Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containers-multinode is broken, what's our plan

[Ben Nemec]

This is a situation where having temprevert/pin/cherrypick functionality 
again would have been really helpful.  I realize that doesn't help in 
the immediate circumstance, but it's something to consider for the future.


On 01/02/2018 10:05 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:

Mistral broke us with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506185/ and we
had a promotion yesterday so now our CI deploy Mistral with this
patch.
It breaks some Mistral actions, including the ones needed by
config-download (in featureset010).

Steve has a fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530781 but there is
no core review yet so we decided to proceed this way:

1) Carry Steve's patch in Mistral distgit:
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ - DONE
2) Remove featureset010 from promotion requirements - DONE
3) Once we have a promotion, we'll be able to land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ - IN PROGRESS
4) Once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ is landed, and the
upstream patch is landed, revert
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ (otherwise RDO will become
inconsistent) and failing to build on master)
5) Re-add featureset010 in promotion requirements (revert
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11142) so we'll catch the issue
next time.

Thanks,



__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containers-multinode is broken, what's our plan

[Wesley Hayutin]

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Emilien Macchi  wrote:

> Mistral broke us with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506185/ and we
> had a promotion yesterday so now our CI deploy Mistral with this
> patch.
> It breaks some Mistral actions, including the ones needed by
> config-download (in featureset010).
>
> Steve has a fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530781 but there is
> no core review yet so we decided to proceed this way:
>
> 1) Carry Steve's patch in Mistral distgit:
> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ - DONE
> 2) Remove featureset010 from promotion requirements - DONE
> 3) Once we have a promotion, we'll be able to land
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ - IN PROGRESS
> 4) Once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ is landed, and the
> upstream patch is landed, revert
> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ (otherwise RDO will become
> inconsistent) and failing to build on master)
> 5) Re-add featureset010 in promotion requirements (revert
> https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11142) so we'll catch the issue
> next time.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>

Thanks for all your hardwork and direction here.  You kept the lights on
while we were all out.
We'll be monitoring the zuul queue for any errors, thanks!

The TripleO-CI team is also working on the tools we'll need moving forward
to help bring the jobs that were moved to non-voting back to voting.
If anyone is interested or has suggestions our sprint work is spec'd out
here [1].  We have a planning meeting tomorrow to work through the details.
We'll also be taking on any unfinished work from the end of last year.

Thanks

[1]
https://trello.com/b/U1ITy0cu/tripleo-ci-squad?menu=filter=label:Sprint%206



>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] containers-multinode is broken, what's our plan

[Emilien Macchi]

Mistral broke us with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506185/ and we
had a promotion yesterday so now our CI deploy Mistral with this
patch.
It breaks some Mistral actions, including the ones needed by
config-download (in featureset010).

Steve has a fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530781 but there is
no core review yet so we decided to proceed this way:

1) Carry Steve's patch in Mistral distgit:
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ - DONE
2) Remove featureset010 from promotion requirements - DONE
3) Once we have a promotion, we'll be able to land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ - IN PROGRESS
4) Once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530783/ is landed, and the
upstream patch is landed, revert
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11140/ (otherwise RDO will become
inconsistent) and failing to build on master)
5) Re-add featureset010 in promotion requirements (revert
https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/11142) so we'll catch the issue
next time.

Thanks,
-- 
Emilien Macchi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev