Re: [openstack-dev] [vote] Re: [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement

[Martin André]

On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)  wrote:
> This may have got lost in the noise of the last few days of ml.  As a
> result, I am tagging with [vote].  I currently count 7 +1’s but again – lots
> of mailing list traffic so I may be off on my counting.
>
>
>
> For all core reviewers:
>
> In the future to help inc0 out with tallying the votes for votes core
> reviewers propose, please tag the email with [vote].
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> -steve
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Paul Bourke 
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> 
> Date: Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 6:21 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> 
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement
>
>
>
> Kolleagues,
>
>
>
> How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix
>
> in commit messages where a bug/bp is not required?
>
>
>
> I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of
>
> this, in my opinion, unnecessary requirement. It also causes friction
>
> for new contributers to the project.
>
>
>
> Are there any major benefits we're getting from the use of this tag that
>
> I'm missing?

This is my feeling as well. The tag really should only be used as an
indication given to the reviewers rather than as a way to enforce a
policy where all commits should have tags.

+1 for not requiring a TrivialFix tag in the commit message where
there is no related bp/bug.

Martin

> Cheers,
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> __
>
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [vote] Re: [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement

[Steven Dake (stdake)]

This may have got lost in the noise of the last few days of ml.  As a result, I 
am tagging with [vote].  I currently count 7 +1’s but again – lots of mailing 
list traffic so I may be off on my counting.

For all core reviewers:
In the future to help inc0 out with tallying the votes for votes core reviewers 
propose, please tag the email with [vote].

Regards
-steve


From: Paul Bourke 
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Date: Thursday, November 3, 2016 at 6:21 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 

Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement

Kolleagues,

How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix
in commit messages where a bug/bp is not required?

I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of
this, in my opinion, unnecessary requirement. It also causes friction
for new contributers to the project.

Are there any major benefits we're getting from the use of this tag that
I'm missing?

Cheers,
-Paul

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev