Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I'm going to be on a flight tomorrow. Given that cinder started with nova code and removed code that was not needed for nova-volumes, I'm hoping we can minimize the time that the project isn't in core. (potentially replacing nova-volumes in folsom - since the work to keep both nova+nova-volumes and nova+cinder will be duplicate since the code started at the same place in folsom day 1) Jesse On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Jonathan Bryce wrote: Besides continuing discussion of the 3rd party API question, is there anything else for the agenda tomorrow? Time permitting, we could discuss Cinder coreness and how much of our long path to become core an existing core project split can actually avoid. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Jay Pipes wrote: On the questions at hand, here are my thoughts: 1) satellite.openstack.org - we talked about setting something similar up a long time ago around Related Projects but never had the bandwidth. I think if we can get user curation tools in there so there's some form distributed quality control and rating, I'd be ok with it. I would not be in favor of using the domain for something that becomes a free for all junkyard. It sounds like these concepts are scoped into Marton's plans, but I don't know how far along they are in execution. Agreed wholeheartedly. I'd prefer if we could test-drive the site to check how the editorial control works first. Maybe it should be given a server instance from the infrastructure pool, so that it can be set up on a temporary domain name (or IP address). Then we can check if it's up to snuff, and grant the openstack.org name ? 2) java package naming - I'd prefer to run this through the standard incubation process if he's going to want to start naming packages org.openstack.*. I definitely wouldn't want to start naming packages like that for random java code. Is a java client library something that we'd like to see as part of OpenStack or as an unofficial project in the Satellite context. Satellite, I believe... Incubation is for projects that are likely to be core projects one day. I don't think language bindings beyond the reference implementation belong to core. That doesn't mean they can't be blessed as official projects, it's just that their incubation process is not the core incubation process. My Java naming knowledge may be a bit rusty, but I feel uncomfortable having Java packages under org.openstack that are actually not built by openstack.org, but by a subgroup using its own development infrastructure. Shouldn't the package name reflect the origin of the package ? Shouldn't those be under es.woorea.openstack or something ? -- Thierry ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or over email? Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Email. On 04/09/2012 01:30 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or over email? Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Jonathan Bryce wrote: We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or over email? Either. Can't hurt to meet, long time no see. -- Thierry ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
On 04/09/2012 06:04 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: This week is actually very busy for me so if people are open to email, that would be my preference. We should definitely schedule an in person next week though. On the questions at hand, here are my thoughts: 1) satellite.openstack.org - we talked about setting something similar up a long time ago around Related Projects but never had the bandwidth. I think if we can get user curation tools in there so there's some form distributed quality control and rating, I'd be ok with it. I would not be in favor of using the domain for something that becomes a free for all junkyard. It sounds like these concepts are scoped into Marton's plans, but I don't know how far along they are in execution. Agreed wholeheartedly. 2) java package naming - I'd prefer to run this through the standard incubation process if he's going to want to start naming packages org.openstack.*. I definitely wouldn't want to start naming packages like that for random java code. Is a java client library something that we'd like to see as part of OpenStack or as an unofficial project in the Satellite context. Satellite, I believe... What time next weeks works for people to get together at the design summit/conference. I'm there all week, Any time in the evenings is good. I'll be swamped during the days Monday through Wednesday. Best, -jay Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Anyone have anything they would like to discuss tomorrow? After the Essex crush is over, I'd like to discuss the Technical Committee, but I would say do it after this week unless anyone objects. Thierry has a draft in the wiki: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee I think there are a couple of points that are still worth debating: 1) PTL membership on the Technical Committee 2) The concept of a Technical Member We'll have some more discussion on the general mailing list on this, but I wanted to bring it to the current PPB's attention specifically in case you're not following the other closely. Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Didn't see anything on the list or wiki, so no meeting today. Jonathan. On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: Good catch. Added him as well. Sorry, Dan! On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Jonathan Bryce wrote: Anything we need to discuss? Read through the logs from last week's meeting and couldn't tell if Monty still needed something from us to move forward with the Satellite CI project. Also, welcome to Joe Heck, the new Keystone PTL and Brian Waldon the new Glance PTL. Results from the elections are available online if you haven't seen them: http://etherpad.openstack.org/xSWPqf6DWE Should we now add DanW (as Quantum PTL) as well ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Jonathan Bryce wrote: Anything we need to discuss? Read through the logs from last week's meeting and couldn't tell if Monty still needed something from us to move forward with the Satellite CI project. Also, welcome to Joe Heck, the new Keystone PTL and Brian Waldon the new Glance PTL. Results from the elections are available online if you haven't seen them: http://etherpad.openstack.org/xSWPqf6DWE Should we now add DanW (as Quantum PTL) as well ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Thanks Jonathan, I'm not totally sure of the procedure here, so I created a wiki page that is an updated version of the original application for incubation: http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/CoreApplication/Quantum I look forward to talking with you all about this in more detail tomorrow at the PPB meeting. Dan On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: I know it's slightly past the 2 pm cutoff, but would like to go ahead and meet tomorrow to discuss Quantum. Dan is interested in getting Quantum promoted to core for the Folsom release cycle and we need to review soon if we're going to make it. I updated the agenda on the wiki. Jonathan. -- ~~~ Dan Wendlandt Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com twitter: danwendlandt ~~~ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Dan Wendlandt wrote: Thanks Jonathan, I'm not totally sure of the procedure here, so I created a wiki page that is an updated version of the original application for incubation: http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/CoreApplication/Quantum I look forward to talking with you all about this in more detail tomorrow at the PPB meeting. Won't be around for the meeting today. FWIW, as far as release management is concerned, Quantum did the best job for a project in incubation so far in tracking features and aligning with release policies ahead of time. Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I know it's slightly past the 2 pm cutoff, but would like to go ahead and meet tomorrow to discuss Quantum. Dan is interested in getting Quantum promoted to core for the Folsom release cycle and we need to review soon if we're going to make it. I updated the agenda on the wiki. Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in Essex or Folsom... Thanks! -jay On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: Let me know if anyone has any topics they'd like to discuss. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Thanks, Jason. Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow? On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in Essex or Folsom... I think Folsom is more likely to start seeing some more common code. Dan gave us some pointers to things in Quantum that he'd like to see ported over to common. Rajaram was going to start looking into adding a notification system with plugins, not sure if any progress has been made on that front. I can only speak for myself, but I unfortunately won't be able to spend much time on it until after we finish our launch, but after that I'm going to make sure I get some time set aside in a few sprints to start pulling things in and proposing for incubation. First on my list would be using entry_points for defining services/daemons and console_scripts dynamically. Happy Hacking! 7-11 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow. Thanks Jason! -jay On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: Thanks, Jason. Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow? On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in Essex or Folsom... I think Folsom is more likely to start seeing some more common code. Dan gave us some pointers to things in Quantum that he'd like to see ported over to common. Rajaram was going to start looking into adding a notification system with plugins, not sure if any progress has been made on that front. I can only speak for myself, but I unfortunately won't be able to spend much time on it until after we finish our launch, but after that I'm going to make sure I get some time set aside in a few sprints to start pulling things in and proposing for incubation. First on my list would be using entry_points for defining services/daemons and console_scripts dynamically. Happy Hacking! 7-11 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Sounds good. Since we didn't have any other items before the cutoff, no meeting tomorrow. On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow. Thanks Jason! -jay On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: Thanks, Jason. Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow? On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote: On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in Essex or Folsom... I think Folsom is more likely to start seeing some more common code. Dan gave us some pointers to things in Quantum that he'd like to see ported over to common. Rajaram was going to start looking into adding a notification system with plugins, not sure if any progress has been made on that front. I can only speak for myself, but I unfortunately won't be able to spend much time on it until after we finish our launch, but after that I'm going to make sure I get some time set aside in a few sprints to start pulling things in and proposing for incubation. First on my list would be using entry_points for defining services/daemons and console_scripts dynamically. Happy Hacking! 7-11 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
