Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:12:04AM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:39:30AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > > Currently open with pending patches (may need FFE): > > - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/multiarch-support > > I'd like an FFE for this, the open reviews are in pretty good shape and > mostly merged. (or +W'd). > > We'll need another tripleo-common release after > https://review.openstack.org/537768 merges which I'd really like to do > next week if possible. Upon reflection I've -W'd some of the changes for this blueprint until Stein. The 5 left are: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/multiarch-support+is:open+label:Workflow%253E-1 Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:07 AM Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: [...] > > - > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/containerized-undercloud > > This needs FFE please. [...] No i don't think we need FFE for containerized undercloud. Most of the code has merged and we're switching the default in tripleoclient as of today if the patches merge (in gate today probably). So we're good on this one. -- Emilien Macchi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:39:30AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > Currently open with pending patches (may need FFE): > - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/multiarch-support I'd like an FFE for this, the open reviews are in pretty good shape and mostly merged. (or +W'd). We'll need another tripleo-common release after https://review.openstack.org/537768 merges which I'd really like to do next week if possible. There is some cleanup that can be done but nothing that's *needed* for rocky. After that there is still a validation that I need to write, and docs to update. I appreciate the help and support I've had from the TripleO community to get to this point. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
On 7/11/18 7:39 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: Hello everyone, As milestone 3 is quickly approaching, it's time to review the open blueprints[0] and their status. It appears that we have made good progress on implementing significant functionality this cycle but we still have some open items. Below is the list of blueprints that are still open so we'll want to see if they will make M3 and if not, we'd like to move them out to Stein and they won't make Rocky without an FFE. Currently not marked implemented but without any open patches (likely implemented): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/major-upgrade-workflow - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-predictable-ctlplane-ips Currently open with pending patches (may need FFE): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/config-download-ui - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/container-prepare-workflow - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/containerized-undercloud This needs FFE please. The remaining work [0] is mostly cosmetic (defaults switching) though it's somewhat blocked on CI infrastructure readiness [1] for containerized undercloud and overcloud deployments. The situation had been drastically improved by the recent changes though, like longer container images caching, enabling ansible pipelining, using shared local container registries for undercloud and overcloud deployments and may be more I'm missing. There is also ongoing work to mitigate the CI walltime [2]. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-July/132126.html [1] https://trello.com/c/1yDVHmqm/115-switch-remaining-ci-jobs [2] https://trello.com/c/PpNtarue/126-ci-break-the-openstack-infra-3h-timeout-wall - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/bluestore - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/gui-node-discovery-by-range - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/multiarch-support - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-routed-networks-templates - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/sriov-vfs-as-network-interface - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/custom-validations Currently open without work (should be moved to Stein): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/automated-ui-testing - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/plan-from-git-in-gui - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-ui-react-walkthrough - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/wrapping-workflow-for-node-operations - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/ironic-overcloud-ci Please take some time to review this list and update it. If you think you are close to finishing out the feature and would like to request an FFE please start getting that together with appropriate details and justifications for the FFE. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/rocky __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Best regards, Bogdan Dobrelya, Irc #bogdando __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 10:39 -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hello everyone, > > As milestone 3 is quickly approaching, it's time to review the open > blueprints[0] and their status. It appears that we have made good > progress on implementing significant functionality this cycle but we > still have some open items. Below is the list of blueprints that are > still open so we'll want to see if they will make M3 and if not, we'd > like to move them out to Stein and they won't make Rocky without an > FFE. Thanks for the reminder. I'd like an FFE for the tripleo-routed- networks-templates blueprint. (Hope this is formal enough.) > Currently open with pending patches (may need FFE): > > - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-routed-netwo > rks-templates > I have made quite a bit of progress on this over the last couple of weeks. There is a bit more too do, but the two sets of changes up there does improve things incrementally. All the patches are under this topic: - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/tripleo-routed-networks-tem plates+(status:open+OR+status:merged) If we manage to land the two patch series starting with ... - https://review.openstack.org/579580 and: - https://review.openstack.org/580235 ... completing the ones starting with https://review.openstack.org/5821 80 and a couple of more follow ups should be achievable before RC1. (I will be on PTO after tomorrow, returning August 13.) Over the last couple of days I have also started using rdocloud and OVB. I pushed this pull request yesterday: https://github.com/cybertron /openstack-virtual-baremetal/pull/43. (We should be able to re-use this in CI to get better coverage.) These changes reduce the complexity of configuring routed networks for the end-user greatly. I.e use the same overcloud node network config template for roles in different routed networks, and remove the need to do hiera overrides such as: ComputeLeaf2ExtraConfig: nova::compute::libvirt::vncserver_listen: "%{hiera('internal_api2')}" neutron::agents::ml2::ovs::local_ip: "%{hiera('tenant2')}" [ ... and so on ... ] -- Harald Jensås __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints
Hello everyone, As milestone 3 is quickly approaching, it's time to review the open blueprints[0] and their status. It appears that we have made good progress on implementing significant functionality this cycle but we still have some open items. Below is the list of blueprints that are still open so we'll want to see if they will make M3 and if not, we'd like to move them out to Stein and they won't make Rocky without an FFE. Currently not marked implemented but without any open patches (likely implemented): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/major-upgrade-workflow - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-predictable-ctlplane-ips Currently open with pending patches (may need FFE): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/config-download-ui - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/container-prepare-workflow - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/containerized-undercloud - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/bluestore - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/gui-node-discovery-by-range - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/multiarch-support - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-routed-networks-templates - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/sriov-vfs-as-network-interface - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/custom-validations Currently open without work (should be moved to Stein): - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/automated-ui-testing - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/plan-from-git-in-gui - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-ui-react-walkthrough - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/wrapping-workflow-for-node-operations - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/ironic-overcloud-ci Please take some time to review this list and update it. If you think you are close to finishing out the feature and would like to request an FFE please start getting that together with appropriate details and justifications for the FFE. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/rocky __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev