[Openvas-discuss] Fwd: Turkish chapter

2010-01-13 Thread Robert Berkowitz
All:

I received this offer to host a mirror in Turkey for download of
OpenVAS. Please let me know if you all agree to this and we can get
them set up.

Regards,
 Robert


-- Forwarded message --
From: Ozgur Ozdemircili ozgur.ozdemirc...@grupserhs.com
Date: Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Turkish chapter
To: robert.berkow...@gmail.com


Hi,

Im Ozgur. As one of the many people Id like to congratulate you guys
for the awesome job. Me and my team would like to offer you mirroring
service in our server under acikkod.org, a Turkish opensource web
site, publishing tips and news. And in the future, depending on the
people I can collect we can start to do the localization of the
website and the software.

Let me know if I can be of assist in any kind.

Have a good day.

Özgür Özdemircili
IT Department
ozgur.ozdemirc...@grupserhs.com

www.serhstourism.com
SERHS TOURISM, S.A. - GRUP SERHS
C/ Garbí, 88-90 - 08397
PINEDA DE MAR (BARCELONA)
937629300
937629301

Sent from Santa Barbara, CT, Spain

Aquest missatge pot contenir informacio privilegiada o confidencial.
Si voste no n'es el destinatari o l'ha rebut per error, li preguem que
ens ho faci saber immediatament i el destrueixi.
Queda notificat que qualsevol utilitzacio, divulgacio i/o copia sense
autoritzacio esta prohibida i pot ser il.legal.

Este mensaje puede contener informacion privilegiada o confidencial.
Si no es Vd. el destinatario o lo ha recibido por error, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique inmediatamente y lo destruya.
Queda notificado de que cualquier utilizacion, divulgacion y/o copia
sin autorizacion esta prohibida y puede ser ilegal.

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient or have received it in error,
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material
in this e-mail is strictly forbidden and may be illegal.




-- 
Robert Berkowitz
919.244.5704
robert.berkow...@gmail.com
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss


Re: [Openvas-discuss] Voting on Change Requests #6 - #9

2008-05-15 Thread Robert Berkowitz
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Jan-Oliver Wagner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello OpenVAS users,

  I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #6 - #9
  as listed here:

   http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html

   #6: Remove support of old XML report format

This looks good to me. Since we can export in a new and better
supported XML format I see no reason not to move forward with this.

   #7: Extend report widget with optional info on NVT name/oid in 
 OpenVAS-Client

The additional info would be helpful. I support this.

   #8: Introduce NVT family Credentials

We should implement this.

   #9: Make OpenVAS use (and depend on) glib

I think some more exploratory work should be done on this before a
full implementation.

-Robert

-- 
Robert Berkowitz
919.244.5704
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss


Re: [Openvas-discuss] [Openvas-devel] Voting on Change Requests #1 - #4

2008-02-19 Thread Robert Berkowitz
On Feb 19, 2008 7:35 PM, Tim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wednesday 20 February 2008 00:08:24 Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I'd like to call for voting on the change requests #1 - #4,
  listed here:
http://www.openvas.org/openvas-crs.html
 
  Naturally, I am in favour of all 4 of them :-)
  However, please read and judge whether it is a good
  or bad idea or wether it needs further refinement.
 
  I am not totally sure about the proper voting scheme.
  Tim, Robert: Does SPI require something special or
  do we just decide upon a simple voting?

 The full details as we expressed them in the constitution can be found at
 http://seedsforchange.org.uk/free/consens, but it essentially comes down to a
 show of negative hands.  If noone raises strong objections against an idea
 then we can proceed.  One thing that isn't defined is the period in which
 people need to respond in order for an objection to be considered.  In the
 past I've seen people work on the 24 hour rule, but since we're spread across
 multiple continents and time zones, I'd propose a longer period.  OTOH we
 can't have an indefinite period of time.  How about 48 hours with an
 gentlemens agreement not to start a call for voting over weekends.


48 Hours sounds good to me. We should be able to make exceptions to
the rule if someone has given advanced notice of not being available
for a certain time period as well.

-RB

-- 
Robert Berkowitz
919.244.5704
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Openvas-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
___
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss