Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

2009-10-20 Thread edgar . soldin
I recall having similar issues when using a recent trunk compiled image 
(after the kernel upgrade) and trying to use a kmod package from the 
8.09.1 repository ... I guess it's the kernel version.


ede

On 20.10.2009 12:33, ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto) wrote:

# opkg install kmod-sched
Collected errors:
  * Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured


I had the same problem with weekend upgrading some packages on same
devices running 8.09.1 tag, and packages were compiled using the trunk
toolchain.

I don't know exactly if this is your case, but for example the Atheros
target changed architecture name from "mips" to
"atheros_uClibc-0.9.30.1".

So if your firmware was compiled before the target name change, and
you are now compiling the packages with a recent toolchain, the opkg
will fail its check because it thinks you are installing a package for
a wrong target.

I have no idea if this only applies for the Atheros target or also for
other targets.

Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

2009-10-20 Thread ZioPRoTo (Saverio Proto)
> # opkg install kmod-sched
> Collected errors:
>  * Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

I had the same problem with weekend upgrading some packages on same
devices running 8.09.1 tag, and packages were compiled using the trunk
toolchain.

I don't know exactly if this is your case, but for example the Atheros
target changed architecture name from "mips" to
"atheros_uClibc-0.9.30.1".

So if your firmware was compiled before the target name change, and
you are now compiling the packages with a recent toolchain, the opkg
will fail its check because it thinks you are installing a package for
a wrong target.

I have no idea if this only applies for the Atheros target or also for
other targets.

Saverio
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


[OpenWrt-Devel] Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

2009-10-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I'm trying to upgrade some packages I just built from an updated trunk
(r18050) and getting:

# opkg install kmod-sched
Collected errors:
 * Packages were found, but none compatible with the architectures configured

Hardware is an ASUS WL500GP:

# uname -a
Linux gw 2.6.25.20 #1 Sat Feb 7 13:49:36 EST 2009 mips unknown

The package's control file says:

Package: kmod-sched
Version: 2.6.30.8-1
Depends: kernel (=2.6.30.8-1)
Provides: 
Source: package/kernel
Section: kernel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: OpenWrt Developers Team 
Architecture: brcm47xx
Installed-Size: 251800
Description:  Kernel schedulers for IP traffic

(Yes, I know the kernel version of this package doesn't match the
running kernel.  That will be remedied once I have the necessary kmod
packages installed.)

In any case, how is opkg verifying this mismatch?  Is it comparing the
Architecture: tag in the control file to $(uname -m)?  If so, why is the
Architecture: tag in my packages wrong?

BTW: kernel module packages really ought to be named/versioned such that
I can have more than one kmod-sched installed at the same time, for
different kernels.

Thanx!
b.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel