Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] dvr job for kilo?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: I noticed that dvr job is now voting for all stable branches, and failing, because the branch misses some important fixes from master. Initially, I tried to just disable votes for stable branches for the job: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205497/ Due to limitations of project-config, we would need to rework the patch though to split the job into stable non-voting and liberty+ voting one, and disable the votes just for the first one. My gut feeling is that since the job never actually worked for kilo, we should just kill it for all stable branches. It does not provide any meaningful actionable feedback anyway. Thoughts? +1 to kill it. Agreed, lets get rid of it for stable branches. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] dvr job for kilo?
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: I noticed that dvr job is now voting for all stable branches, and failing, because the branch misses some important fixes from master. Initially, I tried to just disable votes for stable branches for the job: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205497/ Due to limitations of project-config, we would need to rework the patch though to split the job into stable non-voting and liberty+ voting one, and disable the votes just for the first one. My gut feeling is that since the job never actually worked for kilo, we should just kill it for all stable branches. It does not provide any meaningful actionable feedback anyway. Thoughts? +1 to kill it. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] dvr job for kilo?
+1 Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote on 07/27/2015 08:16:07 AM [with a bit of cleanup]: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: I noticed that dvr job is now voting for all stable branches, and failing, because the branch misses some important fixes from master. Initially, I tried to just disable votes for stable branches for the job: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205497/ Due to limitations of project-config, we would need to rework the patch though to split the job into stable non-voting and liberty+ voting one, and disable the votes just for the first one. My gut feeling is that since the job never actually worked for kilo, we should just kill it for all stable branches. It does not provide any meaningful actionable feedback anyway. Thoughts? +1 to kill it. Agreed, lets get rid of it for stable branches. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] dvr job for kilo?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I noticed that dvr job is now voting for all stable branches, and failing, because the branch misses some important fixes from master. Initially, I tried to just disable votes for stable branches for the job: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205497/ Due to limitations of project-config, we would need to rework the patch though to split the job into stable non-voting and liberty+ voting one, and disable the votes just for the first one. My gut feeling is that since the job never actually worked for kilo, we should just kill it for all stable branches. It does not provide any meaningful actionable feedback anyway. Thoughts? Ihar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVtfgmAAoJEC5aWaUY1u578KgIANvJzlZ+1zsgCsYRSVjbxTny EeHuzMRHaCDCt2AAdwAnf6McV7IdnrOdCGDVwhgnbAUJ0wAABDvNyRF5rsDUuPFb ZYpNf1tKrvfQo9ZsXOD4s6gdY8QDcNd9/H9Amqrc1VaJX7EsexRHZ8M86pd6BaWM aJX7XnkqggdJIsBL+cnNBCdOB35t9fipq2iC1LOHVT944kKcmILQy4adNrpFf1nX mEYUx0JpAsRnKDNMgnJY1neBVbwAw9UVnpcpWbSRIJfC0GsNdgKujS6IqwjSr3uq ooChidbubYWv3M1KYYu72LlXgXt8jjPMja5+gA6BI1LBArSc/a3Yzd9a2TWSVoE= =n/Yt -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
