Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Požega pozega.tomis...@gmail.com wrote: thomson usually sticks with crappy broadcom so don't give much hope for AR9271.. It's a Ralink RT3070 it seems! The console log is here: http://pastebin.com/LCf2rFCv I didn't take it from my device as I'm having problems with the serial adapter which I'll be replacing soon. Should there be any differences between the log I'll take in the next days, as soon as I buy the new adapter, and this one I'll let you know. The bootloader is the Thomson one, and I don't think it's supported sadly. What can I do now? -- Marcus905 GPG pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
Hi, Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices: 1. Leave it 2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :) The devices in linux based so there should be some way... Regards, Jacek On 18.10.2013 10:13, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Požega pozega.tomis...@gmail.com wrote: thomson usually sticks with crappy broadcom so don't give much hope for AR9271.. It's a Ralink RT3070 it seems! The console log is here: http://pastebin.com/LCf2rFCv I didn't take it from my device as I'm having problems with the serial adapter which I'll be replacing soon. Should there be any differences between the log I'll take in the next days, as soon as I buy the new adapter, and this one I'll let you know. The bootloader is the Thomson one, and I don't think it's supported sadly. What can I do now? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
I've been working with someone with a similar one myself the ZTE ZXV10 H108L router modem from Wind Hellas, it has a u-boot bootloader and runs linux. http://pastebin.com/EXzrEwfE is the serial log and http://pastebin.com/H5nbgr3i is printenv, I have issued a GPL source code request to the operator but have yet to receive a response. Do you have any suggested first steps to make openwrt bootable on this? On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro marcu...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Požega pozega.tomis...@gmail.com wrote: thomson usually sticks with crappy broadcom so don't give much hope for AR9271.. It's a Ralink RT3070 it seems! The console log is here: http://pastebin.com/LCf2rFCv I didn't take it from my device as I'm having problems with the serial adapter which I'll be replacing soon. Should there be any differences between the log I'll take in the next days, as soon as I buy the new adapter, and this one I'll let you know. The bootloader is the Thomson one, and I don't think it's supported sadly. What can I do now? -- Marcus905 GPG pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz ja...@aol.pl wrote: Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices: 1. Leave it 2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :) 3. replace bootloader with uboot? Anyways internal pictures are here. https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=ExhibitsRequestTimeout=500calledFromFrame=Napplication_id=526141fcc_id=RSE-TG585V8 I'm trying to get the source for the device, let's see what I can find. -- Marcus905 GPG pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their website? On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz ja...@aol.pl wrote: On 18.10.2013 10:22, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz ja...@aol.pl wrote: Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices: 1. Leave it 2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :) 3. replace bootloader with uboot? Anyways internal pictures are here. https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/**eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.** cfm?mode=Exhibits**RequestTimeout=500**calledFromFrame=Napplication_** id=526141fcc_id=RSE-TG585V8https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=ExhibitsRequestTimeout=500calledFromFrame=Napplication_id=526141fcc_id=RSE-TG585V8 I'm trying to get the source for the device, let's see what I can find. True, but this is risky and it would be good to have JTAG or proper soldering equipment + programmer to play with boot loader. I thin your option is a whole new level (unless there is ready boot loader) :) __**_ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.**org openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-**develhttps://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:37 AM, James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com wrote: What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their website? Tiscali Italy http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/ This is the support page, in Italian. -- Marcus905 GPG pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] ar71xx: Fix sysupgrades for Allnet and OpenMesh devices
Both Allnet and OpenMesh sysupgrade uses fw_setenv from uboot-envtools to
change different settings in the uboot environment. uboot-envtools version
2013.01 introduced a filesystem lock /var/lock/fw_printenv.lock to guarantee
mutually exclusive access to the uboot environment. But the path /var doesn't
exist on the sysupgrade ramfs.
An upgrade on these devices fails since r36033 ([package] uboot-envtools:
upgrade to version 2013.01.01) with following messages:
Error opening lock file /var/lock/fw_printenv.lock
failed to update U-Boot environment
Creating the /var/lock path before running fw_setenv is therefore a
requirement unless the locking functionality in fw_setenv is removed or
replaced with optional locking.
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann s...@open-mesh.com
---
v2:
* just create the path instead in platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv instead of
creating directly before calling fw_setenv
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh | 2 ++
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
index 9a375ff..98b368d 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
@@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
# a minimal web-interface for flashing a new firmware.
# make sure we got uboot-envtools and fw_env.config copied over to the ramfs
+# create /var/lock for the lock fw_setenv.lock of fw_setenv
platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv() {
[ -e /usr/sbin/fw_printenv ] install_bin /usr/sbin/fw_printenv
/usr/sbin/fw_setenv
[ -e /etc/fw_env.config ] install_file /etc/fw_env.config
+ mkdir -p $RAM_ROOT/var/lock
}
append sysupgrade_pre_upgrade platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh
index 5179875..fb8ef19 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/openmesh.sh
@@ -27,10 +27,12 @@ cfg_value_get()
}
# make sure we got uboot-envtools and fw_env.config copied over to the ramfs
+# create /var/lock for the lock fw_setenv.lock of fw_setenv
platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv()
{
[ -e /usr/sbin/fw_printenv ] install_bin /usr/sbin/fw_printenv
/usr/sbin/fw_setenv
[ -e /etc/fw_env.config ] install_file /etc/fw_env.config
+ mkdir -p $RAM_ROOT/var/lock
}
append sysupgrade_pre_upgrade platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv
--
1.8.4.rc3
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar71xx: Fix sysupgrades for Allnet and OpenMesh devices
On Thursday 17 October 2013 16:12:27 Daniel Golle wrote:
Hi Sven,
thank you for addressing that issue!
On 10/17/2013 06:42 PM, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh index
9a375ff..8076fbd 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/allnet.sh
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
platform_add_ramfs_ubootenv() {
[ -e /usr/sbin/fw_printenv ] install_bin /usr/sbin/fw_printenv
/usr/sbin/fw_setenv [ -e /etc/fw_env.config ] install_file
/etc/fw_env.config
+ [ -e /bin/mkdir ] install_bin /bin/mkdir /bin/mkdir
mkdir is a link to busybox. wouldn't it be better to just add that symlink
to the list of busybox symlinks in
/package/base-files/files/lib/upgrade/common.sh
or even better: why not just
mkdir -p $RAM_ROOT/var/lock
and not even use mkdir inside the ramdisk?
Yes, you are right. It is easier and still obvious for the reader. See v2 of
the patch.
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it seem to be generic? I am going to issue a GPL source code request and want to make sure it reaches the right company. There appears to be incomplete source code listed on this website that was formally Thomson http://www3.technicolor.com/en/hi/minisites/open-software/dsl-cable-ip-modem-gateways/dsl-gateways On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro marcu...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:37 AM, James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com wrote: What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their website? Tiscali Italy http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/ This is the support page, in Italian. -- Marcus905 GPG pubkey: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Quick hack for kernel entropy problem on MIPS
Take a look at this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9631 - Original Message - From: Weedy To: OpenWrt Development List Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 1:02 AM Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Quick hack for kernel entropy problem on MIPS On 17 Oct 2013 13:07, chrono chr...@open-resource.org wrote: root@OpenWrt:/# cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail 0 Uhh ok? root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail 1189 What's your uptime? Entropy is added to the pool e.g. based on network activity. The issue is that the pool is empty right after boot up. Well it's not anymore (with the patch). That may be due to the fact that network is the only source of entropy left on MIPS, that is something I personally wouldn't accept as enough anymore. As I reckon there has been a lengthy discussion about it already and many people raised their concerns. ecurity/meldung/Linux-auf-MIPS-jetzt-wieder-mit-mehr-Zufall-1963604.html (sorry for german link) That patch wouldn't work with 3.3.8 due to include dependencies I wasn't willing to follow up. The attached patch will re-enable CPU interrupts as entropy source, at least for AR71xx/mips32r3 and will do so right away, which might also solve issues with hostapd/nginx that require some during init. A, I can see how that might cause issues. I have made some sysctl tweaks and my network always has something going on. So I never noticed. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT on Ubicom Chipsets
Do I need to submit everything all at once or can I add things slowly so I can confirm all components are in compliance with openwrt formatting etc? The first thing to do would be to revert the removal of the ubicom32 platform here https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/ubicom32, from there I can work on integrating the device specific patches. Should I submit a patch for that removal? On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 6:50 AM, James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.comwrote: So, I think i more or less got the boot processes down, however I don't have hardware with me right now. Boot goes from ultraubootlinux more or less. From the looks of it getting a console on uboot should be fairly straight forward. I'm going to attempt to compile an oem build with the uboot console enabled that way we can debug and flash over Ethernet instead of serial. Msg me on gtalk and ill send you some builds(this email). On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 2:04 AM, michal-osowie...@o2.pl michal-osowie...@o2.pl wrote: Hi James AFAIR dir-657 soucecode has openwrt's port which compiles but has no ethernet switch enabled/ported. I's hard to test develop anything without flash programmer so i dropped testing. It would be nice if you could add this model to your work Thanks, Michal Dnia 16 października 2013 20:53 James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com napisał(a): I think i#39;ll attempt to support this and get some vendor/deviceconfigs integrated, can the changes that removed arch support bereverted easily in trunk? I#39;ve been working off of 12.09 here https://github.com/Lightsword1942/openwrtubicom and manually merging some things let me know if you have anysuggestions. I#39;m not sure what this is using for include/siteand that#39;s what I#39;m currently hung up on. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, 2013/9/16 James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com: Anyone interested in OpenWRT on Ubicom? They used OpenWRTinternally so there is already source ready(may be a little outdatedthough). Also have some router specific sources of both it and stock. OpenWrt did support the ubicom32 architecture for awhile, but since this is a very quirky architecture and nobody could step up as a maintainer, it got removed. Unless you are willing to support that architecture, I see no point in supporting it since it reallyrequired a lot of quirks (special hypervisor software,bootloader and !MMU). -- Florian ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com wrote: Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it seem to be generic? I'm not home at the moment so I cannot grab you some screenshots, but the interface is exactly the same as the one here taken from my ISP's website: http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/configurazione_modem/1.php ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 1/3] pptpd: Add uci configuration for PPTPD.
Applied in r38445 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] isc-dhcp: dhcrelay: Add more UCI options
Applied in r38446 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] isc-dhcp: dhcrelay: Add RFC3527 link selection sub-option
Applied in r38447 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iwinfo: make 'type' visible in wrapped iwinfo
Applied in r38448 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 06/10] iw: add patch to support 802.11j frequencies
Applied in r38449 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 09/10] x86: fix condition in base-files.mk
Applied in r38450 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 08/10] wpa_supplicant: fix beacon_int configuration option
Applied in r38451 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] dropbear: add dropbear.nl mirror, provided by dropbear maintainer
Applied in r38413 - thanks! ~ Jow signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Quick hack for kernel entropy problem on MIPS
On 18/10/13 07:09 AM, José Vázquez Fernández wrote: Take a look at this ticket: https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/9631 Again, I do not personally have this issue but I can see why it would need to be fixed. $ ssh r...@openwrt.lan 'reboot';sleep 3;while ! ping -c3 openwrt.lan; do sleep 2; done; ssh r...@openwrt.lan 'while :; do cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail; sleep 1; done' ping: unknown host openwrt.lan snip ping: unknown host openwrt.lan PING openwrt.lan (192.168.8.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from OpenWrt.lan (192.168.8.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=69 time=0.999 ms 64 bytes from OpenWrt.lan (192.168.8.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=69 time=1.24 ms 64 bytes from OpenWrt.lan (192.168.8.1): icmp_seq=3 ttl=69 time=1.22 ms --- openwrt.lan ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.999/1.158/1.247/0.112 ms 135 139 145 151 snip 200 207 213 218 222 229 232 237 242 snip 363 401 440 478 9 46 87 122 166 203 snip 684 726 762 799 837 snip 1346 1381 1416 1452 1481 1513 snip 1074 1106 1161 1197 1231 1263 snip 1270 1304 1347 1385 snip 1091 1123 1156 1185 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] sysupgrade support for OM2P working in AA?
Hi, This is the wiki page in question: http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/openmesh/om2p#upgrading.openwrt Thank you for clarifying that sysupgrade does work! if the sysupgrade works to your satisfaction would you mind updating that section in the wiki ? It might spare the next person some hassle. Thanks, Marek signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Add a new Amazon-SE board
Ok, i'm going to contact the manufacturer directly then and see what they say. On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro marcu...@gmail.comwrote: On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, James Hilliard james.hillia...@gmail.com wrote: Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it seem to be generic? I'm not home at the moment so I cannot grab you some screenshots, but the interface is exactly the same as the one here taken from my ISP's website: http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/configurazione_modem/1.php ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
