Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichiwrote: > 2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa : > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi QA-team, > > In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. > On the other hand, some projects became non-active. > That seems natural thing. > > Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio > on "Project Status". > The project has became non-official since > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ > So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it > disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' > failures. > > Any thoughts? > >>> > >>> Yes, I totally agree we should only list active official projects in > >>> there, otherwise long-dead things like Cue will make the view look bad. > >>> Looks like the system adds new ones but does not remove anything ? It > >>> should probably take its list from [1]. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/ > reference/projects.yaml > >> > >> Is cue completely dead? Should we then retire it completely following > >> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project > ? > >> > >> It still has jobs setup and I see people submitting typo fixes etc. > > > > I'm not sure the cue is dead or not. But I think we should fix the > > failure of the job or remove the periodic jobs. Otherwise, the job > > just waste the resource of the OpenStack infra.. > > Yeah, that is a nice point. > And this case means openstack-health notifies this wasting resource on > the infra, that is good thing. > The failing job is already removed since > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404375/ > So we will not see the failure on the dashboard soon, thanks for helping > that. > > Completely agree on removal of non active one. Failure status from o-h is nice input for removal the inactive projects from OpenStack. So once it is removed from governance then we can remove from o-h too. For non-official one, we can just remove based on their failure frequency etc. > > But we should have the filter feature like a 'Project Type' of > > stackalitics, probably. I think it's useful for openstack-health > > users. > > +1. This will really help. > Yeah, it might be useful. But it is fine to wait for seeing the above > result. > Maybe our motivation of the filter feature will become less after that ;) > > Thanks > Ken Ohmichi > > --- > > >> > >> > >> Andreas > >> -- > >> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > >> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > >>GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, > >>HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > >> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > >> > >> > >> > __ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi QA-team, In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. On the other hand, some projects became non-active. That seems natural thing. Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio on "Project Status". The project has became non-official since https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' failures. Any thoughts? >>> >>> Yes, I totally agree we should only list active official projects in >>> there, otherwise long-dead things like Cue will make the view look bad. >>> Looks like the system adds new ones but does not remove anything ? It >>> should probably take its list from [1]. >>> >>> [1] >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml >> >> Is cue completely dead? Should we then retire it completely following >> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project ? >> >> It still has jobs setup and I see people submitting typo fixes etc. > > I'm not sure the cue is dead or not. But I think we should fix the > failure of the job or remove the periodic jobs. Otherwise, the job > just waste the resource of the OpenStack infra.. Yeah, that is a nice point. And this case means openstack-health notifies this wasting resource on the infra, that is good thing. The failing job is already removed since https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404375/ So we will not see the failure on the dashboard soon, thanks for helping that. > But we should have the filter feature like a 'Project Type' of > stackalitics, probably. I think it's useful for openstack-health > users. Yeah, it might be useful. But it is fine to wait for seeing the above result. Maybe our motivation of the filter feature will become less after that ;) Thanks Ken Ohmichi --- >> >> >> Andreas >> -- >> Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi >> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany >>GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, >>HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) >> GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
Hi, On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaegerwrote: > On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>> Hi QA-team, >>> >>> In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. >>> On the other hand, some projects became non-active. >>> That seems natural thing. >>> >>> Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio >>> on "Project Status". >>> The project has became non-official since >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ >>> So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it >>> disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' >>> failures. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >> >> Yes, I totally agree we should only list active official projects in >> there, otherwise long-dead things like Cue will make the view look bad. >> Looks like the system adds new ones but does not remove anything ? It >> should probably take its list from [1]. >> >> [1] >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml > > Is cue completely dead? Should we then retire it completely following > http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project ? > > It still has jobs setup and I see people submitting typo fixes etc. I'm not sure the cue is dead or not. But I think we should fix the failure of the job or remove the periodic jobs. Otherwise, the job just waste the resource of the OpenStack infra.. But we should have the filter feature like a 'Project Type' of stackalitics, probably. I think it's useful for openstack-health users. Best Regards, -- Masayuki Igawa > > > Andreas > -- > Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi > SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany >GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, >HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi QA-team, >> >> In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. >> On the other hand, some projects became non-active. >> That seems natural thing. >> >> Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio >> on "Project Status". >> The project has became non-official since >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ >> So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it >> disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' >> failures. >> >> Any thoughts? > > Yes, I totally agree we should only list active official projects in > there, otherwise long-dead things like Cue will make the view look bad. > Looks like the system adds new ones but does not remove anything ? It > should probably take its list from [1]. > > [1] > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml Is cue completely dead? Should we then retire it completely following http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#retiring-a-project ? It still has jobs setup and I see people submitting typo fixes etc. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi QA-team, > > In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. > On the other hand, some projects became non-active. > That seems natural thing. > > Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio > on "Project Status". > The project has became non-official since > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ > So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it > disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' > failures. > > Any thoughts? Yes, I totally agree we should only list active official projects in there, otherwise long-dead things like Cue will make the view look bad. Looks like the system adds new ones but does not remove anything ? It should probably take its list from [1]. [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios
Hi QA-team, In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. On the other hand, some projects became non-active. That seems natural thing. Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio on "Project Status". The project has became non-official since https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324412/ So I feel it is nice to have black-list or something to make it disappear from the dashboard for concentrating on active projects' failures. Any thoughts? Thanks Ken Ohmichi --- [1]: http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev