Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-09-02 Thread Matt Jarvis
I was going to review this, but it got merged before I got to it. There's a
couple of fundamental issues with these scripts, the lack of error handling
being one, but more importantly using the existence of apt or yum to check
for OS version is not safe as either can exist on either platform. I'll put
in some changes if I get a chance.

On 31 August 2016 at 20:47, Kris G. Lindgren  wrote:

> I originally agreed with you, but then I thought about it more this way:
> It’s a tool to test to see if clouds are interop compatible (atleast that
> heat works the same on the two clouds).  While not technically a tool to
> manage openstack.  But still something that some Operators could want to
> know if they are looking at doing hybrid cloud.  Or they may want to ensure
> that two of their own private clouds are interop compatible.
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Kris Lindgren
>
> Senior Linux Systems Engineer
>
> GoDaddy
>
>
>
> *From: *Joseph Bajin 
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:39 PM
> *To: *"Yih Leong, Sun." 
> *Cc: *OpenStack Operators ,
> defcore-committee 
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible
> work load test for interop patch set
>
>
>
> This looks like this was merged, but no one really answered my questions
> about an "InterOp Challenge" code base going into the Operators
> repository.
>
>
>
> --Joe
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yih Leong, Sun. 
> wrote:
>
> Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/
>
>
>
> The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin 
> wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to get
> around to taking a look.
>
>
>
> I have a question about these.   What exactly is the Interop Challenge?
> The OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and
> run their cloud.   These don't necessarily look like what we normally see
> submitted.
>
>
>
> Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something
> that Operators would use?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo  wrote:
> >
> > Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
> > Operators mailing list
> > (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> ).
> > I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a +2
> > on it at least.
> +1
>
> I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to contact
> would be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC).  I've also added an OSOps tag to
> this message.
>
> >
> > -Christopher
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li  wrote:
> >> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one
> please
> >> review the patch set here?
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
> >>
> >> Thanks very much!
> >>
> >> Tong Li
> >> IBM Open Technology
> >> Building 501/B205
> >> liton...@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Defcore-committee mailing list
> >> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
> >
> > ___
> > Defcore-committee mailing list
> > defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
> ___
>
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>

-- 
DataCentred Limited registered in England and Wales no. 05611763
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-09-01 Thread Joseph Bajin
Ahh..

Ok, when I read "InterOp Challenge" that sounded like an event and not a
tool.  Since it is a tool, then it totally makes sense, and it could be
used to evaluate a platform which I would agree with you may not
necessarily be an operator tool, but could be something they would use.

I just didn't have any information about it and was just trying to make
sure it was something that should be merged.

Thanks for following up on it and double checking everything!

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Kris G. Lindgren 
wrote:

> I originally agreed with you, but then I thought about it more this way:
> It’s a tool to test to see if clouds are interop compatible (atleast that
> heat works the same on the two clouds).  While not technically a tool to
> manage openstack.  But still something that some Operators could want to
> know if they are looking at doing hybrid cloud.  Or they may want to ensure
> that two of their own private clouds are interop compatible.
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Kris Lindgren
>
> Senior Linux Systems Engineer
>
> GoDaddy
>
>
>
> *From: *Joseph Bajin 
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:39 PM
> *To: *"Yih Leong, Sun." 
> *Cc: *OpenStack Operators ,
> defcore-committee 
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible
> work load test for interop patch set
>
>
>
> This looks like this was merged, but no one really answered my questions
> about an "InterOp Challenge" code base going into the Operators
> repository.
>
>
>
> --Joe
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yih Leong, Sun. 
> wrote:
>
> Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/
>
>
>
> The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin 
> wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to get
> around to taking a look.
>
>
>
> I have a question about these.   What exactly is the Interop Challenge?
> The OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and
> run their cloud.   These don't necessarily look like what we normally see
> submitted.
>
>
>
> Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something
> that Operators would use?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail  wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo  wrote:
> >
> > Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
> > Operators mailing list
> > (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> ).
> > I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a +2
> > on it at least.
> +1
>
> I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to contact
> would be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC).  I've also added an OSOps tag to
> this message.
>
> >
> > -Christopher
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li  wrote:
> >> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one
> please
> >> review the patch set here?
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
> >>
> >> Thanks very much!
> >>
> >> Tong Li
> >> IBM Open Technology
> >> Building 501/B205
> >> liton...@us.ibm.com
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Defcore-committee mailing list
> >> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
> >
> > ___
> > Defcore-committee mailing list
> > defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
> ___
>
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
>
>
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-09-01 Thread Joseph Bajin
Hi Katherine..

