Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

[Jay Pipes]

Gotcha. In that case, yeah, kill it :)

On 05/12/2016 11:41 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jay Pipes > wrote:

On 05/11/2016 11:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:

Greetings,

The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance
Registry
service and this email is a request for feedback from the
overall community
before the team moves forward with anything.

Historically, there have been reasons to create this service. Some
deployments
use it to hide database credentials from Glance public
endpoints, others
use it
for scaling purposes and others because v1 depends on it. This
is a good
time
for the team to re-evaluate the need of these services since v2
doesn't
depend
on it.

So, here's the big question:

Why do you think this service should be kept around?


Question... does the Glare project essentially replace any
functionality that was originally in Glance Registry?

Best,
-jay


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


No, the v2 API-service functionality to be able to talk to the db
directly did.

- Erno


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

[Erno Kuvaja]

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Jay Pipes  wrote:

> On 05/11/2016 11:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance
>> Registry
>> service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall
>> community
>> before the team moves forward with anything.
>>
>> Historically, there have been reasons to create this service. Some
>> deployments
>> use it to hide database credentials from Glance public endpoints, others
>> use it
>> for scaling purposes and others because v1 depends on it. This is a good
>> time
>> for the team to re-evaluate the need of these services since v2 doesn't
>> depend
>> on it.
>>
>> So, here's the big question:
>>
>> Why do you think this service should be kept around?
>>
>
> Question... does the Glare project essentially replace any functionality
> that was originally in Glance Registry?
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

No, the v2 API-service functionality to be able to talk to the db directly
did.

- Erno
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

[Jay Pipes]

On 05/11/2016 11:51 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:

Greetings,

The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance
Registry
service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall community
before the team moves forward with anything.

Historically, there have been reasons to create this service. Some
deployments
use it to hide database credentials from Glance public endpoints, others
use it
for scaling purposes and others because v1 depends on it. This is a good
time
for the team to re-evaluate the need of these services since v2 doesn't
depend
on it.

So, here's the big question:

Why do you think this service should be kept around?


Question... does the Glare project essentially replace any functionality 
that was originally in Glance Registry?


Best,
-jay


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [glance] glance-registry deprecation: Request for feedback

[Flavio Percoco]

Greetings,

The Glance team is evaluating the needs and usefulness of the Glance Registry
service and this email is a request for feedback from the overall community
before the team moves forward with anything.

Historically, there have been reasons to create this service. Some deployments
use it to hide database credentials from Glance public endpoints, others use it
for scaling purposes and others because v1 depends on it. This is a good time
for the team to re-evaluate the need of these services since v2 doesn't depend
on it.

So, here's the big question:

Why do you think this service should be kept around?

Summit etherpad: 
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-glance-registry-deprecation

Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev