Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Erno Kuvajawrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS >>> > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy >>> > gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to >>> > ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. >>> > >>> > I'm confident that I will get all the bits together over next week or >>> > so, but I'm far from confident that we will have them merged in time. >>> > I would like to see this feature making Newton still. >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Erno (jokke) Kuvaja >>> >>> The last commit for this feature is in review [0], pending the >>> decision how & if we split these backends in THT. >>> >>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358525/ >> >> I'm fine with a FFE for this since it's low risk and disabled by default. >> >> Can you please create a blueprint in launchpad if there's not one already, >> as it seems like this work has been done without any associated BP, and >> this makes it hard to track around release time. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Steve >> > > Sure Steve, > > I get it done today. > > Thanks, > Erno The blueprint can be found from https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/manila-cephfs-integration - Erno __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardywrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS >> > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy >> > gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to >> > ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. >> > >> > I'm confident that I will get all the bits together over next week or >> > so, but I'm far from confident that we will have them merged in time. >> > I would like to see this feature making Newton still. >> > >> > Best, >> > Erno (jokke) Kuvaja >> >> The last commit for this feature is in review [0], pending the >> decision how & if we split these backends in THT. >> >> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358525/ > > I'm fine with a FFE for this since it's low risk and disabled by default. > > Can you please create a blueprint in launchpad if there's not one already, > as it seems like this work has been done without any associated BP, and > this makes it hard to track around release time. > > Thanks, > > Steve > Sure Steve, I get it done today. Thanks, Erno __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvajawrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS > > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy > > gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to > > ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. > > > > I'm confident that I will get all the bits together over next week or > > so, but I'm far from confident that we will have them merged in time. > > I would like to see this feature making Newton still. > > > > Best, > > Erno (jokke) Kuvaja > > The last commit for this feature is in review [0], pending the > decision how & if we split these backends in THT. > > [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358525/ I'm fine with a FFE for this since it's low risk and disabled by default. Can you please create a blueprint in launchpad if there's not one already, as it seems like this work has been done without any associated BP, and this makes it hard to track around release time. Thanks, Steve __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvajawrote: > Hi all, > > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy > gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to > ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. > > I'm confident that I will get all the bits together over next week or > so, but I'm far from confident that we will have them merged in time. > I would like to see this feature making Newton still. > > Best, > Erno (jokke) Kuvaja The last commit for this feature is in review [0], pending the decision how & if we split these backends in THT. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358525/ - Erno __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [TripleO] FFE request for Manila CephFS Native backend integration
Hi all, I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy gating left 'till FF and the changes are not reviewed yet, I'd like to ask community consider the feature for Feature Freeze Exception. I'm confident that I will get all the bits together over next week or so, but I'm far from confident that we will have them merged in time. I would like to see this feature making Newton still. Best, Erno (jokke) Kuvaja __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev