I'm going to be on a flight tomorrow.
Given that cinder started with nova code and removed code that was not
needed for nova-volumes, I'm hoping we can minimize the time that the
project isn't in core. (potentially replacing nova-volumes in folsom
- since the work to keep both nova+nova-volumes and nova+cinder will
be duplicate since the code started at the same place in folsom day 1)
Jesse
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Besides continuing discussion of the 3rd party API question, is there
anything else for the agenda tomorrow?
Time permitting, we could discuss Cinder coreness and how much of our
long path to become core an existing core project split can actually
avoid.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release Manager, OpenStack
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
