Hi all. I’ve been looking through the bugs/fixes we’ve made during kilo cycle.
Some of them are worthy of being backported to stable/juno. And some of the
fixes we’ve already made in liberty are worthy of being backported to
stable/kilo.
Since we’ve agreed on using tags for bugs I’ve marked those bugs as
juno-backport-potential and kilo-backport-potential.
Here are the links for them
murano bugs with tag 'juno-backport-potential’ and without a tag
‘in-stable-juno’ : http://j.mp/murano-juno-backport
murano bugs in murano with tag ‘kilo-backport-potential’ and without a tag
‘in-stable-kilo’: http://j.mp/murano-kilo-backport
python-muranoclient bugs with tag 'juno-backport-potential’ and without a tag
‘in-stable-juno’ : http://j.mp/muranoclient-juno-backport
python-muranoclient bugs in murano with tag ‘kilo-backport-potential’ and
without a tag ‘in-stable-kilo’: http://j.mp/muranoclient-kilo-backport
Sorry for using url shortener, the links are really large and would clutter the
email otherwise. I also hope I didn’t mess up with them. =) You can construct
them from Launchpads advanced search.
If you have any objections to the list of bugs to be backported — you can
comment in respective bugs on l-pad and we can discuss it on a per-bug basis.
If you're aware of any bugs, that have backport potential that are not present
on the list: feel free to tag them.
--
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano team
Software Engineer
Mirantis, Inc
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev