Re: [Openstack-operators] MongoDB as Ceilometer backend - scaling

[Joseph Bajin]

I think many people tried to run ceilometer with multiple different
backends and for a while were truly unsuccessful.

If you look at Liberty and now in Mitaka there has been a lot of work to
separate out the alarms from the actual data parts.  You now have Adoh from
the alarming standpoint, and then ceilometer using new backends like
Gnocchi. I'm here a lot of good things about Gnocchi and we are going to
start taking a look at re-deploying ceilometer with that backend.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Tobias Urdin 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We are running Ceilometer with MongoDB as storage backend in production
> and it's building up quite fast.
>
> I'm just having some simple thought on how large MongoDB setups people
> are having with Ceilometer?
>
> More details about backup, replicas and sharding would also be appreciated.
>
>
> I think we will have to look into moving our three replicas to sharding
> in a short period of time.
>
> Best regards
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Interop-Challenge]Please review the work load test scripts

[Joseph Bajin]

It has been merged.



On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Tong Li  wrote:

> Dear openstack/osop-tools-contrib core reviewers, please review the
> following patch which provides ansible and terraform work load tests for
> Interop-challenge effort.
>
> *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366784/*
> 
>
> any comments will be appreciated and addressed accordingly.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tong Li
> IBM Open Technology
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

[Openstack-operators] FW: [band] OpenStack Summit - Barcelona - musicians please raise your hands

[Amrith Kumar]

Sorry, didn't mean to make this only for developers. Cross posting to Operators.

-amrith

> -Original Message-
> From: Amrith Kumar [mailto:amr...@tesora.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2016 1:36 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> 
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [band] OpenStack Summit - Barcelona - musicians
> please raise your hands
> 
> I had a chat with an openstack newbie on Thursday who has never posted a
> message on the mailing list.
> 
> He's a musician and will be at summit in Barcelona, and I happened to
> mention that there were a bunch of other musicians who bring their gear
> along, and have a good time.
> 
> I told him to post to the ML and try and muster up a band, he writes rap
> and I proposed that he write a rap song about OpenStack (as long as he
> said nice things about Trove).
> 
> OK, ... long story short, he didn't want his first post to the ML to be
> about music at the summit, but I have no such inhibitions.
> 
> So, would y'all musicians who plan to bring your gear to Barcelona please
> start a little thread here on the ML and let's get a band going?
> 
> Please ...
> 
> -amrith
> 
> P.S. I'm not a musician. I don't play one on TV. I just hang out ...
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Re: [Openstack-operators] Murano in Production

[Abel Lopez]

I want to imagine that separate vhosts with different usernames and
appropriate permissions would be sufficient. Just like we don't run
separate MySQL instances for a different database, we just make users with
permissions.

But, I haven't played with Murano at all, what do I know.

On Friday, September 16, 2016, Joe Topjian  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> We're planning to deploy Murano to one of our OpenStack clouds and I'm
> debating the RabbitMQ setup.
>
> For background: the Murano agent that runs on instances requires access to
> RabbitMQ. Murano is able to be configured with two RabbitMQ services: one
> for traditional OpenStack communication and one for the Murano/Agent
> communication.
>
> From a security/segregation point of view, would vhost separation on our
> existing RabbitMQ cluster be sufficient? Or is it recommended to have an
> entirely separate cluster?
>
> As you can imagine, I'd like to avoid having to manage *two* RabbitMQ
> clusters. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators