Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision
Thanks Lauren. Mi taco es su taco. On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Lauren Sell lau...@openstack.org wrote: Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release. Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members. On Jul 9, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: Feel free to give input on the Mitaka proposal. Tim -Original Message- From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jbr...@jbryce.com] Sent: 09 July 2015 20:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2015 09:19 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: In the hope of forestalling an unnecessary sub-thread... Mita was #1 in the vote, so has presumably already been ruled out by OpenStack's legal review. That is correct. Hi everyone, I’ve really loved seeing everyone’s understanding and engagement on this thread as we worked through the release cycle naming for ‘M’. This was the first attempt to follow a new process, so not surprisingly, we found some improvements in the algorithm for the future. Still it’s awesome to see how constructive and positive the whole conversation has been. I wanted to provide a quick update on the status of the Foundation’s reviews of the names. First, as Russell mentioned above, after the voting was completed, we asked our trademark counsel to do checks on the top 3 names. The first two both had significant trademark issues with existing trademark holders in the same space that would have prevented us from using the names in most jurisdictions where we have our largest communities (US, Europe and Asia). The 3rd choice was relatively low risk and so we passed word back to Monty who announced it. Once we realized there were other issues with Meiji, we asked for an expedited check of the next 3 names: Mitaka, Musashi, and Meguro. The preliminary check shows that Mitaka and Meguro both present an acceptable level of risk, while Musashi is higher on the risk scale and would probably create problems for usage. At this time, we’re going to do a deeper check on Mitaka, which was the #4 candidate in voting and would be next in line after Meiji. I know Itoh-san mentioned the Mitaka locale has the potential to be associated with certain corporations in Japan, but my personal feeling is that may not be significant enough to override it’s position in the voting and it’s availability for use. I’d encourage anyone with other concerns about Mitaka to post those within the next 24 hours so we can appropriately consider and discuss them. We should have results on the deeper trademark check by next week as well and can hopefully settle on a final name. Thanks again for all the discussion and participation and especially to Monty who’s been on the front lines of helping us navigate this. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions, Jonathan 210-317-2438 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision
Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release. Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members. On Jul 9, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: Feel free to give input on the Mitaka proposal. Tim -Original Message- From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jbr...@jbryce.com] Sent: 09 July 2015 20:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2015 09:19 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: In the hope of forestalling an unnecessary sub-thread... Mita was #1 in the vote, so has presumably already been ruled out by OpenStack's legal review. That is correct. Hi everyone, I’ve really loved seeing everyone’s understanding and engagement on this thread as we worked through the release cycle naming for ‘M’. This was the first attempt to follow a new process, so not surprisingly, we found some improvements in the algorithm for the future. Still it’s awesome to see how constructive and positive the whole conversation has been. I wanted to provide a quick update on the status of the Foundation’s reviews of the names. First, as Russell mentioned above, after the voting was completed, we asked our trademark counsel to do checks on the top 3 names. The first two both had significant trademark issues with existing trademark holders in the same space that would have prevented us from using the names in most jurisdictions where we have our largest communities (US, Europe and Asia). The 3rd choice was relatively low risk and so we passed word back to Monty who announced it. Once we realized there were other issues with Meiji, we asked for an expedited check of the next 3 names: Mitaka, Musashi, and Meguro. The preliminary check shows that Mitaka and Meguro both present an acceptable level of risk, while Musashi is higher on the risk scale and would probably create problems for usage. At this time, we’re going to do a deeper check on Mitaka, which was the #4 candidate in voting and would be next in line after Meiji. I know Itoh-san mentioned the Mitaka locale has the potential to be associated with certain corporations in Japan, but my personal feeling is that may not be significant enough to override it’s position in the voting and it’s availability for use. I’d encourage anyone with other concerns about Mitaka to post those within the next 24 hours so we can appropriately consider and discuss them. We should have results on the deeper trademark check by next week as well and can hopefully settle on a final name. Thanks again for all the discussion and participation and especially to Monty who’s been on the front lines of helping us navigate this. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions, Jonathan 210-317-2438 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision
On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2015 09:19 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: In the hope of forestalling an unnecessary sub-thread... Mita was #1 in the vote, so has presumably already been ruled out by OpenStack's legal review. That is correct. Hi everyone, I’ve really loved seeing everyone’s understanding and engagement on this thread as we worked through the release cycle naming for ‘M’. This was the first attempt to follow a new process, so not surprisingly, we found some improvements in the algorithm for the future. Still it’s awesome to see how constructive and positive the whole conversation has been. I wanted to provide a quick update on the status of the Foundation’s reviews of the names. First, as Russell mentioned above, after the voting was completed, we asked our trademark counsel to do checks on the top 3 names. The first two both had significant trademark issues with existing trademark holders in the same space that would have prevented us from using the names in most jurisdictions where we have our largest communities (US, Europe and Asia). The 3rd choice was relatively low risk and so we passed word back to Monty who announced it. Once we realized there were other issues with Meiji, we asked for an expedited check of the next 3 names: Mitaka, Musashi, and Meguro. The preliminary check shows that Mitaka and Meguro both present an acceptable level of risk, while Musashi is higher on the risk scale and would probably create problems for usage. At this time, we’re going to do a deeper check on Mitaka, which was the #4 candidate in voting and would be next in line after Meiji. I know Itoh-san mentioned the Mitaka locale has the potential to be associated with certain corporations in Japan, but my personal feeling is that may not be significant enough to override it’s position in the voting and it’s availability for use. I’d encourage anyone with other concerns about Mitaka to post those within the next 24 hours so we can appropriately consider and discuss them. We should have results on the deeper trademark check by next week as well and can hopefully settle on a final name. Thanks again for all the discussion and participation and especially to Monty who’s been on the front lines of helping us navigate this. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions, Jonathan 210-317-2438 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision
Feel free to give input on the Mitaka proposal. Tim -Original Message- From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jbr...@jbryce.com] Sent: 09 July 2015 20:52 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision On Jul 9, 2015, at 9:35 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 07/09/2015 09:19 AM, Neil Jerram wrote: In the hope of forestalling an unnecessary sub-thread... Mita was #1 in the vote, so has presumably already been ruled out by OpenStack's legal review. That is correct. Hi everyone, I’ve really loved seeing everyone’s understanding and engagement on this thread as we worked through the release cycle naming for ‘M’. This was the first attempt to follow a new process, so not surprisingly, we found some improvements in the algorithm for the future. Still it’s awesome to see how constructive and positive the whole conversation has been. I wanted to provide a quick update on the status of the Foundation’s reviews of the names. First, as Russell mentioned above, after the voting was completed, we asked our trademark counsel to do checks on the top 3 names. The first two both had significant trademark issues with existing trademark holders in the same space that would have prevented us from using the names in most jurisdictions where we have our largest communities (US, Europe and Asia). The 3rd choice was relatively low risk and so we passed word back to Monty who announced it. Once we realized there were other issues with Meiji, we asked for an expedited check of the next 3 names: Mitaka, Musashi, and Meguro. The preliminary check shows that Mitaka and Meguro both present an acceptable level of risk, while Musashi is higher on the risk scale and would probably create problems for usage. At this time, we’re going to do a deeper check on Mitaka, which was the #4 candidate in voting and would be next in line after Meiji. I know Itoh-san mentioned the Mitaka locale has the potential to be associated with certain corporations in Japan, but my personal feeling is that may not be significant enough to override it’s position in the voting and it’s availability for use. I’d encourage anyone with other concerns about Mitaka to post those within the next 24 hours so we can appropriately consider and discuss them. We should have results on the deeper trademark check by next week as well and can hopefully settle on a final name. Thanks again for all the discussion and participation and especially to Monty who’s been on the front lines of helping us navigate this. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions, Jonathan 210-317-2438 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
