Re: Wrong hash for firewall package?

2022-05-20 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi again,

please ignore my previous message, that was an incorrect observation on my
side. In fact my locally generated source archive matches the one on the
source mirror, so I assume Rui's recent bump simply added a wrong checksum.

~ Jo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Re: Wrong hash for firewall package?

2022-05-20 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi,

I compared the package stored on the source mirror with the locally generated
mismatching one. The contained .tar has the same checksum but the compressed
xz file is different. I suppose this is due to the recent enabling of
multithreaded xz compression which yields different results on different 
machines.

~ Jo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


Wrong hash for firewall package?

2022-05-20 Thread Ansuel Smith
I notice that firewall hash is different for firewall package

The one we have is
307baf09c61ce727b4edb4283144b0d8128ebba34b858cc6389571421f829a24
but the correct one is
ce9e8ac1bcf22afbb0a80c3da1a8e8e887851299681097e3dfbfc347f2c4c80f

Did someone force pushed something to the firewall git or the hash was
just wrong?

Looks strange to me.

___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel