AW: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
Hi, why is it not feasible to add a hack/patch, actually the suggested one in this thread: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220630212703.3280485-1-martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com/ Yes, it is not accepted by the kernel maintainers and yes, it keeps the unwanted or undesirable behaviour of flooding that the changes in dsa should try to avoid. But that should not keep the xrx200 based devices from continuing to work with 5.15 based openwrt. The patch in the link above worked for me, I changed the line to 1344 and replaced max_ports with cpu_port. Then the error messages are gone and I guess the flooding still appears. If you look at the thread above, it looks like a tremendous amount of work that needs to be done to implement it properly. How long will that take by people doing it as a hobby and having other things in life, 2 years?! Daniel. -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only Datum: 2023-05-03T08:34:25+0200 Von: "Nick" An: "openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org" On 5/3/23 02:53, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: > what are the problems with lantiq 5.15? There are some issues with the fdb entries: > lantiq_gswip driver (e.g.: gswip 1e108000.switch: port 4 failed to add > vid 1 to fdb: -22) Ansuel describes here why this is so bad: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/12515#issuecomment-1531686673 Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
On 5/4/23 17:51, Stijn Segers wrote: Hi, Robert Marko schreef op 3 mei 2023 11:21:32 CEST: On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 11:08, Nick wrote: I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq targets could be dropped. I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I would also really like a new release to branch off sooner rather than later, there has been plenty of time for all targets to stabilize on 5.15. I fully agree. Seems source-only is the jolt that omap and lantiq need (I know the latter is a popular target). Lots of people pining for 6.1 support in main etc, so let's branch that baby so we can move on. Stijn I wanted to do some cleanup (removing 5.10 completely) so we can soon release: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/12531 However, if we still keep omap and ath25 around without bumping them to 5.15, build will give warnings in the form of: /home/nick/openwrt/include/kernel-version.mk:11: *** Missing kernel version/hash file for 5.10. Please create /home/nick/openwrt/include/kernel-5.10. Stop. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
Hi, Robert Marko schreef op 3 mei 2023 11:21:32 CEST: >On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 11:08, Nick wrote: >> >> I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than >> a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). >> However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq >> targets could be dropped. I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device >> from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to >> 23.X or fixing it before the branch. > >I would also really like a new release to branch off sooner rather than later, >there has been plenty of time for all targets to stabilize on 5.15. I fully agree. Seems source-only is the jolt that omap and lantiq need (I know the latter is a popular target). Lots of people pining for 6.1 support in main etc, so let's branch that baby so we can move on. Stijn > >Regards, >Robert > >> >> If you branch soon, you could probably also give a talk about the new >> OpenWrt release at Battlemesh v15. ;) >> >> Bests >> Nick >> >> [0] - https://openwrt.org/meetings/20230124 >> >> On 5/1/23 18:01, Paul Spooren wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets >> > lantiq or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for >> > branching another release. >> > >> > Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as >> > source-only and do the 23.05 branch, starting with a RC0. If either of the >> > two targets are fixed within the RC phase, they should be re-added, as >> > discussed during the last meeting. >> > >> > I’d value your feedback. >> > >> > Sunshine, >> > Paul >> > ___ >> > openwrt-devel mailing list >> > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel >> >> ___ >> openwrt-devel mailing list >> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > >___ >openwrt-devel mailing list >openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel -- Verstuurd vanaf mijn Android apparaat met K-9 Mail. Excuseer mijn beknoptheid. ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
W dniu 03.05.2023 o 20:30, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if anyone wants me to test anything just write me. Meanwhile I will also have a look at this issue. This issue only affects the xrx200 target (gswip driver). AVM 7320 is supported by the xway subtarget and has built-in tantos switch. The TP Link TD-W8970 is a xrx200 target. :) So we just could have disabled the xrx200 target instead of setting the whole target to source only? Yes, I think it's a good idea. I made a mistake, I have a 7330. However, I have also some network issues with this device (no connectity to device but a link). This is a known limitation on the AVM 7320/7330. The DSA driver for this switch is missing. Only the first ethernet port works only if the cable is connected at boot. Some time ago I acquired an AVM 7330 and started writing a driver to replace the patch carried downstream. Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
Am 3. Mai 2023 20:30:11 MESZ schrieb Nick : > >On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: >> >> W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: >>> On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: >>> I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. >>> I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if >>> anyone wants me to test anything just write me. Meanwhile I will also have >>> a look at this issue. >> >> >> This issue only affects the xrx200 target (gswip driver). AVM 7320 is >> supported by the xway subtarget and has built-in tantos switch. >The TP Link TD-W8970 is a xrx200 target. :) >So we just could have disabled the xrx200 target instead of setting the whole >target to source only? > >I made a mistake, I have a 7330. However, I have also some network issues with >this device (no connectity to device but a link). > >Bests >Nick > >___ >openwrt-devel mailing list >openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org >https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel The Fritz!Box 7330 has always had broken ethernet. https://github.com/freifunk-gluon/gluon/issues/1943 https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/7125 I suppose you could fix that as well, but maybe you should focus on 5.15 on the TD-W8970. Regards Felix Baumann ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
On 5/3/23 19:23, Aleksander Bajkowski wrote: W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if anyone wants me to test anything just write me. Meanwhile I will also have a look at this issue. This issue only affects the xrx200 target (gswip driver). AVM 7320 is supported by the xway subtarget and has built-in tantos switch. The TP Link TD-W8970 is a xrx200 target. :) So we just could have disabled the xrx200 target instead of setting the whole target to source only? I made a mistake, I have a 7330. However, I have also some network issues with this device (no connectity to device but a link). Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
W dniu 03.05.2023 o 19:11, Nick pisze: On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if anyone wants me to test anything just write me. Meanwhile I will also have a look at this issue. This issue only affects the xrx200 target (gswip driver). AVM 7320 is supported by the xway subtarget and has built-in tantos switch. Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
On 5/3/23 11:07, Nick wrote: I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I organized myself now a **FRITZ!Box 7320** and **TP Link TD-W8970**. So if anyone wants me to test anything just write me. Meanwhile I will also have a look at this issue. Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
On Wed, 3 May 2023 at 11:08, Nick wrote: > > I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than > a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). > However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq > targets could be dropped. I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device > from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to > 23.X or fixing it before the branch. I would also really like a new release to branch off sooner rather than later, there has been plenty of time for all targets to stabilize on 5.15. Regards, Robert > > If you branch soon, you could probably also give a talk about the new > OpenWrt release at Battlemesh v15. ;) > > Bests > Nick > > [0] - https://openwrt.org/meetings/20230124 > > On 5/1/23 18:01, Paul Spooren wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets > > lantiq or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for > > branching another release. > > > > Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as > > source-only and do the 23.05 branch, starting with a RC0. If either of the > > two targets are fixed within the RC phase, they should be re-added, as > > discussed during the last meeting. > > > > I’d value your feedback. > > > > Sunshine, > > Paul > > ___ > > openwrt-devel mailing list > > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel > > ___ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
I would also love to see a release. It is now already delayed more than a month [0] (actual branching should be happening end of march). However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. It's sad that lantiq targets could be dropped. I will also try to fetch me some lantiq device from somewhere to support fixing the fdb issues and re-adding it back to 23.X or fixing it before the branch. If you branch soon, you could probably also give a talk about the new OpenWrt release at Battlemesh v15. ;) Bests Nick [0] - https://openwrt.org/meetings/20230124 On 5/1/23 18:01, Paul Spooren wrote: Hi all, I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets lantiq or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for branching another release. Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as source-only and do the 23.05 branch, starting with a RC0. If either of the two targets are fixed within the RC phase, they should be re-added, as discussed during the last meeting. I’d value your feedback. Sunshine, Paul ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
On 5/3/23 02:53, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: what are the problems with lantiq 5.15? There are some issues with the fdb entries: lantiq_gswip driver (e.g.: gswip 1e108000.switch: port 4 failed to add vid 1 to fdb: -22) Ansuel describes here why this is so bad: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/12515#issuecomment-1531686673 Bests Nick ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: Mark lantiq and omap as source only
Hi Paul, > I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets lantiq > or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for branching > another release. > Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as > source-only and do the 23.05 branch, starting with a RC0. If either of the > two targets are fixed within the RC phase, they should be re-added, as > discussed during the last meeting. what are the problems with lantiq 5.15? For omap: - The upstream kernel changed the ethernet default and the driver will use 2 static vlan ids (configurable via dts) to tag the traffic of port 1 and port 2. ACK for OMAP. I'll try to fix it before the release. Best, lynxis ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Mark lantiq and omap as source only
Hi all, I haven’t seen much progress happening regarding bringing the targets lantiq or omap to Kernel 5.15. That fact is currently the last blocker for branching another release. Instead of postponing another release I’d like to mark both targets as source-only and do the 23.05 branch, starting with a RC0. If either of the two targets are fixed within the RC phase, they should be re-added, as discussed during the last meeting. I’d value your feedback. Sunshine, Paul ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
