Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] brcm2708: add Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-02-11 Thread John Crispin


On 11/02/2015 12:42, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
 From popcornmix: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/22 
 Technically 2708 is the family, and 2835 is a specific
 implementation. We now know that 2835 is the only implementation in
 the family that can run linux, (and there won't be new models of
 this family), so it probably doesn't matter which model is used,
 although it should be consistent.
 

good to know

 If we wanted to use BCM2835, it would make sense also to use
 BCM2836. So it would be BOARDNAME:=Broadcom
 BCM2708/BCM2835/BCM2709/BCM2836, which is kinda long :$.
 
 I suggest either using BCM2708/BCM2709 or BCM2835/BCM2836, but
 using both seems weird, at least for me.

patch looks fine in that case i am already building a test tree ;)
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] brcm2708: add Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-02-11 Thread John Crispin


On 11/02/2015 12:33, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
 -BOARDNAME:=Broadcom BCM2708/BCM2835

should this not be

 +BOARDNAME:=Broadcom BCM2708/BCM2835/BCM2709

i think BCM2835 is used on one of the B+ variants

John
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/3] brcm2708: add Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-02-11 Thread Álvaro Fernández Rojas
From popcornmix: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/22
Technically 2708 is the family, and 2835 is a specific implementation.
We now know that 2835 is the only implementation in the family that can run 
linux, (and there won't be new models of this family), so it probably doesn't 
matter which model is used, although it should be consistent.

If we wanted to use BCM2835, it would make sense also to use BCM2836.
So it would be BOARDNAME:=Broadcom BCM2708/BCM2835/BCM2709/BCM2836, which is 
kinda long :$.

I suggest either using BCM2708/BCM2709 or BCM2835/BCM2836, but using both seems 
weird, at least for me.

El 11/02/2015 a las 12:36, John Crispin escribió:
 
 
 On 11/02/2015 12:33, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
 -BOARDNAME:=Broadcom BCM2708/BCM2835
 
 should this not be
 
 +BOARDNAME:=Broadcom BCM2708/BCM2835/BCM2709
 
 i think BCM2835 is used on one of the B+ variants
 
   John
 
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel