Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Initial member for os-xenapi-release

2016-11-23 Thread Andreas Jaeger 
On 2016-11-24 02:44, Bob Ball wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please could the initial member or owner for os-xenapi-release be set to 
> os-xenapi-core so we can modify the members of the group.
> 
> Link to group: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1650,members
> Review that created group: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400153/
> 

The idea of a release group is to have a smaller subset than the core
group. So, I suggest to set it to just you and you can add additional
members.

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
   HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

[OpenStack-Infra] Initial member for os-xenapi-release

2016-11-23 Thread Bob Ball 
Hi,

Please could the initial member or owner for os-xenapi-release be set to 
os-xenapi-core so we can modify the members of the group.

Link to group: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/1650,members
Review that created group: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400153/

Thanks,

Bob

___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

[OpenStack-Infra] OpenStack Documentation for Preparing CI/CD Setup.

2016-11-23 Thread Amit Manel 
Hello Team,

I am presently, referring following documents, to create an CI/CD environment . 
Unfortunately , I am finding it difficult to grasp as where and how to start 
with the setup.

http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html


However, I found few document that looks I can start with these and can 
understand but these looks to be pretty outdated. Appreciate, if anyone can 
share some more resources.


http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-external-openstack-testing-system/
http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-openstack-external-testing-system-part-2/




Thanks in advance.
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [I18n] Regarding Zanata upgrade plan to 3.9.6 with Xenial: Help is needed

2016-11-23 Thread Alex Eng 
>
> One other thing that came up is do we need to copy any files from the
> old server to the new server? Specifically it looks like portions of
> `/home/wildfly/zanata` may need to be preserved. Or is everything
> important in the database?


The directory /home/wildfly/zanata will need to migrate over to new server
too. :)

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Clark Boylan  wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, at 09:49 AM, Ian Y. Choi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I18n team currently uses Zanata in translate.openstack.org so frequently
> > as an OpenStack translation platform.
> > I really appreciate great help from all contributors, especially infra
> > team members and Zanata development team
> > :
> > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/
> specs/migrate_to_zanata.html
> > .
> >
> > Thanks to [1], the current deployed Zanata version is 3.7.3.
> > During about one year, there were some discussions for Zanata
> > enhancements in many i18n IRC meetings,
> > and especially Austin & Barcelona summits [2].
> > Zanata development team members kindly listen to such enhancements, and
> > they are actively upgrading Zanata
> > with fixing bugs and incorporating cool features, which are very helpful
> > for translators.
> >
> > One main obstacle for upgrading Zanata (as far as I know) was that newer
> > versions of Zanata requires Java 8,
> > but it is not default on Trusty. To upgrade Zanata, upgrading from
> > Trusty to Xenial for translate.openstack.org is needed
> > since default-jre-headless on Trusty is Java 7 and Xenial is Java 8.
> >
> > Recently [3] has been merged, so I really hope that i18n team will see
> > newer version of Zanata soon :)
> >
> > I18n team discussed Zanata upgrade with pleia2 and clarkb during i18n
> > Barcelona meetup (See number 4 in [4]),
> > and the following is my thoughts on appropriate procedures to support
> > Zanata latest version
> > (Currently 3.9.6 - [5]):
> >
> > 1. Xenial OS test for translate-dev.openstack.org
> > : IMO after tests from infra team, [6] will be changed from "# Node-OS:
> > trusty" to "# Node-OS: xenial"
> >
> > 2. Using openstackid instead of openstackid-dev for translators to test
> > translate-dev.o.o
> > : I uploaded a patch [7].
> >
> > 3. Uploading a patch on openstack-infra/puppet-zanata for Zanata 3.9.6
> > : [8] is a reference for previous upgrade from Zanata 3.7.2 to 3.7.3
> >
> > 4. translate-dev.o.o with Zanata 3.9.6 will be ready => I18n translators
> > will test it :)
> >
> > 5. If there will be no error for Zanata 3.9,6, then node upgrade from
> > Trusty to Xenial and Zanata upgrade to 3.9.6
> > is needed for translate.openstack.org
> > : changing [9] line and also proposing a patch similar to [10] will be
> > needed later.
> >
> >
> > Since newer version of Zanata is what translators are expecting a lot :)
> > ,
> > I would like to kindly ask infra team members for the help of reviewing
> > and accomplishing such steps with higher priority.
> >
> > @clarkb, would the proposed procedures cover all the things regarding
> > Zanata upgrade?
> > If yes, would you share a sort of scheduled plans?
> > IMO Zanata development team will kindly help following schedules if
> > there will be some issues which are dependent to Zanata itself.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/240383/
> > [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/I18n-Zanata-enhancement
> > [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/384239/
> > [4] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barcelona-i18n-meetup
> > [5] https://github.com/zanata/zanata-platform/releases
> > [6]
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/
> tree/manifests/site.pp#n1282
> > [7] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393405/
> > [8] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/239617/1/manifests/init.pp
> > [9]
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/
> tree/manifests/site.pp#n1257
> > [10] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232313/
>
> Just a quick status update on this. I have updated puppet things so that
> we can deploy translate-dev01.openstack.org on Xenial then CNAME
> translate-dev.openstack.org to it. (This is part of how we are trying to
> deploy services in the future to avoid being tied to a single instance
> in our puppetry). This includes running the noop puppet apply test
> against Xenial for these nodes on puppet changes as well.
>
> All of that has gone relatively well and I just tried to deploy on
> Xenial and have run into a few problems. The puppet output [11] shows
> that the service isn't installed properly on Ubuntu Xenial. Looking at
> the puppet-wildfly module [12] it doesn't appear to support systemd on
> debuntu yet. Due to the upcoming thanksgiving holiday I doubt I will get
> around to updating and testing that this week, so would be great if
> someone else is able to work with the puppet-wildfly upstream to fix
> this.
>
> One other thing that came up is do we need to copy any files from the
> old server to the new server?