OK. -Original Message- From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Bryce Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:38 PM To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow How do you all feel about doing our meeting tomorrow over lunch from 1:00-2:00? This seems to be about the only time that's clear. John Dickinson had the idea of putting it on sched as well so anyone interested can attend. Let me know if this works for you all. Thanks, Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
How do you all feel about doing our meeting tomorrow over lunch from 1:00-2:00? This seems to be about the only time that's clear. John Dickinson had the idea of putting it on sched as well so anyone interested can attend. Let me know if this works for you all. Thanks, Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Thierry, can you add it to the schedule for 1 tomorrow? Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: ++ On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Josh Kearney j...@jk0.org wrote: Works for me. On Oct 3, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote: How do you all feel about doing our meeting tomorrow over lunch from 1:00-2:00? This seems to be about the only time that's clear. John Dickinson had the idea of putting it on sched as well so anyone interested can attend. Let me know if this works for you all. Thanks, Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I've added a minor rant to that Etherpad. Other than that, I just desperately want us to get to a point that we're happy declaring Diablo's APIs as supported, stable, and future-compatible. Ewan. From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Bryce Sent: 18 September 2011 09:31 To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow Here is a link to an Etherpad to use as a scratchpad for the RFC on API guidelines: http://etherpad.openstack.org/RFC-API-Guidelines Please provide input and one of us (jbryce?) can put out the eventual RFC to the ML. Anyone else have any additional initial feedback on this etherpad before I send out to the full OpenStack list? Jorge also put some samples in the wiki: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/APIManagement-sampleGuidelines . I told him we were going to use the etherpad as the RFC to the list. I plan on sending out a note later today. Jonathan. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Jay Pipes wrote: As for the API coordinator, I thought we had already voted yes on that? My position on the API coordinator is that there is no need for amending our governance and creating an official position for that. I'm all in favor of a technical meritocracy where someone that cares about a subject (or is paid to care about a subject) and does a great job of owning the subject ends up being respected by his peers and be responsible for it. So if Jorge wants to work on API guidelines and convergence efforts, I don't think that needs to be voted by the PPB beforehand. He can just start working on that and do a great job at it. And anyone interested can join him. The PPB /could/ be called to resolve conflicts (between PTLs, or between people working on API guideliens and PTLs) if there are any, under its attribution of ensuring commonality and integration between projects -- but I surely hope concerns can be directly addressed between the interested parties. And by the way (and before anyone inserts snarky comments), that also applies to the release management job. Anyone interested is free to help me there. And everyone can ultimately appeal to the PPB if there is disagreement. This is a duty, not a set of rights. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
Hi josh, just read the blog post you referenced. I now understand why you and I have had (and continue to have) interesting discussions, as we view the world through different prisms. Diversity of opinion and the ability to rationally discuss is what will make the OpenStack community stronger J. Regarding Scalr. this submission brings into focus some issues that we have not addressed to date regarding project submission. With an existing open source project I think the diligence needs to be more than language, test coverage, and CI approach (although these are critical elements to consider). I also believe we need to understand the dynamic of the existing proposed project, as this will be a merge of an existing community into the OpenStack community and ecosystem. How is the project managed, what is the governance, how active are outside community members, how compatible is the project with existing/planned OpenStack processes, etc. this is why I think it is essential that the project advocate attend the PPB meeting when the project is being evaluated. I believe that test coverage, CI, QA integration, etc. are some of the focus areas as a project becomes incubated from related. If the project is willing to adopt the OpenStack Way tm part of the definition of being incubated is that the OpenStack resources (release management, packaging, tooling/build and qa automation) are available to help recast the project. It is much easier to have a project adopt new conventions and workflow than it is to fix a bad or non-existent open source community. The Scalr submission also raises another meta-OpenStack project question: at this particular point in time what do we consider the envelope of OpenStack, in terms of project focus'? The core projects to date are all classic IaaS, is the timing right to introduce PaaS elements into the mix? I believe that some of the related projects (such as RedDwarf, Donabe, Atlas, etc.) can be considered either PaaS offerings or PaaS-elements. As the projects mature and some of them apply to be incubated we should have an agreed to position as to what is within the OpenStack charter and what is clearly not. John From: Joshua McKenty [mailto:j...@piston.cc] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:08 AM To: Jay Pipes Cc: John Purrier; openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow I won't be able to make the POC meeting today (I'm on a plane, unfortunately), but I wanted to weigh in with my thoughts on the two projects proposed for incubation. I blogged briefly about it here: http://www.cognition.ca/2011/06/what-it-means-to-be-openstack.html Which, as you can imagine, is a +1 for dashboard and a -1 for Scalr as a whole. (With all apologies to Sebastian). I'm happy to consider the Scalr guest agent (in python) as a standalone submission, but I think we'd need to see test coverage and CI environments first. Would love to weigh in on django arguments if they come up, maybe Jesse can circulate the NASA Trade Study I wrote on the subject. Thanks all. Joshua McKenty Piston Cloud Computing, Inc. (650) 283-6846 jos...@piston.cc On 2011-06-13, at 7:19 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:09 PM, John Purrier j...@openstack.org wrote: Jay, what is your concern with PHP? Mainly that the rest of OpenStack projects are written in Python. Hey, I used to program in PHP; I don't have anything against the language in particular. But if all the other projects in OpenStack are Python, it's a bit difficult for me to welcome a PHP project as a core project or even incubated... Just my 2 cents, jay ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
As a reminder, we have a Policy Board meeting scheduled for tomorrow in the hour before the weekly team meeting. The Policy Board meeting is 2000 UTC/3:00 PM CDT. We currently have two incubation applications on the agenda. If you get an opportunity, please try to review them before the meeting tomorrow. Do you think we should try to have Sebastian and Devin present in the meeting to answer questions or discuss first without them? Scalr incubation application - http://wiki.openstack.org/Scalr Dashboard incubation application - http://wiki.openstack.org/Projects/IncubatorApplication/OpenStackDashboard Let me know if there's anything else you'd like to discuss, Jonathan.___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:17 PM, John Purrier wrote: For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done? I have a very good start on swift's migration plan. We've been practicing some with the swauth project in Launchpad/GitHub. I've got a few docs written on it, and I'm planning on sharing those with other involved persons as soon as I have a little more details. Our plan is to set a date and make sure all parties are taken care of. --John smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I just spoke with Ziad, he will join the meeting and discuss the current plan of record for proposing Keystone as an incubated project. John -Original Message- From: openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-poc-bounces+john=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Thierry Carrez Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 1:48 PM To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow John Purrier wrote: Does it make sense to discuss the state/progress on the GitHub migration project? I think someone needs to set some specific target milestones and track this (not necessarily the PPB). As ttx points out, earlier is better; if we miss the end of July milestone for having this complete we will likely need to wait until Diablo is done. For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done? It might make sense to discuss the question that John D. raised recently about the possibility for each core project to select its own code hosting... My take on it is that we should come up with a set of sane options, rather than letting each core project can select and change their code hosting whenever they see fit. Those sane options would be those that we support with our continuous integration framework. At this point that means Launchpad, and GitHub would be the second option when integration will be complete. For each option considered we need to consider the cost of supporting it, vs. the gain of supporting it. In the case of GitHub the gain is pretty obvious (developer familiarity with Git/GitHub), and I hope we'll soon have a good idea of the cost :) Then core projects are free to choose their code hosting among the supported options... -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting tomorrow
I shared an initial plan with a few people (mostly PTLs + thierry, I think) and it kind of stalled out on getting pushed to the main list due to Monty / Thierry wanting additional features from GitHub. I've been mostly talking with John DIckinson as it seems like Swift is the likely first project to switch over, and sharing the migration tool I wrote: https://github.com/termie/lp2gh The interesting pages there are: https://github.com/termie/lp2gh/blob/master/docs/moving_branches.rst and https://github.com/termie/lp2gh/blob/master/docs/moving_issues.rst I can rebuild the original email about a plan, but it will still need to get buy in from Monty to move forward. --andy On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:25 AM, John Dickinson john.dickin...@rackspace.com wrote: On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:17 PM, John Purrier wrote: For tomorrow's meeting... PTL's, can you update us on where each of your projects stand on this? Termie and mtaylor (added to the email) were going to come up with a plan for review, is this getting done? I have a very good start on swift's migration plan. We've been practicing some with the swauth project in Launchpad/GitHub. I've got a few docs written on it, and I'm planning on sharing those with other involved persons as soon as I have a little more details. Our plan is to set a date and make sure all parties are taken care of. --John ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
