Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
On 01:15 Thu 12 Mar , Fox, Kevin M wrote: Also, can https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647/2 be considered. all it does is move code from the accepted nfs.py to posix.py as described in the approved spec. This enables all posix complient file systems to be used, such as lustre instead of just nfs. It is already tested through the nfs tests. I would rather review resources be spent on approving the back log of bugs we have submitted. That's what this time is spent for. There's no reason this can't wait for Liberty. The posix backup driver has been cooking in one form or another since Juno. It would be a shame to need to wait over a year and a half for it. Technically this will be in October, which is not a year and a half. More than happy to review in L-1. -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
All, I will sponsor this. Patch just needs to be rebased. Jay On 03/11/2015 10:20 AM, Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review completes the implementation of the NFS backup blueprint [2]. Most of the actual work for this blueprint was a refactor of the Swift backup driver to abstract the backup/restore business logic from the use of the Swift object store itself as the backup repository. With the help of Xing Yang, Jay Bryant, and Ivan Kolodyazhny, that review [3] merged yesterday and made the K3 FFE deadline. In evaluating this FFE request, please take into account the following considerations: * Without the second review, the goal of the blueprint remains unfullfilled. * This code was upstream in January and was essentially complete with only superficial changes since then. * As of March 5 this review had two core +2s. Delay since then has been entirely due to wait time on the dependent review and need for rebase given upstream code churn. * No risk is added outside NFS backup service itself since the changes to current code are all in the core refactor and that is already merged. If this FFE is granted, I will give the required rebase my immediate attention. Thanks. - -- Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149726 [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nfs-backup [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149725 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAF1YAAoJEGeKBzAeUxEHayUH/2iWuOiKBnRauX40fwcR7+js lIM+qRIHlg2iJ+cnqap6HHUhBSxwHnuAV41zQmFBKnfhc3sIqS98ZSVlUaJQtct/ YjjInKOpxFOEw1FgoFMsrg0qm76zFMXXVIKNegy2iXgXsKzDTWed5n57N8FAP2+6 q/uASOZNHgxbeZLV7LSKS21/3WUoQpIQiW0+1GtkVtO1C9t8Io+TrjlZj7T60kHJ UEH5HShKE0U40SKhgwRyEK7HqbMDGv8w5SsUgyUntdgDlQycgyI/erKm5WJqcZsF F6om6HY3oxtulcjbrWmA6+ENnOYsLchXFT8fZeLj7JWOarv5SF2fBQFTqzc/36U= =/FVr -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review completes the implementation of the NFS backup blueprint [2]. Most of the actual work for this blueprint was a refactor of the Swift backup driver to abstract the backup/restore business logic from the use of the Swift object store itself as the backup repository. With the help of Xing Yang, Jay Bryant, and Ivan Kolodyazhny, that review [3] merged yesterday and made the K3 FFE deadline. In evaluating this FFE request, please take into account the following considerations: * Without the second review, the goal of the blueprint remains unfullfilled. * This code was upstream in January and was essentially complete with only superficial changes since then. * As of March 5 this review had two core +2s. Delay since then has been entirely due to wait time on the dependent review and need for rebase given upstream code churn. * No risk is added outside NFS backup service itself since the changes to current code are all in the core refactor and that is already merged. If this FFE is granted, I will give the required rebase my immediate attention. Thanks. - -- Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149726 [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nfs-backup [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149725 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAF1YAAoJEGeKBzAeUxEHayUH/2iWuOiKBnRauX40fwcR7+js lIM+qRIHlg2iJ+cnqap6HHUhBSxwHnuAV41zQmFBKnfhc3sIqS98ZSVlUaJQtct/ YjjInKOpxFOEw1FgoFMsrg0qm76zFMXXVIKNegy2iXgXsKzDTWed5n57N8FAP2+6 q/uASOZNHgxbeZLV7LSKS21/3WUoQpIQiW0+1GtkVtO1C9t8Io+TrjlZj7T60kHJ UEH5HShKE0U40SKhgwRyEK7HqbMDGv8w5SsUgyUntdgDlQycgyI/erKm5WJqcZsF F6om6HY3oxtulcjbrWmA6+ENnOYsLchXFT8fZeLj7JWOarv5SF2fBQFTqzc/36U= =/FVr -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
Discussed in the weekly meeting, plenty of sponsors, agreed to try to get it through today On 11 March 2015 at 18:48, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: All, I will sponsor this. Patch just needs to be rebased. Jay On 03/11/2015 10:20 AM, Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review completes the implementation of the NFS backup blueprint [2]. Most of the actual work for this blueprint was a refactor of the Swift backup driver to abstract the backup/restore business logic from the use of the Swift object store itself as the backup repository. With the help of Xing Yang, Jay Bryant, and Ivan Kolodyazhny, that review [3] merged yesterday and made the K3 FFE deadline. In evaluating this FFE request, please take into account the following considerations: * Without the second review, the goal of the blueprint remains unfullfilled. * This code was upstream in January and was essentially complete with only superficial changes since then. * As of March 5 this review had two core +2s. Delay since then has been entirely due to wait time on the dependent review and need for rebase given upstream code churn. * No risk is added outside NFS backup service itself since the changes to current code are all in the core refactor and that is already merged. If this FFE is granted, I will give the required rebase my immediate attention. Thanks. - -- Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.net [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149726 [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nfs-backup [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149725 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAF1YAAoJEGeKBzAeUxEHayUH/2iWuOiKBnRauX40fwcR7+js lIM+qRIHlg2iJ+cnqap6HHUhBSxwHnuAV41zQmFBKnfhc3sIqS98ZSVlUaJQtct/ YjjInKOpxFOEw1FgoFMsrg0qm76zFMXXVIKNegy2iXgXsKzDTWed5n57N8FAP2+6 q/uASOZNHgxbeZLV7LSKS21/3WUoQpIQiW0+1GtkVtO1C9t8Io+TrjlZj7T60kHJ UEH5HShKE0U40SKhgwRyEK7HqbMDGv8w5SsUgyUntdgDlQycgyI/erKm5WJqcZsF F6om6HY3oxtulcjbrWmA6+ENnOYsLchXFT8fZeLj7JWOarv5SF2fBQFTqzc/36U= =/FVr -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
On 11:20 Wed 11 Mar , Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. This was granted by the community in the Cinder IRC meeting this morning (sorry raw log is only available due to irc bot issues): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-11-16.00.log.txt -- Mike Perez __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup
Also, can https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163647/2 be considered. all it does is move code from the accepted nfs.py to posix.py as described in the approved spec. This enables all posix complient file systems to be used, such as lustre instead of just nfs. It is already tested through the nfs tests. The posix backup driver has been cooking in one form or another since Juno. It would be a shame to need to wait over a year and a half for it. Thanks, Kevin From: Duncan Thomas [duncan.tho...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 10:41 AM To: Jay Bryant; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup Discussed in the weekly meeting, plenty of sponsors, agreed to try to get it through today On 11 March 2015 at 18:48, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.netmailto:jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: All, I will sponsor this. Patch just needs to be rebased. Jay On 03/11/2015 10:20 AM, Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review completes the implementation of the NFS backup blueprint [2]. Most of the actual work for this blueprint was a refactor of the Swift backup driver to abstract the backup/restore business logic from the use of the Swift object store itself as the backup repository. With the help of Xing Yang, Jay Bryant, and Ivan Kolodyazhny, that review [3] merged yesterday and made the K3 FFE deadline. In evaluating this FFE request, please take into account the following considerations: * Without the second review, the goal of the blueprint remains unfullfilled. * This code was upstream in January and was essentially complete with only superficial changes since then. * As of March 5 this review had two core +2s. Delay since then has been entirely due to wait time on the dependent review and need for rebase given upstream code churn. * No risk is added outside NFS backup service itself since the changes to current code are all in the core refactor and that is already merged. If this FFE is granted, I will give the required rebase my immediate attention. Thanks. - -- Tom Barron t...@dyncloud.netmailto:t...@dyncloud.net [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149726 [2] - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/nfs-backup [3] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149725 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAF1YAAoJEGeKBzAeUxEHayUH/2iWuOiKBnRauX40fwcR7+js lIM+qRIHlg2iJ+cnqap6HHUhBSxwHnuAV41zQmFBKnfhc3sIqS98ZSVlUaJQtct/ YjjInKOpxFOEw1FgoFMsrg0qm76zFMXXVIKNegy2iXgXsKzDTWed5n57N8FAP2+6 q/uASOZNHgxbeZLV7LSKS21/3WUoQpIQiW0+1GtkVtO1C9t8Io+TrjlZj7T60kHJ UEH5HShKE0U40SKhgwRyEK7HqbMDGv8w5SsUgyUntdgDlQycgyI/erKm5WJqcZsF F6om6HY3oxtulcjbrWmA6+ENnOYsLchXFT8fZeLj7JWOarv5SF2fBQFTqzc/36U= =/FVr -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
