[Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y plots

[Markus Blatt]

On 21.07.24 18:41, Markus Blatt wrote:

Dear Emmanuel,

It is hard to tell for us what the problem is.

Link for Windows installation is 
https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/windows-installation/


The site says: download the zip file from 
https://github.com/OPM/ResInsight/releases, extract and and run 
ResInsight.exe


If you have problems with this, then maybe create an issue at 
https://github.com/OPM/ResInsight

I meant https://github.com/OPM/ResInsight/issues


HTH and cheers,

Markus

On 21.07.24 06:19, Ndip Ojong Emmanuel wrote:

Hello everyone,

I hope you're having a good morning. I just wanted to express my 
gratitude to Lisa, Markus, and Bård for their help in resolving an 
issue I was facing. Thanks to your input, I was able to plot 
simulation production curves for the SPE1CASE1 data using the 
ResInsight visualizer on Ubuntu. I also updated my Ubuntu version to 
22.04.4 LTS.


However, when I tried to access the link you provided for ResInsight 
on my Windows machine, I encountered difficulties and couldn't 
download it. I've also searched on Google but still couldn't access 
the website. I prefer using ResInsight on Windows due to limited 
space on my Virtual Machine with a Linux OS, which keeps freezing 
despite increasing the capacity from 2GB to 4GB.


Once again, thank you all for your support.

Best regards,

Emmanuel


On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 18:54, Patricia Carreras 
 wrote:


    Wow! I am impressed by your willingness to help!

    Big thanks to Markus, Lisa and Bard for providing potential
    solutions for the problem. Let's wait for what Ndip has to say.
    I really appreciate the help of all of you. I am mentoring Ndip on
    reservoir simulation and have done the same in the past with
    Ricardo Lara, a Mexican student from the University of Austin
    (Texas) at that time. Ricardo also used OPM to improve his
    reservoir simulation skills. I am volunteering as a mentor for the
    SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers).

    I am a big supporter of OPM, as you can see, since many years ago.
    Equinor should also receive praise for providing a free field case
    database and supporting the software.

    I am looking forward to have the software working to start having 
fun!


    Kind regards.

    Patricia

--------
    *De:* Markus Blatt 
    *Enviado:* miércoles, 17 de julio de 2024 08:57
    *Para:* Lisa Julia Nebel ; Ndip Ojong
    Emmanuel 
    *Cc:* Patricia Carreras ;
    opm@opm-project.org 
    *Asunto:* Re: [Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y
    plots

    Hi,

    *Concerning the python problem:*

    Ubuntu/debian had two incompatible python versions (2.* and 3.*)
    during some time. Just use python3 command instead of python:

    *python3 summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD
    WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA*

     Or install the mentioned package:

    sudo apt-get install python-is-python3

    After that using python should also work.

    *Concerning libecl-dev*

    the package that is in Ubuntu seems to be something completely
    different from what we meant our website. The one in Ubuntu is
    titled: " Embeddable Common-Lisp: development files and has
    nothing to do with OPM.

    So I guess if Lisa can run the script then libecl is not needed
    and you can ignore the error when installing it. You definitely
    should not need to upgrade your system.

    Cheers,

    Markus

    On 17.07.24 12:59, Lisa Julia Nebel wrote:


    Hello Emmanuel,

    cool that you could install the python packages! :)

    Regarding libecl-dev: I have a debian 12 machine and also a
    Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS machine, for both this package is available. I
    suggest you either try to install libecl-dev from here:
    https://packages.debian.org/sid/libdevel/libecl-dev or upgrade to
    22.04 (or even to 24.04).

    Alternatively you can install ResInsight
(https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/build-instructions-ubuntu/).

    Best regards,
    Lisa

    On 7/17/24 12:35, Ndip Ojong Emmanuel wrote:

    Hi Lisa. Thank you so much for reaching out to help.
    The version of Ubuntu I use is Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
    Exactly. You understand the problem, but even using the commands
    you sent above didn't work for me. I have attached some
    screenshots of the error messages to this email.
    So the problem has not been solved.
    Error messages below.
    E: Unable to locate package libecl-dev ( I get this when trying
    to install the libecl)

    Command 'python' not found, did you mean:

      command 'python3' from deb python3
      command 'python' from deb python-is-python3 ( I get this when
    I type the command  "*python summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD
    WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA")*
    **
    *I would be happy if

[Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y plots

[Markus Blatt]

Dear Emmanuel,

It is hard to tell for us what the problem is.

Link for Windows installation is 
https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/windows-installation/


The site says: download the zip file from 
https://github.com/OPM/ResInsight/releases, extract and and run 
ResInsight.exe


If you have problems with this, then maybe create an issue at 
https://github.com/OPM/ResInsight


HTH and cheers,

Markus

On 21.07.24 06:19, Ndip Ojong Emmanuel wrote:

Hello everyone,

I hope you're having a good morning. I just wanted to express my 
gratitude to Lisa, Markus, and Bård for their help in resolving an 
issue I was facing. Thanks to your input, I was able to plot 
simulation production curves for the SPE1CASE1 data using the 
ResInsight visualizer on Ubuntu. I also updated my Ubuntu version to 
22.04.4 LTS.


However, when I tried to access the link you provided for ResInsight 
on my Windows machine, I encountered difficulties and couldn't 
download it. I've also searched on Google but still couldn't access 
the website. I prefer using ResInsight on Windows due to limited space 
on my Virtual Machine with a Linux OS, which keeps freezing despite 
increasing the capacity from 2GB to 4GB.


Once again, thank you all for your support.

Best regards,

Emmanuel


On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 18:54, Patricia Carreras 
 wrote:


Wow! I am impressed by your willingness to help!

Big thanks to Markus, Lisa and Bard for providing potential
solutions for the problem. Let's wait for what Ndip has to say.
I really appreciate the help of all of you. I am mentoring Ndip on
reservoir simulation and have done the same in the past with
Ricardo Lara, a Mexican student from the University of Austin
(Texas) at that time. Ricardo also used OPM to improve his
reservoir simulation skills. I am volunteering as a mentor for the
SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers).

I am a big supporter of OPM, as you can see, since many years ago.
Equinor should also receive praise for providing a free field case
database and supporting the software.

I am looking forward to have the software working to start having fun!

Kind regards.

Patricia

--------
*De:* Markus Blatt 
*Enviado:* miércoles, 17 de julio de 2024 08:57
*Para:* Lisa Julia Nebel ; Ndip Ojong
Emmanuel 
*Cc:* Patricia Carreras ;
opm@opm-project.org 
*Asunto:* Re: [Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y
plots

Hi,

*Concerning the python problem:*

Ubuntu/debian had two incompatible python versions (2.* and 3.*)
during some time. Just use python3 command instead of python:

*python3 summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD
WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA*

 Or install the mentioned package:

sudo apt-get install python-is-python3

After that using python should also work.

*Concerning libecl-dev*

the package that is in Ubuntu seems to be something completely
different from what we meant our website. The one in Ubuntu is
titled: " Embeddable Common-Lisp: development files and has
nothing to do with OPM.

So I guess if Lisa can run the script then libecl is not needed
and you can ignore the error when installing it. You definitely
should not need to upgrade your system.

Cheers,

Markus

On 17.07.24 12:59, Lisa Julia Nebel wrote:


Hello Emmanuel,

cool that you could install the python packages! :)

Regarding libecl-dev: I have a debian 12 machine and also a
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS machine, for both this package is available. I
suggest you either try to install libecl-dev from here:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libdevel/libecl-dev or upgrade to
22.04 (or even to 24.04).

Alternatively you can install ResInsight

(https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/build-instructions-ubuntu/).

Best regards,
Lisa

On 7/17/24 12:35, Ndip Ojong Emmanuel wrote:

Hi Lisa. Thank you so much for reaching out to help.
The version of Ubuntu I use is Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Exactly. You understand the problem, but even using the commands
you sent above didn't work for me. I have attached some
screenshots of the error messages to this email.
So the problem has not been solved.
Error messages below.
E: Unable to locate package libecl-dev ( I get this when trying
to install the libecl)

Command 'python' not found, did you mean:

  command 'python3' from deb python3
  command 'python' from deb python-is-python3 ( I get this when
I type the command  "*python summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD
WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA")*
**
*I would be happy if you could help me further to find a solution. *

Ndip Ojong Emmanuel




On Wed,

[Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y plots

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

*Concerning the python problem:*

Ubuntu/debian had two incompatible python versions (2.* and 3.*) during 
some time. Just use python3 command instead of python:


*python3 summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD WGIR:INJ 
SPE1CASE1.DATA*


 Or install the mentioned package:

sudo apt-get install python-is-python3

After that using python should also work.

*Concerning libecl-dev*

the package that is in Ubuntu seems to be something completely different 
from what we meant our website. The one in Ubuntu is titled: " 
Embeddable Common-Lisp: development files and has nothing to do with OPM.


So I guess if Lisa can run the script then libecl is not needed and you 
can ignore the error when installing it. You definitely should not need 
to upgrade your system.


Cheers,

Markus

On 17.07.24 12:59, Lisa Julia Nebel wrote:


Hello Emmanuel,

cool that you could install the python packages! :)

Regarding libecl-dev: I have a debian 12 machine and also a Ubuntu 
22.04.4 LTS machine, for both this package is available. I suggest you 
either try to install libecl-dev from here: 
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libdevel/libecl-dev or upgrade to 
22.04 (or even to 24.04).


Alternatively you can install ResInsight 
(https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/build-instructions-ubuntu/).


Best regards,
Lisa

On 7/17/24 12:35, Ndip Ojong Emmanuel wrote:

Hi Lisa. Thank you so much for reaching out to help.
The version of Ubuntu I use is Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Exactly. You understand the problem, but even using the commands you 
sent above didn't work for me. I have attached some screenshots of 
the error messages to this email.

So the problem has not been solved.
Error messages below.
E: Unable to locate package libecl-dev ( I get this when trying to 
install the libecl)


Command 'python' not found, did you mean:

  command 'python3' from deb python3
  command 'python' from deb python-is-python3 ( I get this when I 
type the command  "*python summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD WOPR:PROD 
WGPR:PROD WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA")*

**
*I would be happy if you could help me further to find a solution. *

Ndip Ojong Emmanuel




On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 08:43, Lisa Julia Nebel 
 wrote:


Hello Emmanuel,

first of all: sorry for not getting back to you earlier, I saw
you wrote an email already yesterday, and I had a look yet
yesterday I was busy.

You mean this here? https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197&page=6
<https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197&page=6>

On my system, the command
*sudo apt-get install python-ecl python-numpy python-matplotlib
libecl-dev
*did not work, so I did
*sudo apt install libecl-dev
**pip install ecl numpy matplotlib
*and then
*python summaryplot WBHP:INJ WBHP:PROD WOPR:PROD WGPR:PROD
WGIR:INJ SPE1CASE1.DATA
*worked.

Does that possibly already solve your question?

If not: What error are you getting?

Best regards,
Lisa

On 7/17/24 07:56, Markus Blatt wrote:


Dear Patricia,

very cool that you are using OPM. I have a dear friend who is
also from Cameroon. Great to meet you guys.

We will try to look into this.

Unfortunately, we often do not find the necessary time to
maintain all the scripts in
https://github.com/OPM/opm-utilities/, which is a bit of a
shame, but there is just so much important work to do and always
so little time.
The same holds for the tutorials that you found/used. "My first
reservoir simulation" <https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197>
<https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197> seems to not have been
updated for some years.

What system is your student using (e.g. Ubuntu 22.04 or the
likes)? If he is using Ubuntu, he might be able to easily
install ResInsight, see Resinsight Installation instructions for
Ubuntu

<https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/linux-installation/>

<https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/linux-installation/>.
That software is rather powerful and many people use it on a
day-day basis Even those not using OPM for simulation. You can
easily plot summary curves with it.

Kind regards,

Markus

On 17.07.24 03:06, Patricia Carreras wrote:

Hello all,
Ndip, a master's student from Cameroon cc in this email, is
having trouble to install the Python script called Summary Plot
necessary to generate X-Y plots (OPR vs time, OPT vs time,
etc.). It seems that he is installing it, but it is not
working. He can visualize grid plots with no problem.
My questions:

   *   Is it mandatory to install the Phyton script to be able
to visualize the X-Y plots (unsmry)?

   *   Any clues about why the script or the installation might
not be working?

   *   Any other guidance that y

[Opm] Re: help - Problem with Phyton script for X-Y plots

[Markus Blatt]

Dear Patricia,

very cool that you are using OPM. I have a dear friend who is also from 
Cameroon. Great to meet you guys.


We will try to look into this.

Unfortunately, we often do not find the necessary time to maintain all 
the scripts in https://github.com/OPM/opm-utilities/, which is a bit of 
a shame, but there is just so much important work to do and always so 
little time.
The same holds for the tutorials that you found/used. "My first 
reservoir simulation" <https://opm-project.org/?page_id=197> seems to 
not have been updated for some years.


What system is your student using (e.g. Ubuntu 22.04 or the likes)? If 
he is using Ubuntu, he might be able to easily install ResInsight, see 
Resinsight Installation instructions for Ubuntu 
<https://resinsight.org/getting-started/download-and-install/linux-installation/>. 
That software is rather powerful and many people use it on a day-day 
basis Even those not using OPM for simulation. You can easily plot 
summary curves with it.


Kind regards,

Markus

On 17.07.24 03:06, Patricia Carreras wrote:

Hello all,
Ndip, a master's student from Cameroon cc in this email, is having trouble to 
install the Python script called Summary Plot necessary to generate X-Y plots 
(OPR vs time, OPT vs time, etc.). It seems that he is installing it, but it is 
not working. He can visualize grid plots with no problem.
My questions:

   *   Is it mandatory to install the Phyton script to be able to visualize the 
X-Y plots (unsmry)?

   *   Any clues about why the script or the installation might not be working?

   *   Any other guidance that you might provide?

He is really in a hurry to have the graphical software working because he is 
planning to use OPM-Flow for his thesis.
Thank you so much for any help that you might provide.
Kind regards.
Patricia Carreras
___
Opm mailing list --opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email toopm-le...@opm-project.org


--
Markus Blatt |https://de.linkedin.com/in/markusblatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com  | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list -- opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opm-le...@opm-project.org

[Opm] Re: help - Mailing list mot working

[Markus Blatt]

Dear Patricia,

I have received your email via the mailing list. So this is working.

What error are you talking about?

Cheers,

Markus

On 03.07.24 14:51, Patricia Carreras wrote:

Hello all,

Is the Mailing List working? I am working with a young professional. He is 
starting to use Flow and the graphic package. He is having some difficulties to 
have the installation of the software working. When trying to define himself as 
part of the Mailing List to be able to ask questions, he got an error and me 
too.

Looking forward to receiving your help. Thanks!

Patricia Carreras
___
Opm mailing list -- opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opm-le...@opm-project.org


--
Markus Blatt | https://de.linkedin.com/in/markusblatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858

___
Opm mailing list -- opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opm-le...@opm-project.org

[Opm] Re: Release 2024.04

[Markus Blatt]

Ich habe das irgendwie zwei Mal bekommen.

Markus

Am Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 03:23:41PM +0200 schrieb Lisa Julia Nebel:

Dear OPM community,

since about four weeks, the *2024.04 OPM release* is ready and available!
This email reaches you this late due to problems with the mailing 
list, sorry for that!!
Thanks a lot to all contributors for your improvements to the software 
and documentation, and to users for alerting us to bugs and problems.


Binary packages for the 2024.04 OPM release are available for RHEL7 
and RHEL8 as well as for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) and 24.04 
LTS (Noble Numbat). The Ubuntu packages may be downloaded from the OPM 
Project’s Personal Package Archive (ppa:opm/ppa). If you have not 
already included this in your package sources, you can do so with the 
commands:


    sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa
    sudo apt-get update

Then you can install the simulator and its prerequisites using the command:

    sudo apt install libopm-simulators-bin

You can install python bindings for opm via pip 
(https://pypi.org/project/opm/) using:


    pip install opm

Full release notes will be available with the updated manual soon. 
Until then, please refer to the old manual.


The 2024.04 release consists of various new features, improvements and 
bug fixes, including:


* A new brine-CO2 mutual solubility model has been implemented from
  Spycher & Pruess, Transp. Porous Med., 2010. This model improves the
  accuracy of the solubility calculations in CO2STORE at temperatures
  above 100 degrees Celsius. In addition, a new keyword, ACTCO2S, has
  been added to choose between activity models.
* Added CO2 mass in place summary vectors for the field and region
  level when using CO2STORE, including trapped masses based on the
  definition of immobile gas in the 11th SPE Comparative Solution Project.
* Added support for the following keywords:

* CO2SOL and H2SOL keywords for modelling CO2 or H2 injection in
  hydrocarbon reservoirs
* SOURCE keyword for modelling a simple source term
* FBHPDEF, WDFAC and WDFACCOR keywords in the SCHEDULE section
* DIFFAGAS and DIFFAWAT
* SKIP, SKIP100, SKIP300, ENDSKIP
* NONNC
* partial support for DATUMR and DATUMRX keywords in the SOLUTION
  section
* PCFACT and THCO2MIX keywords in the PROPS section

* Added support for using well lists (WLIST) in ACTIONX blocks with
  the following keywords: COMPDAT, COMPLUMP, WCONINJE, WCONPROD,
  WECON, WEFAC, WELOPEN, WELPI, WELSPECS, WELTARG, WGRUPCON, WPIMULT,
  WSEGVALV, WTEST and WTMULT.
* Added Support for output of addition summary vectors, initialization
  arrays and restart arrays and for an expanded set of summary vectors
  to be used in defining expressions for UDQs and in the condition
  blocks of the ACTIONX keyword
* Removed the need for a run-function in PYACTION blocks.
  EclipseState, Schedule, ReportStep and SummaryState are now
  available as attributes of the module opm_embedded and tooltips are
  available in Python IDEs. The code maintains backwards compatibility
  with the previous usage.
* Made end-of-simulation performance summary more precise, now also
  includes setup time.


Best regards,

Lisa Julia Nebel, opm-op
Release manager for 2024.04
___
Opm mailing list -- opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opm-le...@opm-project.org


--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list -- opm@opm-project.org
To unsubscribe send an email to opm-le...@opm-project.org

[Opm] OPM Release 2023.10 available

[Markus Blatt]

Dear OPM community,

It is my pleasure to announce that the 2023.04 OPM release is now ready. 
Thanks to all contributors for your improvements to the software and 
documentation, and to users for alerting us to bugs and problems.


We dedicate this OPM 2023.10 release to our colleague and friend David 
Baxendale. David passed away in late June 2023 after a short severe 
illness. Our thoughts are with his wife and son. The OPM community is 
very thankful for all his contributions to OPM and the fruitful 
discussions with him about issues with and advancements of the simulator.


David started contributing to OPM in 2017 and continued his good work 
until his very last days. We owe the OPM Reference manual to him. It is 
an heroic effort with its thousands of pages. We, his colleagues and 
friends, are and will be surely missing him with his reservoir 
engineering expertise and know-how, his enthusiasm, and humor.


The 2023-10 release consists of some new features and various 
improvements and bug fixes. Our main target was to support more keywords 
used for relevant fields and reducing the differences between OPM flow 
and the commercial simulator. These improvements include


 * Added support for temperature (THERMAL) plus salt precipitation
   (PRECSALT) modeling in gas-water-brine (GAS-WATER-BRINE) systems
 * Added support for modelling dissolved gas in water (DISGASW) and
   vaporized water in the gas phase (VAPWAT) in the thermal-gas-water
   simulator
 * Support for modeling FOAM combined with SOLVENT
 * partial support for WAGHYSTR keyword (Water-Alternating-Gas hystersis)
 * Improvements to many user-facing error messages.
 * More graceful exits for problems in parallel runs.
 * Temperature is output if requested via RPTRST
 * Added support for WBP, WBP4, WBP5 and WBP9 in the SUMMARY section to
   output well block averaged pressures for open completions
 * Added support for initializing constant flux aquifers from a restart
 * Added support for WBP, WBP4, WBP5 and WBP9 in the SUMMARY section to
   output well block averaged pressures for open completions
 * Faster two-point flux-approximation introduced in the last release
   is now also used for linearizing gas-oil cases with energy (with
   diffusion) and gas-oil diffusion

Full release notes will be available with the updated manual soon.

Binary packages for the 2023.10 OPM release are available for RHEL 7, as 
well as for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (code name Jammy Jellyfish) and 20.04 LTS 
(code name Focal Fossa). The Ubuntu packages may be downloaded from the 
OPM Project’s Personal Package Archive (ppa:opm/ppa). If you have not 
already included this in your package sources, you can do so with the 
commands:


sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa
sudo apt-get update

Then you can install the simulator and its prerequisites using the command:

sudo apt install libopm-simulators-bin

You can install python bindings for opm via pip 
(https://pypi.org/project/opm/) using:


pip install opm

If you prefer compiling the source yourself then you can either download 
the release tarballs from https://github.com/OPM or checkout the release 
branches in git via


git checkout release/2023.10

Thanks a lot for using and contributing to our software. We are valuing 
your feedback about the release. If you are having problems or find 
flaws or bugs, then please take the time to report them on github, e.g. 
in opm-simulator's issue tracker 
<https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/issues>. This is a good way to 
contribute to the project.


We always try to address issues posted on github if time allows. For the 
time-constrained people there is also the possibility to get commercial 
support.


Please note that the new release of our OPM Reference manual still needs 
some time. We hope to publish it soon. In the meantime we hope that the 
installation instruction on the website 
<https://opm-project.org/?page_id=36> or in the old manual 
<https://opm-project.org/?page_id=955> will help you together with the 
above instructions.


Best Regards,

Markus Blatt

Release manager for 2023.10

--
Markus Blatt |https://de.linkedin.com/in/markusblatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com  | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Fwd: Second release candidate for 2023.10 available

[Markus Blatt]

Dear all,

I am pleased to annouce that we have finished preparing the second release
candidate for testing.

You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag

  release/2022.10/rc2

(do git checkout release/2023.10/rc2 and then rebuild)

or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04.

To test the binary packages, follow the normal installation instructions 
at the OPM website [1], but replace the command


  sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa

with the command

  sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/testing

to use the testing package repository instead of the regular one.

Kind regards,

Markus

[1] 
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] First release candidate for 2023.10 available

[Markus Blatt]

Dear all,

I am pleased to annouce that we have finished preparing the first release
candidate for testing.

You can check out the release candidate from the github repos using the tag

  release/2022.10/rc1

(do git checkout release/2023.10/rc1 and then rebuild)

or use binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 20.04 and 22.04.

To test the binary packages, follow the normal installation instructions at 
the OPM website [1], but replace the command


  sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa

with the command

  sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/testing

to use the testing package repository instead of the regular one.

The release process this year seems much faster than the last time I 
was release manager some years ago. I guess this is a sign of the good 
work of all our developers. So kudos to all of them. It is a pleasure 
to work with you.


Kind regards,

Markus

[1] <https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245>
--  


Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Tentative Release 2023.10 schedule

[Markus Blatt]

Dear OPM community,

time flies and our calendar says that is already October again. 
Everybody has been quite busy improving and extending OPM over the 
summer. Seems like high time to collect the harvest into a new release.


I have the honor of working for you as a release manager and intend to 
base my work on the following tentative release schedule:


2023-10-11: Creation of release branches
    Note that everything in master at this time will also be in
    the release. After this date only important changes will
    become part of the release. These should be mainly bugfixes

2023-10-18: First release candidate available for testing

2023-10-30: Second release candidate available for testing.

2023-11-6: Final release

Please mark the PRs that should go into the release with Milestone 
"Release 2023.10" to make it easier to get an overview.


From October 18 on features/bug fixes will need to be merged to master 
first and will be backported by me to the release branches. Please keep 
that in mind as you will need to clearly state that a PR is also for the 
release to speed up reviewing and prevent me from missing stuff.


Would be a good idea to also start tagging currently open PRs, to help 
with prioritizing reviews. Please don't do this for all of your PRs but 
only those that you think are considerably stable and important 
features. Bugfixes should go in in any case.


Thanks in advance for all the help and your patience with the release 
manager (I know that I can be slow from time to time).


Cheers,

Markus

--
Markus Blatt | https://de.linkedin.com/in/markusblatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Invitation: 7th Dune User Meeting and Developer Meeting in September 2023

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

for those not following the DUNE mailing list I am posting this here, also.

Best,

Markus

- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Simon Praetorius 
 -

Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:48:04 +0200
From: Simon Praetorius 
To: DUNE Liste , "dune-de...@lists.dune-project.org" 

Subject: [Dune-devel] Invitation: 7th Dune User Meeting and Developer Meeting 
in September 2023
Return-path: 
List-Id: Discussion about the development of Dune 


Dear Dune Community,

We are pleased to announce the upcoming 7th Dune User Meeting, which will take 
place on September 18-19 at the Technische Universität Dresden. The goal of 
this meeting is to bring together Dune users from different domains to foster 
collaboration, share experiences, and provide valuable input for the future 
development of Dune.


The 7th Dune User Meeting will maintain an informal atmosphere, encouraging 
attendees to present their work and engage in general discussions about Dune. 
We welcome contributions from other frameworks such as DuMuX, AMDiS, and OPM 
that also use Dune. By sharing your insights, workflows, and challenges, we 
can learn from each other and explore potential avenues for future research.


We are also pleased to announce our two distinguished invited speakers for 
this year's meeting: Christophe Geuzaine (from GMsh) and Luca Heltai (from 
deal.ii).


Please visit our website

https://dune-project.org/community/meetings/2023-09-usermeeting/

or contact us directly via meeting-2...@dune-project.org for more detailed 
information regarding registration, submission of presentations, and the event 
schedule.


Additionally, we will be hosting a meeting for Dune developers immediately 
following the user meeting, from September 19-20. We invite everybody 
interested in the development of the Dune core to join us for this session, as 
it presents an excellent opportunity to contribute ideas and shape the future 
of Dune. See also the Developer Meeting webpage


https://dune-project.org/community/meetings/2023-09-devmeeting/

for more information.

Please reserve these dates in your calendar. Updates will be posted on the 
Dune website and distributed through the mailing list.


We look forward to your participation in the 7th Dune User Meeting and 
Developer Meeting.


Best regards,

Markus Blatt
Simon Praetorius
Oliver Sander

--
Dr. Simon Praetorius
Institut für Wissenschaftliches Rechnen
Fakultät Mathematik
Technische Universität Dresden
Tel.: TUD-34432
Mail:simon.praetor...@tu-dresden.de
Web:https://tu-dresden.de/Members/simon.praetorius



___
Dune-devel mailing list
dune-de...@lists.dune-project.org
https://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel


- Ende weitergeleitete Nachricht -----

--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] 2023.04-rc2

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Am Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 07:06:35AM + schrieb Arne Morten Kvarving:

Ubuntu 20.04 has libfmt 6.x so we fallback to the internal.

However, the internal is no longer sufficient (7.0.3).

We do have to do something about it. We either have to bump the bundled 
version, or my preference, remove the bundled version and rely on users to 
supply this widely available library on their own.
Since flow immediately throws an exception if you use the bundled version, 
there are unlikely to be users who rely on it.


We cannot really be so sure about this. Not everybody might use master.
Anyway, we need to document this properly. If you still have the error message, 
maybe opening an issue might be good. At least something will appear when doing 
a web search.

Best,

Markus

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] 2023.04-rc2

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Am Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 06:24:11AM + schrieb Arne Morten Kvarving:


The rc2 release candidate for the upcoming release is ready for testing!



Very good, thanks a lot for the hard work.



The focal packages have been fixed (the embedded libfmt version in opm-common 
is not usable any longer...)



Two questions:

Is that a general problem not limited to Ubuntu 20.04, because we are using 
functionality that is not in the embedded version?
In that case we would probably need to do something about this.

Why is the embedded version picked up and used anyway? Aren't the build 
dependencies of Debian checked?

Cheers,

Markus

--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Oscars gate 27, 0352 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Drop Dune 2.6 support in 2023.04 (was: Re: Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?)

[Markus Blatt]

Let's revisit this in the light of [0]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 06:31:28AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Circling back to Arne Morten's point, that we would have to backport Dune and 
> put it in our own ppa to use the newer Dune releases, how much work would 
> that be?

I don't think that this is too much work. The only problem that might occur is
that the platform compiler might be too old to compile newer DUNE versions. But
hopfully backporting the next newer version is still possible.

> And if we did that, could/should we skip straight to Dune 2.8 or even 2.9?

Two stable versions seem feasible to me.

Markus

[0] 

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?

[Markus Blatt]

Just for the record:

While OPM might compile with DUNE 2.6 in a Vanilla/Default configuration, it 
seems broken if e.g.
- BUILD__TESTING is ON for opm-models because of 
  https://github.com/OPM/opm-models/blob/master/opm/models/nonlinear/newtonmethod.hh#L191

  There is no equivalent method in DUNE 2.6
- or dune-alugrid/dune-fem are enabled.

Am Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 06:31:28AM + schrieb Atgeirr Rasmussen:

Hi,

Circling back to Arne Morten's point, that we would have to backport Dune and 
put it in our own ppa to use the newer Dune releases, how much work would that 
be? And if we did that, could/should we skip straight to Dune 2.8 or even 2.9? 
If we set as a goal to:
- Use and require as new Dune as feasible (say 2.8 for now).
- Use and require as recent C++ standard as feasible (we now require C++17, but 
say we want to use C++20).
Other than developers updating their systems (which I consider quite acceptable 
as long as we do not require bleeding-edge versions), and the above-mentioned 
backporting, what else would we need to do? I assume Jenkins and Debian may be 
points of difficulty.

Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Upcoming release 2022.10

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

thanks a lot for sharing the timeline. Are you the release manager this time?

Cheers,

Markus

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:48:49PM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Dear OPM community,
> 
> It is time to create the next OPM release, we intend to follow this schedule, 
> all days in October:
> 
> Monday 17: Final merges to master before branching, freeze the master branch.
> Wednesday 19: Create release branches, unfreeze the master branch.
> Monday 24: First release candidate ready for testing.
> 
> The release will then follow shortly after testing, if all is well. If not, 
> we may have further release candidates.
> 
> All developers, please mark all PRs you would like to see merged before the 
> release with the "Release 2022.10" milestone.
> 
> Atgeirr Flø Rasmussen
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?

[Markus Blatt]

Hey,

I am pretty sure that I saw breaking changes since April. Maybe these are only 
there for optional dependencies like dune-alugrid or dune-fem. Has anyone tried 
compiling it lately?

Markus

Am 30. September 2022 15:52:18 MESZ schrieb Arne Morten Kvarving 
:
>gcc9 compiles opm just fine. we have usually supported the last two ubuntu LTS 
>versions, so this would break with prior practices. if we go this route i will 
>have to backport dune in our ppa.
>
>arnem
>
>Fra: Opm  på vegne av Markus Blatt 
>
>Sendt: fredag 30. september 2022 15:09
>Til: opm@opm-project.org 
>Emne: [Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?
>
>Hi,
>
>I think until recently we still aimed to support DUNE 2.6 (for reasons not 
>100% obvious to me). With
>the advent of DUNE 2.9 next month that would mean supporting 4 versions. That 
>seems IMHO like a monstruous tasks.
>Historically we always aimed to support at least 2 recent versions, which 
>seems to make sense.
>
>Hence my question is what versions we actually should support for the next 
>release.
>
>In my humble opinion we should drop support for 2.6. While this is the version 
>in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, the compiler
>on that system does not allow compilation of OPM
>  The next version 2.7 is still in Debian stable, Ubuntu impish 21.10 and we 
> probably should support that one.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Markus
>--
>
>Markus Blatt
>CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
>https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopm-op.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C917a8238de0b43d0c88208daa2e50672%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C0%7C638001401796176973%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eWDD64MBicgxFUiNKtSc2HLhGyJ3SGOtwbOh4gzcIZ4%3D&reserved=0
> | +4916097590858
>___
>Opm mailing list
>Opm@opm-project.org
>https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopm-project.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fopm&data=05%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C917a8238de0b43d0c88208daa2e50672%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C0%7C638001401796333207%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=t3Yida8zb6L8%2FUIObm9C0JGDg3OWOAreVj7k9u%2FQZjY%3D&reserved=0

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Dropping DUNE 2.6 support for OPM 2022.10?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I think until recently we still aimed to support DUNE 2.6 (for reasons not 100% 
obvious to me). With
the advent of DUNE 2.9 next month that would mean supporting 4 versions. That 
seems IMHO like a monstruous tasks.
Historically we always aimed to support at least 2 recent versions, which seems 
to make sense.

Hence my question is what versions we actually should support for the next 
release.

In my humble opinion we should drop support for 2.6. While this is the version 
in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, the compiler
on that system does not allow compilation of OPM
 The next version 2.7 is still in Debian stable, Ubuntu impish 21.10 and we 
probably should support that one.

Cheers,

Markus
--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Run OPM-flow simulation model on GPU

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Ahmed,

Am Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 01:24:25PM +0300 schrieb Ahmed Saied:

Is there possibility to run the OPM flow model on computer GPU instead of the 
CPU ?



If you compiled flow from source and had opencl and/or cuda installed at the 
time it is possible
to solve the linear systems using the GPU. Please not that the rest of the 
simulation will still
use the CPU, though. Depending on your hardware the performance improvements 
might vary.

You tell flow to use the GPU via command line options:

flow --accelerator-mode=opencl MODEL.DATA

This will use opencl. You can use other modes, e.g. cusparseSolver for CUDA.

Excerpt from flow --help

   --accelerator-mode=STRING Use GPU (cusparseSolver or openclSolver) 
or FPGA (fpgaSolver) as the linear solver, usage: 
'--accelerator-mode=[none|cusparse|opencl|fpga|amgcl]'. Default: "none"
   --bda-device-id=INTEGER   Choose device ID for 
cusparseSolver or openclSolver, use 'nvidia-smi' or 'clinfo' to determine valid 
IDs. Default: 0

HTH


What will be the workflow to do the same in case of running the model through 
Windows and through Ubuntu.



The above is for Linux, e.g. Debian/Ubuntu.
I am the wrong person to answer Windows questions, sorry. There is no direct 
support for it. Only via the Windows
for Linux subsystem. See e.g. 
https://pkirkham.github.io/analysis/running-opm-flow-on-windows-subsystem-for-linux/
As you starting from the command line there, too, the workflow should be 
exactly the same.

Cheers,

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] OPM Summit August 30-31 2022: Talks and Schedule

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

We are pleased to announce the schedule of and talks to be held at the 
OPM summit in Trondheim August 30-31, 2022. See 
<https://opm-project.org/?p=1493> for more information.


If you have not registered for the event with Alf and want to take part
then please contact him now.

Hoping to see everybody in Trondheim.

Best,

Markus 
--


Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Could OPM2022.04 build with GCC8.3?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Lei,

Am Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 06:03:15PM +0800 schrieb LEI TING:

I'm working on CentOS7.3. I could build opm2021.10 with gcc8.3. But when I try 
to build opm2022.04, it shows many error messages like:
...  is used but never defined [-fpermissive]
when building the opm-simulators module.
I think gcc 8.3 supports C++17. Should I add some switches?
Or should I use gcc9?
Thanks very much.


Well, I cannot give you a definitive answer, here. As g++8.3 is rather old
and probably nobody of us uses such an old version, I might be very likely be
that we broke support for it. Have you tried gcc9?

Maybe our Redhat expert Arne Morton has more insight.

Generally it would help to have some more information about the error messages.
The one you provided is not the real problem.

HTH,

Markus









--

Lei Ting

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] OPM Release 2022.04

[Markus Blatt]

Dear OPM community,

It is my pleasure to announce that the binary packages for the 2022.04
OPM release are now available for Ubuntu 20.04 LTS (code name Focal
Fossa) and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (code name Jammy Jellyfish). The Ubuntu
packages may be downloaded from the OPM Project’s Personal Package
Archive (ppa:opm/ppa).  If you have not already included this in your
package sources, you can do so with the commands

┌
│ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa
│ sudo apt-get update
└
Then you can install the simulator and its prerequisites using the
command

┌
│ sudo apt install libopm-simulators-bin
└

To install the python bindings of OPM in addition, please use the
command

┌
│ sudo apt install python3-opm-simulators
└

This is also the first release that comes with official packages for
Debian stable and (in about 5 days) for Debian testing. If you are using
that distributions you can use the apt commands above to install the
packages.

Please note that it will still take a few days to make the Redhat
available.

I would also like to use the opportunity to thank all the contributors
for their effort in improving the simulator, especially David for
testing updating the manual and preparing the release notes, Atgeirr
Bård and Tor-Harald for testing and Arne Morton for building the Ubuntu
and Redhat packages.

Best Regards, Markus Blatt, OPM-OP AS Release manager for 2022.04


1 Release notes for 2022.04
═══



  The 2022-04 release consists of some new features and various
  improvements and bug fixes. Highlights for this release include:
  implementation of the Salt Precipitation Model, several ACTIONX
  implementation improvements – including support for the COMPSEGS,
  WELSEGS and WSGVALV keywords in an ACTIONX block, improvements to the
  CO2STORE model to work with numerical aquifers and to account for
  thermal effects, support for gas lift optimization for multi-lateral
  wells, the addition of various SUMMARY vectors, plus various
  enhancements to the RESTART file to improve compatibility and
  robustness. Significant work has also been conducted in fixing the
  number of reported bugs.

  When building OPM Flow from source, the default is now be to compile a
  parallel binary if MPI is installed, this was already the default for
  the binary packages that were previously distributed. Secondly,
  support for building OPM Flow with the new current version of DUNE
  (2.8) has been added.


2 Some of the new features:
═══



  ⁃ Improved version of Python version of the parser in opm-common
  ⁃ Several ACTIONX improvements
  ⁃ Added support for the CO2STORE model to use numerical aquifers
  ⁃ Enabled the CO2STORE model to account for thermal effects
  ⁃ Added support for the GRAVITY keyword in the PROPS section
  ⁃ Improvements on how the well potentials are calculated when the
wells are under guide rate control
  ⁃ Improvements on how the well rates are calculated for when the wells
are or not under group control control
  ⁃ Improved ESmry file output by not writing out empty elements
  ⁃ Improved how the summary keywords are handled for inter-region
summary vectors in ESMRY files, to give a consistent naming
convention
  ⁃ Several RESTART improvements (see pdf)
  ⁃ Added support for the WTMULT keyword in the SCHEDULE section
  ⁃ Implemented the Salt Precipitation Model (see pdf)
  ⁃ Added support for gas lift optimization for multi-segment wells
  ⁃ Added support for gas-water initialization for two-phase runs using
PVDG and PVTW keywords in the PROPS section.
  ⁃ Added support for the WVFPEXP keyword in the SCHEDULE section
  ⁃ Added support for LIFTOPT(TSTEP) option that defines the frequency
of the gas lift optimization calculations.
  ⁃ Water only and water only with thermal models can now be run with
the flow binary
  ⁃ The VAPWAT keyword in the RUNSPEC section, that activates the
vaporized water phase, is now active for this release for gas-water
systems only.

  For further details including a list of known issues and bug fixes
  please see the [OPM Flow Release Notes from the manual].


[OPM Flow Release Notes from the manual]
<http://opm-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/OPM_Flow_Reference_Manual_2022-04_Rev-0-ReleaseNotes.pdf>

[Announcement on web page]
<https://opm-project.org/?p=1471>
--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Tentative Release 2022.04 schedule

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Well, this did take longer than anticipated. My apologies.
I have just tagged the first release candidate (release/2022.04/rc1) for each 
opm module (opm-utilities still missing as I realize now). Please check out the 
tag or the release branches (release/2022.04) and test the release.

Please report which models you tested or intend to test at 
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/issues/3860

The modified schedule is:
- testing until 2022-05-03
- 2022-05-03 second candiate if needed
- 2022-05-10 final release

Next on my list is preparing Debian packages and then Arne Morton will use 
these to provide Ubuntu packages of the release candidate.

Happy testing and kind regards,

Markus
--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Tentative Release 2022.04 schedule

[Markus Blatt]

Hi

It is April already and as usual OPM aims to to a release of our 
software this month. I am lucky to have been named release manager 
for this one. Competition has been fierce this time;)


Anyhow, I hope everybody will enjoy the ride and we will be able to 
ship a stable new release this month.


Here is my tentative release Schedule:

2022-04-10: Creation of release branches
Note that everything in master at this time will also be in
the release. After this date only important changes will
become part of the release. These should be mainly bugfixes
2022-04-15: First release candidate.
We hope that there will be extensive testing
2022-04-22: Second release candidate (if needed)
2022-04-30: Final release

Please mark the PRs that should go into the release with Milestone "Release 
2022.04" to make it easier to get an overview.


From April 15 on features/bug fixes will need to be merged to master first and 
will be backported by me to the release branches. Please keep that in mind 
as you will need to clearly state that a PR is also for the release to speed 
up reviewing and prevent me from missing stuff.


Would be a good idea to also start tagging currently open PRs, to help with 
prioritising reviews.


Thanks in advance for all the help and your patience with the release manager.

Cheers,

Markus
--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Adjust CMake build defaults to reflect those of DUNE 2.8 more closely

[Markus Blatt]

Am Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:14:44AM +0100 schrieb Markus Blatt:

[...]
Errors like this one are hard to judge for the average user (default 
USE_MPI=OFF):

"
-- This build defaults to installing in /home/mblatt/opt/opm
CMake Error at 
/home/mblatt/src/dune/opm-master/opm-common/cmake/Modules/OpmSatellites.cmake:63
 (add_executable):
 Target "test_cartgrid" links to target "MPI::MPI_C" but the target was not
 found.  Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an IMPORTED target, or
 an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
 /home/mblatt/src/dune/opm-master/opm-common/cmake/Modules/OpmLibMain.cmake:248 
(opm_compile_satellites)
 CMakeLists.txt:119 (include)
"

this already appears in opm-common. I was not aware that we would already fail 
here. Makes this even more pressing.


Sorry. Actually this happens in opm-grid and not opm-common
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Adjust CMake build defaults to reflect those of DUNE 2.8 more closely

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

this is is about the github issue https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/issues/2897 
which says


"This has cost me and some others (see https://github.com/OPM/opm-grid/issues/561 ) 
 quite some time for newer DUNE versions (Version 2.8 or newer).


We have USE_MPI, USE_SUPERLU, USE_QUADMATH, that default to OFF. Being off will result 
in OPM not searching for these packages. As a result none of the important targets are 
available in OPM. The problem is that DUNE will as default always search for them and 
use them. That means libraries might link to them and will use imported targets in the 
package configuration files. This will result in cmake errors if the user has not manually 
chosen DUNE's default.


To fix this we should at least use DUNE's defaults or just get rid off these 
settings. This is not a problem, because:

 - USE_MPI is off for historic reasons when some in the project thought that parallel computing was not useful. 
   Luckily this changed. Let's change the default, too.
 - SuperLU is also off for historic reasons to prefer UMFPack which gave better performance. This is not needed 
   anymore as DUNE will prefer UMFPack if available in AMG

 - QuadMath is not used by us and we just stayed consistent and used off as 
default.

Note that the latter two are only an issue if someone has dune-fem on their 
system."

Im my opinion this change will not have any impact on flow other than that 
everybody will
now build the parallel flow version and will not experience any kind of build 
issue with
DUNE >=2.8. The rest stays the same.

To me this clearly means less maintenance and better usability.

Errors like this one are hard to judge for the average user (default 
USE_MPI=OFF):

"
-- This build defaults to installing in /home/mblatt/opt/opm
CMake Error at 
/home/mblatt/src/dune/opm-master/opm-common/cmake/Modules/OpmSatellites.cmake:63
 (add_executable):
  Target "test_cartgrid" links to target "MPI::MPI_C" but the target was not
  found.  Perhaps a find_package() call is missing for an IMPORTED target, or
  an ALIAS target is missing?
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  
/home/mblatt/src/dune/opm-master/opm-common/cmake/Modules/OpmLibMain.cmake:248 
(opm_compile_satellites)
  CMakeLists.txt:119 (include)
"

this already appears in opm-common. I was not aware that we would already fail 
here. Makes this even more pressing.

Thoughts?

Markus

--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Output trapped gas saturation in hysteresis model

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Gareth
Am Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:22:57PM + schrieb Gareth Williams - BGS:

I am a new user of OPM working on CO2 storage. I have successfully run some 
simulations using the CO2STORE option and I was wondering if I could output the 
trapped gas saturation from a hysteresis model run to the RST / SUMMARY files? 
I could not find an obvious way of doing this in the FLOW manual, but it is a 
big document!



Welcome to OPM. Cool that your tried OPM-flow for CO2 storage.

We don't think that we track trapped gas saturation in OPM-flow and hence do not
output it, currently. Sorry.

Is that maybe something that you can compute from the existing summary output 
vectors?
In that case you might be able to compute that using UDQ/UDA/ActionX/PYACTION.

Cheers,

Markus

--

Markus Blatt
CEO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Jenkins server updated

[Markus Blatt]

Thanks a lot for the hard work. Really appreciated it.

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM release 2021.10, release candidate 1

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Thanks a lot. I will do some testing.

Would be good to know what was already tested to prevent double work.

Markus

On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:00:19PM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:

Dear all,

The first release candidate for OPM release 2021.10 is now available for 
testing.
It is available as binary packages for Ubuntu Linux versions 18.04 and 20.04. 
To test
the binary packages, follow the normal installation instructions at the OPM 
website,
https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245, but replace the command

sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa

with the command

sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/testing

to use the testing package repository instead of the regular one.

Atgeirr
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


--

Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Library dependency in building OPM

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

please ALWAYS reply to the list!
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 03:59:11PM +0800, LEI TING wrote:

  Since it's a remote server and I don't have root access, I use source codes 
of OPM to compile from source.
  For all dependencies, I use binary packages from the OPM site:  
https://www.opm-project.org/package/redhat/7/, including dune, suitesparse, and 
trilinos.
  These 3 packages also depend on other packages, so I use yum to download all 
dependencies. I can't use 'yum install' because it requires root access. So I 
use yumdownloader to download all rpm packages, then use rpm2cpio and cpio to 
uncompress all the rpm packages to my home directory, like: rpm2cpio 
dune-common.rpm | cpio -div.


Well the problems with are:
1. You will only install the direct dependencies and might miss the packages 
that they depend on (like openblas)
2. The paths in these packages (libs, includes) are the ones for packages 
installed on the system.

Let's assume that you manage to get 1) right than you need to edit all the 
*-config.cmake and *Config.cmake and *.pc files in those packages to get the 
correct paths.

Personally, I would just download the source of the packages, compile and 
install them locally.

Markus

--

Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Library dependency in building OPM

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:53:25PM +0800, LEI TING wrote:

I'm building OPM 2021.04 in CentOS 7.4 on a remote server. When building the 
module opm-simulator, in the file CMakeFiles/ebos.dir/build.make, it says: 
bin/ebos: /usr/lib64/libopenblas.so. And in the file link.txt, it has the line 
-lopenblas. And many other files have the same pattern.
Because the server doesn't have libopenblas.so in the folder /usr/lib64, I have 
to put this file in my home directory. But the make will only link with 
/usr/lib64/libopenblas.so.


I am a bit puzzeled. If you execute cmake on your remote server, it sure never 
find libraries that are not there. What is CMake telling your and what exactly 
are your doing?

Have run CMake elsewhere and copied stuff. Have you copied libraries needed 
from somewhere else?


I'm new to the cmake system, could anyone tell me how to change the cmake file 
so that it will link the libopenblas.so from my home directory?


Please don't even think about this. It will not work.

Markus
--

Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] about GPU accelerate

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Lei Ting,

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:33:19AM +0800, LEI TING wrote:

Hi, thanks for the great work in OPM.
I want to know if the OPM team has a plan to support GPU acceleration?


actually we already support using the GPU for solving the linear systems.

just pass the option --accelerator-mode=cuspare for CUDA or 
--accelerator-mode=opencl
for OpenCL. There are a few more options concerning the GPU just look at the 
output of
flow --help.

Unfortunately, this is still  a bit experimental. Your mileage may vary 
depending on your
GPU. One still cannot mix MPI and the GPU and hence if you have a powerful CPU 
a parallel run
might be preferable.

HTH

MArkus
--

Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Parallel output in OPM Flow

[Markus Blatt]

Hi, 

Nice to hear that there is some work on the output layer. I just have 
some questions.


On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 07:52:36AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
[...] In the ACROSS project (see https://www.acrossproject.eu for 
information), we intend to implement parallel output for OPM Flow. The 
idea is to do this by using the Damaris software library 
(https://project.inria.fr/damaris/) from INRIA, who are also part of 
the ACROSS project, and will contribute to the implementation. We think 
Damaris is a good fit for OPM. It is open source, has been shown to 
provide good I/O scaling up to large process counts, and has been 
previously applied in the reservoir simulation domain.




Can you please tell us what open source license Damaris uses. I could 
not find any information on the website and at 
https://gitlab.inria.fr/Damaris/damaris it says "No license. All rights 
reserved", but that is probably an oversight. No License file, no 
readme.


Can you point us to a publication where it is used for reservoir 
simulation? That would be interesting.



So far, we see three important tasks related to this:
- Refactoring in OPM Flow to enable the integration of Damaris. From what we 
have seen so far, any necessary refactoring will be improving the Flow code, 
and make it more flexible.
- Integrating the Damaris library. We will ensure that this is an optional 
dependency, to minimize developer workload and hassle.


What does optional mean here? If there is no Damaris we fall back to our 
current way and only if it is there we get hdf5/parallel output? Or are 
there plans to support hdf5 without Damaris (which seems to be a lot 
more than just output: data processing, in situ visualization,...)? That 
would be cool.


Cheers,

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] error when running flow (OPM RELEASE 2021.04)

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 12:43:57PM -0300, Andrés Santiago Cremonini wrote:

Dear all,
I am not able to solve the following error which impedes runnin flow.

flow: error while loading shared libraries: libopmgrid.so.2021.04: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory




Seems like our dependency is not on specific versions as it should be.  
Hence chances are that libopm-grid1 is old on your system.


Please issue

apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

to correct that.

That is also the recommended way for upgrading.

Apologies and HTH,

Markus

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] error when running flow (OPM RELEASE 2021.04)

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,


On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 04:28:16PM -0300, Andrés Santiago Cremonini wrote:

Thank you for your help.


Not much help yet.


I Use Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS.


Can you please send the output of the following commands?

apt-cache policy libopm-grid1

dpkg --listfiles libopm-grid1

dpkg -S /usr/bin/flow

Cheers,

Markus


The previous flow version was running correctly.

I installed following the instructions. Below I paste from terminal.

andres@andres-Inspiron-5770:~$ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:opm/ppa
[sudo] password for andres:
The Open Porous Media (OPM) initiative provides a set of open-source tools
centered around the simulation of flow and transport of fluids in porous
media. The goal of the initiative is to establish a sustainable 
environment

for the development of an efficient and well-maintained software suite.
More info: https://launchpad.net/~opm/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
Press [ENTER] to continue or Ctrl-c to cancel adding it.

Hit:1 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:2 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu focal InRelease

Hit:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net/opm/ppa/ubuntu focal InRelease

Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease [109 kB]

Get:5 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates InRelease [114 kB]

Get:6 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease [101
kB]
Get:7 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 DEP-11
Metadata [24,4 kB]
Get:8 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/universe amd64
DEP-11 Metadata [58,3 kB]
Hit:9 https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/ms-teams stable InRelease

Fetched 406 kB in 5s (86,2 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
andres@andres-Inspiron-5770:~$ sudo apt-get update
Hit:1 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:2 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal InRelease

Hit:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease

Hit:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/opm/ppa/ubuntu focal InRelease

Get:5 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates InRelease [114 kB]

Get:6 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease [101
kB]
Hit:7 https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/ms-teams stable InRelease

Fetched 214 kB in 4s (56,4 kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
andres@andres-Inspiron-5770:~$ sudo apt-get install libopm-simulators1-bin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libopm-simulators1-bin is already the newest version
(2021.04-rfinal-1~focal).
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
 libfprint-2-tod1 libllvm10:i386 libllvm9
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 13 not upgraded.
andres@andres-Inspiron-5770:~$ flow
flow: error while loading shared libraries: libopmgrid.so.2021.04: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
---
No change using:
sudo /sbin/ldconfig -v




El mié, 5 may 2021 a las 16:11, Markus Blatt ()
escribió:


Hi Andres

Are you using self compiled version or packages. Which Linux distribution
and version?

Markus

Am 5. Mai 2021 17:43:57 MESZ schrieb "Andrés Santiago Cremonini" <
acrem...@itba.edu.ar>:


Dear all,
I am not able to solve the following error which impedes runnin flow.

flow: error while loading shared libraries: libopmgrid.so.2021.04: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory

Previous version was running ok. I would appreciate any help.
Regards,

Andrés Cremonini
--
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm



--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.



--

Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] error when running flow (OPM RELEASE 2021.04)

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Andres

Are you using self compiled version or packages. Which Linux distribution and 
version?

Markus

Am 5. Mai 2021 17:43:57 MESZ schrieb "Andrés Santiago Cremonini" 
:
>Dear all,
>I am not able to solve the following error which impedes runnin flow.
>
>flow: error while loading shared libraries: libopmgrid.so.2021.04:
>cannot
>open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
>Previous version was running ok. I would appreciate any help.
>Regards,
>
>Andrés Cremonini
>___
>Opm mailing list
>Opm@opm-project.org
>https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] ParMETIS error on HPC

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:22:13PM +, Antoine B Jacquey wrote:
> 
> But during the first time step calculation, I get the following errors:
> 
> Time step 0, stepsize 1 days, at day 0/7, date = 01-Jan-2015
> Switching control mode for well INJ from RATE to BHP on rank 20
> Switching control mode for well INJ from BHP to RATE on rank 20
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 2 has no vertices 
> assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 4 has no vertices 
> assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 6 has no vertices 
> assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 8 has no vertices 
> assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 12 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 14 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 16 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 18 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 20 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 0 has no vertices 
> assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 10 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 22 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 26 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> PARMETIS ERROR: Poor initial vertex distribution. Processor 24 has no 
> vertices assigned to it!
> 
> Does anyone know what this error means? Is it coming because of a bad mesh 
> partitioning or is it due to something else?
>

in the AMG of dune-istl we try to agglomerate the linear system to successuvely 
fewer processors ( N -> n, with nhttps://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Error using mpirun after compiling from source

[Markus Blatt]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:39:59PM +0400, Mohd wrote:
> Hi, how to unsubscribe from this mailing list?
>


mailto:opm-requ...@opm-project.org?subject=unsubscribe

There is a link at the bottom of every message. please read that page.

Markus
-- 
Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Error using mpirun after compiling from source

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:32:10PM -0400, Josimar Alves da Silva wrote:
> 
> Thank you very much for the reply. I checked and it seems that I have
> Ubuntu 18.04bionic. See below.
> 
> If I understood correctly, according to the Note 1 that you mentioned, the
> way to fix this issue is to install the mpi package provided by opm. Could
> you comment on how to do this? Alternatively, would it be possible to
> direct me to some documentation that helps me to install the mpi properly,
> then to rebuild the source codes using the correct mpi installation?

You can check that with

apt-cache policy libopenmpi2

There should be a line like

Installed: 2.1.1-9~bionic

The easiest way is to simply follow the install instructions for the binary
packages and install libopm-simulators-bin as you can have installed versions
and still compile and use master without installing.

Then you only need to compile/recompile all opm modules from git master (just
to be sure remove the build directories). No
need to compile the dependencies. I just did that and "mpirun -np 2 flow 
NORNE_ATW2003" works like a charm.

Markus

-- 
Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow multi-node simulations stuck at domain decomposition step

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Yogi,

On  Fri Mar 13 06:55:32 UTC 2020 you wrote:
>
> Following your suggestion, I was able to build release 2019.10 successfully.
> The build succeeded with, and without the additional pre-requisites (SuperLU,
> Eigen, and libecl). Thank you so much for your time and help.
>
> Now when I run the simulation, after domain decomposition and printing
> loadbalancing information, simulation terminates with the following error:
> Program threw an exception: Could not distribute the vanguard data.

i know it has been a long timem but ...

I recently fixed a bug in flow that might be similar to yours, see
https://github.com/OPM/opm-grid/issues/476

Maybe your issue is fixed now, too? Chances might be slim though,
You will need to use OPM from the git master or wait until the next
release 2020.10.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Error using mpirun after compiling from source

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Josimar,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:23:41PM -0400, Josimar Alves da Silva wrote:
> [...] I compiled the prerequisites and the
> opm modules from source on a Ubuntu machine. The opm version that I used is
> the 2020.10-pre from the master branch. [...] 
> 
> However, when I try to run the same dataset using mpirun I get an error
> message. I copy below the error message and I can send the complete output
> message if needed. The command that I called was:
> 
> mpirun -np 2 flow --parameter-file=NORNE_JS.PARAM
> 
> [...]
> 
> Could you please help me to understand why the mpirun does not work? [...]
> 
> Summary of the error message:
> 
> Warning: Region to region summary keyword: RGFT at
> /home/josimar/OPM/test/norne/INCLUDE/SUMMARY/summary.data, line 74 is
> ignored [0m
> [34;1m
> Warning: Region to region summary keyword: RWFT at
> /home/josimar/OPM/test/norne/INCLUDE/SUMMARY/summary.data, line 76 is
> ignored [0m
> [GRS4:11127] *** Process received signal ***
> [GRS4:11127] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
> [GRS4:11127] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
> [GRS4:11127] Failing at address: 0x55b34de1a000
> [GRS4:11127] [ 0]
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x128a0)[0x7fd966bc38a0]
> [GRS4:11127] [ 1] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x18f046)[0x7fd964ef7046]
> [GRS4:11127] [ 2]
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_zoltan.so.12(Zoltan_Comm_Do_Post+0xb48)[0x7fd96579f028]
> [GRS4:11127] [ 3]
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_zoltan.so.12(Zoltan_Comm_Do_Reverse+0x4d)[0x7fd96579f62d]
> [GRS4:11127] [ 4]
> [...]


it is hard to say, what goes wrong here, apart from stating that it seems to 
happen
deep down inside the loadlancing of the ZOLTAN library that we use. That is 
aslo the
reason why it does not happend without mpirun.


What Ubuntu version are you using. There have been issues with MPI on Ubuntu 
18.04bionic.
See https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245 Note 1 for a workaround. You will need 
to install
the mpi packages provided by us instead of the official Ubuntu ones.

If you are using another version, then please:

To gain some insight somebody would need to replicate the setup. Would you mind
sharing the parameter file.

HTH,

Markus

-- 
Markus Blatt
CTO @ OPM-OP AS, Heyerdahlsvei 12b, 0777 Oslo, Norway
https://opm-op.com | +4916097590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] How to suppress message "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key"

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Tsuyoshi,

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:50:46AM +0200, Tsuyoshi Matsuura wrote:
> Ok, but I am not working remotely, but directly on the desktop where OPM is
> installed (so no ssh).
>

But MPI could be configure to always use ssh. But this is just a guess. What 
was the
exact error message?

> Could you resend the link? It seems broken.

Sure:

https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/mit-magic-cookie-1-a-761445/

Like I said, check the DISPLAY variable. You can where if it is set by running

find . -maxdepth 1 -name \.[a-Z]\* -type f | xargs grep DISPLAY

Markus

> 
> Thanks & Best regards,
> 
> Tsuyoshi
> 
> On 04/08/2020 10:38, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > it has nothing to do with OPM but rather with your remote session via ssh. 
> > It seems like
> > MPI might be using ssh.
> > 
> > https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/mit-magic-cookie-1-a-761445/
> > 
> > Please check whether you did set the DISPLAY variable (is there output from 
> > "echo $DISPLAY")
> > and unset it (e.g. by deleting lines in .bashrc or .profile or wherever 
> > your shell environment is
> > configured).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Markus
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:32:53AM +0200, Tsuyoshi Matsuura wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for picking up my query.
> > > 
> > > Attached are the output of the following two commands:
> > > 
> > >   * flow SPE1CASE1.DATA > spe1.out 2> spe1.err
> > >   * flow --help > help.out 2> help.err
> > > 
> > > The error 'Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key' is written to 'stderr'.
> > > 
> > > I googled around a bit and found comments that openmpi might be generating
> > > the error, but unclear to me how to fix this. In my environment 'mpirun'
> > > also throws the same error.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > 
> > > Tsuyoshi
> > > 
> > > On 04/08/2020 08:59, OPM User wrote:
> > > > Tsuyoshi,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm running the exact same configuration in a VM and I don't have this,
> > > > can you post a short example so we can see what is happening.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > OPM User
> > > > opmus...@gmail.com
> > > > 
> > > > On 03-Aug-20 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote:
> > > > > Send Opm mailing list submissions to
> > > > >  opm@opm-project.org
> > > > > 
> > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > > >  https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > > >  opm-requ...@opm-project.org
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > > >  opm-ow...@opm-project.org
> > > > > 
> > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > > > than "Re: Contents of Opm digest..."
> > > > > 
> > > > > Today's Topics:
> > > > > 
> > > > >      1. How to suppress message "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key"
> > > > >     (Tsuyoshi Matsuura)
> > > > >      2. Re: Build of intersectio.cpp (Phani Narasimham)
> > > > > 
> > > > > ___
> > > > > Opm mailing list
> > > > > Opm@opm-project.org
> > > > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > > > ___
> > > > Opm mailing list
> > > > Opm@opm-project.org
> > > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > 
> > > ___
> > > Opm mailing list
> > > Opm@opm-project.org
> > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > ___
> > Opm mailing list
> > Opm@opm-project.org
> > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] How to suppress message "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key"

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

it has nothing to do with OPM but rather with your remote session via ssh. It 
seems like
MPI might be using ssh.

https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/mit-magic-cookie-1-a-7\
61445/

Please check whether you did set the DISPLAY variable (is there output from 
"echo $DISPLAY")
and unset it (e.g. by deleting lines in .bashrc or .profile or wherever your 
shell environment is
configured).

Cheers,

Markus

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:32:53AM +0200, Tsuyoshi Matsuura wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for picking up my query.
> 
> Attached are the output of the following two commands:
> 
>  * flow SPE1CASE1.DATA > spe1.out 2> spe1.err
>  * flow --help > help.out 2> help.err
> 
> The error 'Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key' is written to 'stderr'.
> 
> I googled around a bit and found comments that openmpi might be generating
> the error, but unclear to me how to fix this. In my environment 'mpirun'
> also throws the same error.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tsuyoshi
> 
> On 04/08/2020 08:59, OPM User wrote:
> > Tsuyoshi,
> > 
> > I'm running the exact same configuration in a VM and I don't have this,
> > can you post a short example so we can see what is happening.
> > 
> > 
> > OPM User
> > opmus...@gmail.com
> > 
> > On 03-Aug-20 20:00, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote:
> > > Send Opm mailing list submissions to
> > > opm@opm-project.org
> > > 
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > opm-requ...@opm-project.org
> > > 
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > opm-ow...@opm-project.org
> > > 
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of Opm digest..."
> > > 
> > > Today's Topics:
> > > 
> > >     1. How to suppress message "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key"
> > >    (Tsuyoshi Matsuura)
> > >     2. Re: Build of intersectio.cpp (Phani Narasimham)
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > Opm mailing list
> > > Opm@opm-project.org
> > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > 
> > ___
> > Opm mailing list
> > Opm@opm-project.org
> > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Build of intersectio.cpp

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,


On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 08:48:51AM +0530, Phani Narasimham wrote:
> Build of intersection.cpp in cppgrid is failing with integral_constant
> error.
> 
> If i write a sample .cpp file using integral_constant the compiler
> succeeds and builds the executable. ( g++ sample.cpp)
> 
> I am building opm on Ubuntu 16 and gcc 8.04
> 
> Where as building opm with make fails at intersection.cpp that
> integral_constant not known.
>

This should of course work (at least for the releases) as we have prebuilt
packages for Ubuntu. But I am not sure which compiler is used for them.

You are saying that you are using Ubuntu 16.04 with gcc-8.04. That means that
you must be using a non-standard compiler for that system. What I am wondering
is whether you specify the compiler to use to the build-system. If you do not
do that, I would assume that the standard compiler gcc-4.5 will be used. Maybe
that one does not support integral_constant in the standard location.
I would recommend to use the newest available package of the compiler (ggc-5
and g++-5 on xenial).

You need to tell Cmake to use the correct compiler by calling it like this:
"cmake -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/path/to/g++/compiler 
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/path/to/gcc/compiler ..."
otherwise it will use gcc-4.5.

If that does not help, please post your CMakeCache.txt file and the output of
"make VERBOSE=1". Please also tell which version of OPM and DUNE you are using.

Please be aware that if you use e.g. a compiler not directly supported by your
platform, it is recommend to also compile all the dependencies with that 
compiler.

Also note that the next release might not support Ubuntu 16.04 anymore.

Cheers,

Markus

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Talks of OPM Meeting 2020 online

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

thanks a lot to everybody that participated at our meeting and special thanks 
to the people
that gave a talk and did send the slides to me. These have been made available 
(some time ago,
actually) at https://opm-project.org/?page_id=39.

If your talk is missing, then please feel free to add it or send it to someone 
with access to
the wiki.

Cheers,

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow multi-node simulations stuck at domain decomposition step

[Markus Blatt]

Hi Yogi,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Yogi Pandey wrote:
> Simulation is being run on 4 nodes with 32 processors each using following 
> command:
> 
> mpirun --display-map -mca btl self -x UCX_TLS=rc,self,sm -x 
> HCOLL_ENABLE_MCAST_ALL=0 -mca coll_hcoll_enable 0 -x UCX_IB_TRAFFIC_CLASS=105 
> -x UCX_IB_GID_INDEX=3 --cpu-set 
> 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35
>  -np 144 --hostfile /etc/opt/rdma/hostfile 
> /mnt/nfs-share/etc/opm-flow/opm-simulators/build/bin/flow 
> --parameter-file=/mnt/nfs-share/data/norne/params
> 

Out of curiosity. Is there a special reason why --cpu-set runs until 35 with 32 
cpus per node? Might you be oversubscribing a node?

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt
OPM-OP AS
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM Flow multi-node simulations stuck at domain decomposition step

[Markus Blatt]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Yogi Pandey wrote:
> All,
> I am trying to run OPM Flow simulations on multiple nodes. I have built OPM 
> Flow from source on Oracle Linux 7 OS (binary compatible with RHEL) with:
> 
> [...]
>
> .OPM Flow modules are built using following commads:
> 
> o   cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DUSE_MPI=ON -DUSE_OPENMP=ON 
> -DBLAS_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib64 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local ..
> 
> o   sudo make
> 
>  
> 
> For Norne data set, following is the input file (params) content:
> 
> ecl-deck-file-name=NORNE_ATW2013.DATA
> [...]
> 
> Simulation is being run on 4 nodes with 32 processors each using following 
> command:
> 
> mpirun --display-map -mca btl self -x UCX_TLS=rc,self,sm -x 
> HCOLL_ENABLE_MCAST_ALL=0 -mca coll_hcoll_enable 0 -x UCX_IB_TRAFFIC_CLASS=105 
> -x UCX_IB_GID_INDEX=3 --cpu-set 
> 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35
>  -np 144 --hostfile /etc/opt/rdma/hostfile 
> /mnt/nfs-share/etc/opm-flow/opm-simulators/build/bin/flow 
> --parameter-file=/mnt/nfs-share/data/norne/params
> 
>  
> 
> The simulation get stuck indefinitely at the domain decomposition step. I am 
> able to finish a parallel run up to 3 nodes, but always getting stuck at 4 
> nodes.
> 
>  
> 
> I have also created some customized simulation decks with about 11 million 
> cells to rule-out that fewer number of cells in the Norne model may be a 
> reason, but the simulation gets stuck as soon as I scale from 1 node to 2 
> nodes. Can someone please help me understand, what might be causing it?
> 
>

WHich version of OPM are using? If you are using the release, then chances are 
that you might simply run out of available memory. You could check that with 
top or htop on one of the machines and look for the kswapd process popping up.
> 

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt
OPM-OP AS
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Problem installing OPM binaries

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:27:39PM +, Stephen, Karl D wrote:
> Hi,
> I am installing OPM binaries on a computer running Windows 10 on which I have 
> installed Ubuntu 18.04 under the Linux sub-system. (I've got it to work on a 
> separate machine but not this one) I am following the instructions here:
> https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245
> I get an error on the last step of the OPM installation. It happens when I 
> run the following line in Ubuntu:
> sudo apt-get install libopm-simulators-bin
> The error message I get is below. Any help with this would be appreciated. It 
> looks like libopm-simulators-bin doesn't exist, only libopm-simulators1-bin. 
> I've tried installing simulators1 and this has the same error.
> $sudo apt-get install libopm-simulators-binReading package lists... 
> DoneBuilding dependency treeReading state information... DoneNote, selecting 
> 'libopm-simulators1-bin' instead of 'libopm-simulators-bin'Some packages 
> could not be installed. This may mean that you haverequested an impossible 
> situation or if you are using the unstabledistribution that some required 
> packages have not yet been createdor been moved out of Incoming.The following 
> information may help to resolve the situation:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies: libopm-simulators1-bin : 
> Depends: libdune-common-2.5.1  Depends: 
> libdune-geometry-2.5.1  Depends: libopm-grid1 but it 
> is not going to be installed  Depends: 
> libopm-simulators1 (= 2019.10-rfinal-1~bionic) but it is not going to be 
> installedE: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

I did take a look at the ppa. Are your sure that you are on Ubuntu 18.04? The 
packages for it seem to be built
against dune 2.6 now. The Dune packages listed must be some older ones built 
for the opm PPA.

Can you please do:

sudo apt-get update

and then post the output of:

lsb-release -a

apt-cache policy libopmsimulators1

this should be 2019.10-rfinal-2-bionic

Thanks!

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Schedule OPM-Meeting 2020

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

there will be one additional talk on Feb 4:

15:35-16:00 Jostein Alvestad / Torbjørn Skille (Equinor): Eclipse compatible 
Restart Files in OPM flow

Please do not panic. 25 minutes should present the upper limit of the time if 
you are faster and we finish
earlier with the discussions, we just move on to the next one. This means the 
free time for discussion groups
/ unconference grows.

You are also more than welcome to give lightning talks during the unconference 
part.

Markus

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:37:46PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Dear participant,
> 
> I am sorry for spamming and sending misformatted html emails to you.
> This one should be the properly formatted and only received once.
> 
> We are looking forward to meeting you at the meeting next
> week. We have updated the schedule for February 4-5, 2020 on the registration
> page and on github.
> 
> If you presenting a regular talk, please keep in mind that your slot is
> 25 minutes including discussion. Please find the program also below for your
> convenience.
> 
> February 4, 2020
> 
> 
>   Time  What  
>   
>   
> --
>09:00-09:15  Registration / Coffe          
>   
>09:15-09:40  Markus Blatt (OPM-OP / HPC-SimSoft): Welcome / Introduction   
>   
>09:40-10:05  Alf Birger Rustad (Equinor): Summary of OPM and its 
> Development 
>10:05-10:30  Atgeirr Rasmussen (SINTEF): Improvements to OPM Flow since 
> the last meeting 
>10:30-10:50  Break 
>   
>10:50-11:15  Joakim Hove (OPM-OP): Python in opm   
>   
>11:15-11:40  Robert Klöfkorn (NORCE ): Status of Python bindings for 
> OPM-Flow
>11:40-12:05  Cintia Goncalves Machado (TNO ): Latest Developments by TNO   
>   
>12:05-12:30  Tor Harald (NORCE ): CO2 simulations in OPM   
>   
>12:30-14:00  Lunch 
>   
>14:00-14:25  Bernd Flemisch (Uni Stuttgart): Recent Developments in Dumux  
>   
>14:25-14:50  Halvor Møll Nilsen (SINTEF): Linear solvers and 
> preconditioners for Flow
>14:59-15:15  Tom Hogervorst (BigDataAccelerate): OPM hardware acceleration 
>   
>15:15-15:35  Break 
>   
>15:35-17:30  Discussion group /unconference
>   
> 
> 
> February 5, 2020
> 
> 
>   Time  What  
>  
>   
> -
>09:00-09:15  Coffee
>  
>09:15-09:40  Kai Bao (SINTEF): Surfactant and polymer flooding simulation 
> with MRST 
>09:40-10:05  Bård Skaflestad (SINTEF): Coarsening, upscaling and running 
> on graphs  
>10:05-10:30  Joakim Hove (OPM-OP): Recent and Future improvements to 
> OPMRun 
>10:30-12:30  Unconference  
>  
>12:30-14:00  Lunch 
>  
>14:00-15:35  Unconference/ Hacking 
>  
>15:35-15:55  Break 
>  
>15:55-17:30  Unconference / Hacking    
> 
> Registration page: https://events.dr-blatt.de/e/1/opm-meeting-2020
> github : 
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-meeting20/wiki/Proposed-Talks-at-the-OPM-Meeting-2020
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Markus
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858



-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Schedule OPM-Meeting 2020

[Markus Blatt]

Dear participant,

I am sorry for spamming and sending misformatted html emails to you.
This one should be the properly formatted and only received once.

We are looking forward to meeting you at the meeting next
week. We have updated the schedule for February 4-5, 2020 on the registration
page and on github.

If you presenting a regular talk, please keep in mind that your slot is
25 minutes including discussion. Please find the program also below for your
convenience.

February 4, 2020


  Time  What

  
--
   09:00-09:15  Registration / Coffe

   09:15-09:40  Markus Blatt (OPM-OP / HPC-SimSoft): Welcome / Introduction 

   09:40-10:05  Alf Birger Rustad (Equinor): Summary of OPM and its Development 

   10:05-10:30  Atgeirr Rasmussen (SINTEF): Improvements to OPM Flow since the 
last meeting 
   10:30-10:50  Break   

   10:50-11:15  Joakim Hove (OPM-OP): Python in opm 

   11:15-11:40  Robert Klöfkorn (NORCE ): Status of Python bindings for 
OPM-Flow
   11:40-12:05  Cintia Goncalves Machado (TNO ): Latest Developments by TNO 

   12:05-12:30  Tor Harald (NORCE ): CO2 simulations in OPM 

   12:30-14:00  Lunch   

   14:00-14:25  Bernd Flemisch (Uni Stuttgart): Recent Developments in Dumux

   14:25-14:50  Halvor Møll Nilsen (SINTEF): Linear solvers and preconditioners 
for Flow
   14:59-15:15  Tom Hogervorst (BigDataAccelerate): OPM hardware acceleration   

   15:15-15:35  Break   

   15:35-17:30  Discussion group /unconference  



February 5, 2020


  Time  What
   
  
-
   09:00-09:15  Coffee  
   
   09:15-09:40  Kai Bao (SINTEF): Surfactant and polymer flooding simulation 
with MRST 
   09:40-10:05  Bård Skaflestad (SINTEF): Coarsening, upscaling and running on 
graphs  
   10:05-10:30  Joakim Hove (OPM-OP): Recent and Future improvements to OPMRun  
   
   10:30-12:30  Unconference
   
   12:30-14:00  Lunch   
   
   14:00-15:35  Unconference/ Hacking   
   
   15:35-15:55  Break   
   
   15:55-17:30  Unconference / Hacking

Registration page: https://events.dr-blatt.de/e/1/opm-meeting-2020
github : 
https://github.com/OPM/opm-meeting20/wiki/Proposed-Talks-at-the-OPM-Meeting-2020

Kind regards,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:00:26AM +, Atgeirr Rasmussen wrote:
> Despite what I initially wrote (that I want to increase the requirements), if 
> we turn away potential users by this, that would be a good reason to NOT bump 
> the requirements.
> 
> Arne Morten's message implies that we can still provide binary packages for 
> new releases (i.e. 2020.04 and 2020.10 etc.) for Ubuntu back to 16.04.
> But does that still hold if we also increase compiler requirements to gcc 
> 8.3? If not, perhaps we should only increase the Dune version for now?
>

well, even Arne Morton has to admit that supporting a wealth of distributions 
and versions often results in a great amount of work.
We have seen that for Ubuntu and Redhat as well.

I guess we have to decide what we want, and what the user wants. People who 
always want the latest and greatest, might have to
do so with their distribution as well.

I would not consider our current releases maintenance updates (we actually do 
not have these). So while ubuntu LTS will give you
maintenance update for 4 years, if you buy fancy new hardware you only have a  
change of getting it supported after for 2 years.
Hence it seems reasonable to guarantee / thrive for new releases to support a 
two year old ubuntu. https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle
What one could do is provide bugfix releases for the versions on Ubuntu for 4 
years.

That would mean

Ubuntu YY.04 LTS will be supported by 20YY.04 until 20{YY+2}.04 (and maybe 
their bugfix releases.


For Debian versions the current End of life seems to be 3 years (no support by 
Dian any more) https://endoflife.software/operating-systems/linux/debian.
One can get 2 years limited support via Debian LTS https://wiki.debian.org/LTS.

So if we consider the LTS phase as "you might not get a new OPM version", then 
dropping Debian 9 for 2020.04 seems sound.

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Dependencies revisited

[Markus Blatt]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 09:36:47AM +0100, Joakim Hove wrote:
> Another recurring issue is Boost. If we jump to Debian Buster and Ubuntu
> > 19.04, this entails that we can bump minimum version of GCC to 8.3.0. Is
> > this sufficient to consider removing Boost as a dependency?
> >
> 
> The parser uses boost spirit::qi which at some stage proved to give a
> performance gain for plain parsing of numerical input, i.e. "3.14" -> 3.14.
> It is simple to replace with std varieties, but there might be a
> performance hit.

If recall correctly, the flexible solver framework / CPR uses boot property tree
for the parameters read from the config files. So boost usage has increased 
quite
a bit lately.

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] OPM Meeting 2020 (call to action)

[Markus Blatt]

Dear OPM Meeting attendees,

I hope everybody has registered at 
https://events.dr-blatt.de/e/1/opm-meeting-2020.

It is only 3 weeks until our meeting. Time to start planning. Yes, I mean you, 
and you, and you. Basically all (current and prospective) attendees. This is a 
community event and you have the power to propose talks (if you have not done 
so, yet) and discussion and hacking groups. Nearly anything related to OPM 
goes. 

You will find more information on github at 
https://github.com/OPM/opm-meeting20 on how to do so and can act there directly 
using the issue tracker and wiki.

Most of us meet barely once a year. Hence take the chance and make the most of 
out of it.

We want you!

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] OPM Meeting (Feb 4-5, 2020) registration open

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I am pleased to invite you to participate in the 2020 OPM Meeting on February 
4-5 in Germany! This year the event will be hosted by HPC-Simulation-Software & 
Services in Eichstätt

For more information (including schedule, travel information) and registration, 
please visit https://events.dr-blatt.de/e/1/opm-meeting-2020.
Please register as early as possible to make planning more easy.

I hope to welcome all of you in Eichstätt next year.

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Urgent Poll: Extend meeting on Feb 5 until evening?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

current status from dudle or private replies is around 6 people staying.
I guess that is the minimum critical mass to get this going.

But if you want to give a motivation boost, then please add your preference
to

https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/opm2020duration/

Three options available (yes/no/unsure).

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Urgent Poll: Extend meeting on Feb 5 until evening?

[Markus Blatt]

Dear Lezin,

thanks a lot for answering. That is very much appreciated.

For everyone else, Please indicate your preference until tomorrow at

https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/opm2020duration/

If there is enough interest, then I will plan for it. We will have the room
anyway.

Tentative schedule of the meeting will come on Monday.

Cheers,

Markus

On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:36:27AM +, Lezin Galibert wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In reply to Dr. Blatt, I would be very happy to stay a bit more for
> some additional developer work. I am very new here, so far be it from
> me to wish to impose my views, but I think it is a good idea to make
> the most out of the trip!
> 
> Best,
> Lezin
> 
> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 12:00 +, opm-requ...@opm-project.org wrote:
> > Send Opm mailing list submissions to
> > opm@opm-project.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > opm-requ...@opm-project.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > opm-ow...@opm-project.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Opm digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. Re: Save the Date: OPM-Meeting Feb. 4-5, 2020 (Markus Blatt)
> >2. Re: Help - ResInsight Error for Grid Results (Patricia
> > Carreras)
> >3. Re: Help - ResInsight Error for Grid Results (Patricia
> > Carreras)
> >
> >
> > ---
> > ---
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:07:00 +0100
> > From: Markus Blatt 
> > To: opm@opm-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Opm] Save the Date: OPM-Meeting Feb. 4-5, 2020
> > Message-ID: <20191126120700.GB62634@smaug>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Feb 5 is Wednesday and not Thursday. Please mentally do the
> > substitution below.
> > Thank for the hint and apologies for the mistake.
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks a lot for taking part in the date poll for the OPM Meeting.
> > > We had a clear winner andwill be holding the meeting on February 4-
> > > 5,
> > > 2019 in Eichstaett, Germany. The most convenient airport ist
> > > Munich.
> > >
> > > The plan is to start at 9 a.m. on Tuesday and end around 1 p.m. on
> > > Thursday.
> > > This way you will be able to reach the evening flights with SAS/KLM
> > > to Norway
> > > on that day.
> > >
> > > Alternatively we could use Thursday afternoon for more developer
> > > centric stuff,
> > > group work, hacking etc. If that is wanted please let me know soon
> > > and maybe delay
> > > booking your flight a little.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Markus
> > > --
> > > Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services
> > > http://www.dr-blatt.de
> > > Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> > > Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> >
> >
> >
> > > ___
> > > Opm mailing list
> > > Opm@opm-project.org
> > > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> >
> >
> 
> **
> IMPORTANT NOTICE
> 
> The information in this e-mail and any files transmitted is the property of 
> PETRICORE and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
> review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than 
> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
> notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Save the Date: OPM-Meeting Feb. 4-5, 2020

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Feb 5 is Wednesday and not Thursday. Please mentally do the substitution below.
Thank for the hint and apologies for the mistake.

Markus

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:05:57AM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> thanks a lot for taking part in the date poll for the OPM Meeting.
> We had a clear winner andwill be holding the meeting on February 4-5,
> 2019 in Eichstaett, Germany. The most convenient airport ist Munich.
> 
> The plan is to start at 9 a.m. on Tuesday and end around 1 p.m. on Thursday.
> This way you will be able to reach the evening flights with SAS/KLM to Norway
> on that day.
> 
> Alternatively we could use Thursday afternoon for more developer centric 
> stuff,
> group work, hacking etc. If that is wanted please let me know soon and maybe 
> delay
> booking your flight a little.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Markus
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858



> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Save the Date: OPM-Meeting Feb. 4-5, 2020

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

thanks a lot for taking part in the date poll for the OPM Meeting.
We had a clear winner andwill be holding the meeting on February 4-5,
2019 in Eichstaett, Germany. The most convenient airport ist Munich.

The plan is to start at 9 a.m. on Tuesday and end around 1 p.m. on Thursday.
This way you will be able to reach the evening flights with SAS/KLM to Norway
on that day.

Alternatively we could use Thursday afternoon for more developer centric stuff,
group work, hacking etc. If that is wanted please let me know soon and maybe 
delay
booking your flight a little.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Date poll for OPM Meeting in Eichstaett near Munich/Germany

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

thanks to all who already indicated their availability. If someone has not done
this yet, please do until tomorrow night.

Currently it looks like 4.-5.2.2020 is most convenient, second best 
11.-12.2.2020.

Markus

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 02:36:19PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we need to find a date for our meeting.
> Please list your availability at
> 
> https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/opm2020/
> 
> until Wednesday Nov 20, 2019. Afterwards I will decide which date we will use
> based on this. Optimally we would use Tuesday-Wednesday. I will also try
> to persuade fellow DUNE developers to meet here for developer meeting either
> before or afterwards.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Markus
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858



> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm


-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] OPM Release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

Hi OPM community,

We are happy to announce the 2019.10 release of OPM. Binary Packages for
[Ubuntu] 16.04, 18.04 and 18.10 as well as [Redhat Enterprise Linux] 6
and 7. For further information please read the [installation
instructions]

The former module ewoms of OPM has been renamed to opm-models in this
release. Some of its directories have been renamed to reflect this
(ewoms/blackoil -> opm/models/blackoil, ewoms/common ->
opm/models/utils, ewoms/disc -> opm/models/discretization, ewoms/io ->
opm/models/io, ewoms->parallel -> opm/models/parallel, ewoms/linear ->
opm/simulators/linalg).

Further changes/improvements included in this release are:
⁃ Renaming / Restructuring
  ⁃ The former module ewoms of OPM has been renamed to opm-models in
this release. Some of its directories have been renamed to reflect
this (ewoms/blackoil -> opm/models/blackoil, ewoms/common ->
opm/models/utils, ewoms/disc -> opm/models/discretization, ewoms/io
-> opm/models/io, ewoms->parallel -> opm/models/parallel,
ewoms/linear -> opm/simulators/linalg).
  ⁃ The namespace Ewoms has been renamed to Opm
  ⁃ Most files/header that were located in directory opm/autodiff in
opm-simulators have been moved to opm/simulators/aquifers,
opm/simulators/linalg, opm/simulators/utils, or opm/simulators/wells
depending on their content.
⁃ Additions
  ⁃ Support for additional keywords: ROCKCOMP keyword (water induced
rock compaction), COMPDAT, UDQ, UDA, GRUP, FILLEPS.
  ⁃ Support for GOR checking for WECON
  ⁃ Improved support for WTEST
  ⁃ Support for one phase simulations
  ⁃ Experimental support for driftCompensation (off by default, enable
using –ecl-enable-drift-compensation=true)
  ⁃ Experimental support for foam module (keywords FOAM; FOAMADS,
FOAMFSC, FOAMMOB, FOAMOPTS, FOAMROCK, WFOAM)
  ⁃ Many unsupported keywords are now listed as missing features (those
starting with A - M, R, T, V, W, Z).
  ⁃ Write well potentials to restart files if needed.
  ⁃ Support different edge weights when loadbalancing (uniform,
transmissibilities, log of transmissibilities)
  ⁃ Improved support for multisegment wells (now enabled by default).
  ⁃ Many new regression tests.
  ⁃ Added an experimental linear solver subsystem (including complex CPR
solvers) that is configurable during runtime (not parallel, needs
DUNE>=2.6)
  ⁃ Use refactored well implementation from opm-common.
  ⁃ Output NNCs in an Eclipse compliant manner.
  ⁃ Output several diagnostics when parsing a deck.
⁃ Fixes
  ⁃ Made dune-fem version information available
  ⁃ restart values are only read once (twice before)
  ⁃ Fixed several bugs concerning restart
  ⁃ ebos now logs to *.PRT and *DBG files
  ⁃ Abort runs without reading the deck if command line parameters are
incorrect.
  ⁃ Use grid region mapping from opm-grid.
  ⁃ Fixed negative thp values form extrapolation using VFP tables.
  ⁃ Logging from well testing is now in *.PRT and *.LOG files
  ⁃ Serveral fixes to multisegement well model.
  ⁃ *.INIT and *.GRID files are also output on restart.
  ⁃ Do not update RESV for prediction produces.
  ⁃ Output FPRP insteas of ovewritung FPR values.
  ⁃ Always write transmissibilities between vertical neighbours to TRANZ
(even for NNCs).
  ⁃ Support upcoming DUNE 2.7

Special thanks goes to everybody in the community for testing and
especially to Arne Mortoin Kvarving for preparing the binary packages
and discovering all my mistakes in no time.

Cheers,

Markus

[Ubuntu] https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245

[Redhat Enterprise Linux] https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245

[installation instructions] https://opm-project.org/?page_id=36


-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Date poll for OPM Meeting in Eichstaett near Munich/Germany

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

we need to find a date for our meeting.
Please list your availability at

https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/opm2020/

until Wednesday Nov 20, 2019. Afterwards I will decide which date we will use
based on this. Optimally we would use Tuesday-Wednesday. I will also try
to persuade fellow DUNE developers to meet here for developer meeting either
before or afterwards.

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] 4th candidate for 2019.10 release

[Markus Blatt]

Dear Lorenzo,

thanks a lot for the testing and reporting back. It is much appreciated.

Regarding your technical question I will leave the answer to more
skilled people in that particular area. I guess you will have to
generate/write an Eclipse input file for that.

Cheers,

Markus

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:39:52AM +0300, lc wrote:
> Hello dear OPM community,
> 
> I successfully checkedout to the new release and I'm going with some
> testing, specifically, polymer injection scenarios in water/oil. I run
> without problems.
>
> In this regards, I'd like to ask wheher/how is it possible to set up a
> simulation for a five spot pattern scenario, thus with vertical wells with
> polymer injection in water/oil.
> 
> I don't find any example, for the grid generation as well.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Lorenzo Campoli
> 
> 
> On 12.11.2019 17:57, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote:
> > rc4 builds are now in testing ppa for xenial and bionic (done building, 
> > might take 30 mins before they published).
> > 
> > Fra: Opm  p?? vegne av Markus Blatt 
> > 
> > Sendt: tirsdag 12. november 2019 15:36
> > Til: opm@opm-project.org 
> > Emne: [Opm] 4th candidate for 2019.10 release
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > third time is the charm, does not seem to hold here.
> > 
> > This morning a tagged a another release candidate. You get it from git,
> > by "git checkout release/2019.10/rc4" after fetching updates for each 
> > module.
> > 
> > Arne Morton will provide binary packages (at least for Ubuntu) in due time.
> > 
> > It would be nice if everyboday would do some testing. No report will be
> > interpreted as "works for me". Optimistic as I am, I intend to tag the
> > final release on Friday.
> > 
> > What changed since rc3 is:
> > opm-common: PRs 1068 (improvements related to Aquifer modeling) and 1113 
> > (Apply
> > Multz to edit section) have been backported.
> > opm-simulators: Print number of OMP threads and MPI processors
> > 
> > Happy testing!
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Markus
> > --
> > Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services 
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dr-blatt.de&data=02%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C9a9572b81c4f470f485d08d7677dd6fd%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C1%7C637091662488023882&sdata=m1PkG%2BOAQod2%2FA003OS8ucZ9LfD8XO6QNfNXyy0BwuE%3D&reserved=0
> > Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstaett, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> > Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> > ___
> > Opm mailing list
> > Opm@opm-project.org
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fopm-project.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fopm&data=02%7C01%7Carne.morten.kvarving%40sintef.no%7C9a9572b81c4f470f485d08d7677dd6fd%7Ce1f00f39604145b0b309e0210d8b32af%7C1%7C1%7C637091662488023882&sdata=6AubA8kvs5YB6UB0kZmq%2BTmx041HSZgltQIx%2BUjrTXM%3D&reserved=0
> > ___
> > Opm mailing list
> > Opm@opm-project.org
> > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> 
> -- 
> 
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica sono
> strettamente riservate e indirizzate esclusivamente al destinatario. Si
> prega di non leggere, fare copia, inoltrare a terzi o conservare tale
> messaggio se non si ?? il legittimo destinatario dello stesso. Qualora tale
> messaggio sia stato ricevuto per errore, si prega di restituirlo al mittente
> e di cancellarlo permanentemente dal proprio computer.
> 
> The information contained in this e mail message is strictly confidential
> and intended for the use of the addressee only.?? If you are not the
> intended recipient, please do not read, copy, forward or store it on your
> computer. If you have received the message in error, please forward it back
> to the sender and delete it permanently from your computer system.
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichst??tt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] 4th candidate for 2019.10 release

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

third time is the charm, does not seem to hold here.

This morning a tagged a another release candidate. You get it from git,
by "git checkout release/2019.10/rc4" after fetching updates for each module.

Arne Morton will provide binary packages (at least for Ubuntu) in due time.

It would be nice if everyboday would do some testing. No report will be
interpreted as "works for me". Optimistic as I am, I intend to tag the
final release on Friday.

What changed since rc3 is:
opm-common: PRs 1068 (improvements related to Aquifer modeling) and 1113 (Apply
   Multz to edit section) have been backported.
opm-simulators: Print number of OMP threads and MPI processors

Happy testing!

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstaett, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] third candidate for release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

sicne we discorvered one critical bug in parallel flow. We have prepared
another release candidate.

In git please use 

"git checkout release/2019.10/rc3"

 There are also Ubuntu packages in the ppa

Please give it another spin. We reallz rely on your testing.

Cheers.

Markus


-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Second candidate for release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

as there were some (not to big) changes to the release, I felt the need to
play it a bit safe. Therefore I tagged a second release candidate. Once you
have pulled the updates from github, you can check it out via

"git checkout release/2019.10/rc2"

in every module.

Would be nice if some you would give it another spin.

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

CMake versions: 3.7.2, 3.9.6, 3.10.2, 3.13.4

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:31:47AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just to save others some time (but by any means do test it if you have
> spare time since there are multiple settings.) an get a list of supported
> systems.
> 
> I tested successfully on the following systems:
> - Ubuntu 18.04 (g++-7.4.0)
> - Debian 9 (g++-6.3.0)
> - Debian 10 (g++-8.3.0)
> 
> If you have tested on other systems or with other compilers please send
> a short reply.
> 
> Markus
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

just to save others some time (but by any means do test it if you have
spare time since there are multiple settings.) an get a list of supported
systems.

I tested successfully on the following systems:
- Ubuntu 18.04 (g++-7.4.0)
- Debian 9 (g++-6.3.0)
- Debian 10 (g++-8.3.0)

If you have tested on other systems or with other compilers please send
a short reply.

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] First candidate for release 2019.10 is out

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I just tagged the first candidates for the release 2019.10. To test
it just checkout the corresponding tag from github with
"git checkout release/2019.10/rc1" in each module after an update.

Binary release candidates will be prepared in due time.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Tentative release 2019.10 plan

[Markus Blatt]

Hi fellow developers and users,

we might be a bit behind schedule currently as there is a regression
in the parallel flow with one of the models (excessive timestep chopping
and a deadlock). It does not make sense to publish release candidates
before this is resolved.

Therefore I will now investigate time and find out when the regression
happened. Once that is done I will fix it somehow for the release. That
might mean that some of the features already in the release might need
to go again if they are somehow related.

Thanks a lot for your patience. If you habe any hints on what the cause
could be, just shoot.

Cheers,

Markus

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:49:39PM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this is a gentle reminder that there is approximately half a
> week left until the feature freeze. Thanks for all the hard work that
> I see happening currently. I am really looking forward to the release.
> 
> If you are still working on features or know existing features that should be
> in the release then please mark those PRs with Milestone "Release 2019.10" 
> (preferred)
> or send me a mail. Only features marked in such a way and merged to master 
> until the
> freeze will be considered. Once merged I will label them with "backported".
> 
> Basically I use github to look for work, e.g. for opm-common:
> 
> https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+milestone%3A%22Release+2019.10%22
> 
> Your help is highly appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Markus
> 
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > as discussed internally the our regular fall release is on our doorstep 
> > already.
> > I have the pleasure of being the release manager this time.
> > 
> > My current time plan is as follows:
> > 
> > Fri Oct 11 (evening): creation of release branches. PRs merged by then will 
> > be
> >  in the release automatically.
> > Sa Oct 12 - Su Oct 20: First tests by the release manager (and hopefully 
> > the rest)
> >  Important features might still be backported from master on
> >  special request.
> > Mo Oct 21 (10:00 CET): Feature freeze. Only bug fixes will be 
> > backported/merged from now on.
> > We Oct 23: 1st beta release candidate.
> > Mo Oct 28: 2nd beta release candidate.
> > Th Oct 31: release.
> > 
> > Please mark the PRs that should go into the release with Milestone "Release 
> > 2019.10" to make it easier to get an overview.
> > 
> > From Oct 12 on features/bug fixes will need to be merged to master first 
> > and will be backported by me
> > to the release branches. Please keep that in mind as you will need to 
> > clearly state that a PR is also for
> > the release to speed up reviewing and prevent me from missing stuff.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for all the help and your patience with the release 
> > manager.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Markus
> > -- 
> > Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> > Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> > Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> > ___
> > Opm mailing list
> > Opm@opm-project.org
> > https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Tentative release 2019.10 plan

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

this is a gentle reminder that there is approximately half a
week left until the feature freeze. Thanks for all the hard work that
I see happening currently. I am really looking forward to the release.

If you are still working on features or know existing features that should be
in the release then please mark those PRs with Milestone "Release 2019.10" 
(preferred)
or send me a mail. Only features marked in such a way and merged to master 
until the
freeze will be considered. Once merged I will label them with "backported".

Basically I use github to look for work, e.g. for opm-common:

https://github.com/OPM/opm-common/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Amerged+milestone%3A%22Release+2019.10%22

Your help is highly appreciated.

Cheers,

Markus

On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:14:55AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as discussed internally the our regular fall release is on our doorstep 
> already.
> I have the pleasure of being the release manager this time.
> 
> My current time plan is as follows:
> 
> Fri Oct 11 (evening): creation of release branches. PRs merged by then will be
>  in the release automatically.
> Sa Oct 12 - Su Oct 20: First tests by the release manager (and hopefully the 
> rest)
>  Important features might still be backported from master on
>special request.
> Mo Oct 21 (10:00 CET): Feature freeze. Only bug fixes will be 
> backported/merged from now on.
> We Oct 23: 1st beta release candidate.
> Mo Oct 28: 2nd beta release candidate.
> Th Oct 31: release.
> 
> Please mark the PRs that should go into the release with Milestone "Release 
> 2019.10" to make it easier to get an overview.
> 
> From Oct 12 on features/bug fixes will need to be merged to master first and 
> will be backported by me
> to the release branches. Please keep that in mind as you will need to clearly 
> state that a PR is also for
> the release to speed up reviewing and prevent me from missing stuff.
> 
> Thanks in advance for all the help and your patience with the release manager.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Markus
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> _______
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Tentative release 2019.10 plan

[Markus Blatt]

Dear fellow developers,

Please also beware of the following:

If you want to have a PR also in the release, then please mark it with 
milestone "Release 2019.10".
Otherwise it will be missing from the release as I might not find the time to 
investigate and mark
them myself or simply have no idea that they are suitable for the release.
Once the marked PRs are merged into master, I will try to backport them to the 
release, make a new PR for the release
(seems to be more work with github then with gitlab, sigh), and mark the 
original with label backported
once it is merged.

This also means that all PRs including fixes to the release need to made for 
master!

Cheers,

Markus

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 09:28:04AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as some might have noticed, I have created release branches (release/2019.10)
> in the night from friday to saturday.
> 
> Please be aware that up until now these are untested apart from our
> usual jenkins tests run before their creation. You are of course welcome to
> test them yourself, but if you want to prevent double work you should wait
> until I did run some tests and verified that they work as expected.
> 
> If somebody already verified this, please yell.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Markus
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
> Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
> Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
> ___
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Tentative release 2019.10 plan

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

as some might have noticed, I have created release branches (release/2019.10)
in the night from friday to saturday.

Please be aware that up until now these are untested apart from our
usual jenkins tests run before their creation. You are of course welcome to
test them yourself, but if you want to prevent double work you should wait
until I did run some tests and verified that they work as expected.

If somebody already verified this, please yell.

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Tentative release 2019.10 plan

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

as discussed internally the our regular fall release is on our doorstep already.
I have the pleasure of being the release manager this time.

My current time plan is as follows:

Fri Oct 11 (evening): creation of release branches. PRs merged by then will be
 in the release automatically.
Sa Oct 12 - Su Oct 20: First tests by the release manager (and hopefully the 
rest)
 Important features might still be backported from master on
 special request.
Mo Oct 21 (10:00 CET): Feature freeze. Only bug fixes will be backported/merged 
from now on.
We Oct 23: 1st beta release candidate.
Mo Oct 28: 2nd beta release candidate.
Th Oct 31: release.

Please mark the PRs that should go into the release with Milestone "Release 
2019.10" to make it easier to get an overview.

From Oct 12 on features/bug fixes will need to be merged to master first and 
will be backported by me
to the release branches. Please keep that in mind as you will need to clearly 
state that a PR is also for
the release to speed up reviewing and prevent me from missing stuff.

Thanks in advance for all the help and your patience with the release manager.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM software installation

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:35:46AM +, Kjell Randa wrote:
>
> Are the OPM simulators available as tar archive with all software and 
> libraries compiled for Centos 7? That would allow us to install OPM on a NFS 
> filesystem mounted on all nodes ant run it from this location similar to what 
> we do with their existing simulators.
> We will probably need to install both the single core executables and the 
> parallel mpi based executables.
>

I might be wrong, but I recall that CentOs is a derivation from Redhat and
should be compatible. We do ship Redhat packages as you can see on the Download
page https://opm-project.org/?page_id=36. You might want to give them a try.

Otherwise you need to compile from source. The information is on the same page.
If you cannot connect to the internet from the cluster, then you could clone 
the git repositories on another machine, tar them and the copy them to the 
target
machine.

HTH,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] 2019.04 release plan

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Great! Thanks a lot for all the hard work when preparing it.

Cheers,

Markus

On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 08:51:34AM +, Arne Morten Kvarving wrote:
> yay, we did it! we have a 2019.04 final release. thanks to everybody who 
> contributed code, testing, thoughts, coffee , tears and sweat to make it 
> happen. onto 2019.10!
> 
> packages for ubuntu xenial, bionic (no mpi), cosmic, rh6 and rh7 are all 
> available in the repos.
> 
> Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving
> Sendt: mandag 29. april 2019 12.08
> Til: opm@opm-project.org
> Emne: Sv: 2019.04 release plan
> 
> release 2019.04 rc2 (what I hope to be the final) is available in the testing 
> ppa.
> 
> 
> Fra: Arne Morten Kvarving
> Sendt: onsdag 27. mars 2019 08.56
> Til: opm@opm-project.org
> Emne: 2019.04 release plan
> 
> 
> Dear OPM community;
> 
> 
> we are now getting very close to a 2019.04 release. Among the core developers 
> there are no well known blockers for the release, and the plan is create 
> release branches (i..e feature freeze) on Wednesday 10nd of April, with the 
> first release candidates shortly thereafter. If everything goes according to 
> plan, the final will be released April 25.
> 
> 
> If someone in the wider OPM community have opinions on this matter please 
> speak up.
> 
> 
> Arnem
> _______
> Opm mailing list
> Opm@opm-project.org
> https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] [Offtopic] Problem with mails via mailinglist

[Markus Blatt]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 10:16:52AM +, Kai Bao wrote:
> Testing message as requested.
> 

Cool, I see the message as it should be! It works again.

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] [Offtopic] Problem with mails via mailinglist

[Markus Blatt]

Kai, would you send a test reply to this message. please. If I can read it
without any hassle then the issue is fixed.

Thanks.

Cheers,

Markus


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] [Offtopic] Problem with mails via mailinglist

[Markus Blatt]

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 06:04:37PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> 
> Is that a problem of the mailman installation or the sender?
>

Seems like  a problem of the sending mail user agent as my message (from mutt)
is nicely displayed 
(https://www.mail-archive.com/opm@opm-project.org/msg01171.html)

BTW The archive has problems with broken multipart/alternative emails, too.
See e.g. https://www.mail-archive.com/opm@opm-project.org/msg01170.html.
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] [Offtopic] Problem with mails via mailinglist

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

since last month I have trouble viewing messages that come via our mailinglist.
Apparantly, these mime messages have as first part a multipart/alternative that
should indicate that the both attachments in it should be alternates (i.e.
have equivalent content). Unfortunately, they are not. They are both
text/plain but the second one has no content. My email program prefers the
latter one.

Is that a problem of the mailman installation or the sender?

Cheers,

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

you probably figured out that there is a small bug in the script and fixed it
already, but anyway:

you need to add a line with "fi" in line 54 for the script to work.

Cheers,

Markus
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

[Markus Blatt]

BTW The script works for RefHat, too. You just need to install dune-istl 
differently (using yum?)
or check it out manually (
git clone https://gitlab.dune-project.org/core/dune-istl; cd dune-istl;
git checkout releases/2.4; cd ..
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:43:24PM -0400, sindimo wrote:
> I was suspecting this might be an issue with Flow RedHat7/MPICH build but I
> am able to reproduce the same problem even on an Ubuntu machine with
> OpenMPI.
>

Thanks for the instructions. I had such an ubuntu machine available and it hangs
indeed. Might be an issue with our connected to our release.

Anyway with a new release upcoming, there will probably be no time to 
investigate
this. I would recommend to try the master branches of the software. On your  
ubuntu
machine you already have dune except for dune-istl. Install it with

sudo apt-get install libdune-istl-dev

The run the attached build script. It will download OPM and compile it for you.
You will find flow in opm-simulators/opm-parallel/bin/flow.

This worked for me (at least the load balancing)  for the whole simulation 
there was
not enough memory on the virtual machine and the processes got killed with 
signal 9

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


build-opm.sh
Description: Bourne shell script


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] MPI Parallel OPM Flow - SPE 10 Model 2 Hangs

[Markus Blatt]

Hi

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:30:26PM -0400, sindimo wrote:
> I am running OPM Flow with MPICH MPI on RedHat 7 (installed via yum through
> OPM repo, version 2018.04).
> 
> I am able to successfully run in parallel  some of the test models  (norne,
> spe5, spe9), however spe10model2 always hangs when I try to launch it. It
> seems it hangs during the cell partitioning as below. It just partially
> does the partitioning on a subset of the processes only (example below
> where I have 4 processes and it hangs after doing 2 partitions, I've also
> tried with 8 processors and it shows similar behavior). Any help with this
> is much appreciated as I need to run SPE10 for some work I am doing, many
> thanks!

May I ask what work that is?

So you are using a release (even of a target distribution). That is a bit 
weired.
Unfortunately I do not have access to such a system and cannot be of much help 
here.
Maybe somebody else can do a quick test?

But I did a quick test with the current master on my system and it works with 4 
processes.
So if nobody else can help you, then you might want to checkout master and 
compile
OPM yourself.

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Redhat RPM package with MPI

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:30:03PM +0100, bacetti abdelmoumen wrote:
> Is there any link to get an complete RPM package of the simulator with MPI?
>

AFAIK package libopm-simulators1-openmpi (for download see 
https://opm-project.org/?page_id=245) does support MPI, but you have to select 
OpemMPI on redhat (see 
https://www.mail-archive.com/opm@opm-project.org/msg01087.html).

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
https://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Problem installing python-ecl for 2017.10 version of OPM

[Markus Blatt]

On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 02:48:35PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:

> We are sorry about this known issue. according to
> http://opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2017-December/001204.html this
> will be resolved early next year by rebulding the packages. Maybe
> Roland's suggestion in the same thread helps?

Seems like there is an issue with the archive on opm-project.org. Here
is a working link from another one:

https://www.mail-archive.com/opm@opm-project.org/msg01052.html

and for Roland's suggestion:

https://www.mail-archive.com/opm@opm-project.org/msg01053.html
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Problem installing python-ecl for 2017.10 version of OPM

[Markus Blatt]

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:23:22PM -0600, George Williams wrote:
> I haven't yet been successful installing the python-ecl package due to a
> conflict described below.  I would appreciate any advice as to how I should
> resolve this conflict.
> Thanks,
> George Williams
> 
> As shown here, python-ecl depends on libert.ecl1:
> 
> Package: python-ecl
> Source: ecl
> Priority: extra
> Section: python
> Installed-Size: 1524
> Maintainer: Arne Morten Kvarving 
> Architecture: amd64
> Version: 2017.10-rfinal-1~xenial
> Depends: libert.ecl1, python-cwrap
> Filename: pool/main/e/ecl/python-ecl_2017.10-rfinal-1~xenial_amd64.deb
> 
> 
> libert.ecl1 is from the 2017.4 version of OPM:
> 
> Package: libert.ecl1
> Source: ert.ecl
> Priority: extra
> Section: libs
> Installed-Size: 1145
> Maintainer: Arne Morten Kvarving 
> Architecture: amd64
> Version: 2017.04-rfinal-1~xenial
> 

> libert.ecl1 conflicts with libecl1, which is required for the 2017.10
> version of OPM, as shown below when I tried to install libecl1 without
> removing libert.ecl1.
>

We are sorry about this known issue. according to
http://opm-project.org/pipermail/opm/2017-December/001204.html this
will be resolved early next year by rebulding the packages. Maybe
Roland's suggestion in the same thread helps?

Cheers,

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Who sets MODULE_ROOT when he/she calls CMake?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

does anyone really pass MODULE_ROOT (OPM_CORE_ROOT, OPM_MATERIAL_ROOT,
etc.) to CMake to tell it where the modules are located?

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Pedettistr. 38, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] New version of libecl required

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Thanks for the heads up. I guess updating earlier is not a problem?

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Travis flooded with CMake warnings

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

looks like somebody updated the CMake version on the build server and
did not update the CMake scripts with policy settings. No the travis
logs are flooded with policy warnings and not displayed completely
because of their length (This log is too long to be displayed. Please
reduce the verbosity of your build or download the raw log.)
https://travis-ci.org/OPM/opm-simulators/builds/235220937?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification

Could we either downgrade CMake, set the correct policies, or simply
use -Wno-dev to suppress these warnings when building-

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Extracting matrices and right-hand sides

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:16:49AM +0200, Andreas Lauser wrote:
> ... zero entries. If I remember correctly, there are also some routines in 
> Dune 
> which output matrices and vectors to standardized format like MatrixMarket. I 
> haven't personally used them yet, though.

Sure there are. Located in dune-istl dune/istl/matrixmarket.hh
Dune::writeMatrixMarket
https://www.dune-project.org/doxygen/2.5.0/group__ISTL__IO.html#ga8da01d126c9f37e57fa4f719e1d05487

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Are build tests supposed to work again?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

Quick question to not waste CPU cycles for no use:

I have some PRs hanging around which had weired failures (no bc,
regression when comparing results). Is the automated test system
supposed to work again? If it is, do I need to rebase the PRs onto the
current master branch?

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Installation from binary on Ubuntu 16.04, undefined symbol

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I am not on ubuntu, but on Debian stable. Therefore this is a guess:

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 03:01:34PM +, Tobias Kasper Skovborg Ritschel wrote:

> 
> flow: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libptscotch-5.1.so: undefined symbol: 
> ompi_mpi_op_bor
> 

Looks like a problemn with OpenMPI. Are you sure that libopenmpi1.6
(for 14.04, version might differ for other ubuntu versions) is
installed?

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Posters at SIAM CSE17 and GS17?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

and here comes the first Christmas present:

The poster has already been accepted.

Cheers,

Markus

___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Posters at SIAM CSE17 and GS17?

[Markus Blatt]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:01:21PM +, Kai Bao wrote:
> I would like to help the preparation of the poster. I can contribute to a few 
> different aspects, while especially, I would like to design an example for 
> polymer flooding. 
> 

Great! According to the schedule, they will us whether the poster is
accepted by January 4. Let us start when we are accepted. A natural
deadline for a first prototype version is January 30 as that is the
deadline for editing the abstract/authors in the online program.

Looking forward to it.

Markus

-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Posters at SIAM CSE17 and GS17?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I have set up a repository for this effort:
https://github.com/blattms/opm-poster. If you are interested and
want to contribute, please add your information to abstracts.org and
post a merge request. People whose sole contribution is adding the name
to list might be kicked out on January 30.

The way I read the website
http://meetings.siam.org/start.cfm?CONFCODE=POCS one can modify the
submission until 23:59 EST tonight and between January 4-30. (Not
sure whether the later changes will be in the printed program, but
they will be online).
I will try to check for PRs shortly before the deadline tonight.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Posters at SIAM CSE17 and GS17?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

the poster deadline for the SIAM CSE conference (Atlanta, Februrary)
has been extended until monday. As I intend to got there anyway, I
want to also present a poster about OPM. I would volunteer to be the
presenter and do most of the work (but would appreciate input by
others). Maybe we can host the poster creation process in an open
repository and use an open licence such that others can profit from
it. 

Maybe we can use the same author list as for the release paper
(atgeirr would you send it to me, please)?

The same poster could be presented at SIAM Geosciences in Erlangen in
September.

Any objections/suggestions?

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] Change in solver time Model2

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:57:59AM +, Tor Harald Sandve wrote:
> I think this is due to #916
> 
> linear_solver_maxiter was changed from 75 to 150
> which removes many of the linear solver convergence issues.
>

That is weired. I checked the runs of flow_legacy last Friday and it
still used 75 steps, see
https://github.com/OPM/opm-simulators/issues/955

Maybe I did something wrong. I will recheck.

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Runtime improvements benchmark Flow MPI Extra

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

I just noticed that there was a quite big runtime improvement for Model
2 somewhen between Nov 16 and Nov 28. See
http://linuxbenchmarking.com/?open-porous-media-git Flow MPI Extra.
For Norne things stayed the same, though.

Does anybody have some insight what actually might have caused this?

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

Re: [Opm] OPM release 2016.10

[Markus Blatt]

FYI I did send out notifications to the siam cse, siam Geoscience, and
na-digest list, to spread the word a bit wider.
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm

[Opm] Open well with zero perforations valid?

[Markus Blatt]

Hi,

as I only have a slight idea about the eclipse file format I need to
ask this.

Is it valid to describe a well with status not equal to shut that has no
perforations defined in the eclipse file?

I know that in the OPM code is invalid to an open well with all
perforations shut. But that might be  a different scenarios.

Cheers,

Markus
-- 
Dr. Markus Blatt - HPC-Simulation-Software & Services http://www.dr-blatt.de
Hans-Bunte-Str. 8-10, 69123 Heidelberg, Germany,  USt-Id: DE279960836
Tel.: +49 (0) 160 97590858


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm