Re: project site deployment
Great Mark!, I will do in the evening;
Thanks;
/Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 1:50:58 AM
Subject: project site deployment
Hi Gurkan!
Can you please write-allow the group on /www/incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans?
Otherwise I wont be able to do a site deployment ;)
I btw had an idea about how we could be future safe:
/www/incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans
|- openwebbeans
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- openwebbeans-impl
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- openwebbeans-api
| |- 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
| |- 1.0.0-M1
|
|- samples
...
All sites are automatically deployed to
./${project.artifactId}/${project.version}
and the main directory only contains an index.html with a redirect to the
actual version of the parent poms site.
LieGrue,
strub
[jira] Created: (OWB-61) Refactor the annotations to match the new package schema.
Refactor the annotations to match the new package schema. - Key: OWB-61 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-61 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu Gavin changed the final public review spec in a way that we don't have all WebBeans annotations in javax.webbeans anymore. Instead we now have the following packages: javax.context javax.inject javax.inject.manager javax.event See appendix C of the spec for the details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml
Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml --- Key: OWB-62 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-62 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Struberg Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu The term "WebBeans" has completely removed from the final PR spec and also the xml config files name has changed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: M1-Release Content
Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > Hi, > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the > volenteer process. > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to > the OpenWebBeans! > > Thanks a lot; > > Cheers; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved that I > start > working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. > > I just want you to know that I am not totally free for oss > development. I only do whatever I can in my free time :-). > I mean I > hope your not sad of not working on the former items :-). > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > Hi Mohammad, > > yeap I did this stuff. > > > > You could look for the jira for any further issues :) > > > > > > thanks; > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > Sorry but now I don't understand I thought that > all the points in the > > list are not implemented yet, it seems that I > undertsood wrong. Is > > there anything else I can do, I may have time during > this weekend. > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > wrote: > >> All done ? > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > >> wrote: > >>> Its done. > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:56:41 AM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Ok, Mohammad. > >>> Thanks; > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:19:24 PM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Hey Gurkan... > >>> > >>> No not really I have been too busy at work > :-( . I will start work > >>> on the issues as soon as I have some free > time. If you started to work > >>> on them please let me know so I work on free > issues. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Gurkan > Erdogdu wrote: > Hey Mohammad; > > Is there any progress on this issue :) ? > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:11:43 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > Oh sorry :-) you mean the items listed in > the quoted text of this > thread :-) right ? anyway I will start > working on them as much as I > can and I will send you a mail on Sunday > to tell what I have done of > them. > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Mohammad > Nour El-Din > wrote: > > Hi Gurkan... > > > > Sorry but what Items you are > referring to ? > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:01 AM, > Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > >> Hi Mohammad, > >> > >> Could you do anything about the > following items? If not I will start to finish them. > >> > >> I wish that we are able to ready > at start of the next week for M1-Release VOTE ? > >> > >> Thanks; > >> > >> > Hi Gurkan... > >> > I noticed that from the > SCM mails :-). I will check the mails for > >any other required > items. > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, > Gurkan Erdogdu > >> > wrote: > >>> Hi Mohammad; > >>> > >>> I attacked the two of them in > the late night :) > >>> > >>> 1* I added the *licences* > directory for binary distribution of the project. You can > reach > >> all the distribution related > stuffs under the */distribution* directory. > >>> 2* I changed the artifact > names of the *
[jira] Commented: (OWB-24) Producer Field Implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1249#action_1249 ] Mark Struberg commented on OWB-24: -- the use cases for @Target(METHOD) : @Produces public static String foo = "foo"; @Produces static Integer bar = 1; @Produces static String johnDoe = getUnknownAuthor(); > Producer Field Implementation > - > > Key: OWB-24 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-24 > Project: OpenWebBeans > Issue Type: Task > Components: Core >Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu > Fix For: M2 > > > Adding of the producer field components. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: M1-Release Content
+1 Mark. As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration point. Because the specification removes the plug-in functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via listener. Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, we could create a another module for EJB integration. What do you think about integration code? How can we start this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. this weekend. And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and M1-Release Content that I have sent before? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > Hi, > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the > volenteer process. > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to > the OpenWebBeans! > > Thanks a lot; > > Cheers; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved that I > start > working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. > > I just want you to know that I am not totally free for oss > development. I only do whatever I can in my free time :-). > I mean I > hope your not sad of not working on the former items :-). > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > Hi Mohammad, > > yeap I did this stuff. > > > > You could look for the jira for any further issues :) > > > > > > thanks; > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > Sorry but now I don't understand I thought that > all the points in the > > list are not implemented yet, it seems that I > undertsood wrong. Is > > there anything else I can do, I may have time during > this weekend. > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > wrote: > >> All done ? > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > >> wrote: > >>> Its done. > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:56:41 AM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Ok, Mohammad. > >>> Thanks; > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:19:24 PM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Hey Gurkan... > >>> > >>> No not really I have been too busy at work > :-( . I will start work > >>> on the issues as soon as I have some free > time. If you started to work > >>> on them please let me know so I work on free > issues. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Gurkan > Erdogdu wrote: > Hey Mohammad; > > Is there any progress on this issue :) ? > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 7:11:43 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > Oh sorry :-) you mean the items listed in > the quoted text of this > thread :-) right ? anyway I will start > working on the
Re: M1-Release Content
* Simple WebBeans Support * Producer Method Support * Event and Observer Support * Decorator and Interceptor Support * Experimental XML Configuration Support * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface) Is this list enough for the M1-Release? If not what do you want to see in the M1-Release? I will create jira issue as a content of the M1-Release with these support items. /Gurkan From: Gurkan Erdogdu To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:37:06 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content +1 Mark. As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration point. Because the specification removes the plug-in functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via listener. Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, we could create a another module for EJB integration. What do you think about integration code? How can we start this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. this weekend. And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and M1-Release Content that I have sent before? Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Do, 22.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > Hi, > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is the > volenteer process. > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help to > the OpenWebBeans! > > Thanks a lot; > > Cheers; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved that I > start > working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. > > I just want you to know that I am not totally free for oss > development. I only do whatever I can in my free time :-). > I mean I > hope your not sad of not working on the former items :-). > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > wrote: > > Hi Mohammad, > > yeap I did this stuff. > > > > You could look for the jira for any further issues :) > > > > > > thanks; > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > Sorry but now I don't understand I thought that > all the points in the > > list are not implemented yet, it seems that I > undertsood wrong. Is > > there anything else I can do, I may have time during > this weekend. > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > wrote: > >> All done ? > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > >> wrote: > >>> Its done. > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 8:56:41 AM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Ok, Mohammad. > >>> Thanks; > >>> > >>> /Gurkan > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > >>> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 11:19:24 PM > >>> Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > >>> > >>> Hey Gurkan... > >>> > >>> No not really I have been too busy at work > :-( . I will start work > >>> on the issues as soon as I have some free > time. If you started to work > >>> on them pleas
[jira] Created: (OWB-63) M1-Release Content
M1-Release Content -- Key: OWB-63 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-63 Project: OpenWebBeans Issue Type: Task Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu These are the items that we want to support in M1 * Simple WebBeans Support * Producer Method Support * Event and Observer Support * Decorator and Interceptor Support * Experimental XML Configuration Support * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: M1-Release Content
I'm not sure if the change for the Integration part in the PDR is kind of 'politically' caused. Since JBoss is a J2EE and there was not much time for Gavin to finish the PDR, it was maybe simply the easiest way to get the spec finished. Sure it makes EJB and JMS integration a lot easier, but then there are other scenarios where EJB and JMS is not required at all. So for me I'd prefer to still have 2 ways to get OpenWebBeans running: 1.) with Geronimo in an J2EE environment where we provide the full EJB and JMS integration 2.) SE with a ServletContextListener running on a simple webserver like tomcat or jetty + MyFaces + OpenJPA, which would be THE killer criteria to be competitive with Spring! LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 20:37 > +1 Mark. > > As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the > weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far > into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration > point. Because the specification removes the plug-in > functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate > the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans > supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a > plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the > WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via > listener. > > Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have > looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning > seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, > we could create a another module for EJB integration. > > What do you think about integration code? How can we start > this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. > this weekend. > > And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and > M1-Release Content that I have sent before? > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mark Struberg > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > Hi folks! > > Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to > ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? > > Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, > and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a > lot. > > e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. > > Do we really like to release M1 today? > Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final > spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then > prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? > > Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package > changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we > could try how good our release process works already ;) > > WDYT? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb > am Do, 22.1.2009: > > > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > > Hi, > > > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is > the > > volenteer process. > > > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help > to > > the OpenWebBeans! > > > > Thanks a lot; > > > > Cheers; > > > > /Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved > that I > > start > > working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. > > > > I just want you to know that I am not totally free for > oss > > development. I only do whatever I can in my free time > :-). > > I mean I > > hope your not sad of not working on the former items > :-). > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > > wrote: > > > Hi Mohammad, > > > yeap I did this stuff. > > > > > > You could look for the jira for any further > issues :) > > > > > > > > > thanks; > > > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:02:17 PM > > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > > > Sorry but now I don't understand I thought > that > > all the points in the > > > list are not implemented yet, it seems that I > > undertsood wrong. Is > > > there anything else I can do, I may have time > during > > this weekend. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Mohammad Nour > El-Din > > > wrote: > > >> All done ? > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Gurkan > Erdogdu > > >> wrote: > > >>> Its done. > > >>> > > >>> /Gurkan > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> From: Gurkan Erdogdu > > > > >>> To: openwebbeans-de
Re: M1-Release Content
I think in the M1-Release we just support the ServletContextListener scanning, it is fine for me. But this requires the developer to configure OpenWebBeans related artifacts in his web.xml file of the application. After the M1 release it is good idea to integrate WAR scanning via Geronimo WAR deployment integration. So Geronimo users can benefit from the Webbeans functionality. After this integration is done successfully, we can further integrate other points like EJB, JMS etc. Kevan : How could we start to integrate the our WAR scanning to discover deployed webbeans classes with Geronimo WAR deployment? Do we have to provide some sort of SPI that the Geronimo implements ? Our aim is that when the user deploys war archive into the Geronimo, if this WAR archive contains WEB-INF/beans.xml file (or classpath libraries with theirs META-INF/beans.xml ), it automatically provides the webbeans functionality without the configuring the any other details. Moreover, Geronimo must add the OpenWebBeans specific listeners, filters etc. to the deployment. Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:48:54 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I'm not sure if the change for the Integration part in the PDR is kind of 'politically' caused. Since JBoss is a J2EE and there was not much time for Gavin to finish the PDR, it was maybe simply the easiest way to get the spec finished. Sure it makes EJB and JMS integration a lot easier, but then there are other scenarios where EJB and JMS is not required at all. So for me I'd prefer to still have 2 ways to get OpenWebBeans running: 1.) with Geronimo in an J2EE environment where we provide the full EJB and JMS integration 2.) SE with a ServletContextListener running on a simple webserver like tomcat or jetty + MyFaces + OpenJPA, which would be THE killer criteria to be competitive with Spring! LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 20:37 > +1 Mark. > > As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the > weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far > into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration > point. Because the specification removes the plug-in > functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate > the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans > supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a > plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the > WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via > listener. > > Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have > looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning > seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, > we could create a another module for EJB integration. > > What do you think about integration code? How can we start > this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. > this weekend. > > And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and > M1-Release Content that I have sent before? > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mark Struberg > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > Hi folks! > > Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to > ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? > > Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, > and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a > lot. > > e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. > > Do we really like to release M1 today? > Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final > spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then > prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? > > Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package > changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we > could try how good our release process works already ;) > > WDYT? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb > am Do, 22.1.2009: > > > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > > Hi, > > > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is > the > > volenteer process. > > > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help > to > > the OpenWebBeans! > > > > Thanks a lot; > > > > Cheers; > > > > /Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > > > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:59:58 PM > > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > > > I am thinking after having the Vote over M1 approved > that I > > start > > working on M2 beside JIRA for sure. > > > >
Re: M1-Release Content
I have created a jira ticket for M1-Release, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-63. Please add your comments about the M1-Release into this issue. From: Gurkan Erdogdu To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:05:47 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I think in the M1-Release we just support the ServletContextListener scanning, it is fine for me. But this requires the developer to configure OpenWebBeans related artifacts in his web.xml file of the application. After the M1 release it is good idea to integrate WAR scanning via Geronimo WAR deployment integration. So Geronimo users can benefit from the Webbeans functionality. After this integration is done successfully, we can further integrate other points like EJB, JMS etc. Kevan : How could we start to integrate the our WAR scanning to discover deployed webbeans classes with Geronimo WAR deployment? Do we have to provide some sort of SPI that the Geronimo implements ? Our aim is that when the user deploys war archive into the Geronimo, if this WAR archive contains WEB-INF/beans.xml file (or classpath libraries with theirs META-INF/beans.xml ), it automatically provides the webbeans functionality without the configuring the any other details. Moreover, Geronimo must add the OpenWebBeans specific listeners, filters etc. to the deployment. Thanks; /Gurkan From: Mark Struberg To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:48:54 PM Subject: Re: M1-Release Content I'm not sure if the change for the Integration part in the PDR is kind of 'politically' caused. Since JBoss is a J2EE and there was not much time for Gavin to finish the PDR, it was maybe simply the easiest way to get the spec finished. Sure it makes EJB and JMS integration a lot easier, but then there are other scenarios where EJB and JMS is not required at all. So for me I'd prefer to still have 2 ways to get OpenWebBeans running: 1.) with Geronimo in an J2EE environment where we provide the full EJB and JMS integration 2.) SE with a ServletContextListener running on a simple webserver like tomcat or jetty + MyFaces + OpenJPA, which would be THE killer criteria to be competitive with Spring! LieGrue, strub --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 20:37 > +1 Mark. > > As Mark said, it is good idea to read the PDR in the > weekend and puts all the issues that we do not handle so far > into the jira. I am thinking about the server integration > point. Because the specification removes the plug-in > functionality. How do we handle this ? How do we integrate > the OpenWebBeans with Geronimo ? Currently, OpenWebBeans > supports the WAR deployment via ServletContextListener as a > plugin functionality. In this scenario, we are scanning the > WAR archive to setup the initial Manager(activity) via > listener. > > Currently we do not support for the EJB's. I have > looked at the WebBeansScanner class today, the EJB scanning > seems to be implemented wrongly. As Mark indicated before, > we could create a another module for EJB integration. > > What do you think about integration code? How can we start > this? Maybe we can talk about it after reading the spec. > this weekend. > > And what do you think about the date of the M1-Release and > M1-Release Content that I have sent before? > > Thanks; > > /Gurkan > > > > > > From: Mark Struberg > To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 8:24:37 PM > Subject: Re: M1-Release Content > > Hi folks! > > Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to > ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? > > Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, > and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a > lot. > > e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. > > Do we really like to release M1 today? > Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final > spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then > prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? > > Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package > changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we > could try how good our release process works already ;) > > WDYT? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- Gurkan Erdogdu schrieb > am Do, 22.1.2009: > > > Von: Gurkan Erdogdu > > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Datum: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2009, 19:48 > > Hi, > > > > Do not worry Mohammad, we know that the open source is > the > > volenteer process. > > > > You are always welcome whenever you have time to help > to > > the OpenWebBeans! > > > > Thanks a lot; > > > > Cheers; > > > > /Gurkan > > > > > > >
Re: M1-Release Content
On Jan 23, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi folks! Before we click on the red button finally, I'd like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? Gavin today published the public review draft of the spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change WebBeans a lot. e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. Do we really like to release M1 today? Just to be sure -- that should say something like "do we really like to create an M1 release candidate to vote on, today?" Or should we better take 2 days, read through the final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. Otoh we could try how good our release process works already ;) WDYT? I have no problem either way. It sounds prudent to allow some time for everyone to review the new spec and then make the decision. I'm guessing that you'll probably want to make updates to rapidly match the new spec. --kevan
kevan hands out gold stars
Since I was thinking about this, I thought I'd go ahead and send a note. I think you guys are off to a really good start. You're making a lot of really good progress with the implementation. The release preparation, although potentially delayed for a bit (which is not a bad thing at all), has gone very well. Most importantly, I'm very pleased by the amount of communication that I'm seeing. Keep up the good work! You all deserve a pat on the back this weekend, while reading the updated spec, of course... :-P --kevan
Re: M1-Release Content
> Just to be sure -- that should say something like "do > we really like to create an M1 release candidate to vote on, > today?" Yes, sorry my phrasing was misleading. LieGrue, strub --- Kevan Miller schrieb am Fr, 23.1.2009: > Von: Kevan Miller > Betreff: Re: M1-Release Content > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 21:36 > On Jan 23, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > Before we click on the red button finally, I'd > like to ask if we really do like to release M1 NOW? > > > > Gavin today published the public review draft of the > spec, and it contains a lot of changes which do change > WebBeans a lot. > > > > e.g. the change of the packages, EJB handling etc. > > > > Do we really like to release M1 today? > > Just to be sure -- that should say something like "do > we really like to create an M1 release candidate to vote on, > today?" > > > > > Or should we better take 2 days, read through the > final spec, create Jiras for all things we have to do, then > prioritise them and finally do a M1 release next week? > > > > Otherwise we have to admit that without e.g. the > package changes, we will have to ship a M2 very quickly. > Otoh we could try how good our release process works already > ;) > > > > WDYT? > > I have no problem either way. It sounds prudent to allow > some time for everyone to review the new spec and then make > the decision. I'm guessing that you'll probably want > to make updates to rapidly match the new spec. > > --kevan
first version of mvn generated site online
tadaaa: http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html There are still few failures I have to correct tomorrow: 1.) the headers of the sub modules are currently missing 2.) the links in the breadcrumbs are partly (mostly) broken. 3.) the structure of the page (on the disk) is not as I like it to be. I'll probably redeploy an update tomorrow evening. If all is ok, then I'll mv the main index.html to index2.html and create a fresh one with a redirect to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html LieGrue, strub
Re: [jira] Created: (OWB-62) Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml
Doesn't this make conflict with Spring bean.xml ? it looks like it is in Spring roadmap to become a light weight EJB 3.1 container, it may be possible in future that both web-beans and spring containers are allowed together. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Mark Struberg (JIRA) wrote: > Refactor web-beans.xml to beans.xml > --- > > Key: OWB-62 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-62 > Project: OpenWebBeans > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Mark Struberg >Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu > > > The term "WebBeans" has completely removed from the final PR spec and also > the xml config files name has changed. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > -- Arash Rajaeeyan
