RE: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session

2003-02-03 Thread Jason Carreira
Oops! I was looking at the wrong week when I scheduled this. I've got an
appointment at 1:45. How about Tuesday at 2? Does that work for everyone
who wants to attend?

 -Original Message-
 From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 6:17 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session
 
 
 I'll be there. Anyone else? We had some mementum going a 
 couple weeks back, I'd like to see it pick up again. Please, 
 anyone who is interested in XWork and/or WebWork 2.0, join 
 us! If you have firewall issues and can't connect to IRC from 
 work, contact me and I can help you find ways around it if possible.
 
 -Pat
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:28 PM
 Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session
 
 
  Oops, forgot to list the time... I was thinking 2PM Eastern time 
  Monday 2/3...
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Jason Carreira
   Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 12:23 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session
  
  
   On the table is the ThreadLocal issue and how to re-introduce it. 
   The current Xwork code uses an ActionInvocation which is 
 passed to 
   each of the interceptors and holds the state of the request 
   processing. In order to make Actions (more) backward 
 compatible in 
   WW 2.0, we need to re-introduce the ThreadLocal state management 
   concept from WW 1.2/1.3.
  
   Rickard, etc. let me know if this is a good time for you. 
 Anyone who 
   plans to attend, please look through the sandbox code 
 first. If you 
   have any other issues you'd like to discuss, please post them to 
   this list so people have time to think about them beforehand.
  
   Patrick has suggested we do this on #xwork on irc.werken.com, so 
   that it can be logged at http://irc.werken.com/channels/.
  
   Jason
  
   --
   Jason Carreira
   Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
   phone: 585.240.2793
 fax: 585.272.8118
   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ---
   Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
  
  
  
   ---
   This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
   SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld 
 =omething 2 See! 
   http://www.vasoftware.com 
   ___
   Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
  
 
 
  ---
  This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
  SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld
 http://www.vasoftware.com
  ___
  Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 
 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com 
 ___
 Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
 


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



RE: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session

2003-02-03 Thread Bernard Jérôme
 Oops! I was looking at the wrong week when I scheduled
 this. I've got an appointment at 1:45. How about Tuesday
 at 2? Does that work for everyone who wants to attend?

Would be better for me. Can't be available today too.

Regards,
Jérôme.





---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



RE: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session

2003-01-31 Thread Jason Carreira
Oops, forgot to list the time... I was thinking 2PM Eastern time Monday
2/3...

 -Original Message-
 From: Jason Carreira 
 Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 12:23 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [OS-webwork] Xwork 1.0 / Webwork 2.0 design session
 
 
 On the table is the ThreadLocal issue and how to re-introduce 
 it. The current Xwork code uses an ActionInvocation which is 
 passed to each of the interceptors and holds the state of the 
 request processing. In order to make Actions (more) backward 
 compatible in WW 2.0, we need to re-introduce the ThreadLocal 
 state management concept from WW 1.2/1.3. 
 
 Rickard, etc. let me know if this is a good time for you. 
 Anyone who plans to attend, please look through the sandbox 
 code first. If you have any other issues you'd like to 
 discuss, please post them to this list so people have time to 
 think about them beforehand.
 
 Patrick has suggested we do this on #xwork on irc.werken.com, 
 so that it can be logged at http://irc.werken.com/channels/.
 
 Jason
 
 --
 Jason Carreira
 Technical Architect, Notiva Corp.
 phone:585.240.2793
   fax:585.272.8118
 email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---
 Notiva - optimizing trade relationships (tm)
  
 
 
 ---
 This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
 SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =omething 2 
 See! http://www.vasoftware.com 
 ___
 Opensymphony-webwork mailing list 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
 


---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork