Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
Hi John -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of John Crispin Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:38 AM To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices On 15/07/2015 09:21, Guenther Kelleter wrote: -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of John Crispin Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47 PM To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices On 14/07/2015 20:00, Karl Palsson wrote: We're adding support for gpio irqs to all of ar71xx this late in the CC release? i was not planning on merging the irq patch No possible side affects here? see above Are the gpio irqs required for these platforms? no It's needed to reflect status info of the PLC firmware to an LED via LED gpio trigger. PLC has no directly connected LEDs on the dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac. sure but we can also do this using polling and thus not having the need to merge the irq patch. the irq patch will lead to gpio-button-hotplu using irqs for all buttons/boards. i just started drinking my first coffee and will look into this during the day. need to sort out a few other things beforehand Any news on this subject? I can't find an obvious way how to use polling for led trigger. Günther What makes these two platforms special that they can be added as new platforms this late? nothing, he simply asked. there is no rule against backporting patches. if i am not mistaken, new boards are explicitly allowed to be backported if asked for. We've already added support for new platforms and reverted them again. Given that openwrt is moving forward with wonderful speed, and the time between releases is shortening, can't this just wait? well, he asked nicely and i dont see a problem with adding 2 more boards that users can enjoy. what technical reasons can you give us not to merge them. i am all ears... ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel Günther ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
On 15/07/2015 09:21, Guenther Kelleter wrote: -Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of John Crispin Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47 PM To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices On 14/07/2015 20:00, Karl Palsson wrote: We're adding support for gpio irqs to all of ar71xx this late in the CC release? i was not planning on merging the irq patch No possible side affects here? see above Are the gpio irqs required for these platforms? no It's needed to reflect status info of the PLC firmware to an LED via LED gpio trigger. PLC has no directly connected LEDs on the dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac. sure but we can also do this using polling and thus not having the need to merge the irq patch. the irq patch will lead to gpio-button-hotplu using irqs for all buttons/boards. i just started drinking my first coffee and will look into this during the day. need to sort out a few other things beforehand What makes these two platforms special that they can be added as new platforms this late? nothing, he simply asked. there is no rule against backporting patches. if i am not mistaken, new boards are explicitly allowed to be backported if asked for. We've already added support for new platforms and reverted them again. Given that openwrt is moving forward with wonderful speed, and the time between releases is shortening, can't this just wait? well, he asked nicely and i dont see a problem with adding 2 more boards that users can enjoy. what technical reasons can you give us not to merge them. i am all ears... ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel Günther ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
-Original Message- From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] On Behalf Of John Crispin Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47 PM To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices On 14/07/2015 20:00, Karl Palsson wrote: We're adding support for gpio irqs to all of ar71xx this late in the CC release? i was not planning on merging the irq patch No possible side affects here? see above Are the gpio irqs required for these platforms? no It's needed to reflect status info of the PLC firmware to an LED via LED gpio trigger. PLC has no directly connected LEDs on the dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac. What makes these two platforms special that they can be added as new platforms this late? nothing, he simply asked. there is no rule against backporting patches. if i am not mistaken, new boards are explicitly allowed to be backported if asked for. We've already added support for new platforms and reverted them again. Given that openwrt is moving forward with wonderful speed, and the time between releases is shortening, can't this just wait? well, he asked nicely and i dont see a problem with adding 2 more boards that users can enjoy. what technical reasons can you give us not to merge them. i am all ears... ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel Günther ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
On 14 July 2015 at 16:05, Günther Kelleter guenther.kelle...@devolo.de wrote: This patch set is a backport of svn commits 46338..46342 from trunk to CC. It adds support for devolo devices: dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac There is a nice 1-line script I got from Felix that easily adds Backport of ... for you: sed -e 's,git-svn-id: .*@\([0-9]*\) [0-9a-z-]*,Backport of r\1,' $1 | git am (which is a nice thing to have in a log) ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
On 14/07/2015 16:38, Rafał Miłecki wrote: On 14 July 2015 at 16:05, Günther Kelleter guenther.kelle...@devolo.de wrote: This patch set is a backport of svn commits 46338..46342 from trunk to CC. It adds support for devolo devices: dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac There is a nice 1-line script I got from Felix that easily adds Backport of ... for you: sed -e 's,git-svn-id: .*@\([0-9]*\) [0-9a-z-]*,Backport of r\1,' $1 | git am (which is a nice thing to have in a log) i took care of that 2 minutes ago when i pulled the patches into my tree doing a test build just now ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
This patch set is a backport of svn commits 46338..46342 from trunk to CC. It adds support for devolo devices: dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac Günther Kelleter (1): ar71xx: add support for the devolo dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac blogic (4): ar71xx: add support for the devolo dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ ar71xx: add support to use gpio irqs mac80211: make ath10k firmware v2 selectable base-files: added option to configure the gpio led trigger in uci-defaults package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/led| 7 + .../base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 20 ++ package/kernel/mac80211/Makefile | 12 ++ target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 6 + .../etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata | 8 + .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 13 ++ .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 10 + target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 6 + .../ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 2 + target/linux/ar71xx/config-3.18| 2 + .../files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-1200-ac.c | 189 + .../files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-500-wp.c | 203 +++ .../linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/devolo-dlan.mk | 33 +++ target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 21 ++ .../610-MIPS-ath79-openwrt-machines.patch | 40 +++- .../739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-irq-support.patch | 224 + 16 files changed, 790 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-1200-ac.c create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-500-wp.c create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/devolo-dlan.mk create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/patches-3.18/739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-irq-support.patch -- 2.4.4.88.gac2ab0d ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH CC 0/5] ar71xx: backport of support for devolo dLAN devices
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We're adding support for gpio irqs to all of ar71xx this late in the CC release?No possible side affects here? Are the gpio irqs required for these platforms? What makes these two platforms special that they can be added as new platforms this late? We've already added support for new platforms and reverted them again. Given that openwrt is moving forward with wonderful speed, and the time between releases is shortening, can't this just wait? Cheers, Karl P Günther Kelleter guenther.kelle...@devolo.de wrote: This patch set is a backport of svn commits 46338..46342 from trunk to CC. It adds support for devolo devices: dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac Günther Kelleter (1): ar71xx: add support for the devolo dLAN pro 1200+ WiFi ac blogic (4): ar71xx: add support for the devolo dLAN pro 500 Wireless+ ar71xx: add support to use gpio irqs mac80211: make ath10k firmware v2 selectable base-files: added option to configure the gpio led trigger in uci-defaults package/base-files/files/etc/init.d/led| 7 + .../base-files/files/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh | 20 ++ package/kernel/mac80211/Makefile | 12 ++ target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh | 6 + .../etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata | 8 + .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds | 13 ++ .../ar71xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network | 10 + target/linux/ar71xx/base-files/lib/ar71xx.sh | 6 + .../ar71xx/base-files/lib/upgrade/platform.sh | 2 + target/linux/ar71xx/config-3.18| 2 + .../files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-1200-ac.c | 189 + .../files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-500-wp.c | 203 +++ .../linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/devolo-dlan.mk | 33 +++ target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 21 ++ .../610-MIPS-ath79-openwrt-machines.patch | 40 +++- .../739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-irq-support.patch | 224 + 16 files changed, 790 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-1200-ac.c create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/mach-dlan-pro-500-wp.c create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/generic/profiles/devolo-dlan.mk create mode 100644 target/linux/ar71xx/patches-3.18/739-MIPS-ath79-add-gpio-irq-support.patch - -- Sent using Mailpile, Free Software from www.mailpile.is -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVpU5YAAoJEBmotQ/U1cr2uLAQAIQrn94yfseElffBvSxK+UCg SFMhKd5pt/gerD7h4H8zeqZLET7o9KmzTWNJhFY3YbEZLkRsjY1H3bSnIUNHs4Ii /1tKRaPHRNL+rQc9MyK8muCDmDogLa38DDAIZaYPDhtEwQVCj+NW7nALaX1mM40D 8ybh20T6jb9ngOAwsbopJfip0mu1pgm3VU1h1Ir4FhKa00RoRzfJa2CxwHjvFYUv MIetemy3Xq0aDSNMgY/6v+ogOxo4OJIFtMcJwmdHFkxkynvfjwQBIQ4ZlvlVnEQ1 vqpyCir5QtQN3Tt6y5s5hqP2hd5JYRBz1UkYWLIekn/xFA7nbrKkYQPIyGPpTMqF uRy2ApleWQpSOoAlB7r8NKLD+u+rGmlmnvF85p8Hx122EBm6Gn/X5JkJuSSvxDfw tYgVOk2GuRR215rwKjlYM39xif2lW13Iu35GGXmEkym5wR9uYTB0R3YrdeYmBGRE EUtmTtwOk4LVn7M35ucyYG+mqtUQYuU+BmA2W9I7xm3DiWBsXJKZ1BjG94PhVgXL S9wlOFMzCiIV847q5eq4aaimMKYOpMoncet7B6jY0zLb1kbDYRgh27H6Ibk8JqxQ X1m45zrDU5bCi8QnWduFeguOLVndMK4J30dn1jaonIB1oIiz0rPEVhUyPL0XVOrV lYOOiJQUMhLwNkgdlV9K =uMlw -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
