
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
>> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale
>>
>> >I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>> >physical nodes are hard to come by.
>>
>> Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent
>> fixes, but I will be able to do this in May or later.
>>
>> >About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For
>> All project.
>> >Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>> >perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.
>>
>> [1] http://osic.org
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this!
>>
>> >It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>> >scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>>
>> Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.
>>
>> P. S.
>>
>> I've updated environment description in report with some details.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido <rsblend...@suse.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
>>> > Hi guys!
>>> >
>>> > As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
>>> > nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
>>> > not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
>>> > enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
>>> > deployments have.
>>> >
>>> > Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
>>> > nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
>>> > shaker and rally tests and also performed some
>>> > manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
>>> > share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
>>> > for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
>>> > make sure that we are heading the right way.
>>> >
>>> > The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
>>> > google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>>>
>>> It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>>> scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>>>
>>> Rossella
>>>
>>> >
>>> > [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
>>> > [2]
>>> > -
>>> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Ann Kamyshnikova
>>> > Mirantis, Inc
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> __
>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-20 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova 
Unfortunately, I won't attend summit in Austin, that is why I decided to
present these results in the mailing list instead.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com>
wrote:

> Is there any session presenting these results during the Summit? It will
> be awesome to have a session on this. I could extend the invite to the Ops
> Meet-up. We have a section on lighting talks where the team will be very
> intesreted in learning from your testing.
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Anna Kamyshnikova <akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:30 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale
>
> >I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
> >physical nodes are hard to come by.
>
> Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent
> fixes, but I will be able to do this in May or later.
>
> >About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For
> All project.
> >Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
> >perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.
>
> [1] http://osic.org
>
> Thanks for pointing this!
>
> >It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
> >scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>
> Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.
>
> P. S.
>
> I've updated environment description in report with some details.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido <rsblend...@suse.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
>> > Hi guys!
>> >
>> > As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
>> > nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
>> > not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
>> > enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
>> > deployments have.
>> >
>> > Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
>> > nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
>> > shaker and rally tests and also performed some
>> > manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
>> > share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
>> > for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
>> > make sure that we are heading the right way.
>> >
>> > The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
>> > google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>>
>> It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>> scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>>
>> Rossella
>>
>> >
>> > [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
>> > [2]
>> > -
>> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Ann Kamyshnikova
>> > Mirantis, Inc
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> __
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ann Kamyshnikova
> Mirantis, Inc
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-19 Thread Edgar Magana 
Is there any session presenting these results during the Summit? It will be 
awesome to have a session on this. I could extend the invite to the Ops 
Meet-up. We have a section on lighting talks where the team will be very 
intesreted in learning from your testing.

Edgar

From: Anna Kamyshnikova 
<akamyshnik...@mirantis.com<mailto:akamyshnik...@mirantis.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:30 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

>I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>physical nodes are hard to come by.

Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent fixes, but 
I will be able to do this in May or later.

>About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For All 
>project.
>Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org<http://osic.org/>

Thanks for pointing this!

>It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.

P. S.

I've updated environment description in report with some details.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido 
<rsblend...@suse.com<mailto:rsblend...@suse.com>> wrote:


On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
> not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
> enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
> deployments have.
>
> Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
> nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
> shaker and rally tests and also performed some
> manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
> share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
> for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
> make sure that we are heading the right way.
>
> The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
> google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Rossella

>
> [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> [2]
> - 
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Regards,
> Ann Kamyshnikova
> Mirantis, Inc
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-19 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova 
>I would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
>physical nodes are hard to come by.

Yes, I'm planning to check how situation will change with all recent fixes,
but I will be able to do this in May or later.

>About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For
All project.
>Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
>perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org

Thanks for pointing this!

>It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
>scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Thanks! I have testing L3 HA + DVR in plans.

P. S.

I've updated environment description in report with some details.

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Rossella Sblendido 
wrote:

>
>
> On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> > nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
> > not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
> > enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
> > deployments have.
> >
> > Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
> > nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
> > shaker and rally tests and also performed some
> > manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
> > share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
> > for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
> > make sure that we are heading the right way.
> >
> > The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
> > google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>
> It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
> scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?
>
> Rossella
>
> >
> > [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> > [2]
> > -
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ann Kamyshnikova
> > Mirantis, Inc
> >
> >
> >
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-19 Thread Rossella Sblendido 


On 04/18/2016 04:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova wrote:
> Hi guys!
> 
> As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are
> not able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful
> enough. But it is really important to understand the issues that real
> deployments have.
> 
> Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49
> nodes (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran
> shaker and rally tests and also performed some
> manual destructive scenarios. I think that this is very important to
> share these results. Ideally, I think that we should collect statistics
> for different configurations each release to compare and check it to
> make sure that we are heading the right way.  
> 
> The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in
> google doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

It's a great report, thanks for sharing that! Do you plan to run similar
scale tests on other scenarios e.g. dvr?

Rossella

> 
> [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> [2]
> - 
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> Regards,
> Ann Kamyshnikova
> Mirantis, Inc
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-18 Thread Kosnik, Lubosz 
Great work Ann.
About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For All 
project.
Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org

Regards,
Lubosz “diltram” Kosnik

On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:42 AM, John Schwarz 
> wrote:

This is some awesome work, Ann. It's very neat to see that all the
races we've struggled with w.r.t. the l3 scheduler has paid off. I
would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
physical nodes are hard to come by.

Also, we should see how to best handle of the issue Ann found (and is
tracked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/). Specifically,
reproducing this should be our goal.

John.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova
> wrote:
Hi guys!

As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are not
able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful enough. But
it is really important to understand the issues that real deployments have.

Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49 nodes
(3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran shaker and
rally tests and also performed some manual destructive scenarios. I think
that this is very important to share these results. Ideally, I think that we
should collect statistics for different configurations each release to
compare and check it to make sure that we are heading the right way.

The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in google
doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

[1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
[2] -
https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--
John Schwarz,
Red Hat.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-18 Thread Kosnik, Lubosz 
Great work Ann.
About testing on scale it’s not so problematic because of the Cloud For All 
project.
Here [1] you can request for a multi node cluster which you can use to
perform tests. Exact requirements are specified on that website.

[1] http://osic.org

Regards,
Lubosz “diltram” Kosnik

On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:42 AM, John Schwarz 
> wrote:

This is some awesome work, Ann. It's very neat to see that all the
races we've struggled with w.r.t. the l3 scheduler has paid off. I
would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
physical nodes are hard to come by.

Also, we should see how to best handle of the issue Ann found (and is
tracked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/). Specifically,
reproducing this should be our goal.

John.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova
> wrote:
Hi guys!

As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are not
able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful enough. But
it is really important to understand the issues that real deployments have.

Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49 nodes
(3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran shaker and
rally tests and also performed some manual destructive scenarios. I think
that this is very important to share these results. Ideally, I think that we
should collect statistics for different configurations each release to
compare and check it to make sure that we are heading the right way.

The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in google
doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

[1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
[2] -
https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--
John Schwarz,
Red Hat.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-18 Thread John Schwarz 
This is some awesome work, Ann. It's very neat to see that all the
races we've struggled with w.r.t. the l3 scheduler has paid off. I
would definitely like to see how these results are effected by
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/ but understandably 49
physical nodes are hard to come by.

Also, we should see how to best handle of the issue Ann found (and is
tracked at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305774/). Specifically,
reproducing this should be our goal.

John.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Anna Kamyshnikova
 wrote:
> Hi guys!
>
> As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
> nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are not
> able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful enough. But
> it is really important to understand the issues that real deployments have.
>
> Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49 nodes
> (3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran shaker and
> rally tests and also performed some manual destructive scenarios. I think
> that this is very important to share these results. Ideally, I think that we
> should collect statistics for different configurations each release to
> compare and check it to make sure that we are heading the right way.
>
> The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in google
> doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.
>
> [1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
> [2] -
> https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Regards,
> Ann Kamyshnikova
> Mirantis, Inc
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
John Schwarz,
Red Hat.

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] L3 HA testing on scale

2016-04-18 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova 
Hi guys!

As a developer I use Devstack or multinode OpenStack installation (4-5
nodes) for work, but these are "abstract" environments, where you are not
able to perform some scenarios as your machine is not powerful enough. But
it is really important to understand the issues that real deployments have.

Recently I've performed testing of L3 HA on the scale environment 49 nodes
(3 controllers, 46 computes) Fuel 8.0. On this environment I ran shaker and
rally tests and also performed some manual destructive scenarios. I think
that this is very important to share these results. Ideally, I think that
we should collect statistics for different configurations each release to
compare and check it to make sure that we are heading the right way.

The results of shaker and rally tests [1]. I put detailed report in google
doc [2]. I would appreciate all comments on these results.

[1] - http://akamyshnikova.github.io/neutron-benchmark-results/
[2] -
https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/document/d/1TFEUzRRlRIt2HpsOzFh-RqWwgTzJPBefePPA0f0x9uw/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,
Ann Kamyshnikova
Mirantis, Inc
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev