Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

2017-01-10 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
Hi,

Exactly. We limit OpenStack to the projects with tc:approved-release tag and 
the functionality should be accessible via a NB API (not an API designed for 
communication between OpenStack components).

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 8:29 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Ok. If IFA005/IFA006 is not defined as the API interface syntax, just for 
functionality description, I think the gap is not so huge.

So only need to check for each interface defined in IFA005/IFA006 whether this 
interface's function could be supported by OpenStack.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 16:09
To: joehuang; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Thanks for the quick analyzis.
The target of the current call for experts is only to identify the gaps. We are 
not looking to one-to-one match for each information element and each operation 
of IFA005 and 006 but looking for the same functionality provided by OpenStack.

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:59 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Hello,

I go through the IFA 005 & IFA 006. The difference between API defined in IFA 
005/IFA 006 and OpenStack API is very huge, it seems that there must be some 
wrapper layer above OpenStack API.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Csatari, Gergely 
(Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 2:41
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Now I resend it to correct an actual mistake in my original mail.

The deadline for application is 26th of January.

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.26. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar] Reminder of call this thursday 11AM US EST - also send me suggestions on when to do a F2F

2017-01-10 Thread Margaret Chiosi 
Folks:
Sounds like ONS may be the best time for us to do F2F vs Openstack in
Atlanta next month.
Let me know which conferences you will be attending to see if we can get a
quorum at one of these:
1. Openstack Atlanta, Feb
2. Openstack Boston, May?
3. ONS Santa Clara, April
4. Layer 123 Santa Clara, April
4. Others?

-- 
Margaret Chiosi
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 1/13

2017-01-10 Thread Tianhongbo 
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Tianhongbo:MAILTO:hongbo.tianhon...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='TECH-DISC
 USS OPNFV':MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='Christoph
 er Price':MAILTO:christopher.pr...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='Dave Near
 y':MAILTO:dne...@redhat.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='marko.a.k
 ui...@nokia.com':MAILTO:marko.a.kui...@nokia.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="'Rautakump
 u, Mika (Nokia - FI/Espoo)'":MAILTO:mika.rautaku...@nokia.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='sheng-ann
 .y...@ericsson.com':MAILTO:sheng-ann...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='yangjiany
 j...@chinamobile.com':MAILTO:yangjian...@chinamobile.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='zhang.jun
 3...@zte.com.cn':MAILTO:zhang.ju...@zte.com.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="'HU, BIN'":
 MAILTO:bh5...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='lma@biigr
 oup.cn':MAILTO:l...@biigroup.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN='Tetsuya N
 akamura':MAILTO:t.nakam...@cablelabs.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Wenjing Ch
 u:MAILTO:wenjing@huawei.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:时间: 2017年1月13日星期五 22:00-23:00(UT
 C+08:00)北京，重庆，香港特别行政区，乌鲁木齐。\n\n注
 意: 以上 GMT 时差并不反映夏令时调整。\n\n*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
 *\n\nHi all:\n\nLet us continue to discuss the dovetail release plan.\n\n1
 ) Topic: dovetail release plan\nReport：hongbo\nTime needed(min):
 50 minutes\nBackground and Main decision points:\nhttps://etherpad.opn
 fv.org/p/collabrationofdovetail\n2)  Other issues (10 minutes)\n\nMeet
 ing information:\n\n•   Weekly on Friday at 1400-1500 UTC\n•  
  Gotomeeting Access\n•   https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/9696049
 01\n•   United States +1 (224) 501-3318\n•   Access Code: 458-
 547-813\n•   IRC channel\n•   #opnfv-meeting@ Freenode (Web Ch
 at)\n•   For more detail\, please refer to :\n•   https://wiki
 .opnfv.org/display/dovetail\n\nBest Regards\n\nhongbo\n\n\n
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 1/13
DTSTART;TZID=China Standard Time:20170113T22
DTEND;TZID=China Standard Time:20170113T23
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E0088099CAD6FF6BD201000
 01000AE8508DD64A7C34BA5A2FD42ACC9BCFA
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20170111T034251Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:-473229343
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:0
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Infra Working Group Meeting

2017-01-10 Thread Morgan, Jack 
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN="Morgan, Jack":MAILTO:jack.mor...@intel.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=FALSE;CN=opnfv-tec
 h-discuss (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org):MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@l
 ists.opnfv.org
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:The "Infra Working Group" plans and tracks infra
 structure cross project initiatives. We report our efforts up to the TSC t
 o ensure the community is able to provide sufficient resources for develop
 ment and release infrastructure.\n\nTopics and meeting agenda at https://w
 iki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group\n\n•   Weekly on Wedne
 sday at 8:00 PST  or 16:00 UTC\n•   GTM Link https://global.gotomeet
 ing.com/join/819733085\n•   Minutes at Meetings#InfraWorkingGroupMee
 ting\n•   IRC #opn
 fv-meeting - freenode.net\n•   Chaired by Jack Morgan (meetings chai
 red by Infra PTLs on a 2-month basis)\n\nYou can also dial in using your p
 hone with Access Code: 773-318-405\nUnited States +1 (224) 501-3312\nAustr
 alia (Long distance): +61 2 8355 1039\nAustria (Long distance): +43 7 2088
  1033\nBelgium (Long distance): +32 (0) 28 93 7001\nCanada (Long distance)
 : +1 (647) 497-9379\nDenmark (Long distance): +45 69 91 89 33\nFinland (Lo
 ng distance): +358 (0) 942 41 5770\nFrance (Long distance): +33 (0) 170 95
 0 585\nGermany (Long distance): +49 (0) 692 5736 7205\nIreland (Long dista
 nce): +353 (0) 19 030 050\nItaly (Long distance): +39 0 693 38 75 50\nNeth
 erlands (Long distance): +31 (0) 208 080 208\nNew Zealand (Long distance):
  +64 9 925 0481\nNorway (Long distance): +47 21 54 82 21\nSpain (Long dist
 ance): +34 911 82 9890\nSweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 853 527 817\nSwitz
 erland (Long distance): +41 (0) 435 0167 65\nUnited Kingdom (Long distance
 ): +44 (0) 330 221 0099\n\n\n
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;UNTIL=20170222T16Z;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=WE;WKST=SU
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:Infra Working Group Meeting
DTSTART;TZID=Pacific Standard Time:20170111T08
DTEND;TZID=Pacific Standard Time:20170111T09
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E00880B1D4E1646BD201000
 010005E212FD6F7EB6043B4F4B301B08B7E1F
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20170111T013056Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:GTM and IRC #opnfv-meeting
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:1531582433
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:TRUE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] proposed schedule slip for MS5 and MS6

2017-01-10 Thread David McBride 
Team,

In case you weren't on the call this morning, the TSC approved the proposed
schedule slip.  I will be updating the schedule on the Danube release page
this week.  Let me know if you have any questions.

David

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:46 PM, David McBride 
wrote:

> Reminder - discussion and vote tomorrow at TSC meeting.
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:50 PM, David McBride <
> dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> This week, I learned that the system migration in the OPNFV Intel lab has
>> had a larger impact than expected.  The migration has hindered many OPNFV
>> projects from making progress toward MS5, which is currently scheduled for
>> January 13.
>>
>> Therefore, I am recommending to the TSC that we slip MS5 by two weeks to
>> January 27 and MS6 by three weeks to Feb 17.  I'm recommending that MS6 be
>> slipped by more than MS5 in order to avoid the Chinese New Year holiday in
>> early February.
>>
>> At this time, I am *not* recommending that we slip the release date
>> (March 27) for Danube.  This will reduce the time between scenario
>> integration (MS5) and stable branch (MS7) from 8 weeks to 6 weeks.  This
>> will put some pressure on the project teams and the scenario owners to
>> stabilize scenarios in less time than expected.  However, since we don't
>> yet have a lot of data on how much time this actually requires (which,
>> itself, is a moving target), then I think we should test whether we can
>> maintain the schedule for stable branch, and subsequent milestones.
>>
>> The TSC will discuss and vote on this proposed schedule change at the
>> next TSC meeting on January 10.  In the mean time, please feel free to
>> respond to this mail with your thoughts on this change.  Thanks.
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> *David McBride*
>> Release Manager, OPNFV
>> Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
>> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
>> Skype: davidjmcbride1
>> IRC: dmcbride
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *David McBride*
> Release Manager, OPNFV
> Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
> Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
> Skype: davidjmcbride1
> IRC: dmcbride
>



-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] short release meeting next week (Jan 17)

2017-01-10 Thread David McBride 
Team,

I have a conflict at 9 a.m. (PST) next Tuesday, so I will be cutting the
release meeting short by 15 minutes.

David

-- 
*David McBride*
Release Manager, OPNFV
Mobile: +1.805.276.8018
Email/Google Talk: dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
Skype: davidjmcbride1
IRC: dmcbride
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

2017-01-10 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
Thanks for the link. I do look at the Jenkins status for high-level info, but 
it’s hard to find out the things I need from that, which are, to start related 
to how a developer deploys a simple fuel-based scenario (e.g. os-nosdn-nonha) 
in the lab

-  What has changed since 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/fuel/colorado/3.0/docs/installationprocedure/index.html
 (in general are there any draft Danube docs yet)

-  Is booting the fuel ISO the only option, or as with other installers 
can we build/deploy on the fly with a simple bash script (deploy.sh) after 
cloning the repo

-  If booting the fuel ISO is the only option, what are the 
requirements for the jumphost, e.g. can this be done in a virt-manager VM (and 
how) or does it need to be bare metal, what are the host requirements (minimum) 
for the jumphost, etc

-  How is virtual deployment of the fuel master achieved (the install 
doc above does not specify the details) – it’s not clear if this is different 
from booting the fuel ISO in a VM

-  If supported, what are the minimum requirements for virtual deploy

-  What are the minimum requirements for bare metal lab servers, e.g. 
as I have been using will this work

o   Three Intel NUC i7 machines with two NICs, wake-on-lan + PXE boot (no 
IPMI), 16GB memory

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT

From: Serg Melikyan [mailto:smelik...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 7:59 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

Hi Bryan,

indeed IRC channel mentioned on our wiki page was wrong, I have updated wiki 
page - our actively used IRC channel is #opnfv-fuel.

You can track our CI by the following link: 
http://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/fuel/ which has corresponding jobs for master 
which is Denube right now.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:20 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L 
> wrote:
Hi all Fuel team members,

I’m looking for some guidance on how to track Fuel status for Danube and how to 
contact the Fuel team other than email, which we all have too much of. I see 
some info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fuel/Fuel+Opnfv but it seems that 
the irc channel referenced (opnfv-bgs) has been idle for a while, so that’s 
clearly not where the OPNFV Fuel team hangs out.

But the basic question is whether Fuel is ready for Danube testing, e.g. has 
been updated to OpenStack Newton. The Copper project would like to help in the 
testing of Congress, and for Models and VES I want to start 
developing/verifying support under Fuel-based installs.

Please let me know where you guys hang out on IRC, Slack, Trello, or whatever, 
if we can start testing Fuel for Danube yet, and how to track the status of 
Fuel for Danube overall.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss



--
Serg Melikyan, Development Manager at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | 
smelik...@mirantis.com | +1 (650) 440-8979
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Danube Status - ready to test in labs?

2017-01-10 Thread Serg Melikyan 
Hi Bryan,

indeed IRC channel mentioned on our wiki page was wrong, I have updated
wiki page - our actively used IRC channel is #opnfv-fuel.

You can track our CI by the following link:
http://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/fuel/ which has corresponding jobs for
master which is Denube right now.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:20 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:

> Hi all Fuel team members,
>
>
>
> I’m looking for some guidance on how to track Fuel status for Danube and
> how to contact the Fuel team other than email, which we all have too much
> of. I see some info at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fuel/Fuel+Opnfv but
> it seems that the irc channel referenced (opnfv-bgs) has been idle for a
> while, so that’s clearly not where the OPNFV Fuel team hangs out.
>
>
>
> But the basic question is whether Fuel is ready for Danube testing, e.g.
> has been updated to OpenStack Newton. The Copper project would like to help
> in the testing of Congress, and for Models and VES I want to start
> developing/verifying support under Fuel-based installs.
>
>
>
> Please let me know where you guys hang out on IRC, Slack, Trello, or
> whatever, if we can start testing Fuel for Danube yet, and how to track the
> status of Fuel for Danube overall.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT
>
>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>


-- 
Serg Melikyan, Development Manager at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com | +1 (650) 440-8979
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfvdocs project meeting

2017-01-10 Thread Sofia Wallin 
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:W. Europe Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T03
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=Sofia Wallin:MAILTO:sofia.wal...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=TECH-DISCU
 SS OPNFV (opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org):MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@li
 sts.opnfv.org
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=en-US:Welcome to join the opnfvdocs meeting.\n\nIntent
 ion is to cover:\nProject backlog and progress\nQuestions and issues\n\n\n
 Please join my meeting from your computer\, tablet or smartphone.\nhttps:/
 /global.gotomeeting.com/join/984191797 \n\nYou can also dial in using your phone.\nUnited States: +1 
 (669) 224-3318\n\nAccess Code: 984-191-797\n\nMore phone numbers\nAustrali
 a: +61 2 8355 1039\nAustria: +43 7 2088 1049\nBelgium: +32 (0) 42 68 0180\
 nCanada: +1 (647) 497-9379\nDenmark: +45 69 91 89 30\nFinland: +358 (0) 94
 2 41 5793\nFrance: +33 (0) 170 950 589\nGermany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7301\nIr
 eland: +353 (0) 15 360 757\nItaly: +39 0 230 57 81 80\nNetherlands: +31 (0
 ) 208 080 221\nNew Zealand: +64 9 280 6304\nNorway: +47 21 04 30 54\nSpain
 : +34 911 82 9908\nSweden: +46 (0) 852 500 516\nSwitzerland: +41 (0) 435 0
 167 69\nUnited Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0099\n\nFirst GoToMeeting? Try a t
 est session: http://help.citrix.com/getready\n
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;UNTIL=20170628T13Z;INTERVAL=2;BYDAY=WE;WKST=MO
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008A07BDE37576BD201000
 018C7B19FD4AFEB49B5C917F979D273AA
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-US:[opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfvdocs project meeting
DTSTART;TZID=W. Europe Standard Time:20170111T15
DTEND;TZID=W. Europe Standard Time:20170111T16
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20170110T144710Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=en-US:https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/984191797
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:1315575777
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT15M
ACTION:DISPLAY
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Multisite VNF Geo site disaster recovery

2017-01-10 Thread Klemen Pogacnik 
OK, I'll join you.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:03 AM, joehuang  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> If you are interested in this topic, we can discuss it in the weekly
> meeting, but I don't know whether the meeting time works for you or not.
>
> http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting every Thursday, 8:00-9:00
> UTC (During winter time, means CET 9:00 AM).
>
> Best Regards
> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
> --
> *From:* Klemen Pogacnik [kle...@psi-net.si]
> *Sent:* 09 January 2017 20:57
> *To:* joehuang
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Multisite VNF Geo site
> disaster recovery
>
> Thanks for answer. If I understand right, currently there is no work on DR
> with 2 or more Openstack clouds. Is it maybe planned for the future?
> Kemo
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:50 AM, joehuang  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for the mail, please see inline comments:
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
>> --
>> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [
>> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Klemen Pogacnik
>> [kle...@psi-net.si]
>> *Sent:* 06 January 2017 22:05
>> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
>> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite] Multisite VNF Geo site
>> disaster recovery
>>
>> I'm trying to deploy Multisite VNF Geo site disaster recovery scenario
>> with Ceph as a backend for a Cinder service (scenario 3, 3rd way) . Ceph
>> rbd mirroring is used for data replication between two sites. Volume
>> created on site1 is replicated to site2, but this volume is not visible on
>> Cinder on side2. Probably some metadata from Cinder DB must be replicated
>> too. Has anybody been thinkink or even working on that?
>>
>> ---> yes, current replication implementation will hide all these
>> information from the API level, and the replication fail-over, fail-back
>> are activities inside one OpenStack domain. you have to replicate the db to
>> the site2 if you want to do DR with different OpenStack cloud. We had
>> discussed with the community, whether it's reasonable to expose the volume
>> reference from the admin API, community prefer to let the driver to deal
>> with these information.
>>
>>
>> The second question is, how to make switchover, when site one goes down.
>> On open stack there is cinder failover-host command, which is, as I can
>> understand, only useful for configuration with one openstack and two ceph
>> clusters. Any idea how to make switchover with two openstacks each
>> connected to its own ceph cluster.
>> Thanks a lot for help!
>>
>> ---> This needs to be triggered by GR software, or manually, or via
>> DNS(if applicable).
>>
>> Kemo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

2017-01-10 Thread Michael Polenchuk 
Hi Veena,

In case of DPDK enabled the br-aux bridge ain't created on compute nodes
since physical(dpdk) interface is being connected directly to br-prv ovs
bridge.

I guess this case (ODL + OVS/DPDK) ain't supported yet.
Please turn off "install dpdk" option and try it out.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Veena Lingadahalli  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using opnfv fuel 9.0 to deploy openstack with ODL-SFC(netvirt) +
> OVS(DPDK+NSH). I have used all default plugins which are staged with the
> fuel iso.
> I have made the necessary configurations related to neutron VLAN IDs, DPDK
> enabled interface and Hugepage configuration in compute node. Network
> verification is also successful. The deployment is failing with the below
> error.
>
> generate_network_config(): Endpoint 'br-aux' not found in interfaces or
> transformations result. at /etc/fuel/plugins/opendaylight
> -0.9/puppet/manifests/odl-netconfig.pp:25 on node node-1.domain.tld
>
> I'm unable to check where this bridge is being created. Never faced this
> issue before when neutron with tunneling is used. Am I missing any
> configuration related to vlan? Attached the complete puppet log and
> network_scheme. Please let me know the cause for error and how to proceed
> about this.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Veena
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss
>
>


-- 
  Michael Polenchuk
  Private Cloud / Mirantis Inc.
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] VNF on boarding: Q Functest versus orchestrator projects

2017-01-10 Thread morgan.richomme 
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Romance Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T03
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=3
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN:MAILTO:morgan.richo...@orange.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=zhao.huabi
 n...@zte.com.cn:MAILTO:zhao.huab...@zte.com.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=meng.zhaox
 i...@zte.com.cn:MAILTO:meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=bylee@etri
 .re.kr:MAILTO:by...@etri.re.kr
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=navid.nika
 e...@eurecom.fr:MAILTO:navid.nika...@eurecom.fr
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=wluhan@bup
 t.edu.cn:MAILTO:wlu...@bupt.edu.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=cs15mtech0
 1...@iith.ac.in:MAILTO:cs15mtech01...@iith.ac.in
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=cs15mtech0
 1...@iith.ac.in:MAILTO:cs15mtech01...@iith.ac.in
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=opnfv-tech
 -disc...@lists.opnfv.org:MAILTO:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Prakash.Ra
 mchand...@huawei.com:MAILTO:prakash.ramchand...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=giuseppe.c
 are...@fokus.fraunhofer.de:MAILTO:giuseppe.care...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=narinder.g
 u...@canonical.com:MAILTO:narinder.gu...@canonical.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=boucherv@l
 ive.fr:MAILTO:bouch...@live.fr
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=olga.havel
 @huawei.com:MAILTO:olga.ha...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=dmcbride@l
 inuxfoundation.org:MAILTO:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=bs3131@att
 .com:MAILTO:bs3...@att.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=jose.lausu
 c...@ericsson.com:MAILTO:jose.laus...@ericsson.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=michael.pa
 u...@tu-berlin.de:MAILTO:michael.pa...@tu-berlin.de
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=lorenzo.to
 mas...@fokus.fraunhofer.de:MAILTO:lorenzo.tomas...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Helen.Chen
 @huawei.com:MAILTO:helen.c...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=huang.leib
 o...@zte.com.cn:MAILTO:huang.leib...@zte.com.cn
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=thajudheen
 .ra...@huawei.com:MAILTO:thajudheen.ra...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Yang.Xu3@h
 uawei.com:MAILTO:yang@huawei.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=fr-FR:Quand : mercredi 11 janvier 2017 17:00-18:00. (U
 TC+01:00) Bruxelles\, Copenhague\, Madrid\, Paris\nOù : Conf Bridge (see 
 details in the mails)\n\n*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*\n\nHi\n\nbased of first discu
 ssions during functest weekly meeting (http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.or
 g/meetings/opnfv-functest/2017/opnfv-functest.2017-01-10-08.00.html)\n1h t
 o discuss Q and VNF on boarding in Functest\nmeet on #opnfv-functest\, s
 ee details below for the audio bridge\n\nfeel free to forward to whom it m
 ay concern\n\n/Morgan\n\nsee details below\n\nConf bridge\nNamePasswor
 dBridge no.  Date (-MM-DD)   Start time  Time zone
 \nOPNFV   123456789   +33 4 37 21 95 48   2017-01-10  17:00   
 (UTC+01:00) Brussels\, Copenhagen\, Madrid\, Paris\n\n\nINTERNET : htt
 ps://coopnet.multimedia-conference.orange-business.com/?c=YoFlYSq3Yr\n\n\n
 Note: for your participants abroad\, please give them the number to dial f
 rom their country and the participant code to join the audio bridge.\ncoun
 tries   number to dial from countries   participant code\nAlgeria +213
  98 320 20 82   437219548#\nArgentina   +54 11 5984-191243
 7219548#\nAustralia   +61 2 8278 4149 437219548#\nAustria +43 1 360277
 4662437219548#\nBahrain +973 1619 6694  437219548#\nBelgium +32 2 
 620 02 78 437219548#\nBrazil  +55 11 3878-8226437219548#\nBulgaria
 +359 2 935 8227 437219548#\nCanada  +1 418-478-0963 437219548#\nCh
 ile   +56 2 2618 8329 437219548#\nChina   +86 400 819 869543721954
 8#\nCyprus  +357 22 007320  437219548#\nCzech Republic  +420 225 439 794  
   437219548#\nDenmark +45 35 15 80 66 437219548#\nDominican

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ACL error

2017-01-10 Thread Ehsan Tadayon 
Hi all

I am using distribution-karaf-0.5.2-Boron-SR2. When i add access list, enter 
parameters and save it, there is noting happened. I captured GET/PUT REST 
requests and it returned 404 error. How could i resolve that? The mentioned 
errors are as follows:


PUT /restconf/config/ietf-access-control-list:access-lists/acl/ACL1 HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found

GET /restconf/config/service-function-classifier:service-function-classifiers 
HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 200 OK

GET /restconf/config/ietf-access-control-list:access-lists HTTP/1.1
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [joid] ceilometer config bug

2017-01-10 Thread Ryota Mibu 
Hi,


Thanks for checking and letting me know the right person. I may reach out you 
again, once we got the upstream patch merged.


BR,
Ryota

From: Narinder Gupta [mailto:narinder.gu...@canonical.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:24 PM
To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) 
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; artur.tyl...@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [joid] ceilometer config bug

Hi Ryota,
Thanks for submitting the reviews. James Page is the right guy and he did -1 on 
charm and post some review comments to submit the changes. Will you please look 
into the review comments and act on it? In case there are questions please feel 
free to post your comments on the review.


Thanks and Regards,

Narinder Gupta (PMP)   
narinder.gu...@canonical.com

Canonical, Ltd.narindergupta 
[irc.freenode.net]

+1.281.736.5150narindergupta2007[skype]



Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | 
www.canonical.com

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Ryota Mibu 
> wrote:
Hi Artur and JOID team,


I've found config bug in ceilometer for aodh even-alarm, while I'm testing 
doctor scenario in my joid deployment.

Could you help me fix the bug in upstream? I already posted a patch:

https://review.openstack.org/418202

I also filed the bug.

https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/JOID-117


Thanks in advance,
Ryota

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs IFA00[56] gap analyzis

2017-01-10 Thread Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) 
Hi,

Thanks for the quick analyzis.
The target of the current call for experts is only to identify the gaps. We are 
not looking to one-to-one match for each information element and each operation 
of IFA005 and 006 but looking for the same functionality provided by OpenStack.

Br,
Gerg0

From: joehuang [mailto:joehu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:59 AM
To: Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: RE: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis

Hello,

I go through the IFA 005 & IFA 006. The difference between API defined in IFA 
005/IFA 006 and OpenStack API is very huge, it seems that there must be some 
wrapper layer above OpenStack API.

Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
 [opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] on behalf of Csatari, Gergely 
(Nokia - HU/Budapest) [gergely.csat...@nokia.com]
Sent: 10 January 2017 2:41
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] ETSI NFV Call for Experts on OpenStack vs 
IFA00[56] gap analyzis
Hi,

Now I resend it to correct an actual mistake in my original mail.

The deadline for application is 26th of January.

There is an effort in ETSI NFV to identify the gaps between the specified VIM 
NB API-s and the OpenStack NB API-s (what called TST003). We, who are working 
on this item realized that we need to involve external expertise to have the 
desired progress of the work.
ETSI NFV decided to start a task force and call for external experts. The task 
is to analyze the API-s described in IFA005 and IFA006 and point out the gaps 
compared to the OpenStack API-s (Closing the gaps either on NFV or in OpenStack 
side is not in the scope of the work).
I'm sending this mail to you to draw your attention to this possibility as 
experts in the OPNFV community have the right mix of knowledge for an applicant.

The deadline for application is 2017.01.26. Work starts in March and results 
should be delivered by August.
More details are here: 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TSC?preview=/2925933/8687963/CL16_3343r1%20Clean%20-%20Call%20for%20Expertise%20-%20Identification%20of%20Gaps%20between%20docx

In case of any questions please mail or irc (csatari on freenode) me.

Br,
Gerg0



___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss