[OpenWrt-Devel] channels
I just need to open channels from 2312 MHz to 2484 MHz for ham radio on my custom build I hope someone can help me thanks for all ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 6/9] ar71xx: add support for Anonabox Pro
Hello Zoltan, August, On 23.10.2017 21:58, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: L. D. Pinney wrote: Why does this patch use "legacy" ? On Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:23:20 AM GMT+8, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Because this seemed to build, and without access to the actual hardware, I had to rely on the PR sent. [snip] Please, move image generation code for this device to the new building code. You can follow definition for "zbt-we1526" which also uses rootfs-kernel mtd order and is based on the same h/w platform. -- Cheers, Piotr ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 6/9] ar71xx: add support for Anonabox Pro
L. D. Pinney wrote: Why does this patch use "legacy" ? On Monday, October 23, 2017, 4:23:20 AM GMT+8, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Because this seemed to build, and without access to the actual hardware, I had to rely on the PR sent. Happy to see that August is also on the thread now. :) Regards, -w- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 9/9] ar71xx: add support for Comfast E214N V2 Outdoor CPE
Hello Zoltan,
On 22.10.2017 22:21, Zoltan HERPAI wrote:
Based on Robert Budde's patch, with additional reworks.
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/390
Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI
---
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds | 10 ++
target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 3 +
.../ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 1 +
target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.4 | 1 +
target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.9 | 1 +
.../ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/Kconfig.openwrt | 8 ++
target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/Makefile | 1 +
.../files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-cf-e214n-v2.c | 124 +
.../linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/machtypes.h | 1 +
target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk | 8 ++
10 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-cf-e214n-v2.c
We have some COMFAST devices already supported under ar71xx target in
LEDE and as they are very similar, support for all of them (IIRC) is
kept in single mach file [1]. This limits code duplication, e.g. for
their external watchdog, network initialization, etc.
Also, after a brief review, I found some issues here:
- LED names don't follow general naming convention (color is missing)
- support for reset button is missing
- COMFAST keeps ART copy in last 64 KB mtd partition, thus we have a
"art-backup" partition defined [2], not "nvram" as in the patch
Personally, I would prefer to include support for this model in the same
way as we did for rest from this vendor. How would you like to proceed
with this one then?
--
Cheers,
Piotr
[1]
https://github.com/lede-project/source/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-cf-e316n-v2.c
[2]
https://github.com/lede-project/source/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/image/generic.mk#L142
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
index 27e6c8a..5707624 100755
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds
@@ -182,6 +182,16 @@ carambola2)
ucidef_set_led_netdev "wan" "WAN" "$board:orange:eth1" "eth1"
ucidef_set_led_wlan "wlan" "WLAN" "$board:green:wlan" "phy0tpt"
;;
+cf-e214n-v2)
+ ucidef_set_led_netdev "lan" "LAN" "$board:lan" "eth0"
+ ucidef_set_led_netdev "wan" "WAN" "$board:wan" "eth1"
+ ucidef_set_led_wlan "wlan" "WLAN" "$board:wlan" "phy0tpt"
+ ucidef_set_rssimon "wlan" "20" "1"
+ ucidef_set_led_rssi "rssilow" "RSSILOW" "$board:link1" "wlan" "1" "100" "0"
"13"
+ ucidef_set_led_rssi "rssimediumlow" "RSSIMEDIUMLOW" "$board:link2" "wlan" "26" "100"
"-25" "13"
+ ucidef_set_led_rssi "rssimediumhigh" "RSSIMEDIUMHIGH" "$board:link3" "wlan" "51" "100"
"-50" "13"
+ ucidef_set_led_rssi "rssihigh" "RSSIHIGH" "$board:link4" "wlan" "76" "100" "-75"
"13"
+ ;;
cf-e316n-v2)
ucidef_set_led_netdev "lan" "LAN" "$board:blue:lan" "eth0"
ucidef_set_led_netdev "wan" "WAN" "$board:blue:wan" "eth1"
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh
index bdba81b..1c1317d 100755
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh
@@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ ar71xx_board_detect() {
*"Carambola2"*)
name="carambola2"
;;
+ *"CF-E214N v2")
+ name="cf-e214n-v2"
+ ;;
*"CF-E316N v2")
name="cf-e316n-v2"
;;
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
index a60e44c..e768386 100755
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
@@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ platform_check_image() {
bullet-m|\
c-55|\
carambola2|\
+ cf-e214n-v2|\
cf-e316n-v2|\
cf-e320n-v2|\
cf-e355ac|\
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.4 b/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.4
index 4793bf4..d8f94e3 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.4
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.4
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_C55=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CAP324=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CAP4200AG=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CARAMBOLA2=y
+CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E214N_V2=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E316N_V2=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E320N_V2=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E355AC=y
diff --git a/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.9 b/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.9
index 285c638..df90b20 100644
--- a/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.9
+++ b/target/linux/ar71xx/config-4.9
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_C55=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CAP324=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CAP4200AG=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CARAMBOLA2=y
+CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E214N_V2=y
CONFIG_ATH79_MACH_CF_E316N_V2=y
CONFIG
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge
Hi, > > - https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/539 > > Add TL-WA901v5 support > > The GCC 7 patches are probably already in, but the target commit looks > ok to me, but I am not a ar71xx expert. Yesterday, I came across a TL-WA901v5 and did a PR on LEDE github, without knowing that someone already started on the OpenWrt side ;-) The OpenWrt PR adds another mach-*-v5 file, which basically is a copy of the mach-*-v4. Since both boards are identical in HW (used CPU, RAM, Flash, WLAN, GPIO assignments), I've just added another MIPS_MACHINE in the existing mach-*-v4 file without introducing a clone there. However, as the OEM bootloader requires the image to have the correct HW-ID (09010005), we still need to make a seperate image for these devices. Flashing is successfully tested via TFTP, like for the -v4 unit as described in [1] You can find the LEDE PR at [2] - everything is compile-tested and run-tested on real HW. Best regards, P. Wassi [1]: https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=320942#p320942 [2]: https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/1446 ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 8/9] ramips: add Devolo WiFi Repeater (mt2681)
Hi Mathias, On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Mathias Kresin wrote: 22.10.2017 22:21, Zoltan HERPAI: This is pretty much the same as the ALL0256N-8M but with different LED settings. Based on Matt Jenkins' patch, with additional reworks. https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/491 Signed-off-by: Zoltan HERPAI Hey Zoltan, I'm not sure how proceed with the patch. It has bunch of issues and if someone else would send this patch I wouldn't merge it as it is. Some of the issues are: - missing hardware description in the commit message - missing initial install instructions in the commit message - bad board naming (the name looks like a mediatek reference board) - wrong use of wifi led - outdated syntax in the dts Since you most likely do not have this board, I'm not sure if it does make any sense to do the full review => request changes cycle. Any suggestions how to proceed with this one? Correct, I don't have the hardware, and the HW descriptions I've found on google are misleading. I'm leaning more towards dropping this, and if someone wants support for it, he/she can prep the patch correctly. -w- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] OpenWrt -> LEDE git tree merge
Hi Mathias, On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, Mathias Kresin wrote: 22.10.2017 22:56, Hauke Mehrtens: On 10/22/2017 10:28 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: Hi, - https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/312 ar71xx: add support for Zsun WiFi SD Card Reader This is missing a Singed-of-by line A few days ago a similar PR was created (and unfortunately already closed): https://github.com/lede-project/source/pull/1422. The OpenWrt PR has a lot of issues, like enabling unencrypted wireless for the whole target. "- #5 needs some work as it has some dirty hacks. This can be taken care on the summit's second day - I recall someone going there has a ZSun reader" So, fully agree, I could have written s/some work/full rework/. If n0p doesn't come back with the fixes by the summit, we could take care of adding the support there, with the actual hardware to test. -w- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
