Thanks for testing Rohith, we will need to find time to go through your cases.
Cheers,
Alf
From: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith)
[rohith.n...@tno.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 1:18 PM
To: Alf Birger Rustad; opm@opm-project.org
Subject: Re: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Hi Alf,
The switch linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true doesn’t seem to help in
this case.
Additionally, a deck file
(https://gist.github.com/nairr/8dbe35141a7b93dda90a1babd462b843 ) which used to
run with FLOW_2016.04_stablerelease, gives the following error with
FLOW_2016.04_current: Floating point exception (core dumped). I think the same
issue has been referenced in opm-simulators #731.
Cheers,
Rohith
From: Alf Birger Rustad [mailto:a...@statoil.com]
Sent: woensdag 15 juni 2016 16:28
To: Nair, R. (Rohith); opm@opm-project.org
Subject: RE: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Hi Rohith,
One thing you can try right away is the new switch for ignoring convergence
failure for the linear solver. On the command line or in a parameter file you
can add:
linear_solver_ignoreconvergencefailure=true
Cheers,
Alf
From: Opm [opm-boun...@opm-project.org] on behalf of Nair, R. (Rohith)
[rohith.n...@tno.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 3:39 PM
To: opm@opm-project.org<mailto:opm@opm-project.org>
Subject: [Opm] FW: [Help] Convergence issues - FLOW
Dear OPM community,
At the recently held OPM meeting I had mentioned that we at TNO are facing
convergence issues with FLOW when using perturbed schedule files and also with
handling well openings (Note: ECLIPSE is able to deal with these perturbed
schedule files). I believe it was mentioned that you guys were already working
towards a fix for these sort of issues. We would appreciate your
help/suggestions/workarounds in solving these convergence issues and ultimately
improving the robustness of the FLOW simulator in the process.
Please find the relevant data available for download from the following link:
https://we.tl/OBTYWPLnwg
The download contains:
1. Failed simulation with FLOW for simple water injection rate
optimization (successful simulation is also included): The only difference
between the successful and failed simulation is different water injection rates
2. Failed simulation where wells are opened at predefined intervals
3. Benchmark plots which successfully compare FLOW with other
simulators(E100, MRST, Mores, AD-GPRS) for oil-water flow simulation
Thanks and Kind regards,
Rohith Nair
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic
transmission of messages.
---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you
___
Opm mailing list
Opm@opm-project.org
http://opm-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opm
