Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] glance issue at QA team meeting on 12 January

[Brian Rosmaita]

Hello Ken'ichi and the QA Team,

Sorry about the confusion over today's meeting time.  All I was going to
say at the meeting was it would be great if some core reviewers could
take a look at the glance tempest patch,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414261/.

I realize that you give each patch all the care and attention it
deserves, but this is an important patch for Glance, so we'd appreciate
anything you can do to expedite it.  We discussed the issue again at
today's API-WG meeting, and agreed that what's needed is an "official"
response from the QA team concerning the acceptability of the patch so
that we can figure out our next steps.

thanks,
brian


On 1/11/17 12:10 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> Hello QA Team,
> 
> There wasn't an agenda for 12 January on the Meetings/QATeamMeeting page
> on the wiki, so I took the liberty of creating one.  I added an item
> under the "Tempest" section to discuss a patch to modify a Glance test
> that is currently blocking a few Glance Ocata priorities (community
> images and rolling upgrades).
> 
> I put the following link on the agenda to provide some background about
> the issue and the subsequent discussion:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109817.html
> 
> So far a few QA team members have weighed in on the discussion, either
> on the ML or on the patch, but I need to get an official decision from
> the QA team on whether the patch is acceptable or not so that we can get
> moving.  As you know, O-3 is fast approaching!
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414261/
> 
> thanks,
> brian
> 


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] glance issue at QA team meeting on 12 January

[GHANSHYAM MANN]

Thanks Brian.

Update on meeting time, 12th Jan meeting will be at 0900 UTC.
I just sent mail about meeting invite.

​-gmann

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:10 AM, Brian Rosmaita 
wrote:

> Hello QA Team,
>
> There wasn't an agenda for 12 January on the Meetings/QATeamMeeting page
> on the wiki, so I took the liberty of creating one.  I added an item
> under the "Tempest" section to discuss a patch to modify a Glance test
> that is currently blocking a few Glance Ocata priorities (community
> images and rolling upgrades).
>
> I put the following link on the agenda to provide some background about
> the issue and the subsequent discussion:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-
> January/109817.html
>
> So far a few QA team members have weighed in on the discussion, either
> on the ML or on the patch, but I need to get an official decision from
> the QA team on whether the patch is acceptable or not so that we can get
> moving.  As you know, O-3 is fast approaching!
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414261/
>
> thanks,
> brian
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [qa] glance issue at QA team meeting on 12 January

[Brian Rosmaita]

Hello QA Team,

There wasn't an agenda for 12 January on the Meetings/QATeamMeeting page
on the wiki, so I took the liberty of creating one.  I added an item
under the "Tempest" section to discuss a patch to modify a Glance test
that is currently blocking a few Glance Ocata priorities (community
images and rolling upgrades).

I put the following link on the agenda to provide some background about
the issue and the subsequent discussion:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109817.html

So far a few QA team members have weighed in on the discussion, either
on the ML or on the patch, but I need to get an official decision from
the QA team on whether the patch is acceptable or not so that we can get
moving.  As you know, O-3 is fast approaching!

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414261/

thanks,
brian

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev