Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutronclient check queue is broken

2016-08-29 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka

Assaf Muller  wrote:

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka   
wrote:

Akihiro Motoki  wrote:


In the neutronclient check queue,
gate-neutronclient-test-dsvm-functional is broken now [1].
Please avoid issuing 'recheck'.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1616749

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:  
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



The proposed fix (removal tests for lbaasv1) made me wonder why we don’t
gate on neutron stable branches in client master branch. Isn’t it a test
matrix gap that could allow a new client to introduce a regression that
would break interactions with older clouds?


Absolutely. Feel free to send a project-config patch :)


Arie Bregman did: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/361603/

Ihar

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutronclient check queue is broken

2016-08-25 Thread Assaf Muller
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka  wrote:
> Akihiro Motoki  wrote:
>
>> In the neutronclient check queue,
>> gate-neutronclient-test-dsvm-functional is broken now [1].
>> Please avoid issuing 'recheck'.
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1616749
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> The proposed fix (removal tests for lbaasv1) made me wonder why we don’t
> gate on neutron stable branches in client master branch. Isn’t it a test
> matrix gap that could allow a new client to introduce a regression that
> would break interactions with older clouds?

Absolutely. Feel free to send a project-config patch :)

>
> I see that some clients (nova) validate stable server branches against
> master client patches. Shouldn’t we do the same?
>
> Ihar
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutronclient check queue is broken

2016-08-25 Thread Henry Gessau
Akihiro Motoki  wrote:
> In the neutronclient check queue,
> gate-neutronclient-test-dsvm-functional is broken now [1].
> Please avoid issuing 'recheck'.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1616749

The fix [2] has merged. Carry on.

[2] https://review.openstack.org/360291


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutronclient check queue is broken

2016-08-25 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka

Akihiro Motoki  wrote:


In the neutronclient check queue,
gate-neutronclient-test-dsvm-functional is broken now [1].
Please avoid issuing 'recheck'.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1616749

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


The proposed fix (removal tests for lbaasv1) made me wonder why we don’t  
gate on neutron stable branches in client master branch. Isn’t it a test  
matrix gap that could allow a new client to introduce a regression that  
would break interactions with older clouds?


I see that some clients (nova) validate stable server branches against  
master client patches. Shouldn’t we do the same?


Ihar

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutronclient check queue is broken

2016-08-25 Thread Akihiro Motoki
In the neutronclient check queue,
gate-neutronclient-test-dsvm-functional is broken now [1].
Please avoid issuing 'recheck'.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1616749

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev