Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Git mirror with branches, tags and full history?

2016-03-30 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Bruno Randolf  wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 08:32 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>> i have just updated https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt
>
> Thanks!
>
> Now, if you could add a tag "v15.05.1" things would be perfect...
>

Geil (German)!

Just curious, is the GitHub-OpenWrt-Mirror faster in things of checking-out?

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] new kernel 4.1.20 / jffs-deadlock fix

2016-03-19 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Bastian Bittorf  wrote:
> maybe someone has the power to bump
> kernel 4.1.x to 4.1.20 - it has in
> jffs2-deadlock fix...
>
> does somebody already working or on the schedule?
>

Just FYI...

"jffs2: Fix page lock / f->sem deadlock" see [1].

- Sedat -

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?h=v4.1.20=e0dae728bf0878ad831440ff5d2e90ec10b794a4
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] gcc: remove v4.6 relicts

2015-12-21 Thread Sedat Dilek 
Fixes: commit f17e56eff5b9 ("gcc: remove version 4.6, it is no longer needed")

CC: Felix Fietkau <n...@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.di...@gmail.com>
---
 toolchain/gcc/common.mk | 10 --
 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/toolchain/gcc/common.mk b/toolchain/gcc/common.mk
index 3e4f3ee984f4..648cd2d5adcf 100644
--- a/toolchain/gcc/common.mk
+++ b/toolchain/gcc/common.mk
@@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ GCC_DIR:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION)
 PKG_SOURCE_URL:=@GNU/gcc/gcc-$(PKG_VERSION)
 PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-$(PKG_VERSION).tar.bz2
 
-ifeq ($(PKG_VERSION),4.6.3)
-  PKG_MD5SUM:=773092fe5194353b02bb0110052a972e
-endif
 ifeq ($(PKG_VERSION),4.8.0)
   PKG_MD5SUM:=e6040024eb9e761c3bea348d1fa5abb0
 endif
@@ -40,13 +37,6 @@ endif
 
 ifeq ($(findstring linaro, $(CONFIG_GCC_VERSION)),linaro)
 LINARO_RELEASE:=
-ifeq ($(CONFIG_GCC_VERSION),"4.6-linaro")
-  PKG_REV:=4.6-2013.05
-  PKG_VERSION:=4.6.4
-  PKG_VERSION_MAJOR:=4.6
-  PKG_MD5SUM:=26b48802ae1203cd99415026fbf56ed7
-  PKG_COMP:=bz2
-endif
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_GCC_VERSION),"4.8-linaro")
   PKG_REV:=4.8-2014.04
   PKG_VERSION:=4.8.3
-- 
2.6.4
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Added WIZnet WizFi630A Platform based on Ralink RT5350

2015-08-17 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, John Crispin blo...@openwrt.org wrote:
 Hi Tobias,

 Thanks for the patch. unfortunately its line mangled and white space
 broken. also it seems you sent a HTML email. If you take a few minutes
 to setup git, you can use git send-email to avoid these issues.


On Debian/Ubuntu install git send-email or check your distubition's
docs and help...

   root# apt-get update  apt-get install git-email

Feel free to adapt my local dot-gitconfig...

$ cat ~/.gitconfig
[user]
name   = Sedat Dilek
email  = sedat.di...@gmail.com

[core]
abbrev = 12

[format]
subjectprefix = PATCH
signoff = false

[pretty]
fixes = Fixes: %h (\%s\)

[push]
default = matching

[sendemail]
smtpserver = smtp.gmail.com
smtpserverport = 587
smtpencryption = tls
smtpuser = sedat.di...@gmail.com

Hope this helps.

- sed@ -


 John


 On 15/08/2015 10:08, Tobias Welz wrote:
 Hello OpenWrt Developers,

 I added the WIZnet WizFi630A Platform to the trunk. The board is based
 on Ralink RT5350 in MiniPci Express Form Factor.

 Kind regards
 Tobias Welz



 From bd69bb513e36abda43e86f0eb64caf004260e415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Tobias Welz t...@wiznet.eu
 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 02:30:34 +0200
 Subject: [PATCH] Added WIZnet WizFi630A Platform based on Ralink RT5350


 Signed-off-by: Tobias Welz t...@wiznet.eu
 ---
  .../linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network |6 +
  target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh |3 +
  target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh   |3 +
  .../ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh  |1 +
  target/linux/ramips/dts/WIZFI630A.dts  |  304
 
  target/linux/ramips/image/Makefile |3 +
  target/linux/ramips/rt305x/profiles/wizfi630a.mk   |   18 ++
  7 files changed, 338 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 target/linux/ramips/dts/WIZFI630A.dts
  create mode 100644 target/linux/ramips/rt305x/profiles/wizfi630a.mk

 diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
 b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
 index da1854a..c211ab9 100755
 --- a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
 +++ b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network
 @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ ramips_setup_interfaces()
  ucidef_add_switch_vlan switch0 2 4 6t
  ;;

 +wizfi630a | \
  y1s)
  ucidef_set_interfaces_lan_wan eth0.1 eth0.2
  ucidef_add_switch switch0 1 1
 @@ -297,6 +298,11 @@ ramips_setup_macs()
  wan_mac=$(mtd_get_mac_binary factory 46)
  ;;

 +wizfi630a)
 +lan_mac=$(mtd_get_mac_binary factory 4)
 +wan_mac=$(mtd_get_mac_binary factory 40)
 +;;
 +
  w306r-v20)
  lan_mac=$(cat /sys/class/net/eth0/address)
  wan_mac=$(macaddr_add $lan_mac 5)
 diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
 b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
 index e63f0df..3ffcc22 100644
 --- a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
 +++ b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/etc/diag.sh
 @@ -252,6 +252,9 @@ get_status_led() {
  zte-q7)
  status_led=zte:red:status
  ;;
 +wizfi630a)
 +status_led=wizfi630a::run
 +;;
  mzk-dp150n)
  status_led=mzkdp150n:green:power
  ;;
 diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh
 b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh
 index 7db6d37..474fdb8 100755
 --- a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh
 +++ b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/ramips.sh
 @@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ ramips_board_detect() {
  *Planex MZK-DP150N)
  name=mzk-dp150n
  ;;
 + *WIZnet WizFi630A)
 +name=wizfi630a
 +;;
  *)
  name=generic
  ;;
 diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
 b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
 index 8221997..bdc6be9 100755
 --- a/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
 +++ b/target/linux/ramips/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh
 @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ platform_check_image() {
  whr-300hp2 |\
  whr-600d |\
  whr-1166d |\
 +wizfi630a |\
  wsr-600 |\
  wl-330n | \
  wl-330n3g | \
 diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/dts/WIZFI630A.dts
 b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WIZFI630A.dts
 new file mode 100644
 index 000..b3f655d
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/target/linux/ramips/dts/WIZFI630A.dts
 @@ -0,0 +1,304 @@
 +/dts-v1/;
 +
 +/include/ rt5350.dtsi
 +
 +/ {
 +compatible = wizfi630a, ralink,rt5350-soc;
 +model = WIZnet WizFi630A;
 +
 +chosen {
 +bootargs = console=ttyS1,115200;
 +};
 +
 +palmbus@1000 {
 +gpio1: gpio@660 {
 +status = okay;
 +};
 +
 +spi@b00 {
 +status = okay;
 +
 +m25p80@0 {
 +#address-cells = 1

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Chaos Calmer 15.05-rc2

2015-06-14 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote:
 The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the first release candidate
 of OpenWrt Chaos Calmer.

___ __
  |   |.-.-.-.|  |  |  |..|  |_
  |   -   ||  _  |  -__| ||  |  |  ||   _||   _|
  |___||   __|_|__|__||||__|  ||
   |__| W I R E L E S S   F R E E D O M
  -
  CHAOS CALMER (15.05 RC2)
  -
   * 1 1/2 oz GinShake with a glassful
   * 1/4 oz Triple Sec   of broken ice and pour
   * 3/4 oz Lime Juice   unstrained into a goblet.
   * 1 1/2 oz Orange Juice
   * 1 tsp. Grenadine Syrup
  -


Hi,

first of all thank you as OpenWrt developer team and all users who
contributed to that release.

[ By not wanting to break your tradition of announces ]
Please, think of people who don't consume alcohol for diverse reasons.
Alcohol is drug #1 and has destroyed many people and families.
And alcohol is no solution :-).

 http://downloads.openwrt.org/chaos_calmer/15.05-rc2/

Hm, the final will be Chaos Calmer aka 15.06 (June 2015)?

My best wishes and good luck for a cool final release!

- sed@ -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Linux 4.x

2015-06-05 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Baptiste Clenet bapcle...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi OpenWRT developers,

 Is there any plan to port OPENWRT on Linux 4.x? (Or is it already done?)


Linux v4.0.4 is supported, see...

http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=blob;f=include/kernel-version.mk

 Wpan-tools works mainly on bluetooth-next kernel which is base on
 Linux 4.x so it doesn't currently work with OpenWRT.


What do you mean by bluetooth-next?
Linux v4.1 is at -rc6.
So you mean bluetooth stuff for Linux v4.2?

- sed@ -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] generic/4.0: bump to version 4.0

2015-04-21 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org wrote:
 Linux 4.0 was released on 2014-04-12


Looking at the history of commits concerning Linux kernel-versions it
seems not to be unambiguous how such patches are labeled.
So what says generic/4.0 to me - generic of what?
Why don't all developers/submitters use a label like kernel: (some
committers has used this)?

What about...?

kernel: Bump to Linux version 4.0

This is more meaningful to me.

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=history;f=include/kernel-version.mk

 Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle dan...@makrotopia.org
 ---
  include/kernel-version.mk | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/include/kernel-version.mk b/include/kernel-version.mk
 index bb43e00..de20fef 100644
 --- a/include/kernel-version.mk
 +++ b/include/kernel-version.mk
 @@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
  LINUX_RELEASE?=1

  LINUX_VERSION-3.18 = .11
 -LINUX_VERSION-4.0 = -rc7
 +LINUX_VERSION-4.0 =

  LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM-3.18.11 = 2def91951c9cedf7896efb864e0c090c
 -LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM-4.0-rc7 = 26db663899b1a54397b4f184ca05f213
 +LINUX_KERNEL_MD5SUM-4.0 = a86916bd12798220da9eb4a1eec3616d

  ifdef KERNEL_PATCHVER
LINUX_VERSION:=$(KERNEL_PATCHVER)$(strip 
 $(LINUX_VERSION-$(KERNEL_PATCHVER)))
 --
 2.3.5
 ___
 openwrt-devel mailing list
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
 https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar7: Remove linux-3.10 leftovers

2014-12-18 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
 On 2014-12-16 22:57, Sedat Dilek wrote:
 The config-3.10 got removed in r43632, so bye-bye to patches-3.10 as well.

 Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
 Patch didn't apply, so I removed the 3.10 patches myself.


OK, thanks.

I just grepped/searched for *-3.10 material...

$ grep KERNEL_PATCHVER -nr target/linux/ | sort

$ find target/linux/ -name patches-3.10 | sort

$ find target/linux/ -name config-3.10 | sort

Can you explain the correlation?
IIRC you support more than one linux-version?
Is my assumption correct, if you have no config-3.x, you can drop
according patches-3.x (where x is the same value)?
AFAICS I have seen one target that has no patches but a config file.
Some targets support two linux-versions, etc.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ar7: Remove linux-3.10 leftovers

2014-12-16 Thread Sedat Dilek 
The config-3.10 got removed in r43632, so bye-bye to patches-3.10 as well.

Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
 .../ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch |  28 --
 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch  |  22 --
 .../linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch   |  28 --
 .../patches-3.10/160-vlynq_try_remote_first.patch  | 300 -
 .../200-free-mem-below-kernel-offset.patch |  15 --
 .../ar7/patches-3.10/300-add-ac49x-platform.patch  |  85 --
 .../ar7/patches-3.10/310-ac49x-prom-support.patch  |  20 --
 .../patches-3.10/320-ac49x-mtd-partitions.patch|  35 ---
 .../linux/ar7/patches-3.10/500-serial_kludge.patch |  28 --
 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/920-ar7part.patch| 118 
 .../ar7/patches-3.10/925-actiontec_leds.patch  |  95 ---
 .../linux/ar7/patches-3.10/950-cpmac_titan.patch   |  52 
 12 files changed, 826 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch
 delete mode 100644 
target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/160-vlynq_try_remote_first.patch
 delete mode 100644 
target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/200-free-mem-below-kernel-offset.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/300-add-ac49x-platform.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/310-ac49x-prom-support.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/320-ac49x-mtd-partitions.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/500-serial_kludge.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/920-ar7part.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/925-actiontec_leds.patch
 delete mode 100644 target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/950-cpmac_titan.patch

diff --git a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch 
b/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index f556ee2..000
--- a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/001-mips-ar7-fix-serial.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-From 443ab715a40881d6c9ba11b027ba154bac904cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de
-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:19:08 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH] MIPS/AR7: ensure that serial ports are properly set up
-
-without UPF_FIXED_TYPE, the data from the PORT_AR7 uart_config entry is
-never copied, resulting in a dead port.
-
-Signed-off-by: Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de

- arch/mips/ar7/platform.c | 1 +
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
-
-diff --git a/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c b/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c
-index 7e2356f..e4f47d3 100644
 a/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c
-+++ b/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c
-@@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int __init ar7_register_uarts(void)
-   uart_port.type  = PORT_AR7;
-   uart_port.uartclk   = clk_get_rate(bus_clk) / 2;
-   uart_port.iotype= UPIO_MEM32;
-+  uart_port.flags = UPF_FIXED_TYPE;
-   uart_port.regshift  = 2;
- 
-   uart_port.line  = 0;
--- 
-1.8.5.3.2.g3dbf181
-
diff --git a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch 
b/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index e12eec5..000
--- a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/110-flash.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
 a/drivers/mtd/Makefile
-+++ b/drivers/mtd/Makefile
-@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_OF_PARTS)   += ofpart.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_REDBOOT_PARTS) += redboot.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_CMDLINE_PARTS) += cmdlinepart.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_AFS_PARTS)   += afs.o
--obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_AR7_PARTS)   += ar7part.o
-+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_AR7_PARTS)   += ar7part.o titanpart.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_BCM63XX_PARTS)   += bcm63xxpart.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_BCM47XX_PARTS)   += bcm47xxpart.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_MYLOADER_PARTS) += myloader.o
 a/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c
-+++ b/arch/mips/ar7/platform.c
-@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct resource physmap_flash_res
-   .name   = mem,
-   .flags  = IORESOURCE_MEM,
-   .start  = 0x1000,
--  .end= 0x107f,
-+  .end= 0x11ff,
- };
- 
- static const char *ar7_probe_types[] = { ar7part, NULL };
diff --git a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch 
b/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 15bc6c3..000
--- a/target/linux/ar7/patches-3.10/120-gpio_chrdev.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
 a/drivers/char/Kconfig
-+++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
-@@ -464,6 +464,15 @@ config MWAVE
- To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
- module will be called mwave.
- 
-+config AR7_GPIO
-+  tristate TI AR7 GPIO Support
-+  depends on AR7
-+  help
-+Give userspace access to the GPIO pins on the Texas Instruments AR7
-+processors.
-+
-+If compiled as a module, it will be called ar7_gpio.
-+
- config SCx200_GPIO

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] ar8216 patch series

2014-11-08 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Heiner Kallweit hkallwe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Am 08.11.2014 um 13:49 schrieb Dirk Neukirchen:
 On 31.10.2014 21:46, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
 Patch series adds more abstraction to the driver, adds smaller improvements
 and fixes an issue with kernels = 3.14.
 Ticket 17800: With kernel 3.14 sometimes ports operate at 10/half only

 This patch series works for me on:
 TP-LINK TL-WDR4300 ( ar71xx + AR8327v2)
 TP-LINK TL-WDR4900 (mpc85xx + AR8327v4)

 I'd appreciate if others with non-AR8327 switches supported by the
 ar8216 driver test this patch series.

 Rgds, Heiner

 I was testing this series on a TP-LINK TL-WDR3600 ( ar71xx + AR8327v2)
 but with default kernel (3.10.58). - as I understand this is supposed to 
 work too

 I encountered an error: WAN (eth0.2) does not work. (LAN seems fine)
 The dmesg seems to be identical between patched+unpatched. Both list

 switch0: Atheros AR8327 rev. 2 switch registered on ag71xx-mdio.0
 ag71xx ag71xx.0: connected to PHY at ag71xx-mdio.0:00 [uid=004dd033, 
 driver=Atheros AR8216/AR8236/AR8316]
 eth0: Atheros AG71xx at 0xb900, irq 4, mode:RGMII
 Dirk,
 here come updated versions of patches 3-5 from the series. I'd appreciate if 
 you could test the updated series.
 changes:
 patch 3|4: keep phy_fixup callback closer to the original fixup code
 patch 5: less intrusive, doesn't touch advertising


Please attach test-patches as a file, some MUAs truncate the text.

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] BB: lantiq: Concatenate multiple flash chips for lantiq-flash

2014-11-07 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Eddi De Pieri e...@depieri.net wrote:
 please wait to aplpy this patch...

 I've found two potential regression in:

 -  for (type = rom_probe_types; !ltq_mtd-mtd  *type; type++) {
 -  ltq_mtd-mtd = do_map_probe(*type, ltq_mtd-map);
 -  }

 and

 +  if (!ltq_mtd-mtd) {


Send a v2 with a proper changelog after a lot of testing :-)?

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-23 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
 Hi Sedat,
 Sedat Dilek wrote,

 On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org 
 wrote:
[...]
  I have added most of the patches from your projects on top of uClibc
  master.
 

 Did you look also at the patches [1] from the Freetz project?

 Yes. I wanted to inform the freetz project, but I didn't find a
 mailinglist or the mail adresses of the main contributors.
 Most of the patches are either backports from git master or from
 OpenWrt. I hope the rest might get contributed by the freetz people
 with some meta-information, what kind of problem is fixed by a
 patch.


If it hasn't changes the freetz-devel list is member-only and not public.
I have CCed Oliver who is lead of the project.
Maybe, you can talk with him or he can delegate to the toolchain
responsibles in the Freetz project.
( But do not expect too much. )

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-21 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb w...@uclibc-ng.org wrote:
 Hello Embedded Linux Hackers,

 it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version.
 The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails
 about a plan to do a needed release. Therefore most of you carrying a lot
 of patches against uClibc 0.9.33.2 to make it work in your project.
 A really ugly situation.


I have seen some patches got in uClibc upstream some weeks ago (- inactivity).
But anyway, a 1st try...
Look at OpenSSL and LibreSSL... Might be we see some competition or
rebirth starting here, too?

My POV (from my experiences) is most embedded projects are not really
interested in upstream work or keep their own patches (this seems to
be easier).
An example:
Recently, I pointed to [0], but the maintainer of the project did not
give any feedback to Bernd (requested a simple S-o-b).
What I want to say it is not only a problem of the uClibc maintainer :-).

From my experiences successful projects do regular releases (6 months
or a year).
What are your plans?

 To get out of this situation I started a spin-off called uClibc-ng.
 The website for the project is here: http://www.uclibc-ng.org
 Beta 3 is tagged and downloadable via
 http://downloads.uclibc-ng.org/uClibc-ng-1.0.0beta3.tar.xz


Do you plan a browsable Git website, where someone can look at the
source via webbrowser?

OK, you have now an infrastructure...
Do you have people (developers, users) behind you :-)?

 If you want a 1.0 in the near future please test and report back any
 issues. You can use the bug tracker, the mailing list or dicussion forum
 to report back. To prevent spam you need to be subscribed or registered.

 I have added most of the patches from your projects on top of uClibc
 master.


Did you look also at the patches [1] from the Freetz project?

Thanks for your initial work!

- Sedat -

[0] 
http://freetz.org/browser/trunk/toolchain/make/target/uclibc/0.9.32.1/100-fix_hosttools.patch
[1] http://freetz.org/browser/trunk/toolchain/make/target/uclibc
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] How To Remove nf_conntrack

2014-03-28 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Alan.Hoo huqings...@ycmedia.cn wrote:
 Hello Everyone

 how can I remove the nf_conntrack kernel module from OpenWRT System ?



What do you mean by remove?
It should not be built and included or it should not be loaded?

What about posting your OpenWrt .config file first?
Which box (and which kernel-release)?

Check what your kernel-config says on CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK (and
CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_XXX)

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Information about JTAG chain for Fritzbox 3370

2013-12-28 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Thomas Strobel ts...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
 Dear all,

 does anyone of you maybe have information about the JTAG chain of an AVM
 Fritzbox 3370? Can anyone help me with finding out which devices are
 connected to the JTAG chain, and what their instruction register lengths
 are? Or even better, does anyone happen to have a configuration file for
 e.g. openocd?

 In advance, many thanks for your help!


Hi,

you might have a look at WHMF wiki [1] (a lot of hardware related informations).
Can't say offhand if there is sth. about JTAG for fbox3370.
Try to contact hippie2000 on IRC [2].

Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] http://www.wehavemorefun.de/fritzbox/Main_Page
[2] http://www.wehavemorefun.de/fritzbox/IRC-Chat
[3] http://www.wehavemorefun.de/fritzbox/FRITZ!Box_WLAN_3370

 Best regards,

   Thomas
 ___
 openwrt-devel mailing list
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
 https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Patches for uClibc

2013-12-28 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Jiri Slachta slac...@cesnet.cz wrote:
 Hello,

 please consider three previous patches as a patchset. Those patches were 
 backported from uClibc
 master which fixes DNS hangups etc..

 The patchset:
 http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4650/
 http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4649/
 http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4648/

 Further details are there:
 http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/uclibc/2013-August/047885.html

 Those changes were accepted and merged into uClibc master:
 http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/libc/inet/resolv.c?id=1c8d287e58a3199213b5533136a7a04c8eb231bb
 http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/libc/inet/resolv.c?id=ecc7aee9a0eb4f9fbdf4dc2972e8c6361e531b6a
 http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/libc/inet/resolv.c?id=20b69920b299585265eb100d0b67e1097ccb1092

 I would be happy if at least the patch #4648 at patchwork would be accepted, 
 it fixes 17 months
 opened ticket #11929 - https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/11929


This cover-letter is nice, but 2 of the patches miss a proper
changelog - pointing at least to the upstream commit-id.
As an example Linux-stable [1].
A new uClibc 0.9.33.x is overdue...

- Sedat -

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-3.12/usb-serial-fix-race-in-generic-write.patch

 Thank you so much!
 Jiri
 ___
 openwrt-devel mailing list
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
 https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wget-nossl compile problem in trunk..

2013-10-01 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Daniel,

 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:31 +0300, Daniel Petre wrote:
 so i cannot compile wget-nossl , the error is this:

 [..]

 any ideas please?
 Thanks!

 This is due to new behaviour in Perl 5.18. I submitted a patch for this
 issue two weeks ago.

 http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4062/


But again... why is there no wget-nossl-no-docs.patch?
IMHO a project focussed on Linux-embedded can save build-time by not
generating any doc-files.

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wget-nossl compile problem in trunk..

2013-10-01 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Daniel,

 On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:31 +0300, Daniel Petre wrote:
 so i cannot compile wget-nossl , the error is this:

 [..]

 any ideas please?
 Thanks!

 This is due to new behaviour in Perl 5.18. I submitted a patch for this
 issue two weeks ago.

 http://patchwork.openwrt.org/patch/4062/


 But again... why is there no wget-nossl-no-docs.patch?
 IMHO a project focussed on Linux-embedded can save build-time by not
 generating any doc-files.


There exist already a patch from the GNU/wget BTS (see quote below).
This is is what the Freetz router has in its archives [1].

[ QUOTE ]
From: Dave Reisner dreis...@archlinux.org
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:31:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Fix error in texi2pod intriduced with Perl 5.18

taken from http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-wget/2013-06/msg00046.html
[ /QUOTE ]

- Sedat -

[1] 
http://freetz.org/browser/trunk/make/wget/patches/040-fix-error-in-texi2pod-introduced-with-perl-5.18.patch
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] wget-nossl compile problem in trunk..

2013-09-30 Thread Sedat Dilek 
Try to attach your build-log as a text-file (Bug-Tracking-System
and/or Mailing-List)?

From what I see (on a quick look) sth. wrong when generating the
docs... I am wondering why the docs are built/generated here.

I any case, please add also your config files!
( Not that I am willing or able to help, just some general
recommendations, you can follow or not... )

- Sedat -

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Petre daniel.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello, i'm sorry to post here but openwrt ticket system fails to interpret
 my ticket as anything but spam,

 so i cannot compile wget-nossl , the error is this:

 [..]

 mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
 -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\/etc/wgetrc\ -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -I.
 -I../lib -I../lib
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves
 -fhonour-copts -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float  -MT
 build_info.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/build_info.Tpo -c -o build_info.o
 build_info.c
 mv -f .deps/build_info.Tpo .deps/build_info.Po
 echo '/* version.c */'  version.c
 echo '/* Autogenerated by Makefile - DO NOT EDIT */'  version.c
 echo ''  version.c
 echo 'const char *version_string = 1.14;'  version.c
 echo 'const char *compilation_string = 'mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc
 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\/etc/wgetrc\
 -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -I.  -I../lib -I../lib
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves
 -fhonour-copts -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float ';' \
 | sed -e 's/[\\]/\\/g' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/\\;$/;/'  version.c
 echo 'const char *link_string = 'mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc  -Os -pipe
 -mno-branch-likely -mips32 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves -fhonour-copts
 -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float  \

 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/lib
 -lz  -lpcre  ftp-opie.o ../lib/libgnu.a';' \
 | sed -e 's/[\\]/\\/g' -e 's/\\//' -e 's/\\;$/;/'  version.c
 mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
 -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\/etc/wgetrc\ -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -I.
 -I../lib -I../lib
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves
 -fhonour-copts -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float  -MT
 version.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/version.Tpo -c -o version.o version.c
 mv -f .deps/version.Tpo .deps/version.Po
 mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
 -DSYSTEM_WGETRC=\/etc/wgetrc\ -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -I.
 -I../lib -I../lib
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/include
 -I/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/include
 -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves
 -fhonour-copts -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float  -MT
 ftp-opie.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ftp-opie.Tpo -c -o ftp-opie.o ftp-opie.c
 mv -f .deps/ftp-opie.Tpo .deps/ftp-opie.Po
 mipsel-openwrt-linux-uclibc-gcc  -Os -pipe -mno-branch-likely -mips32
 -mtune=mips32 -fno-caller-saves -fhonour-copts
 -Wno-error=unused-but-set-variable -msoft-float
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/target-mipsel_mips32_uClibc-0.9.33.2/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/usr/lib
 -L/home/dani/trunk/staging_dir/toolchain-mipsel_mips32_gcc-4.6-linaro_uClibc-0.9.33.2/lib
 -o wget cmpt.o connect.o convert.o cookies.o ftp.o css_.o css-url.o

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] kernel update to 3.10.12

2013-09-16 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Mirko Vogt mi...@openwrt.org wrote:
 On 09/15/2013 12:05 PM, Daniel Petre wrote:
 Hello, can we have 3.10.12 updated to OpenWrt trunk and patches
 refreshed please?

 We appreciate your interest in this.
 Feel free to send in patches.


kernel: update 3.10 to 3.10.12

http://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd758645eb70c1b9d3f52878eaaf2f901342e7fd

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-09-02 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Steven Barth cy...@openwrt.org wrote:
 Hi,

 thanks to you all for your contributions.

 I've commited something based upon this in
 https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/37866

 This also adds proper packaging for kernel-modules and iptables-modules.

 I moved the IPv6-NAT stuff out of regular NAT-stuff as it doesn't really fit
 in (many people use IPv4 NAT, only few will use IPv6-NAT).

 I hope this is more complete now but I would still consider this
 experimental, however this is something people can play with.

 Feedback and comments or improvements are appreciated.


Cool and thanks for a more complete approach!

I really looked at the Linux-kernel sources when new Kconfigs were introduced.
Did you check when CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT and
CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETMAP hit 1st?

...
$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_NAT6,CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_REDIRECT,
$(P_V4)ip6t_REDIRECT, lt 3.8.0))
...
$(eval $(call nf_add,IPT_NAT6,CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_NETMAP,
$(P_V6)ip6t_NETMAP, lt 3.8.0))
...

All other Kconfig stuff was ge 3.7.0 (guess this is greater-or-equal).
( Maybe, Adam can check this. )

Do you happen to know which iptables-version had 1st support for NAT-IPv6?

What is the suffix for your IPv6 related kmod-* and IPT_*

These lines in special:
...
DEPENDS:=ip6tables +kmod-ipt-nat6 --- kmod-ip6t-nat
...
IPT_BUILTIN += $(IPT_NAT6-y) --- IP6T_NAT-y

It is not NATv6 but IPv6 :-).

But I dunno anything about your naming or coding convenstions.
( I did not grep OpenWrt sources. )

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Failing x86 builds with eglibc

2013-08-31 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Florian Fainelli f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
 2013/8/31 Dirk Neukirchen dirkneukirc...@web.de:
 On 31.08.2013 01:28, Philip A. Prindeville wrote:
 make --jobserver-fds=3,4 -j subdir=csu -C csu ..=../ subdir_lib
 make[6]: Entering directory 
 `/home/philipp/openwrt2/build_dir/toolchain-i386_gcc-4.6-linaro_eglibc-2.15/eglibc-2.15-r18909/libc/csu'
 make[6]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1.  Add `+' to parent make 
 rule.
 make[6]: *** INTERNAL: readdir: Bad file descriptor
 .  Stop.


 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885474

 Anyone have a workaround for it?  This is make-3.82-15.fc18.x86_64 ...

 -Philip

 What about - taken from bug report:
 This problem can be avoided by omitting -j 2.
 and disabling concurrent building  ?

 If this produces random build errors try compiling again without the 
 -j-option
 from: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/build

 The eglibc build system has several issues with parallel building, one
 that I have tried to fix is also reported here:
 https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/12403

 Unfortunately disabling parallel build considerably slows down the
 build. Maybe we could disable it on a per-directory basis until this
 properly gets fixed.

How do you disable parallel-build on per-directory basis or in
general in OpenWrt?
( Just curious. )

For example GNU/make has .NOTPARALLEL (note the . dot) as
so-called special built-in target-name.

- Sedat -


[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Special-Targets.html
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-30 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 With the latest patch you posted, and by doing make
 kernel_menuconfig and searching for CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 and enabling
 all its dependencies (so it showed up in the menus under its
 human-readable name) and then enabling it, I was indeed able to get it
 to build the right modules. The userspace ip6tables seemed to have the
 relevant bits already (unless my enabling of the various extra
 packages for it added them); I think it mostly just passes table and
 target names on to the kernel, right? So I now have working IPv6
 masquerade.

 Anyway, since this works now, I want to write up your last patch as a
 formal [PATCH] message. Do you agree to release it under the
 appropriate licenses for OpenWRT?

 Thanks again! You've been a great help.

Great news and thanks for testing!

Please, add some words to OpenWrt Ticket #13446.
Add some comments how you tested NAT IPv6 and that it works.

As said the kernel-space side is done.

I would prefer to split the working patch and put some comments in
include/netfilter.mk.
As you have seen NAT IPv4 was a bit confusing with the kernel
Kconfig-options and version-check.
So 1/2 should correct this.
2/2 adds the kernel bits for NAT IPv6.
If you enable CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 you have to do sth. with
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_MASQUERADE (ip6t_MASQUERADE.ko) and
CONFIG_IP6_NF_TARGET_NPT (ip6t_NPT.ko).
It's a so-called tristate (y|m|n) and see also comment #2 in Ticket #13446.

As pointed out I don't know which version of iptables has support for
NAT IPv6 and if OpenWrt ships it (for people wanting firewall
support).
Please add a comment in the changelog of the patch.
I cannot say if OpenWrt developers NAK this due to incompleteness.

I cannot test NAT IPv6 nor am I an expert on this area.
( So, it was only compile-tested here. )

Please, put a note about credits and mention Ticket #13446 as a
reference in the changelog, too.

I know OpenWrt people don't like that much to comment or write changelogs.

I will help with reviewing.

- Sedat -

 -Adam

 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 Thank you so much for your help! I will try your patch when I get home
 this evening.


 With [1] I was able to build a kernel, see also attached 
 check-nf-nat-kmod.txt.
 ( But this is only kernel-space stuff. )

 - Sedat -

 [1] 
 https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/include-netfilter_mk-kernelspace-v3.diff
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I am trying to convince the OpenWRT build process to build
 nf_nat_ipv6.ko (which, by analogy with the nf_nat_ipv4.ko, I would
 expect to contain the new Kernel 3.7+ IPv6 nat chain and MASQUERADE
 target). I'm starting with r37855, and trying to use this patch:

 https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/netfilter.3.diff

 However, just making these makefile changes does not result in the
 module building. I think this is because the makefile is instructing
 the build system to only build if a certain menuconfig option is
 selected, and that option doesn't exist to select. If I try changing:

 $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 to:

 $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 it looks like it makes a bit more progress, but the build dies with:

 ERROR: module 
 '/home/anovak/workspace/openwrt/build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko'
 is missing.
 make[3]: *** 
 [/home/anovak/workspace/openwrt/bin/x86/packages/kmod-ipt-nat_3.8.13-1_x86.ipk]
 Error 1

 Does anyone who speaks Kernel Makefile want to tell me what exactly
 that patch says to do and why the netfilter ipv6 NAT stuff isn't
 building? Where can I find the Makefile that actually controls the
 compilation of C source files into netfilter .ko files, and determines
 what C code builds into what .ko file? Is the source for this feature
 just missing from the openwrt tree?


( I am not using OpenWrt, just regularly looking over the build-system. )

People wanting to help will be interested in your openwrt-config.
Can you please attach it?
Can you check if CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 is enabled (=y) in your
kernel-config (see .config file in your unpacked Linux-kernel
sources)?

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I've attached 
 ./build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/.config.
 It has a line:

 CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6=m

 This matches:

 CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4=m


Sorry, for kernel-modules it has to be (=m).

 I am not sure if this is my openwrt-config, or if that is a different
 file. No file named openwrt-config exists in my tree.


There should be a (.config) file in your OpenWrt root-dir, this is
what I meant with your openwrt-config.
Sorry, if I was not precise enough.

- Sedat -

 Thanks,
 -Adam


 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I am trying to convince the OpenWRT build process to build
 nf_nat_ipv6.ko (which, by analogy with the nf_nat_ipv4.ko, I would
 expect to contain the new Kernel 3.7+ IPv6 nat chain and MASQUERADE
 target). I'm starting with r37855, and trying to use this patch:

 https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/netfilter.3.diff

 However, just making these makefile changes does not result in the
 module building. I think this is because the makefile is instructing
 the build system to only build if a certain menuconfig option is
 selected, and that option doesn't exist to select. If I try changing:

 $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 to:

 $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 it looks like it makes a bit more progress, but the build dies with:

 ERROR: module 
 '/home/anovak/workspace/openwrt/build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko'
 is missing.
 make[3]: *** 
 [/home/anovak/workspace/openwrt/bin/x86/packages/kmod-ipt-nat_3.8.13-1_x86.ipk]
 Error 1

 Does anyone who speaks Kernel Makefile want to tell me what exactly
 that patch says to do and why the netfilter ipv6 NAT stuff isn't
 building? Where can I find the Makefile that actually controls the
 compilation of C source files into netfilter .ko files, and determines
 what C code builds into what .ko file? Is the source for this feature
 just missing from the openwrt tree?


 ( I am not using OpenWrt, just regularly looking over the build-system. )

 People wanting to help will be interested in your openwrt-config.
 Can you please attach it?
 Can you check if CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 is enabled (=y) in your
 kernel-config (see .config file in your unpacked Linux-kernel
 sources)?

 - Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

[OpenWrt-Devel] Availability of the online GIT repository at nanl.de

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
Hi,

in the last days I have troubles to look trough OpenWrt at [1].
My Firefox web-browser tries to connect, connect, connect, ...

Known?

Regards,
- Sedat -

[1] git.mirror.nanl.de/?p=openwrt/trunk.git;a=summary
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I've attached that file. It doesn't seem to have anything about
 nat_ipv4 or nat_ipv6.


$ egrep -i 'ip6t|kmod-ip|nat' /tmp/dot-config_adam.txt | grep ^CONFIG | sort
CONFIG_DEFAULT_ip6tables=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_kmod-ipt-nathelper=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_kmod-natsemi=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_ip6tables=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ip6tables=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-conntrack-extra=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-conntrack=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-core=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-extra=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nat-extra=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nathelper-extra=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nathelper=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nat=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipv6=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-natsemi=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_libip6tc=y

There is no *ip6table_nat* selected (from the diff you pointed to):

$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_
IPV6,
$(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

I cannot say why...

Did you look over the sources and searched for nf_nat_ipv6.ko file.

$ find /path/to/openwrt/ -name 'nf_nat_ipv6.ko'

...was it built?

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 I've attached that file. It doesn't seem to have anything about
 nat_ipv4 or nat_ipv6.


 $ egrep -i 'ip6t|kmod-ip|nat' /tmp/dot-config_adam.txt | grep ^CONFIG | sort
 CONFIG_DEFAULT_ip6tables=y
 CONFIG_DEFAULT_kmod-ipt-nathelper=y
 CONFIG_DEFAULT_kmod-natsemi=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_ip6tables=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ip6tables=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-conntrack-extra=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-conntrack=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-core=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-extra=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nat-extra=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nathelper-extra=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nathelper=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nat=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipv6=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-natsemi=y
 CONFIG_PACKAGE_libip6tc=y

 There is no *ip6table_nat* selected (from the diff you pointed to):

 $(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_
 IPV6,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 I cannot say why...

 Did you look over the sources and searched for nf_nat_ipv6.ko file.

 $ find /path/to/openwrt/ -name 'nf_nat_ipv6.ko'

 ...was it built?


[ KERNEL-SPACE ]

In your kernel-config you have...

CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4=m
CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6=m

...so I would expect to see as corresponding OpenWrt Kconfig-options:

CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ipt-nat=y --- IPv4?
CONFIG_PACKAGE_kmod-ip6t-nat=y --- IPv6 (this option does not exist!)?

[ USER-SPACE (here: iptables package) ]

Next question is what are the corresponding iptables Kconfig-options
to above kernel-options?

You have...

CONFIG_DEFAULT_iptables=y
CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables=y

...but did not selected any of the CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-* options...

# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-account is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-chaos is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-condition is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-conntrack-extra is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-delude is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-dhcpmac is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-dnetmap is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-extra is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-filter is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-fuzzy is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-geoip is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-hashlimit is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-iface is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ipmark is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ipopt is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ipp2p is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-iprange is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ipsec is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ipv4options is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-led is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-length2 is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-logmark is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-lscan is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-lua is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-nat-extra is not set --- NAT for both
IPv4 and IPv6?
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-psd is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-quota2 is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-rawnat is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-steal is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-sysrq is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-tarpit is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-tee is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-tproxy is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-u32 is not set
# CONFIG_PACKAGE_iptables-mod-ulog is not set

Anyway, those options correspond to each other and should be
auto-selected... to say make it more user-friendly.
( I know from the Freetz router project, Linux-kernel-iptables is
still a chaos...)

Sorry, but I had to dig more into the sources to understand all
correlations in OpenWrt.

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:

[ ... ]

That diff [0] you pointed to is IMHO wrong...

With Linux v3.7 it is now CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4 [1] and
CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 [2] was 1st introduced.

I checked the netfilter kernel-modules here on Ubuntu/precise with
raring-lts v3.8 kernel.

[ include/netfilter.mk ]

ifeq ($(NF_KMOD),1)
P_V4:=ipv4/netfilter/
P_V6:=ipv6/netfilter/
P_XT:=netfilter/
P_EBT:=bridge/netfilter/
endif

[ P_XT ]

/lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_nat.ko
/lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/xt_nat.ko

( I don't know why this both kernel-modules are required with
nf_nat_ipv4.ko together. )

[ P_V4 ]

/lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv4.ko

[ P_V6 ]

/lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko

[ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv4) ]

-$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
$(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
3.7.0),))

+$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4,
$(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
3.7.0),))

[ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv6) ]

+$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6,
$(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

[ USER-SPACE ]

I am unsure if the iptables package shipped with OpenWrt (trunk) has
netfilter-nat IPv6 support (for firewall settings).

You can try the attached experimental patch.

- Sedat -

[0] https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/netfilter.3.diff
[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n17
[2] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv6/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n11
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:

 [ ... ]

 That diff [0] you pointed to is IMHO wrong...

 With Linux v3.7 it is now CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4 [1] and
 CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 [2] was 1st introduced.

 I checked the netfilter kernel-modules here on Ubuntu/precise with
 raring-lts v3.8 kernel.

 [ include/netfilter.mk ]

 ifeq ($(NF_KMOD),1)
 P_V4:=ipv4/netfilter/
 P_V6:=ipv6/netfilter/
 P_XT:=netfilter/
 P_EBT:=bridge/netfilter/
 endif

 [ P_XT ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_nat.ko
 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/xt_nat.ko

 ( I don't know why this both kernel-modules are required with
 nf_nat_ipv4.ko together. )

 [ P_V4 ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv4.ko

 [ P_V6 ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko

 [ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv4) ]

 -$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
 $(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
 3.7.0),))

 +$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4,
 $(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
 3.7.0),))

 [ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv6) ]

 +$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))


Typo: ge 3.7.0

 [ USER-SPACE ]

 I am unsure if the iptables package shipped with OpenWrt (trunk) has
 netfilter-nat IPv6 support (for firewall settings).

 You can try the attached experimental patch.


Patch really attached.

- Sedat -

 - Sedat -

 [0] https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/netfilter.3.diff
 [1] 
 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n17
 [2] 
 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv6/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n11


include_netfilter_mk.diff
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:

 [ ... ]

 That diff [0] you pointed to is IMHO wrong...

 With Linux v3.7 it is now CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4 [1] and
 CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6 [2] was 1st introduced.

 I checked the netfilter kernel-modules here on Ubuntu/precise with
 raring-lts v3.8 kernel.

 [ include/netfilter.mk ]

 ifeq ($(NF_KMOD),1)
 P_V4:=ipv4/netfilter/
 P_V6:=ipv6/netfilter/
 P_XT:=netfilter/
 P_EBT:=bridge/netfilter/
 endif

 [ P_XT ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/nf_nat.ko
 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/netfilter/xt_nat.ko

 ( I don't know why this both kernel-modules are required with
 nf_nat_ipv4.ko together. )


Hmm, I see...

[ net/netfilter/Makefile ]

obj-$(CONFIG_NF_NAT) += nf_nat.o
obj-$(CONFIG_NF_NAT) += xt_nat.o

[ net/ipv4/netfilter/Kconfig ]

config NF_NAT_IPV4
select NF_NAT

[ /net/ipv6/netfilter/Kconfig ]

config NF_NAT_IPV6
select NF_NAT

Hmm, so we have to take into account CONFIG_NF_NAT and CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4.

Attached v2 to fix this.

- Sedat -

 [ P_V4 ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv4.ko

 [ P_V6 ]

 /lib/modules/3.8.0-30-generic/kernel/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko

 [ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv4) ]

 -$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT,
 $(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
 3.7.0),))

 +$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV4,
 $(P_XT)nf_nat $(P_V4)nf_nat_ipv4 $(P_XT)xt_nat $(P_V4)iptable_nat, ge
 3.7.0),))

 [ KERNEL-MODULE NF-NAT (IPv6) ]

 +$(eval $(if $(NF_KMOD),$(call nf_add,IPT_NAT,CONFIG_NF_NAT_IPV6,
 $(P_V6)nf_nat_ipv6 $(P_V6)ip6table_nat, ge 3.8.0),))

 [ USER-SPACE ]

 I am unsure if the iptables package shipped with OpenWrt (trunk) has
 netfilter-nat IPv6 support (for firewall settings).

 You can try the attached experimental patch.

 - Sedat -

 [0] https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/netfilter.3.diff
 [1] 
 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv4/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n17
 [2] 
 http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/net/ipv6/netfilter/Makefile?id=v3.7#n11


include_netfilter_mk-v2.diff
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building nf_nat_ipv6.ko

2013-08-29 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Adam Novak ano...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
 Hello,

 Thank you so much for your help! I will try your patch when I get home
 this evening.


With [1] I was able to build a kernel, see also attached check-nf-nat-kmod.txt.
( But this is only kernel-space stuff. )

- Sedat -

[1] 
https://dev.openwrt.org/attachment/ticket/13446/include-netfilter_mk-kernelspace-v3.diff
$ files=nf_nat.ko xt_nat.ko nf_nat_ipv4.ko iptable_nat.ko nf_nat_ipv6.ko 
ip6table_nat.ko ip6t_MASQUERADE.ko ip6t_NPT.ko

$ for i in $files ; do find 
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/ -name $i 
; done
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/netfilter/nf_nat.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/netfilter/xt_nat.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv4.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_ipv6.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_MASQUERADE.ko
build_dir/target-i386_uClibc-0.9.33.2/linux-x86_generic/linux-3.8.13/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_NPT.ko


-dileks // 29-Aug-2013
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCHv2] mklibs: Fix mklibs usage when *.so files reside in subdirs

2013-08-24 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Helmut Schaa
helmut.sc...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Helmut Schaa
 helmut.sc...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Currently package/Makefile only passes /lib /usr/lib and /usr/lib/ebtables
 to mklibs. However, other libs can also reside in different subdirectories
 (in my case /usr/lib/ipsec). Hence, create the list of library directories
 dynamically.

 Signed-off-by: Helmut Schaa helmut.sc...@googlemail.com
 ---

 v2: Replace dirname with sed to prevent issues with old versions of dirname

 Any issues with this patch? Haven't seen it in trunk yet ...

Was this patch committed in the meantime?

- Sedat -
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] where does boot log info 10000c00.uartlite: ttyS0 at MMIO 0x10000c00 (irq = 20) is a 16550A come from?

2013-07-28 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Jiapeng Li gaplee...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi everyone,

 Today i dig the linux kernel to see what happened.
 I want to find from which funciton these kernel info comes.
 And i found below result. But for the [ 0.40] 1c00.uartlite: ttyS0
 at MMIO 0x1c00 (irq = 20) is a 16550A, i didn't find mention from any
 source code.


Not sure what is your exact problem.

But maybe you find some useful cheat-codes in
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt to get some more outputs.
See console= (uart[8250]), boot console etc.

Try to contact the linux-serial ML as this is not an OpenWrt-specific thingie?

Hope this helps you.

- Sedat -

[1] 
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt

 Thanks.
 Jiapeng

 // this kernel info comes from serial8250_init
 [0.36] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 2 ports, IRQ sharing disabled

 // 
 [0.40] 1c00.uartlite: ttyS0 at MMIO 0x1c00 (irq = 20) is a
 16550A

 // this two info come from linux function register_console###
 [0.42] console [ttyS0] enabled, bootconsole disabled
 [0.42] console [ttyS0] enabled, bootconsole disabled

 // ?
 [0.45] 1500.uart: ttyS1 at MMIO 0x1500 (irq = 13) is a
 16550A




 ___
 openwrt-devel mailing list
 openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
 https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [packages] mksh: Bump to R47

2013-07-25 Thread Sedat Dilek 
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org wrote:
 Also refresh patches or drop where unneeded.

 Signed-off-by: Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org

Recommended-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com

 ---
  utils/mksh/Makefile   | 14 +++
  utils/mksh/patches/000-debian_build_fix.patch | 18 -
  utils/mksh/patches/100-dot_mkshrc | 58 
 ---
  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
  delete mode 100644 utils/mksh/patches/000-debian_build_fix.patch

 diff --git a/utils/mksh/Makefile b/utils/mksh/Makefile
 index 27a2801..66e8e63 100644
 --- a/utils/mksh/Makefile
 +++ b/utils/mksh/Makefile
 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
  #
  # Copyright (C) 2007-2011 OpenWrt.org
 -# Copyright (c) 2009 Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org
 +# Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org
  #
  # This is free software, licensed under the GNU General Public License v2.
  # See /LICENSE for more information.
 @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
  include $(TOPDIR)/rules.mk

  PKG_NAME:=mksh
 -PKG_VERSION:=40d
 +PKG_VERSION:=47
  PKG_RELEASE:=1

 -PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-R$(PKG_VERSION).cpio.gz
 +PKG_SOURCE:=$(PKG_NAME)-R$(PKG_VERSION).tgz
  PKG_SOURCE_URL:=http://www.mirbsd.org/MirOS/dist/mir/mksh
 -PKG_MD5SUM:=c6428401103367730a95b99284bf47dc
 +PKG_MD5SUM:=71c7cbcd78306897801b8b6691091e66

  PKG_BUILD_DIR:=$(BUILD_DIR)/$(PKG_NAME)

 @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ derivate currently being actively developed.  It includes 
 bug
  fixes and feature improvements, in order to produce a modern,
  robust shell good for interactive and especially script use.
  mksh has UTF-8 support (in substring operations and the Emacs
 -editing mode) and, while R40d corresponds to OpenBSD 5.0-cur-
 +editing mode) and - while R47 corresponds to OpenBSD 5.1-cur-
  rent ksh (without GNU bash-like PS1 and fancy character clas-
 -ses), adheres to SUSv4 and is much more robust.  The code has
 +ses) - adheres to SUSv4 and is much more robust. The code has
  been cleaned up and simplified, bugs fixed, standards compli-
  ance added, and several enhancements (for extended compatibi-
  lity to other modern shells - as well as a couple of its own)
 @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ define Build/Compile
 CC=$(TARGET_CC) \
 TARGET_OS=$(shell uname -s) \
 CFLAGS=$(TARGET_CFLAGS) \
 -   CPPFLAGS=-DMKSH_SMALL=1 -DMKSH_ASSUME_UTF8=0 
 -DMKSH_GCC565048=1 \
 +   CPPFLAGS=-DMKSH_SMALL=1 -DMKSH_ASSUME_UTF8=0 \
 HAVE_CAN_FSTACKPROTECTORALL=0 \
 LDFLAGS=$(TARGET_LDFLAGS) \
 $(BASH) Build.sh -Q -r -c lto
 diff --git a/utils/mksh/patches/000-debian_build_fix.patch 
 b/utils/mksh/patches/000-debian_build_fix.patch
 deleted file mode 100644
 index b64fe71..000
 --- a/utils/mksh/patches/000-debian_build_fix.patch
 +++ /dev/null
 @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
 -This patch is a backport of the fix proposed at:
 -https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mksh/+bug/1058035
 -
 -diff -urN mksh/Build.sh mksh.new/Build.sh
  mksh/Build.sh  2012-12-11 14:28:56.632807230 +0100
 -+++ mksh.new/Build.sh  2012-12-11 14:35:23.704817141 +0100
 -@@ -1530,9 +1530,11 @@
 - /* but the next three are; we REQUIRE signed integer wraparound */
 - cta(ari_is_signed, (mksh_ari_t)-1  (mksh_ari_t)0);
 - cta(ari_has_31_bit, 0  (mksh_ari_t)(mksh_ari_t)1  15)  15) - 1) * 
 2 + 1));
 -+#if !defined(MKSH_GCC565048)
 - cta(ari_sign_32_bit_and_wrap,
 - (mksh_ari_t)(mksh_ari_t)1  15)  15) - 1) * 2 + 1) 
 - (mksh_ari_t)(mksh_ari_t)1  15)  15) - 1) * 2 + 2));
 -+#endif
 - /* the next assertion is probably not really needed */
 - cta(uari_is_4_char, sizeof(mksh_uari_t) == 4);
 - /* but the next four are; we REQUIRE unsigned integer wraparound */
 diff --git a/utils/mksh/patches/100-dot_mkshrc 
 b/utils/mksh/patches/100-dot_mkshrc
 index f326ae7..7cdd162 100644
 --- a/utils/mksh/patches/100-dot_mkshrc
 +++ b/utils/mksh/patches/100-dot_mkshrc
 @@ -1,38 +1,50 @@
 -$Id$
 +From 2bee59bb9e6b142a78c94f5e77a54e4e2366c1b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 +From: Thorsten Glaser t...@freewrt.org
 +Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:07:33 +0200
 +Subject: [PATCH] Make default mkshrc file suitable for OpenWrt environment:

 -   • Part of the FreeWRT patches:
 - – no hostname(1)
 - – ls(1) has no -o option
 -   • OpenWrt and FreeWRT-1.0 fix:
 - – since this is not ~/.mkshrc make sure subshells find it
 +* Part of the FreeWRT patches:
 +  - no hostname(1)
 +  - ls(1) has no -o option
 +* OpenWrt and FreeWRT-1.0 fix:
 +  - since this is not ~/.mkshrc make sure subshells find it
 +---
 + dot.mkshrc | 10 +++---
 + 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

  a/dot.mkshrc   Sat Nov 26 18:15:38 2011
 -+++ b/dot.mkshrc   Sun Dec 11 21:31:27 2011
 -@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 - #-
 - # ${ENV:-~/.mkshrc}: mksh initialisation file for interactive shells
 +diff --git a/dot.mkshrc b/dot.mkshrc
 +index c10b8fd..3a389b2

[OpenWrt-Devel] [toolchain] gcc: Fix texinfo directives in 910-mbsd_multi patches

2013-05-26 Thread Sedat Dilek 
Hi,

unfortunately, I had only a SVN tarball which I updated today and from
there I created the attached patch via 'svn diff' (normally, I clone
the Git repo and use git-sendemail).

This is just a cosmetic (academically correct) version to fix the
following two texinfo directives:

#1: at item - @item
#2: at opindex - @opindex

Noticed while looking over your gcc-4.8 patches.

Have fun!

Regards,
- Sedat (dileks on IRC) -


fix-texinfo-directives-in-910-mbsd_multi.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel