Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > > of some logic around proactive backports: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and > > I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported > > and has broken gate setup. > > It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team > to process them. > > Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please > EOL in > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4 > ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt > > Hey, I have processed these retirements. Let me know if there are any more or any problems etc. Cheers, Josh > Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can > drop > the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches. > > Tony. > > ___ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see > stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way > of some logic around proactive backports: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and > I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported > and has broken gate setup. It seems I setup the second wave and then neglected to ask the infra team to process them. Infra tema (*cough* Josh *cough*) can you remove the branches marke Please EOL in https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/4f781426270cb2030f978f47b1f46dae6f5aecb4/liberty_eol_data.txt Once that's done I can do a final pass for jobs that may break and we can drop the devstack, devstack-gate and requirements branches. Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Has the liberty-eol cleanup happened? Because I still see
stable/liberty branch in openstack/neutron repo, which gets in the way
of some logic around proactive backports:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427936/4/bugs-fixed-since.py@75, and
I see backports proposed for the branch that is no longer supported
and has broken gate setup.
Please advise,
Ihar
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tony and all,
>>
>> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
>> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
>> it I'll look at it then.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>>> > and Dec
>>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>>> > zuul/layout.yaml
>>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>>
>>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>>> were a
>>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>>>
>>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>>> that
>>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
>>> later.
>>>
>>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>>
>>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>>
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>>> [2]
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:28:46PM -0800, Sumit Naiksatam wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh > wrote: > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with > > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned. > > > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list. > > Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the > openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_ > removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We > have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in > advance! As Josh pointed out you're not in the list due to the problems we had retiring kilo. I do have a request for you though. Currently your gate (both kilo and liberty) relies on devstack and requirements and probably isn't testing what you thin it is. Can you please update project-config with a gate config that will work on this branches *without* the need to keep liberty (and kilo) alive in those repos. If you need help feel free to reach out. Yours Tony. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Hi Sumit,
That's fine. That repo wasn't marked for removal.
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with
> > a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
> openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
> removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
> have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
> advance!
>
> ~Sumit.
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Tony and all,
> >>
> >> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't
> get
> >> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me
> to
> >> it I'll look at it then.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Josh
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov
> 28th
> >>> > and Dec
> >>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> >>> > zuul/layout.yaml
> >>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> >>>
> >>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL
> that
> >>> were a
> >>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> >>>
> >>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed
> at
> >>> that
> >>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> >>> later.
> >>>
> >>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> >>> something like:
> >>>
> >>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> >>>
> >>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> >>>
> >>> Yours Tony.
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> >>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> >>> [2]
> >>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> tree/eol_branch.sh
> >>>
> >>> ___
> >>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ___
> > OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced with
> a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Hi Joshua, Apologies for chiming in late, but we request that the
openstack/group-based-policy repo’s stable/liberty branch be _not_
removed/EOL’ed and the currently open patches not be abandoned. We
have consumers of this branch and we do backport bug fixes. Thanks in
advance!
~Sumit.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Tony and all,
>>
>> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
>> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
>> it I'll look at it then.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>>> > and Dec
>>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>>> > zuul/layout.yaml
>>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>>
>>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>>> were a
>>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>>>
>>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>>> that
>>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
>>> later.
>>>
>>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>>> something like:
>>>
>>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>>
>>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>>
>>> Yours Tony.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>>> [2]
>>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-12-14 08:37:10 -0500:
> Excerpts from Joshua Hesketh's message of 2016-12-14 23:54:20 +1100:
> > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
>
> Projects seeing release note build failures with errors like:
>
> Command '(['git', 'log', '--simplify-by-decoration', '--pretty="%d"',
> 'origin/stable/liberty'],)' returned non-zero exit status 128
>
> Should remove the liberty.rst page from their release notes builds.
I've posted https://review.openstack.org/410792 to teach reno about our
EOL process, but it may be some time before we have a release that
includes that fix because it relies on a significant rewrite of reno's
internals.
Rather than removing the liberty.rst file, it may also be possible
to just change "stable/liberty" in that file to "liberty-eol", since
the fix linked above should support that form, too. vdrok is going
to try this in ironic.
Doug
>
> Where do I go to add this step to our branch EOL process documentation?
>
> Doug
>
> >
> > [0]
> > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Tony and all,
> > >
> > > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> > > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> > > it I'll look at it then.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> > >> and Dec
> > >> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> > >> zuul/layout.yaml
> > >> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> > >>
> > >> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> > >> were a
> > >> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> > >>
> > >> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> > >> that
> > >> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> > >> later.
> > >>
> > >> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> > >> something like:
> > >> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
> > >> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> > >> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> > >>
> > >> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> > >>
> > >> Yours Tony.
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
> > >> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> > >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> > >> tree/eol_branch.sh
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> > >> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> > >>
> > >
> > >
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Excerpts from Joshua Hesketh's message of 2016-12-14 23:54:20 +1100:
> The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
>
> Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
Projects seeing release note build failures with errors like:
Command '(['git', 'log', '--simplify-by-decoration', '--pretty="%d"',
'origin/stable/liberty'],)' returned non-zero exit status 128
Should remove the liberty.rst page from their release notes builds.
Where do I go to add this step to our branch EOL process documentation?
Doug
>
> [0]
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Tony and all,
> >
> > I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> > to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> > it I'll look at it then.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Josh
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >>
> >> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> >> and Dec
> >> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> >> zuul/layout.yaml
> >> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
> >>
> >> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> >> were a
> >> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
> >>
> >> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> >> that
> >> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> >> later.
> >>
> >> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> >> something like:
> >> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
> >> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
> >>
> >> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
> >>
> >> Yours Tony.
> >>
> >> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
> >> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> >> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> >> tree/eol_branch.sh
> >>
> >> ___
> >> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> >> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
> >>
> >
> >
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
Cheers,
Josh
[0]
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Joshua Hesketh
wrote:
> Hey Tony and all,
>
> I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
> to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
> it I'll look at it then.
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
>> and Dec
>> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
>> zuul/layout.yaml
>> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>>
>> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
>> were a
>> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>>
>> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
>> that
>> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
>> later.
>>
>> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
>> something like:
>> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa4
>> 6269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
>> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>>
>> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>>
>> Yours Tony.
>>
>> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0
>> a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
>> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
>> tree/eol_branch.sh
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
>> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
Hey Tony and all,
I'm happy to take care of these retirements. However I probably can't get
to it until Tuesday next week. So assuming no other infra root beats me to
it I'll look at it then.
Cheers,
Josh
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th
> and Dec
> > 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> zuul/layout.yaml
> > to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
>
> This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that
> were a
> little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
>
> Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at
> that
> URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done
> later.
>
> eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with
> something like:
> URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
>
> The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
>
> Yours Tony.
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4
> ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/
> tree/eol_branch.sh
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [openstack-dev] [all][stable][ptls] Tagging liberty as EOL
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:35:48PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> I'll batch the removal of the stable/liberty branches between Nov 28th and Dec
> 3rd (UTC+1100). Then during Decemeber I'll attempt to cleanup
> zuul/layout.yaml
> to remove liberty exclusions and jobs.
This took longer as there are a few repos that are scheduled for EOL that were a
little problematic during the kilo cycle. I've updated the list at [1]
Can the infra team please run eol_branch.sh [2] over the repos listed at that
URL [1] and flagged with 'Please EOL'. The others will need to be done later.
eol_branch.sh needs just the repo names what can be generated with something
like:
URL=https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
eol_branch.sh REPOS=$(curl -s $URL | awk '/Please EOL/ {print $1}')
The data format is a balance between human and machine readable.
Yours Tony.
[1]
https://gist.github.com/tbreeds/93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac#file-liberty_eol_data-txt
[2]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
