Re: question to block mount/umount
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 07:00:40PM -0800, B wrote: > On 12/14/22 05:45, e9hack wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm build OpenWrt with additional sub directories in /mnt. > > /etc/config/fstab contains an entry, to mount an usb drive to /mnt/1. If > > I execute 'block umount', the usb drive will be unmount and the > > subdirectory 1 in /mnt will be removed. Removing of the sub directory, > > is this the expected behaviour? > > This is not the way the mount command typically works on most unix-like > systems. In that respect, it's unexpected. You are not wrong to be perturbed > here. If that's what you want to do, OpenWrt will act just like any other UNIX-like system out there. Just use the 'mount' and 'umount' commands then, you may also use /etc/fstab, of course. OP was asking about the 'block umount' command, which is anyway specific to OpenWrt, and used for specific use-cases such as automatically creating mountpoints, automatically mounting devices on insertion, unmounting them on removal, ... It is configured in /etc/config/fstab (and *not* /etc/fstab). > Why OpenWRT needs to be different is for someone else to explain, because I > don't know. Also with regard to top-posting OpenWrt is not that different from most other UNIX-related communities. Just don't do it ;) ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: question to block mount/umount
This is not the way the mount command typically works on most unix-like systems. In that respect, it's unexpected. You are not wrong to be perturbed here. Why OpenWRT needs to be different is for someone else to explain, because I don't know. On 12/14/22 05:45, e9hack wrote: Hi, I'm build OpenWrt with additional sub directories in /mnt. /etc/config/fstab contains an entry, to mount an usb drive to /mnt/1. If I execute 'block umount', the usb drive will be unmount and the subdirectory 1 in /mnt will be removed. Removing of the sub directory, is this the expected behaviour? Regards, Hartmut ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
Hi Janusz, > Could I just buy (any experience): > > HP switch 1920-24G JG924A > Do I need to check any HW ver? Or any JG924A should work? The devices from HPE 1920 series with model numbers JG92xA are all Realtek-based, and should be compatible with OpenWrt (make sure not to get a device from the similarly-named 1920S-series though, as those are not supported). Note that the HPE devices are only supported in master and support for 1920-48G is not yet included. And to be clear, the models with PoE are also not supported (I forgot about those in the initial message). For 1920-24G, the patches 2 and 5 from [1] are probably still necessary, as the device will reset during boot otherwise. I should really send updated versions of these to finally get that issue fixed. Best, Jan [1] http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039565.html ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
Hi Janusz, > Could I just buy (any experience): > > HP switch 1920-24G JG924A > Do I need to check any HW ver? Or any JG924A should work? The devices from HPE 1920 series with model numbers JG92xA are all Realtek-based, and should be compatible with OpenWrt (make sure not to get a device from the similarly-named 1920S-series though, as those are not supported). Note that the HPE devices are only supported in master and support for 1920-48G is not yet included. For 1920-24G, the patches 2 and 5 from [1] are probably still necessary, as the device will reset during boot otherwise. I should really send updated versions of these to finally get that issue fixed. Best, Jan [1] http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2022-October/039565.html ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Upstreaming mac80211 patches?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 06:04:40PM +0100, Nick wrote: > Lately, I had to look at some mac80211 patches and I did not understand why > some patches are still present or not upstreamed. What about upstreaming > some of the mac80211 patches or removing some? > For example "120-cfg80211_allow_perm_addr_change.patch" from 2014 I did not > find it on typical mailinglist > (https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/subsys/120-cfg80211_allow_perm_addr_change.patch)? > For ath9k we have 28 patches. Some of them are only for changing "channel > bandwidth to 5/10" (so not 20 or 40 bw included). I guess that is legacy? > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/9f38d4402bede0c35bb8f4814e577dc0b0a2f184 IEEE 802.11 standard originally intended also operating on 5 MHz and 10 MHz wide channels. However, in Linux mac80211 doesn't handle those more narrow channels. As ath5k and ath9k hardware does support this, we have patches to allow using 5 MHz and 10 MHz channels in a non-standard way. While this is most likely not acceptable for upstream, it is still very useful as the possible link distance is (naturally) improved quite a lot when using 10 MHz or even 5 MHz channel bandwidth. Hence this is popular among amateur radio hams, for example. > And some were rejected upstream > (https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ath9k/354-ath9k-force-rx_clear-when-disabling-rx.patch): > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20180723160300.58024-3-...@nbd.name/ > > These are just some examples. However, I think it would be beneficial to get > closer to upstream mac80211 again? Help with cleaning and (re-)submitting patches upstream is for sure always welcome ;) Now that nvmem framework is ready and afaik we got rid of all pre-DTS platform_data users, many of the MTD EEPROM and MAC address hacks could be re-implemented using nvmem cells (and then get closer to being acceptable upstream). ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
> > > > D-Link DGS-1210-48 HW Ver. G1 - will be fine? I need some confirmation. > > Anyone could confirm? > D-Link DGS-1210-52 F does work in snapshot. You'll need to wait for the next 23.x for a stable release. I think there is only one switch with >=48 ports supported in 22.03: zyxel gs1900. And even that one might be missing some fixes current in the master branch. I would recommend to search for a switch with less ports or wait for the 23.x release. Regards, Luiz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 18:16, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > śr., 14 gru 2022 o 12:59 Janusz Dziedzic > napisał(a): > > > > wt., 13 gru 2022 o 14:20 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Do you know any/some ethernet switch project (best 18+ gbps ports) > > > > that using linux/openwrt and DSA architecture? > > > > > > Some switches with high port density currently supported by OpenWrt: > > > * TP-Link SG2452P > > > * ZyXEL GS1900-48 > > > * Panasonic Switch-M48eG PN28480K > > > > > > All of the above are using RealTek RTL839x platform. > > > > > > > Could I just buy (any experience): > > > > HP switch 1920-24G JG924A > > Do I need to check any HW ver? Or any JG924A should work? > > > Or > > D-Link DGS-1210-48 HW Ver. G1 - will be fine? I need some confirmation. > Anyone could confirm? F1 and F2 revisions are RTL, but not idea about Gx. Regards, Robert > > BR > Janusz > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
śr., 14 gru 2022 o 12:59 Janusz Dziedzic napisał(a): > > wt., 13 gru 2022 o 14:20 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Do you know any/some ethernet switch project (best 18+ gbps ports) > > > that using linux/openwrt and DSA architecture? > > > > Some switches with high port density currently supported by OpenWrt: > > * TP-Link SG2452P > > * ZyXEL GS1900-48 > > * Panasonic Switch-M48eG PN28480K > > > > All of the above are using RealTek RTL839x platform. > > > > Could I just buy (any experience): > > HP switch 1920-24G JG924A > Do I need to check any HW ver? Or any JG924A should work? > Or D-Link DGS-1210-48 HW Ver. G1 - will be fine? I need some confirmation. Anyone could confirm? BR Janusz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Upstreaming mac80211 patches?
Lately, I had to look at some mac80211 patches and I did not understand why some patches are still present or not upstreamed. What about upstreaming some of the mac80211 patches or removing some? For example "120-cfg80211_allow_perm_addr_change.patch" from 2014 I did not find it on typical mailinglist (https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/subsys/120-cfg80211_allow_perm_addr_change.patch)? For ath9k we have 28 patches. Some of them are only for changing "channel bandwidth to 5/10" (so not 20 or 40 bw included). I guess that is legacy? https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/9f38d4402bede0c35bb8f4814e577dc0b0a2f184 And some were rejected upstream (https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ath9k/354-ath9k-force-rx_clear-when-disabling-rx.patch): https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20180723160300.58024-3-...@nbd.name/ These are just some examples. However, I think it would be beneficial to get closer to upstream mac80211 again? Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[PATCH 1/1] netifd: device: add ipvlan support
Please, any review? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: question to block mount/umount
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 02:45:02PM +0100, e9hack wrote: > Hi, > > I'm build OpenWrt with additional sub directories in /mnt. /etc/config/fstab > contains an entry, to mount an usb drive to /mnt/1. If I execute 'block > umount', the usb drive will be unmount and the subdirectory 1 in /mnt will be > removed. Removing of the sub directory, is this the expected behaviour? If the directoty is empty, then yes, this is the expected behavior. See https://git.openwrt.org/?p=project/fstools.git;a=blob;f=block.c;h=4b45200ad3812f5b79bda5d53c72a13ca5e92636;hb=HEAD#l1225 In case you'd like to keep it, simply have a 0 byte file in the directory (ie. `touch /mnt/1/.keep`), this will prevent rmdir() from succeeding and will result in the directory being kept after 'block umount'. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
question to block mount/umount
Hi, I'm build OpenWrt with additional sub directories in /mnt. /etc/config/fstab contains an entry, to mount an usb drive to /mnt/1. If I execute 'block umount', the usb drive will be unmount and the subdirectory 1 in /mnt will be removed. Removing of the sub directory, is this the expected behaviour? Regards, Hartmut ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Ethernet switch with linux/openwrt and DSA
wt., 13 gru 2022 o 14:20 Daniel Golle napisał(a): > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Do you know any/some ethernet switch project (best 18+ gbps ports) > > that using linux/openwrt and DSA architecture? > > Some switches with high port density currently supported by OpenWrt: > * TP-Link SG2452P > * ZyXEL GS1900-48 > * Panasonic Switch-M48eG PN28480K > > All of the above are using RealTek RTL839x platform. > Could I just buy (any experience): HP switch 1920-24G JG924A Do I need to check any HW ver? Or any JG924A should work? BR Janusz -- Janusz Dziedzic ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[PATCH 1/1] netifd: device: add ipvlan support
Please, any review? ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
