Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 01:11:05 schrieb Tim Brown:
> The work flow should be as follows, IMO:
>
> Initial request via tracker or mailing list -> Request is discussed in
> tracker and debated on list with any substantial points imported into
> tracker -> Consensus reached, developer documented change request uploaded
> to http://www.openvas.org/ -> Work done to implement change, with updates
> to tracker and lists as appropriate
sounds good.
> I would also suggest that the change requests link back to the relevant
> tracker entry.
this is a very good idea. Also links to mailing list discussions. I've added
this to the CRs now.
Best
Jan
_______________________________________________
Openvas-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-devel
_______________________________________________
Openvas-discuss mailing list
Openvas-discuss@wald.intevation.org
http://lists.wald.intevation.org/mailman/listinfo/openvas-discuss
