Hi all. I’ve been looking through the bugs/fixes we’ve made during kilo cycle. 
Some of them are worthy of being backported to stable/juno. And some of the 
fixes we’ve already made in liberty are worthy of being backported to 
stable/kilo.

Since we’ve agreed on using tags for bugs I’ve marked those bugs as 
juno-backport-potential and kilo-backport-potential.

Here are the links for them 

murano bugs with tag 'juno-backport-potential’ and without a tag 
‘in-stable-juno’ : http://j.mp/murano-juno-backport
murano bugs in murano with tag ‘kilo-backport-potential’ and without a tag 
‘in-stable-kilo’: http://j.mp/murano-kilo-backport

python-muranoclient bugs with tag 'juno-backport-potential’ and without a tag 
‘in-stable-juno’ : http://j.mp/muranoclient-juno-backport
python-muranoclient bugs in murano with tag ‘kilo-backport-potential’ and 
without a tag ‘in-stable-kilo’: http://j.mp/muranoclient-kilo-backport

Sorry for using url shortener, the links are really large and would clutter the 
email otherwise. I also hope I didn’t mess up with them. =) You can construct 
them from Launchpads advanced search.

If you have any objections to the list of bugs to be backported — you can 
comment in respective bugs on l-pad and we can discuss it on a per-bug basis.
If you're aware of any bugs, that have backport potential that are not present 
on the list: feel free to tag them.

-- 
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano team
Software Engineer
Mirantis, Inc
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to