Re: [OpenXPKI-users] Active/Active Setup

2023-09-28 Thread Martin Bartosch via OpenXPKI-users
Hi,

>  we are planning to setup up an active/active system over two geo locations.
> Does anyone have experience with such a scenario and can share some best 
> practices?
> We would otherwise testing db replication or setting up different signing 
> ca’s within the datacenters, but I would rather have this in a way to be able 
> to control duplicated certificates.

Yes, active-active works without any problems with any number of worker nodes.

For an active-active setup you need:

- a redundant database, All OpenXPKI worker node need to access the same 
database instance
- any number of OpenXPKI worker nodes. All worker nodes must have the same 
configuration.
- the OpenXPKI web interface must be configured to store sessions in the 
database. For a long time this has been the default.
- a load balancer which proxies all the worker nodes' web interfaces. The load 
balancer shall be configured in a way that for a given worker node topology 
queries get routed to the same worker node based on the Source IP (e. g. source 
IP hash).

Cheers

Martin





___
OpenXPKI-users mailing list
OpenXPKI-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-users


[OpenXPKI-users] Active/Active Setup

2023-09-28 Thread Siekmann, Marco
Hello,

we are planning to setup up an active/active system over two geo locations.
Does anyone have experience with such a scenario and can share some best 
practices?
We would otherwise testing db replication or setting up different signing ca's 
within the datacenters, but I would rather have this in a way to be able to 
control duplicated certificates.

Cheers

Marco

___
OpenXPKI-users mailing list
OpenXPKI-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openxpki-users