Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-08-27 14:25:47 -0700: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! +1 I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? I am reluctant to go there just yet. We have a couple of absentee members of core at the moment and thus we really only have 4 active reviewers. That is n+1, but I worry about reviewers getting fatigued or feeling pressure to get to more reviews rather than feeling pressure to do a few really thorough reviews. So I think we should let derekh's presence on core be felt for a few weeks and then re-visit the +4 requirement then. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
(sent 2 days ago, but re-sending this as it never seemed to have arrived on the mailing list) Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2013-08-27 14:25:47 -0700: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! +1 I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? I am reluctant to go there just yet. We have a couple of absentee members of core at the moment and thus we really only have 4 active reviewers. That is n+1, but I worry about reviewers getting fatigued or feeling pressure to get to more reviews rather than feeling pressure to do a few really thorough reviews. So I think we should let derekh's presence on core be felt for a few weeks and then re-visit the +4 requirement then. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! +1 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
+1 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? Also tsk! to those cores who aren't reviewing as regularly :) Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- -- James Slagle -- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
As an outsider to OOO, but a Keystone core, let me endorse Derek's work on provioning in general. He is an outstanding developer. On 08/28/2013 10:31 AM, James Slagle wrote: +1 On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? Also tsk! to those cores who aren't reviewing as regularly :) Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com mailto:rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- -- James Slagle -- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? Also tsk! to those cores who aren't reviewing as regularly :) Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
+1 here On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the culture etc now, I think. So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer! I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? Also tsk! to those cores who aren't reviewing as regularly :) Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core
Hi On 27 August 2013 22:25, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer +1 I think we're nearly at the point where we can switch to the 'two +2's' model - what do you think? Selfishly I'd quite like to see a little more EU core reviewer presence, but in reality there's not many hours where we'll be potentially unable to land things. That aside, I like the idea. -- Cheers, Chris ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev