Re: x86/64 SDK segfaults on some hosts [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fakeroot: make fakeroot script relocatable]
Paul Spooren [2020-11-09 08:58:16]: > On Mon Nov 9, 2020 at 7:33 AM HST, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > > I probably missed the point of your mail - do you meant to imply that my > > patch introduced this regression? > > Since the CI builds start failing the same day as the patches were > commited there could be a correlation. There is also a GitHub issue > open: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/13855 For the archives, it was fixed by Jo in https://git.openwrt.org/d4521fb132266 -- ynezz ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: x86/64 SDK segfaults on some hosts [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fakeroot: make fakeroot script relocatable]
On Mon Nov 9, 2020 at 7:33 AM HST, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > I probably missed the point of your mail - do you meant to imply that my > patch introduced this regression? Since the CI builds start failing the same day as the patches were commited there could be a correlation. There is also a GitHub issue open: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/13855 Sunshine, Paul ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Re: x86/64 SDK segfaults on some hosts [Was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fakeroot: make fakeroot script relocatable]
Hi, > it seems like mixing dynamic loader from the host and libraries from SDK > doesn't work reliably in all cases and may result in crash. Yes, that is why we wrap the SDK executables to forcibly invoke them through the bundled loader. Attempting to use SDK executables or librries with the host system LDSO will result in undefined behavior. I probably missed the point of your mail - do you meant to imply that my patch introduced this regression? ~ Jo ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
