Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-03 Thread Asha Seshagiri 
Thanks Mathew for providing the updated information :)

Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Treinish 
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:30:55PM -0500, Douglas Mendiz?bal wrote:
>
> > Hi Asha,
> >
> > The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think it
> > pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all project
> > tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete, but someone
> > from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Yes, that blueprint was quite old and if you look at the history for it
> there
> was nary a patch submitted against it. So, I guess whoever was planning to
> do
> that work never got around to it. The reason the BP was sitting around for
> so
> long is mostly because I'm terrible at the lp maintenance. I apologize for
> any
> confusion that caused. I took some time this afternoon to go through open
> blueprints and specs repo to clean things up. I marked this particular BP
> as
> obsolete now to reflect it's actual state.
>
> You're correct in your assertion that we will be moving to a limited set of
> projects for which tests are maintained in the tempest tree. The plan is
> to have
> everything else that wants to use tempest for testing but doesn't fit into
> that
> set of projects leverage tempest-lib and the plugin interface which is
> currently
> in progress. However, until all the pieces are in place, including docs to
> explain this all, we're not blocking additions for projects that are
> currently
> in-tree but outside that set. (which does not include barbican because
> nothing
> was ever added)
>
> -Matt Treinish
>
> >
> > The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests I
> > linked in my earlier email.
> >
> > - - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> >
> > On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > > Hi Douglas ,
> > >
> > > Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the
> > > Barbican APIs.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri
> > > mailto:asha.seshag...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to
> > > the right link
> > >
> > > I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican
> > > APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same
> > > .
> > >
> > > [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-te
> > sts.html
> > >
> > >
> > [2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-ba
> > rbican
> > >
> > > Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now I
> > > could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendiz?bal
> > >  > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Asha,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking
> > > for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
> > > functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> > >
> > > We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the
> > > Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away
> > > from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using
> > > tempest-lib.
> > >
> > > - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
> > >
> > >
> > s
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > >> Hi All ,
> > >
> > >> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help
> > >> would be highly appreciated.
> > >
> > >> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> > >
> > >
> > > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-02 Thread Matthew Treinish 
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:30:55PM -0500, Douglas Mendiz?bal wrote:

> Hi Asha,
> 
> The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think it
> pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all project
> tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete, but someone
> from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.

Yes, that blueprint was quite old and if you look at the history for it there
was nary a patch submitted against it. So, I guess whoever was planning to do
that work never got around to it. The reason the BP was sitting around for so
long is mostly because I'm terrible at the lp maintenance. I apologize for any
confusion that caused. I took some time this afternoon to go through open
blueprints and specs repo to clean things up. I marked this particular BP as
obsolete now to reflect it's actual state.

You're correct in your assertion that we will be moving to a limited set of
projects for which tests are maintained in the tempest tree. The plan is to have
everything else that wants to use tempest for testing but doesn't fit into that
set of projects leverage tempest-lib and the plugin interface which is currently
in progress. However, until all the pieces are in place, including docs to
explain this all, we're not blocking additions for projects that are currently
in-tree but outside that set. (which does not include barbican because nothing
was ever added)

-Matt Treinish

> 
> The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests I
> linked in my earlier email.
> 
> - - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> 
> On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > Hi Douglas ,
> > 
> > Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the
> > Barbican APIs.
> > 
> > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri
> > mailto:asha.seshag...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to 
> > the right link
> > 
> > I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican
> > APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same
> > .
> > 
> > [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-te
> sts.html
> >
> > 
> [2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-ba
> rbican
> > 
> > Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now I
> > could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> > 
> > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendiz?bal 
> >  > > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Asha,
> > 
> > I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking
> > for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the 
> > functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> > 
> > We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the 
> > Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away
> > from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using
> > tempest-lib.
> > 
> > - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> > 
> > [1] 
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
> >
> > 
> s
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> >> Hi All ,
> > 
> >> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help
> >> would be highly appreciated.
> > 
> >> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> > 
> > 
> > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Douglas Mendizábal 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Asha,

Information for running the Functional tests can be found in our
official documentation. [1]

- - Douglas Mendizábal

[1]
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/barbican/testing.html#functional-tes
ts

On 7/1/15 5:08 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> Thanks a lot Douglas for your response :) I would like to know the
> steps required to configure and run automated functional test cases
> for  validating Barbican APIs.
> 
> Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> 
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Douglas Mendizábal 
>  > wrote:
> 
> Hi Asha,
> 
> The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think
> it pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all
> project tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete,
> but someone from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.
> 
> The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests
> I linked in my earlier email.
> 
> - Douglas Mendizábal
> 
> On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
>> Hi Douglas ,
> 
>> Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the 
>> Barbican APIs.
> 
>> Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri 
>> mailto:asha.seshag...@gmail.com>
>  >>
>> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me
>> to the right link
> 
>> I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican 
>> APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the
>> same .
> 
>> [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-t
e
>
>> 
sts.html
> 
> 
sts.html>
> 
> 
> [2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-
ba
>
> 
rbican
> 
>> Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now
>> I could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> 
>> Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendizábal 
>>  
>>  >> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Asha,
> 
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're
>> looking for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them
>> in the functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> 
>> We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the 
>> Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away 
>> from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using 
>> tempest-lib.
> 
>> - Douglas Mendizábal
> 
>> [1] 
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
>
>> 
> 
> s
> 
> 
>> On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
>>> Hi All ,
> 
>>> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help 
>>> would be highly appreciated.
> 
>>> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> 
>> _
_
>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: 
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
>>
> 

>>> 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
>> _
_
>
>> 

> 
> 
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
>>
> 

> 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
>> _
_
>
>> 

> 
> 
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
>>
> 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __

>
> 
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> 
>
> 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> ___

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri 
Thanks a lot Douglas for your response :)
I would like to know the steps required to configure and run automated
functional test cases for  validating Barbican APIs.

Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Douglas Mendizábal <
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi Asha,
>
> The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think it
> pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all project
> tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete, but someone
> from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests I
> linked in my earlier email.
>
> - - Douglas Mendizábal
>
> On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > Hi Douglas ,
> >
> > Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the
> > Barbican APIs.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri
> > mailto:asha.seshag...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to
> > the right link
> >
> > I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican
> > APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same
> > .
> >
> > [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-te
> sts.html
> >
> >
> [2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-ba
> rbican
> >
> > Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now I
> > could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> >
> > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendizábal
> >  > > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Asha,
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking
> > for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
> > functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> >
> > We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the
> > Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away
> > from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using
> > tempest-lib.
> >
> > - Douglas Mendizábal
> >
> > [1]
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
> >
> >
> s
> >
> >
> > On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> >> Hi All ,
> >
> >> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help
> >> would be highly appreciated.
> >
> >> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> >
> >
> >
> > __
> >
> >
> 
> >
> >
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > 
> >>
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > __
> 
> >
> >
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > 
> >
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> >
> >
> > __
> 
> >
> >
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVlE3/AAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX70vcP/imbbk9quMlxpX0IbGTOuoAH
> +cpiUU0g9dQFawjQQpVXQhalR1JNOIhZlFICP1VHama6mh/HChuM4EUS/Ic/w4Dd
> eRGamkwG2l/OWWdNaE7l4y6kCgvT6QQQFKwJNG6HgJtChs4u9aL6WgQS85ACaw70
> I6ZK0QBXXe/VQFMmxWqYflHmDF6G5UP+4BzGcwIO41tWKKYf9V0rFh5JBDDFW7yC
> A6YuWNGHfR3OqJuS5hw0if2q94LXzw2qKI6eMMmiV9OAT0U/mLufTPpNkH37DJ0w
> CCQudKlqZQN0FELhr1oxM88KVoOD0N1S/yOfjNA4TdvvpB/2EIt+t8GZZKoXeLtx
> YfzPsa1cBO/zpgoiPO6zCqF7HvUMwSnPEBnRAQl15mXUfSKJJJzh0GaCEQ5bjTIb
> 2s+xQIyBAXuUtTPYJMzHlw2nEeov77U+OvR90lswSuppO/du3YTYfJX799pqTLg5
> QY4bsuxQpdVlHV+nu4mC2cImU0ZUVTzNDCMKgWbw30Ni+yc9TDTlZs301/odHrjy
> WuiKkXId/Fp5hYh7dSvt4wMKO0XdiMUiSNP1KybO0smCvCxa5AhcsiL1nZ05f+cG
> eylLvYheaEGemnsTy1SVOQ0UowA7sDAaaOTl9KBhvAYZS+dWHwaC5ZJzDB/rRdnG
> WELJUjLwg2V2MSGFRiIk
> =G1kZ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
*Than

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Douglas Mendizábal 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi Asha,

The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think it
pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all project
tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete, but someone
from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.

The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests I
linked in my earlier email.

- - Douglas Mendizábal

On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> Hi Douglas ,
> 
> Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the
> Barbican APIs.
> 
> Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> 
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri
> mailto:asha.seshag...@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to 
> the right link
> 
> I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican
> APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same
> .
> 
> [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-te
sts.html
>
> 
[2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-ba
rbican
> 
> Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now I
> could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> 
> Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendizábal 
>  > wrote:
> 
> Hi Asha,
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking
> for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the 
> functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> 
> We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the 
> Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away
> from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using
> tempest-lib.
> 
> - Douglas Mendizábal
> 
> [1] 
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
>
> 
s
> 
> 
> On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
>> Hi All ,
> 
>> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help
>> would be highly appreciated.
> 
>> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> 
> __
>
> 

> 
> 
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
>>
> 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __

>
> 
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> 
>
> 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> __

>
> 
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVlE3/AAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX70vcP/imbbk9quMlxpX0IbGTOuoAH
+cpiUU0g9dQFawjQQpVXQhalR1JNOIhZlFICP1VHama6mh/HChuM4EUS/Ic/w4Dd
eRGamkwG2l/OWWdNaE7l4y6kCgvT6QQQFKwJNG6HgJtChs4u9aL6WgQS85ACaw70
I6ZK0QBXXe/VQFMmxWqYflHmDF6G5UP+4BzGcwIO41tWKKYf9V0rFh5JBDDFW7yC
A6YuWNGHfR3OqJuS5hw0if2q94LXzw2qKI6eMMmiV9OAT0U/mLufTPpNkH37DJ0w
CCQudKlqZQN0FELhr1oxM88KVoOD0N1S/yOfjNA4TdvvpB/2EIt+t8GZZKoXeLtx
YfzPsa1cBO/zpgoiPO6zCqF7HvUMwSnPEBnRAQl15mXUfSKJJJzh0GaCEQ5bjTIb
2s+xQIyBAXuUtTPYJMzHlw2nEeov77U+OvR90lswSuppO/du3YTYfJX799pqTLg5
QY4bsuxQpdVlHV+nu4mC2cImU0ZUVTzNDCMKgWbw30Ni+yc9TDTlZs301/odHrjy
WuiKkXId/Fp5hYh7dSvt4wMKO0XdiMUiSNP1KybO0smCvCxa5AhcsiL1nZ05f+cG
eylLvYheaEGemnsTy1SVOQ0UowA7sDAaaOTl9KBhvAYZS+dWHwaC5ZJzDB/rRdnG
WELJUjLwg2V2MSGFRiIk
=G1kZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri 
Hi Douglas ,

Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the Barbican APIs.

Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri 
wrote:

> Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to the
> right link
>
> I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican APIs
> Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same .
>
> [1]
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-tests.html
> [2]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-barbican
>
> Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican?
> Now I could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Asha Seshagiri
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendizábal <
> douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> Hi Asha,
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking for
>> Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
>> functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
>>
>> We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the Tempest
>> repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away from one
>> monolithic repository into a modular approach using tempest-lib.
>>
>> - - Douglas Mendizábal
>>
>> [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
>> s
>>
>>
>> On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
>> > Hi All ,
>> >
>> > Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help would
>> > be highly appreciated.
>> >
>> > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
>> >
>> >
>> > __
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
>> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVlEAyAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX7NBYQAJB/ArYrW0LDitmlaTcupf8I
>> B+LjBD6uMLI0nsFx4dOFu/FROSe37XkNvWumkj96wPZcmZNx1wuOntuyYu7STMBH
>> Z+3JHxLwEdW5A3j0437IuNf14y8JZhio1+txMa0MWEEWIkfk/15Ppz3vhkKgfKsc
>> ldMxQ0RboH5xXOWpIpCa8S022I+N2Erhp7Rn1xKA0rICKzvhpa87lB2aFZdZ3NMw
>> pgM3W1Nzongl+zG0NHxqtxBX2y41nvzWSX7slvcjE1LIjPcBuc12Ja9WM6piZj/L
>> +CxLHf8hAfZDxUDEm1Uwm9yvaWFtQFw684+CksRB4uq6KMGpF1EYOvnfoHtC71X9
>> GokjNYZoz8vqkRdtXHvMwUTPH1V+G3y0mBL2eAZspfxjcfqkDudilkMdmEAhPWLy
>> ihsH/S5g4SCgozYb9sZ9RJxNN/lGJodjyg3ODdFUwjPQtryejryVp2EOryA0T5Pd
>> 7M7Zlhmm/NlZzwQBqQxDmVFHNU3baYizLTinPiYtURNmy6CqDs8WAWR/Br0oGJUI
>> 5vL/y5hjPBR+WJV9IXfT0EuNqFTck1r0+vm/isez4hM2T7wFJcpFSPXS7l1GKxsx
>> HTOqvujAOREcGfLYBBwwCoKCmDWoTqBjxUfY182sjYoUx1SnL5Ws01AdRcU3oNIl
>> dEpBJSS6YgwvUZkjUJD2
>> =FKK1
>> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Thanks and Regards,*
> *Asha Seshagiri*
>



-- 
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri 
Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to the
right link

I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican APIs
Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same .

[1]
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-tests.html
[2]
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-barbican

Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican?
Now I could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs

Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri




On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendizábal <
douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi Asha,
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking for
> Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
> functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
>
> We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the Tempest
> repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away from one
> monolithic repository into a modular approach using tempest-lib.
>
> - - Douglas Mendizábal
>
> [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
> s
>
>
> On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > Hi All ,
> >
> > Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help would
> > be highly appreciated.
> >
> > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> >
> >
> > __
> 
> >
> >
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVlEAyAAoJEB7Z2EQgmLX7NBYQAJB/ArYrW0LDitmlaTcupf8I
> B+LjBD6uMLI0nsFx4dOFu/FROSe37XkNvWumkj96wPZcmZNx1wuOntuyYu7STMBH
> Z+3JHxLwEdW5A3j0437IuNf14y8JZhio1+txMa0MWEEWIkfk/15Ppz3vhkKgfKsc
> ldMxQ0RboH5xXOWpIpCa8S022I+N2Erhp7Rn1xKA0rICKzvhpa87lB2aFZdZ3NMw
> pgM3W1Nzongl+zG0NHxqtxBX2y41nvzWSX7slvcjE1LIjPcBuc12Ja9WM6piZj/L
> +CxLHf8hAfZDxUDEm1Uwm9yvaWFtQFw684+CksRB4uq6KMGpF1EYOvnfoHtC71X9
> GokjNYZoz8vqkRdtXHvMwUTPH1V+G3y0mBL2eAZspfxjcfqkDudilkMdmEAhPWLy
> ihsH/S5g4SCgozYb9sZ9RJxNN/lGJodjyg3ODdFUwjPQtryejryVp2EOryA0T5Pd
> 7M7Zlhmm/NlZzwQBqQxDmVFHNU3baYizLTinPiYtURNmy6CqDs8WAWR/Br0oGJUI
> 5vL/y5hjPBR+WJV9IXfT0EuNqFTck1r0+vm/isez4hM2T7wFJcpFSPXS7l1GKxsx
> HTOqvujAOREcGfLYBBwwCoKCmDWoTqBjxUfY182sjYoUx1SnL5Ws01AdRcU3oNIl
> dEpBJSS6YgwvUZkjUJD2
> =FKK1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Douglas Mendizábal 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi Asha,

I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking for
Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.

We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the Tempest
repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away from one
monolithic repository into a modular approach using tempest-lib.

- - Douglas Mendizábal

[1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
s


On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> Hi All ,
> 
> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help would
> be highly appreciated.
> 
> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> 
> 
> __

>
> 
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=FKK1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

2015-07-01 Thread Asha Seshagiri 
Hi All ,

Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API
Any help would be highly appreciated.

-- 
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev