Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-05 Thread John Garbutt
Yeah, I have been reviewing these, so happy to sponsor them too.

Patches have been re-approved.

Thanks,
John

On 5 September 2014 00:23, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
 So, that's your three. This exception is approved.

 Michael

 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 09/04/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
 I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
 vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/

 All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
 The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
 recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
 considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
 by VMware CI multiple times.

 They're all internal to the VMWare driver, have multiple ACKs from VMWare
 maintainers as well as core, so don't require extra review time. So I think
 it is reasonable request.

 ACK, I'll sponsor it.


 +1 here - I've already looked at a number of those.

 N.

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



 --
 Rackspace Australia

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-04 Thread Matthew Booth
I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/

All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
by VMware CI multiple times.

Matt
-- 
Matthew Booth
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team

Phone: +442070094448 (UK)
GPG ID:  D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
 I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
 vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:
 
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/
 
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/
 
 All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
 The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
 recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
 considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
 by VMware CI multiple times.

They're all internal to the VMWare driver, have multiple ACKs from VMWare
maintainers as well as core, so don't require extra review time. So I think
it is reasonable request.

ACK, I'll sponsor it.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-04 Thread Matthew Booth
On 04/09/14 14:46, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
 I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
 vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/

 All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
 The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
 recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
 considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
 by VMware CI multiple times.
 
 They're all internal to the VMWare driver, have multiple ACKs from VMWare
 maintainers as well as core, so don't require extra review time. So I think
 it is reasonable request.
 
 ACK, I'll sponsor it.

Thanks, Dan. John Garbutt has also said he'll sponsor the previously
approved patches, so that's 2.

Matt
-- 
Matthew Booth
Red Hat Engineering, Virtualisation Team

Phone: +442070094448 (UK)
GPG ID:  D33C3490
GPG FPR: 3733 612D 2D05 5458 8A8A 1600 3441 EA19 D33C 3490

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 09/04/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
 I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
 vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/

 All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
 The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
 recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
 considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
 by VMware CI multiple times.
 
 They're all internal to the VMWare driver, have multiple ACKs from VMWare
 maintainers as well as core, so don't require extra review time. So I think
 it is reasonable request.
 
 ACK, I'll sponsor it.
 

+1 here - I've already looked at a number of those.

N.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware][nova][FFE] vmware-spawn-refactor

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Still
So, that's your three. This exception is approved.

Michael

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
 On 09/04/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:09:26PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote:
 I'd like to request a FFE for the remaining changes from
 vmware-spawn-refactor. They are:

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117283/

 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98322/

 All but the last had +A, and were in the gate at the time it was closed.
 The last had not yet been approved, but is ready for core review. It has
 recently had some orthogonal changes split out to simplify it
 considerably. It is largely a code motion patch, and has been given +1
 by VMware CI multiple times.

 They're all internal to the VMWare driver, have multiple ACKs from VMWare
 maintainers as well as core, so don't require extra review time. So I think
 it is reasonable request.

 ACK, I'll sponsor it.


 +1 here - I've already looked at a number of those.

 N.

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Rackspace Australia

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev