Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposed changes to TripleO project tags

[James Slagle]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Steven Hardy  wrote:
> All,
>
> We discussed some changes to our release cycle in the weekly meeting
> yesterday, namely to align with the intended direction of the puppet
> community to adopt the new cycle-trailing tag[1].
>
> We have also discussed and agreed[2] to adopt the standard stable branch
> policy[3] for those repos where we maintain stable/mitaka branches (from
> mitaka onwards, superseding the "release branch" experimient we tried
> for stable/liberty)[4].
>
> To reflect these changes via the governance repo, I've proposed a patch[5]
> that changes the tags to release:cycle-trailing and stable:follows-policy
> for those repos where it is appropriate.
>
> Please provide feedback on that review if you have any comments, questions
> or concerns about this, thanks!
>
> Steve

Thanks, I also pushed a followup patch to move the other projects from
release:independent to release:cycle-with-intermediary. However, I
left diskimage-builder and dib-utils as release:independent for now
pending the discussion in the dib thread.

https://review.openstack.org/308574



-- 
-- James Slagle
--

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposed changes to TripleO project tags

[Steven Hardy]

All,

We discussed some changes to our release cycle in the weekly meeting
yesterday, namely to align with the intended direction of the puppet
community to adopt the new cycle-trailing tag[1].

We have also discussed and agreed[2] to adopt the standard stable branch
policy[3] for those repos where we maintain stable/mitaka branches (from
mitaka onwards, superseding the "release branch" experimient we tried
for stable/liberty)[4].

To reflect these changes via the governance repo, I've proposed a patch[5]
that changes the tags to release:cycle-trailing and stable:follows-policy
for those repos where it is appropriate.

Please provide feedback on that review if you have any comments, questions
or concerns about this, thanks!

Steve

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297382/
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-March/090855.html
[3] 
http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#appropriate-fixes
[4] 
https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/release-branch.rst
[5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308236/

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev