Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-04 Thread Anne Gentle 
Atsushi, you have been a lifesaver in triaging the openstack-api-site bugs!
Much appreciated. Our workflow is so smooth and fluid since you've joined,
thank you so much.

Anne

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Atsushi SAKAI 
wrote:

> Lana
>
> Thank you for commenting me.
>
> > I use the russelbryant stats
> > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > I haven't heard anything specific from Atsushi-san.
>
> I am doing launchpad bugs reviewing mainly (api-site and manuals)
>   (but I recognize working contribution is low at this moment.)
>
> for example (commenting bug list, not confirmed bug list)
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/~sakaia/+commentedbugs?orderby=-id=0
>
> Thanks
> Atsushi SAKAI
>
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:39:37 +1000
> Lana Brindley  wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > I use the russelbryant stats (which are linked in the headers), because
> of comments made on this list back when we changed the process. The main
> reason, IIRC, was because it was more specific to openstack-manuals. Happy
> to reopen that conversation, though. In my core reviews, when I use the
> term "not appearing in any stats", I mean not appearing on my spreadsheet
> (which only looks at the top 12 in each c ategory). I can change the
> wording of this to make it clearer.
> >
> > I note that, while Matt is still participating at a high level, he just
> isn't in the top 12. I put this down to increased focus on the Install
> Guide testing, but I'm happy to hear from Matt if I've made an erroneous
> assumption there. To respond to Andreas' query about other underperforming
> cores, I can explain that Christian and Darren are both focussed on other
> interest areas right now, and forewarned me that their contributions would
> drop. They will both be returning to normal shortly. I haven't heard
> anything specific from Atsushi-san.
> >
> > Hope that helps,
> > Lana
> >
> > On 04/03/16 00:37, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mariia Zlatkova <
> mzlatk...@mirantis.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I thought we were using this link:
> > >> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > >>
> > >>
> > > To root cause this misperception, I want to point out that I clicked
> the
> > > links in the column headers. Lana, can you fix those? Whether we point
> to
> > > stackalytics or russelbryant may also be a point to discuss.
> > >
> > > Anne
> > >
> > >
> > >> Maria
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Steve Gordon 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> - Original Message -
> >  From: "Anne Gentle" 
> >  To: "Andreas Jaeger" 
> > 
> >  On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > >> Hi core team,
> > >>
> > >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]:
> > >>
> > >> Current cores not appearing in any stats:
> > >> Matthew Kassawara
> > >>
> > >> Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t
> > >>> run
> > >> through Gerrit), so this is expected. It’s also expected to impact
> > >>> the
> > >> stats of other core reviewers involved in that task.
> > >>
> > >
> > > What does "not appearing in any stats" mean exactly?
> > >
> > >
> >  I couldn't find him on Stackalytics, take a look at this (which
> makes me
> >  wonder if the affiliation change is broken?)
> > 
> > 
> > >>>
> http://stackalytics.com/?module=openstack-manuals=liberty=commits_id=ionosphere80
> > >>>
> > >>> That query is explicitly pinned to liberty only and also measuring
> > >>> commits not reviews. I would think these are the more relevant
> stackalytics
> > >>> views (and Matt is on them):
> > >>>
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/30
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/90
> > >>>
> > >>> I still tend to use Russell's stats at:
> > >>>
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-30.txt
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-60.txt
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-90.txt
> > >>>
> > >>> -Steve
> > >>>
> > > I see Matt reviewing a bit - but other cores reviewing even less ;(
> > >
> > 
> >  Ok, good. Stackalytics is incorrect then.
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Matt is ionosphere80 in the list - I see 60 reviews in the last 90
> > >>> list
> > > for him, and Christian Berendt with 40, Atsushi SAKAI with 32, and
> > > Darren Chan with 26.
> > >
> > > I still think we should keep the current state - but let's discuss
> > >>> with
> > > Darren, Atsushi and Christian what's up,
> > >
> > > Andreas
> > > --
> > >  Andreas Jaeger

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-04 Thread Atsushi SAKAI 
Lana

 Additionally, I found.
 Following Karma seems high for Matt and me.

> > >> Current cores not appearing in any stats:

https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+topcontributors
https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+topcontributors

Hopefully, launchpad karma affects the stats :-)

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI


On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:54 +0900
Atsushi SAKAI  wrote:

> Lana
> 
> Thank you for commenting me.
> 
> > I use the russelbryant stats 
> > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > I haven't heard anything specific from Atsushi-san.
> 
> I am doing launchpad bugs reviewing mainly (api-site and manuals)
>   (but I recognize working contribution is low at this moment.)
> 
> for example (commenting bug list, not confirmed bug list)
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/~sakaia/+commentedbugs?orderby=-id=0
> 
> Thanks
> Atsushi SAKAI
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:39:37 +1000
> Lana Brindley  wrote:
> 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> > I use the russelbryant stats (which are linked in the headers), because of 
> > comments made on this list back when we changed the process. The main 
> > reason, IIRC, was because it was more specific to openstack-manuals. Happy 
> > to reopen that conversation, though. In my core reviews, when I use the 
> > term "not appearing in any stats", I mean not appearing on my spreadsheet 
> > (which only looks at the top 12 in each c ategory). I can change the 
> > wording of this to make it clearer. 
> > 
> > I note that, while Matt is still participating at a high level, he just 
> > isn't in the top 12. I put this down to increased focus on the Install 
> > Guide testing, but I'm happy to hear from Matt if I've made an erroneous 
> > assumption there. To respond to Andreas' query about other underperforming 
> > cores, I can explain that Christian and Darren are both focussed on other 
> > interest areas right now, and forewarned me that their contributions would 
> > drop. They will both be returning to normal shortly. I haven't heard 
> > anything specific from Atsushi-san.
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> > Lana
> > 
> > On 04/03/16 00:37, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mariia Zlatkova 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> I thought we were using this link:
> > >> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > >>
> > >>
> > > To root cause this misperception, I want to point out that I clicked the
> > > links in the column headers. Lana, can you fix those? Whether we point to
> > > stackalytics or russelbryant may also be a point to discuss.
> > > 
> > > Anne
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> Maria
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Steve Gordon  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> - Original Message -
> >  From: "Anne Gentle" 
> >  To: "Andreas Jaeger" 
> > 
> >  On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger  wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > >> Hi core team,
> > >>
> > >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]:
> > >>
> > >> Current cores not appearing in any stats:
> > >> Matthew Kassawara
> > >>
> > >> Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t
> > >>> run
> > >> through Gerrit), so this is expected. It’s also expected to impact
> > >>> the
> > >> stats of other core reviewers involved in that task.
> > >>
> > >
> > > What does "not appearing in any stats" mean exactly?
> > >
> > >
> >  I couldn't find him on Stackalytics, take a look at this (which makes 
> >  me
> >  wonder if the affiliation change is broken?)
> > 
> > 
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/?module=openstack-manuals=liberty=commits_id=ionosphere80
> > >>>
> > >>> That query is explicitly pinned to liberty only and also measuring
> > >>> commits not reviews. I would think these are the more relevant 
> > >>> stackalytics
> > >>> views (and Matt is on them):
> > >>>
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/30
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/90
> > >>>
> > >>> I still tend to use Russell's stats at:
> > >>>
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-30.txt
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-60.txt
> > >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-90.txt
> > >>>
> > >>> -Steve
> > >>>
> > > I see Matt reviewing a bit - but other cores reviewing even less ;(
> > >
> > 
> >  Ok, good. Stackalytics is incorrect then.
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Matt is ionosphere80 in the list - I see 60 reviews in the last 90
> > >>> list
> > > for him, and Christian Berendt with 40, Atsushi SAKAI with 32, and
> > > Darren Chan with 26.
> > >
> > > I