Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-14 Thread Samuel Bercovici
11 people have responded so far.
Please note that tomorrow is the last day to do the survey.
I will close the survey and publish the results sometimes tomorrow night.

Regards,
   -Sam.

On 9 במאי 2014, at 15:59, Stephen Balukoff 
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote:

Sam,

That deadline seems reasonable to me. I should have time later today or later 
this weekend to fill it out.

Thanks,
Stephen


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Samuel Bercovici 
samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com wrote:
Hi,

9 people have filled the survey so far.
See attached pdf.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:51 PM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi everyone,

I think that it is a good feedback to prioritize features.
I can publish the results in time for the 2nd LBaaS meeting (so deadline would 
be end of 15th May “summit time”)
Is this acceptable?

-Sam.



From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Samuel--

I've been heads down working on API proposal review documentation, and haven't 
had time to fill it out yet. Do you have a deadline by which we should have 
filled out the survey to get our voices heard?

Thanks,
Stephen

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Samuel Bercovici 
samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com wrote:

6 people have completed the survey so far.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone,

The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
The password is: lbaas

The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information to 
base decisions next week.

Regards,
-Sam.



From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.




___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807tel:%28800%29613-4305%20x807

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-09 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Sam,

That deadline seems reasonable to me. I should have time later today or
later this weekend to fill it out.

Thanks,
Stephen


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote:

  Hi,



 9 people have filled the survey so far.

 See attached pdf.



 Regards,

 -Sam.





 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:51 PM

 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi everyone,



 I think that it is a good feedback to prioritize features.

 I can publish the results in time for the 2nd LBaaS meeting (so deadline
 would be end of 15th May “summit time”)

 Is this acceptable?



 -Sam.







 *From:* Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.netsbaluk...@bluebox.net]

 *Sent:* Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:17 AM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi Samuel--



 I've been heads down working on API proposal review documentation, and
 haven't had time to fill it out yet. Do you have a deadline by which we
 should have filled out the survey to get our voices heard?



 Thanks,

 Stephen



 On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.com
 wrote:

 6 people have completed the survey so far.





 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM


 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi Everyone,



 The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user

 The password is: lbaas



 The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from
 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing

 Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information
 to base decisions next week.



 Regards,

 -Sam.







 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi,



 I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements
 which are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)

 I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to
 reflect most common use cases.

 I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing
 use cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.



 Regards,

 -Sam.





 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi Everyone!



 To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have
 ~45 use cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something
 like surveymonkey.

 The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask
 you identify and vote.

 Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.



 To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for
 editing and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish
 the survey link to ML ASAP after that.



 Please let me know if this is acceptable.



 Regards,

 -Sam.








 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev





 --
 Stephen Balukoff
 Blue Box Group, LLC
 (800)613-4305 x807

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-07 Thread Samuel Bercovici
The survey is not anonymous and I plan to publish it with its raw data we can 
then discuss how to interpret.
Each use case has an accompanying text field so that you can add any comments 
you wish.
At least I did add comments to most use cases when I responded :-)


-Sam.


-Original Message-
From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:16 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a 
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each use 
case to capture extra thoughts.

I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely 
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the supposed 
purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding which use-cases 
matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real variance for what I would 
vote versus what my teammates would vote, since we have the same customersŠ


Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of 
large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is being 
used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes for smaller 
companies so that we do not alienate them from further voting/discussions?

Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:

On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
 Sam,

 I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
 I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat 
 least I'd hope!

I'd hope not! :)

Even within the same organization or company, we all have different 
ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the 
cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of 
things.

I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than 
myself fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.

Best,
-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-07 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Jorge,

It's your call. I prefer to gather information for now, if multiple people from 
the same organization will have drastically different answers, than this should 
also be considered.

-Sam.


From: Jorge Miramontes [mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 9:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Sam,

I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct? I'm 
pretty sure people in each organization will vote the same...at least I'd hope!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone,

The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
The password is: lbaas

The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information to 
base decisions next week.

Regards,
-Sam.



From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-07 Thread Samuel Bercovici
6 people have completed the survey so far.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone,

The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
The password is: lbaas

The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information to 
base decisions next week.

Regards,
-Sam.



From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-07 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Samuel--

I've been heads down working on API proposal review documentation, and
haven't had time to fill it out yet. Do you have a deadline by which we
should have filled out the survey to get our voices heard?

Thanks,
Stephen


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote:

  6 people have completed the survey so far.





 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM

 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi Everyone,



 The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user

 The password is: lbaas



 The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from
 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing

 Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information
 to base decisions next week.



 Regards,

 -Sam.







 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi,



 I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements
 which are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)

 I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to
 reflect most common use cases.

 I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing
 use cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.



 Regards,

 -Sam.





 *From:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Sent:* Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 *Cc:* Samuel Bercovici
 *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey



 Hi Everyone!



 To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have
 ~45 use cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something
 like surveymonkey.

 The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask
 you identify and vote.

 Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.



 To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for
 editing and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish
 the survey link to ML ASAP after that.



 Please let me know if this is acceptable.



 Regards,

 -Sam.







 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi Everyone,

The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
The password is: lbaas

The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information to 
base decisions next week.

Regards,
-Sam.



From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Sam,

I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct? I'm 
pretty sure people in each organization will vote the same…at least I'd hope!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 2:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone,

The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
The password is: lbaas

The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information to 
base decisions next week.

Regards,
-Sam.



From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jay Pipes

On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:

Sam,

I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the same…at least
I'd hope!


I'd hope not! :)

Even within the same organization or company, we all have different 
ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the 
cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of 
things.


I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself 
fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.


Best,
-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jorge Miramontes
I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.

I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the
supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding
which use-cases matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real
variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since
we have the same customersŠ


Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of
large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is
being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes
for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further
voting/discussions?

Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:

On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
 Sam,

 I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
 I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least
 I'd hope!

I'd hope not! :)

Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the
cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of
things.

I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself
fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.

Best,
-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Adam Harwell
I'd like to add that size of the organization (or really, size of the
development team) that is voting in this quiz does not directly correlate
to size of customer base. If there were any weighting happening, I'd hope
these answers would be weighted by size of user base, since really it is
the users' interests we are all trying to represent, not our own!

--Adam

On 5/6/14 2:16 PM, Jorge Miramontes jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com
wrote:

I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.

I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the
supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding
which use-cases matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real
variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since
we have the same customersŠ


Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of
large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is
being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes
for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further
voting/discussions?

Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:

On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
 Sam,

 I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
 I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least
 I'd hope!

I'd hope not! :)

Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the
cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of
things.

I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself
fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.

Best,
-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Stephen Balukoff
I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public as
well--  meaning that it should be possible to come up with a
representative average per organization, as well as several other ways to
interpret the data. Right now, the emphasis is just to gather the data. We
can decide how to interpret it later.

There's a reason this survey is not anonymous. :)

Thanks,
Stephen



On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Adam Harwell adam.harw...@rackspace.comwrote:

 I'd like to add that size of the organization (or really, size of the
 development team) that is voting in this quiz does not directly correlate
 to size of customer base. If there were any weighting happening, I'd hope
 these answers would be weighted by size of user base, since really it is
 the users' interests we are all trying to represent, not our own!

 --Adam

 On 5/6/14 2:16 PM, Jorge Miramontes jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com
 wrote:

 I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
 representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
 use case to capture extra thoughts.
 
 I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
 varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the
 supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding
 which use-cases matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real
 variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since
 we have the same customersŠ
 
 
 Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of
 large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is
 being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes
 for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further
 voting/discussions?
 
 Cheers,
 --Jorge
 
 
 
 
 On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
  Sam,
 
  I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
  I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least
  I'd hope!
 
 I'd hope not! :)
 
 Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
 ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the
 cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of
 things.
 
 I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself
 fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.
 
 Best,
 -jay
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jay Pipes

On 05/06/2014 03:16 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:

I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.


Because all of us have different experiences. Not all of us have worked 
for the specific company we work at now for the past 20 years. We all 
have different customer experiences and use cases based on a variety of 
job positions and past employers.



I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*


You have only one type of customer?

, since that is the

supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding
which use-cases matter *to our customers*,


Yep, and there are many different types of customers even within a 
single company. I'm sure you don't assume that RAX Public Cloud 
customers have the same needs of RAX private cloud or enterprise hosting 
customers. At the same time, is there a single person at RAX that can 
adequately speak for all those segments? As a former Racker, I can 
remember meeting no such person.


 so there should be no real

variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since
we have the same customersŠ


And there are multiple teams at Rackspace, no?


Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of
large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is
being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes
for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further
voting/discussions?


Through consensus and discussion, same as any other OpenStack project.

Best,
-jay


Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:


On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:

Sam,

I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least
I'd hope!


I'd hope not! :)

Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things in the
cloud, and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of
things.

I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself
fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.

Best,
-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jay Pipes

On 05/06/2014 04:22 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:

I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public
as well--  meaning that it should be possible to come up with a
representative average per organization, as well as several other ways
to interpret the data. Right now, the emphasis is just to gather the
data. We can decide how to interpret it later.


I don't think a representative average for each organization is 
necessarily useful (compared to the average over some larger grouping), 
but sure, the focus should be on data collection now, not interpretation.



There's a reason this survey is not anonymous. :)


++

-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-06 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Okay, makes sense to gather all data now and interpret this later. I'm too
jaded for these types of debates right now since the summit is around the
corner.

Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 3:32 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:

On 05/06/2014 04:22 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
 I think the plan is to release all the raw results of this to the public
 as well--  meaning that it should be possible to come up with a
 representative average per organization, as well as several other ways
 to interpret the data. Right now, the emphasis is just to gather the
 data. We can decide how to interpret it later.

I don't think a representative average for each organization is
necessarily useful (compared to the average over some larger grouping),
but sure, the focus should be on data collection now, not interpretation.

 There's a reason this survey is not anonymous. :)

++

-jay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-05 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi,

I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements which 
are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to reflect 
most common use cases.
I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing use 
cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.

Regards,
-Sam.


From: Samuel Bercovici
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Samuel Bercovici
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-01 Thread Jorge Miramontes
That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have 
prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want to 
ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually agreed 
upon. Thanks for spearheading this!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-01 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Yep, I'm all for this as well!

Note: We're just talking about user use cases in this survey, correct?
 (We'll leave the operator use cases for later when we have more of a story
and/or model to work with on how we're going to approach those, yes?)

Thanks,
Stephen


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Miramontes 
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:

   That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have
 prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want
 to ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually
 agreed upon. Thanks for spearheading this!

  Cheers,
 --Jorge

   From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.com
 Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:39 PM
 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!



 To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have
 ~45 use cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something
 like surveymonkey.

 The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask
 you identify and vote.

 Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.



 To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for
 editing and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish
 the survey link to ML ASAP after that.



 Please let me know if this is acceptable.



 Regards,

 -Sam.








 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-01 Thread Eichberger, German
Stephen,

I would prefer if we can vote on them, too. They are essential and I would like 
to make sure they are considered first-class citizen when it comes to use cases.

Thanks,
German

From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:52 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Yep, I'm all for this as well!

Note: We're just talking about user use cases in this survey, correct?  
(We'll leave the operator use cases for later when we have more of a story 
and/or model to work with on how we're going to approach those, yes?)

Thanks,
Stephen

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Miramontes 
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.commailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have 
prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want to 
ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually agreed 
upon. Thanks for spearheading this!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam.




___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

2014-05-01 Thread Carlos Garza
 Balukoff I'm liking your API spec so far but can you elaborate on what 
this loadbalancer object you refer to is. on page You declare its immutable and 
refer to it like an actual primitive object yet I don't
see a schema for it. I see loadbalancer_id in the vip request that reference. 
The top part of the doc declares a loadbalancer is is the first object created 
according to the definition in the glossary.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/Glossary#Loadbalancer where it is 
defined as the root Object that is first created or can be fully populated but 
in you API proposal it looks like the vip object is the created top level 
primitive with flavor attribute is apart of a VIP. Are you intending to rename 
what we call a loadbalancer to a VIP? Could you provide a work flow of a 
created loadbalancer. It looks good either way.

Is it cool if we rename ca_certificate_id to client_ca or client_ca_certificate 
to make it clear the purpose of the CA is to snub clients. Later on if we need 
to do encryption to back end pool members that have x509s signed by their own 
CA we can then use a parameter like reencryption_ca_certificate.

Consider the following cases.

The user wants SSL_ID based persistence on an HTTPS LoadBalancer where the 
loadbalancer does not know the key or cert but has access to the unencrypted 
RFC5246: 7.4.1.2 uncrypted Session ID
to identify persistence to the back end HTTPS pool member?

On the pool side of the loadbalaancer can a loadbalancer still encrypt if no 
ca_certificate_id or client_certificate_id is present? How would they signal to 
the api that they extend to encrypt with out host name validation or even vert 
validation at all. Not sure why they would want to other then they don't feel 
the need to pay for certs on their backend nodes or worse yes pay for a signing 
cert.

The user feels secure on their network and wants SSL termination at the 
loadbalancer so the loadbalancer has the Cert and Key and extends to use plain 
old HTTP to the pool members with some headers injected. What would the 
protocol on the listener be HTTPS and would placing a CERT and KEY imply 
deception should happen.

Also I've been burned in an earlier project when I started noticing some CA's 
were using ECDSA certs instead of RSA? should we take non RSA x509s into 
account as well? Right now it looks like the API assumes everything is RSA.


By placing
On May 1, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Stephen Balukoff 
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote:

German,

They certainly are essential-- but as far as I can tell, we haven't been 
concentrating on them, so the list there is likely very incomplete.

Stephen


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Eichberger, German 
german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
Stephen,

I would prefer if we can vote on them, too. They are essential and I would like 
to make sure they are considered first-class citizen when it comes to use cases.

Thanks,
German

From: Stephen Balukoff 
[mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:52 PM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey


Yep, I'm all for this as well!

Note: We're just talking about user use cases in this survey, correct?  
(We'll leave the operator use cases for later when we have more of a story 
and/or model to work with on how we're going to approach those, yes?)

Thanks,
Stephen

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Jorge Miramontes 
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.commailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have 
prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want to 
ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually agreed 
upon. Thanks for spearheading this!

Cheers,
--Jorge

From: Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.commailto:samu...@radware.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, May 1, 2014 12:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey

Hi Everyone!

To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use 
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like 
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you 
identify and vote.
Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.

To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for editing 
and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish the survey 
link to ML ASAP after that.

Please let me know if this is acceptable.

Regards,
-Sam