Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread Tony Breeds 
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:29:23PM -0400, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is FFE request to get ceilometerclient 2.6.1 into upper constraints.
> There is already a patch for this blocked by freeze[1].
> 
> ceilometerclient 2.6.1 was cut 3 days after the freeze looks like and it
> includes various critical fixes such as[2]. Without this aodh logs fill up
> with following errors[3] and alarm creation fails.
> 
> Please consider approving this for newton asap.

This is a u-c only change.  I'm a little concerned that we're skipping 2.6.0
but I understand how/why that happend.

python-ceilometerclient is only used by services:
---
Package  : python-ceilometerclient [python-ceilometerclient>=2.5.0] (used 
by 7 projects)
Included in  : 6 projects
openstack/congress[type:service]
openstack/heat[type:service]
openstack/horizon [type:service]
openstack/mistral [type:service]
openstack/vitrage [type:service]
openstack/watcher [type:service]
Also affects : 1 projects
openstack/kolla   [release:cycle-trailing]
---

So Looks good to me.

Yours Tony.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread Matthew Thode 
On 09/09/2016 04:24 PM, gordon chung wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/09/16 03:45 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> Does this mean that the minimum (GR needs raising as well)?
> 
> iiuc, just the max or upper-constraints.
> 
> cheers,
> 
k, I already +2'd it as I think this is fine, waiting on glorious leader
(tonyb) to +2+W it.

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread gordon chung 


On 09/09/16 03:45 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> Does this mean that the minimum (GR needs raising as well)?

iiuc, just the max or upper-constraints.

cheers,
-- 
gord

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread Matthew Thode 
On 09/09/2016 02:29 PM, Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is FFE request to get ceilometerclient 2.6.1 into upper
> constraints. There is already a patch for this blocked by freeze[1].
> 
> ceilometerclient 2.6.1 was cut 3 days after the freeze looks like and it
> includes various critical fixes such as[2]. Without this aodh logs fill
> up with following errors[3] and alarm creation fails.
> 
> Please consider approving this for newton asap.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ~ Prad
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367386/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366638/
> [3] 
> http://logs.openstack.org/96/366896/4/check/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-nv/97ed4b4/logs/subnode-2/var/log/aodh/evaluator.txt.gz#_2016-09-09_13_05_23_261
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
Does this mean that the minimum (GR needs raising as well)?

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread Emilien Macchi 
+1, this release fix a bug to better understand the errors in logs for
Aodh and Ceilometer.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Pradeep Kilambi  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is FFE request to get ceilometerclient 2.6.1 into upper constraints.
> There is already a patch for this blocked by freeze[1].
>
> ceilometerclient 2.6.1 was cut 3 days after the freeze looks like and it
> includes various critical fixes such as[2]. Without this aodh logs fill up
> with following errors[3] and alarm creation fails.
>
> Please consider approving this for newton asap.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ~ Prad
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367386/
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366638/
> [3]
> http://logs.openstack.org/96/366896/4/check/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-nv/97ed4b4/logs/subnode-2/var/log/aodh/evaluator.txt.gz#_2016-09-09_13_05_23_261
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [requirements][FFE] Request to allow ceilometerclient 2.6.1 in upper-constraints for newton

2016-09-09 Thread Pradeep Kilambi 
Hi,

This is FFE request to get ceilometerclient 2.6.1 into upper constraints.
There is already a patch for this blocked by freeze[1].

ceilometerclient 2.6.1 was cut 3 days after the freeze looks like and it
includes various critical fixes such as[2]. Without this aodh logs fill up
with following errors[3] and alarm creation fails.

Please consider approving this for newton asap.

Thanks,

~ Prad

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367386/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366638/
[3]
http://logs.openstack.org/96/366896/4/check/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-nv/97ed4b4/logs/subnode-2/var/log/aodh/evaluator.txt.gz#_2016-09-09_13_05_23_261
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev