Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dmitry Tantsurwrote: > On 08/22/2016 08:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. >> Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're >> wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. >> >> Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? > > > I think the best option is to run it as wsgi in the same Apache instance as > e.g. Horizon (and I guess Keystone and other services in the future as > well), just with a different leading path. Not sure how doable it is though. > I am sure that that is the Correct Way to do it. We don't want another process listening on a different port after we've put all this effort into getting everything in WSGI. Is that doable in the time we have remaining? --Hugh -- , ,| Hugh Brock, hbr...@redhat.com )-_"""_-(| Director of Engineering, OpenStack Management ./ o\ /o \. | TripleO: Install, configure, and scale OpenStack. . \__/ \__/ . | http://rdoproject.org, http://tripleo.org ... V ... | ... - - - ... | "I know that you believe you understand what you . - - . | think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what `-.-ยด| you heard is not what I meant." --Robert McCloskey "TripleOwl" __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app
On 08/22/2016 08:08 AM, Honza Pokorny wrote: Hello folks, We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? I think the best option is to run it as wsgi in the same Apache instance as e.g. Horizon (and I guess Keystone and other services in the future as well), just with a different leading path. Not sure how doable it is though. Thanks Honza Pokorny __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app
On 22.8.2016 08:08, Honza Pokorny wrote: Hello folks, We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? Thanks Honza Pokorny __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev It would probably be nice to run it on port 80. Not sure if it will collide with anything in undercloud. Horizon maybe? -- Jirka __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Honza Pokornywrote: > Hello folks, > > We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. > Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're > wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. > > Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? > > Thanks > > Honza Pokorny > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev Based on http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/config-reference/firewalls-default-ports.html 3000 should be unused so far. IANA has assigned 3000 and there is widespread use colliding with it as well, but neither looks like something that would collide in Undercloud: hbci 3000tcpHBCI [Kurt_Haubner][Kurt_Haubner] hbci 3000udpHBCI [Kurt_Haubner][Kurt_Haubner] remoteware-cl 3000tcpRemoteWare Client [Tim_Farley] [Tim_Farley] This entry records an unassigned but widespread use remoteware-cl 3000udpRemoteWare Client [Tim_Farley] [Tim_Farley] This entry records an unassigned but widespread use So by the quick look the 3000 is likely as bad choice as any unassigned for it by IANA one. - Erno __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][UI] Port number for frontend app
On 22/08/16 08:08, Honza Pokorny wrote: > Hello folks, > > We've been using port 3000 for the GUI during development and testing. > Now that we're working on packaging and shipping our code, we're > wondering if port 3000 is still the best choice. > > Would 3000 conflict with any other services? Is there a better option? grafana from opstools uses the same port[1] That being said, I wonder if someone would install both services on the same node. [1] https://github.com/centos-opstools/opstools-doc/blob/master/performance-monitoring.txt#L70 Matthias -- Matthias RungeRed Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill, Eric Shander __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev