Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-16 Thread Alan Pevec
 let's release this last one (codename: Farewell ?) point release. I
 can do this next week after we finish pending reviews.

Remaining stable/icehouse reviews[1] have -2 or -1 except
https://review.openstack.org/176019 which I've asked
neutron-stable-maint to review.
Matt, anything else before we can tag 2014.1.5 and icehouse-eol ?

Cheers,
Alan

[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+AND+branch:stable/icehouse+AND+%28project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/keystone+OR+project:openstack/glance+OR+project:openstack/cinder+OR+project:openstack/neutron+OR+project:openstack/horizon+OR+project:openstack/heat+OR+project:openstack/ceilometer+OR+project:openstack/trove%29,n,z

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-04 Thread Alan Pevec
 The only open question I have is if we need to do an Icehouse point release
 prior to the tag and dropping the branch, but I don't think that's happened
 in the past with branch end of life - the eol tag basically serves as the
 placeholder to the last 'release'.

 I don't think we need to do a point release, there will be the icehouse-eol
 tag which will mark the same thing. But, even if we later decide to add a
 point release to mark the same thing it is trivial to push another tag for
 the same sha1.

 I CC-ed the stable branch release managers for their opinion on it. We
 definitely announced a 2014.1.5 last icehouse release, so I think we
 should probably do one. Ideally we would have time to coordinate it in
 the coming week so that both plans are compatible.

Based on previoius 15 months plan, 2014.1.5 was targeting July 2015,
so releasing it next week would be close enough:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranchRelease#Planned_stable.2Ficehouse_releases

I'm not sure if release machinery would work after removing the branch
so let's release this last one (codename: Farewell ?) point release. I
can do this next week after we finish pending reviews.

Cheers,
Alan

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Matthew Treinish wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:06:29AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
 Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at
 the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2].

 I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and we're down to at
 least one screen of changes now [3].

 My thinking was once we've processed that list, i.e. either approved what
 we're going to approve or -2 what we aren't, then we should proceed with
 doing the icehouse-eol tag and deleting the branch.

 Is everyone generally in agreement with doing this soon?  If so, then I'm
 thinking target a week from today for the stable maint core team to scrub
 the list of open reviews in the next week and we then get the infra team to
 tag the branch and close it out.
 
 Not really a surprise, but I support doing this soon. Next week seems fine
 to me.

Right, I also support doing this sometimes this month.

 The only open question I have is if we need to do an Icehouse point release
 prior to the tag and dropping the branch, but I don't think that's happened
 in the past with branch end of life - the eol tag basically serves as the
 placeholder to the last 'release'.
 
 I don't think we need to do a point release, there will be the icehouse-eol
 tag which will mark the same thing. But, even if we later decide to add a
 point release to mark the same thing it is trivial to push another tag for
 the same sha1.

I CC-ed the stable branch release managers for their opinion on it. We
definitely announced a 2014.1.5 last icehouse release, so I think we
should probably do one. Ideally we would have time to coordinate it in
the coming week so that both plans are compatible.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Targeting icehouse-eol?

2015-06-03 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 09:06:29AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
 Following on the thread about no longer doing stable point releases [1] at
 the summit we talked about doing icehouse-eol pretty soon [2].
 
 I scrubbed the open stable/icehouse patches last week and we're down to at
 least one screen of changes now [3].
 
 My thinking was once we've processed that list, i.e. either approved what
 we're going to approve or -2 what we aren't, then we should proceed with
 doing the icehouse-eol tag and deleting the branch.
 
 Is everyone generally in agreement with doing this soon?  If so, then I'm
 thinking target a week from today for the stable maint core team to scrub
 the list of open reviews in the next week and we then get the infra team to
 tag the branch and close it out.

Not really a surprise, but I support doing this soon. Next week seems fine
to me.

 
 The only open question I have is if we need to do an Icehouse point release
 prior to the tag and dropping the branch, but I don't think that's happened
 in the past with branch end of life - the eol tag basically serves as the
 placeholder to the last 'release'.

I don't think we need to do a point release, there will be the icehouse-eol
tag which will mark the same thing. But, even if we later decide to add a
point release to mark the same thing it is trivial to push another tag for
the same sha1.

 
 [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-May/065144.html
 [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-relmgt-stable-branch
 [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:stable/icehouse,n,z
 


-Matt Treinish


pgp0XpfsPKAOn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev