Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature to L-3 milestone

2015-09-10 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Good day Germy,

>I have reviewed the specification linked above. Thank you for introducing
>such an interesting and important feature. But as I commented inline, I
>think it still need some further work to do. Such as how to get those logs
>stored? To admin and tenant, I think it's different.
>And performance impact, if tenantA turn on logs, will tenantB on the same
>host be impacted?

Thank you so much for your reviewing to the specification.
That's really helpful. I have just updated the specs based on your 
considerations.
Could you please take a look at it?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/


Best regards,

Cao Xuan Hoang


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-28 Thread Germy Lure
Hi Cao,

I have reviewed the specification linked above. Thank you for introducing
such an interesting and important feature. But as I commented inline, I
think it still need some further work to do. Such as how to get those logs
stored? To admin and tenant, I think it's different.
And performance impact, if tenantA turn on logs, will tenantB on the same
host be impacted?

Many thanks,
Germy

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:04 PM, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:

 Good day,

  The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in
 next week.
  #link
  http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/network
  ing_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html
 
  No - I did not say definitely - nowhere in that IRC log was that word
 used.

 I'm sorry.  Yes, that should be probably.

 --
 Best regards,

 Cao Xuan Hoang
 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-21 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Good day,

 The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in next 
 week.
 #link
 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/network
 ing_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html

 No - I did not say definitely - nowhere in that IRC log was that word used.

I'm sorry.  Yes, that should be probably.

--
Best regards,

Cao Xuan Hoang
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],
CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],
CC: All,

According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and FW 
rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.
#link 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-12-18.30.html

The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in next 
week.
#link 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html

a. RFE #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/

b. Specification: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/

c. Source codes: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204481/
  #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204484/

So could you please consider the spec for L-3 approval possibility?
Currently, The RFE bug is still Confirmed status and would love to moving on 
:)

P/s: I have tried to ping you in #openstack-neutron channel but you seem so 
busy to be on it.
So I decided to send email through ML.

--
Best regards,
Cao Xuan Hoang

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread Gal Sagie
I think that before this can be applied to SG rules which are on the VM
ports,
there needs to be another spec in FWaaS which enable defining rules on VM
ports, i am not
sure something like that currently exists. (event that there are many use
cases for such ability)

Gal.

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:55 PM, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com 
hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:

 Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],
 CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],
 CC: All,

 According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG
 and FW rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.
 #link
 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-12-18.30.html

 The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in
 next week.
 #link
 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html

 a. RFE #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/

 b. Specification: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/

 c. Source codes: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204481/
   #link
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204484/

 So could you please consider the spec for L-3 approval possibility?
 Currently, The RFE bug is still Confirmed status and would love to
 moving on :)

 P/s: I have tried to ping you in #openstack-neutron channel but you seem
 so busy to be on it.
 So I decided to send email through ML.

 --
 Best regards,
 Cao Xuan Hoang

 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Best Regards ,

The G.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread Sean M. Collins

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:55:12AM EDT, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote:
 Hi Kye Mestery [PTL],
 CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair],
 CC: All,
 
 According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the Logging API for SG and 
 FW rules feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team.
 #link 
 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-12-18.30.html

I said specifically:

so I think we'll need more time to do the review of that spec, probably by 
next week we'll be able to discuss

Since I have not had a chance to review, and it does not appear that
there has been much review by others.


 
 The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in next 
 week.
 #link 
 http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html

No - I did not say definitely - nowhere in that IRC log was that word
used.

-- 
Sean M. Collins

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev