Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] changeset 40948 breaks loading ath9k calibration data from EEPROM
On 14/06/2014 23:08, José Vázquez wrote: The main problem with the wifi in the Lantiq target are the ARV boards: a lot of people, John included, spent a lot of time an still there are some problems, as you see. bollocks .. i never spent any time on that code. i don't even have the boards so i cannot test which is why its most likely why its broken. if people had spend that much time on the code it would be woring and not ugly and broken. as for the patches you sent, they were not merged because they are a big pile of copy pasta churn that adds lots of redunancy and duplication. it would make the code even uglier than it is now. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support
Hi Andre, could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant instead of a config option, please? Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it as ipks because we cannot enable dnssec by default. Otherwise thanks for your work. Cheers, Steven ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] changeset 40948 breaks loading ath9k calibration data from EEPROM
2014-06-15 8:03 GMT+02:00, John Crispin j...@phrozen.org: On 14/06/2014 23:08, José Vázquez wrote: The main problem with the wifi in the Lantiq target are the ARV boards: a lot of people, John included, spent a lot of time an still there are some problems, as you see. bollocks .. i never spent any time on that code. i don't even have the boards so i cannot test which is why its most likely why its broken. if people had spend that much time on the code it would be woring and not ugly and broken. as for the patches you sent, they were not merged because they are a big pile of copy pasta churn that adds lots of redundancy and duplication. it would make the code even uglier than it is now. You are right: those patches had a lot of redundant code. I will take more care next time, but the original code was not mine. I have a question flying around my head: why nobody realized, apart of you, the potential problems of those patches and the redundant code, and told something to improve them? My apologies: José Vázquez ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq BTHOMEHUBV2B - update dts for automatic detection of ubi partition and rootfs type
This patches the BTHOMEHUB2B device tree to make use of the
new code for automatic detection of the ubi partition and the
rootfs type within it. Gets rid of the ugly alternative bootargs
lines.
Signed-off-by: Ben Mulvihill ben.mulvih...@gmail.com
---
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/dts/BTHOMEHUBV2B.dts 2014-06-14 07:24:27.022339541
+0200
+++ b/target/linux/lantiq/dts/BTHOMEHUBV2B.dts 2014-06-15 06:56:30.578024477
+0200
@@ -6,10 +6,7 @@
model = BTHOMEHUBV2B - BT Home Hub 2B; /* SoC: Lantiq Danube-S PSB
50712 @ 333MHz V1.3/1.5 */
chosen {
- // uncomment for overlayfs on top of ubi
- bootargs = console=ttyLTQ0,115200 init=/etc/preinit
ubi.mtd=rootfs_ubi,256 root=/dev/mtdblock8;
- // uncomment for ubifs
-// bootargs = console=ttyLTQ0,115200 init=/etc/preinit
ubi.mtd=rootfs_ubi,256 root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs;
+ bootargs = console=ttyLTQ0,115200 init=/etc/preinit;
};
memory@0 {/* RAM: Samsung K4H511638F-LC
64MB */
@@ -88,7 +85,7 @@
};
partition@164000 {
- label = rootfs_ubi;
+ label = ubi;
reg = 0x164000 0x1E9C000;
};
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] lantiq BTHOMEHUBV2B - update dts for automatic detection of ubi partition and rootfs type
Looks good. On 06/15/2014 05:01 PM, Ben Mulvihill wrote: This patches the BTHOMEHUB2B device tree to make use of the new code for automatic detection of the ubi partition and the rootfs type within it. Gets rid of the ugly alternative bootargs lines. Signed-off-by: Ben Mulvihill ben.mulvih...@gmail.com Acked-by: Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 0/4] dnsmasq: DNSSEC support
On 15 June 2014 17:13, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote: Hi Andre, could you please add nettle-mini support and make this a build variant instead of a config option, please? Build variant has the advantage that we can precompile it as ipks because we cannot enable dnssec by default. There exists need for compilation with the combination of multiple features enabled. With dnssec and dhcpv6, 4 variants are needed to cover all the possibilities. So I prefer keeping them in the form of configurable options as there are other features in dnsmasq to be enabled like ipset support, and serious users would enable/compile on their own. yousong Otherwise thanks for your work. Cheers, Steven ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