The OsOps Working Group meets on the Odd Wednesday's at 1900 UTC in
#openstack-meetings-4. You can find out more here -
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_OSOps/Monitoring_and_Tools_Working_Group

Thanks

Joe

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Catherine Cuong Diep 
wrote:

> Kris ++.
>
> Kris' statement below is the exact reason why the Interop-Challenge team
> thinks Operators repository is a good place to store the interop workload
> deployment tool sets. In addition, during today's Interop-Challenge IRC
> meeting, we think that it would help if we can have a representative from
> the the Operators team to join the Interop-Challenge IRC meeting
> (Wednesdays at 1400 UTC, IRC Channel (on freenode): #openstack-defcore ) if
> possible,
>
> What is the IRC channel for the "OSOps Working Group" ? As you indicated,
> that would be a good place for us to ask questions. Thanks!
>
> Catherine Diep
> RefStack Project PTL
> IBM
> - Forwarded by Catherine Cuong Diep/San Jose/IBM on 08/31/2016 01:25
> PM -
>
> From: "Kris G. Lindgren" 
> To: Joseph Bajin , "Yih Leong, Sun." <
> yihle...@gmail.com>
> Cc: OpenStack Operators ,
> defcore-committee 
> Date: 08/31/2016 12:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [OpenStack-DefCore] [Openstack-operators] [OSOps] Ansible
> work load test for interop patch set
> --
>
>
>
> I originally agreed with you, but then I thought about it more this way:
> It’s a tool to test to see if clouds are interop compatible (atleast that
> heat works the same on the two clouds). While not technically a tool to
> manage openstack. But still something that some Operators could want to
> know if they are looking at doing hybrid cloud. Or they may want to ensure
> that two of their own private clouds are interop compatible.
>
> ___
> Kris Lindgren
> Senior Linux Systems Engineer
> GoDaddy
>
> *From: *Joseph Bajin 
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:39 PM
> *To: *"Yih Leong, Sun." 
> *Cc: *OpenStack Operators ,
> defcore-committee 
> *Subject: *Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible
> work load test for interop patch set
>
> This looks like this was merged, but no one really answered my questions
> about an "InterOp Challenge" code base going into the Operators repository.
>
> --Joe
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yih Leong, Sun. <*yihle...@gmail.com*
> > wrote:
> Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
> *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/*
> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/>
>
> The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin <*josephba...@gmail.com*
> > wrote:
>
>Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to
>get around to taking a look.
>
>I have a question about these. What exactly is the Interop Challenge?
>The OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and
>run their cloud. These don't necessarily look like what we normally see
>submitted.
>
>Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something
>that Operators would use?
>
>Thanks
>
>Joe
>
>On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail <*itzsham...@gmail.com*
>> wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo <*d...@aedo.net*
>> wrote:
>>
>> Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
>> Operators mailing list
>> (
>*http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators*
><http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
>).
>> I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a
>+2
>> on it at least.
>+1
>
>I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to
>contact would be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC). I've also added an OSOps
>tag to this message.
>>
>> -Christopher
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li <*liton...@us.ibm.com*
>> wrote:
>>> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one
>please
>>> review the patch set here?
>>>
>>> *https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/*
><https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/>
>>>
>>> Thanks very much!
>>>
>>

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-08-31 Thread Kris G. Lindgren
I originally agreed with you, but then I thought about it more this way:  It’s 
a tool to test to see if clouds are interop compatible (atleast that heat works 
the same on the two clouds).  While not technically a tool to manage openstack. 
 But still something that some Operators could want to know if they are looking 
at doing hybrid cloud.  Or they may want to ensure that two of their own 
private clouds are interop compatible.

___
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy

From: Joseph Bajin 
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:39 PM
To: "Yih Leong, Sun." 
Cc: OpenStack Operators , 
defcore-committee 
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work 
load test for interop patch set

This looks like this was merged, but no one really answered my questions about 
an "InterOp Challenge" code base going into the Operators repository.

--Joe

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yih Leong, Sun. 
mailto:yihle...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/

The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
Thanks!



On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin 
mailto:josephba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to get 
around to taking a look.

I have a question about these.   What exactly is the Interop Challenge?  The 
OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and run their 
cloud.   These don't necessarily look like what we normally see submitted.

Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something that 
Operators would use?

Thanks

Joe

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail 
mailto:itzsham...@gmail.com>> wrote:


> On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo 
> mailto:d...@aedo.net>> wrote:
>
> Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
> Operators mailing list
> (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators).
> I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a +2
> on it at least.
+1

I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to contact would 
be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC).  I've also added an OSOps tag to this 
message.
>
> -Christopher
>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li 
>> mailto:liton...@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one please
>> review the patch set here?
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
>>
>> Thanks very much!
>>
>> Tong Li
>> IBM Open Technology
>> Building 501/B205
>> liton...@us.ibm.com<mailto:liton...@us.ibm.com>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
> ___
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee

___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


___
Defcore-committee mailing list
defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee


___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-08-31 Thread Joseph Bajin
This looks like this was merged, but no one really answered my questions
about an "InterOp Challenge" code base going into the Operators repository.

--Joe

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Yih Leong, Sun. 
wrote:

> Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/
>
> The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin 
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to get
>> around to taking a look.
>>
>> I have a question about these.   What exactly is the Interop Challenge?
>> The OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and
>> run their cloud.   These don't necessarily look like what we normally see
>> submitted.
>>
>> Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something
>> that Operators would use?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
>>> > Operators mailing list
>>> > (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
>>> ck-operators).
>>> > I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a +2
>>> > on it at least.
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to
>>> contact would be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC).  I've also added an
>>> OSOps tag to this message.
>>> >
>>> > -Christopher
>>> >
>>> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li  wrote:
>>> >> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one
>>> please
>>> >> review the patch set here?
>>> >>
>>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks very much!
>>> >>
>>> >> Tong Li
>>> >> IBM Open Technology
>>> >> Building 501/B205
>>> >> liton...@us.ibm.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ___
>>> >> Defcore-committee mailing list
>>> >> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
>>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Defcore-committee mailing list
>>> > defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Defcore-committee mailing list
>> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>>
>>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [OSOps] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-08-31 Thread Yih Leong, Sun.
Can someone from ospos please review the following patch?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/

The patchset was last updated Aug 11th.
Thanks!



On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Joseph Bajin  wrote:

> Sorry about that. I've been a little busy as of late, and was able to get
> around to taking a look.
>
> I have a question about these.   What exactly is the Interop Challenge?
> The OSOps repos are usually for code that can help Operators maintain and
> run their cloud.   These don't necessarily look like what we normally see
> submitted.
>
> Can you expand on what the InterOp Challenge is and if it is something
> that Operators would use?
>
> Thanks
>
> Joe
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Shamail  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Christopher Aedo  wrote:
>> >
>> > Tong Li, I think the best place to ask for a look would be the
>> > Operators mailing list
>> > (http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensta
>> ck-operators).
>> > I've cc'd that list here, though it looks like you've already got a +2
>> > on it at least.
>> +1
>>
>> I had contacted JJ earlier and he told me that the best person to contact
>> would be Joseph Bajin (RaginBajin in IRC).  I've also added an OSOps tag to
>> this message.
>> >
>> > -Christopher
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Tong Li  wrote:
>> >> The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one
>> please
>> >> review the patch set here?
>> >>
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
>> >>
>> >> Thanks very much!
>> >>
>> >> Tong Li
>> >> IBM Open Technology
>> >> Building 501/B205
>> >> liton...@us.ibm.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ___
>> >> Defcore-committee mailing list
>> >> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Defcore-committee mailing list
>> > defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>>
>
>
> ___
> Defcore-committee mailing list
> defcore-commit...@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/defcore-committee
>
>
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators


Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-DefCore] [osops] Ansible work load test for interop patch set

2016-08-16 Thread Sun, Yih Leong
Seems like the openstack/osops-tools-contrib repo is managed/reviewed by a 
separate osops core team?

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351799/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351879/


From: Tong Li [mailto:liton...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:59 AM
To: defcore-committee 
Subject: [OpenStack-DefCore] Ansible work load test for interop patch set


The patch set has been submitted to github for awhile, can some one please 
review the patch set here?

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354194/

Thanks very much!

Tong Li
IBM Open Technology
Building 501/B205
liton...@us.ibm.com
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators