Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost] Question about the "nics" argument provide to ansible os_ironic module.
Excerpts from hu.zhijiang's message of 2016-08-24 11:11:04 +0800: > Hi Bifrost Team, > > From the code study about Bifrost and Shade I found that the "nics" > argument provide to ansible's os_ironic module is used for creating ports > for a bare metal. I think it is related to neutron. But for bifrost which > uses ironic in standalone mode, there is no need to create ports like > this. So I don't know why we need to provide the "nics" argument. Is it > optional or even shall be hidden from Bifrost user's eyes? Nics are still needed for drivers that need to know the boot MAC of the machine, such as PXE. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [bifrost] Question about the "nics" argument provide to ansible os_ironic module.
Hi Bifrost Team, >From the code study about Bifrost and Shade I found that the "nics" argument provide to ansible's os_ironic module is used for creating ports for a bare metal. I think it is related to neutron. But for bifrost which uses ironic in standalone mode, there is no need to create ports like this. So I don't know why we need to provide the "nics" argument. Is it optional or even shall be hidden from Bifrost user's eyes? Thanks. B.R., Zhijiang __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
